Racecar Engineering

The porpoise effect Part two

In last month’s article on porpoising, I gave a broad overview of what the effect was, and a case study of how the approaches to dealing with it were applied to a high-downforce open wheeler.

What that article lacked, however, was detail, because I was talking about a live racecar and was unable to share any particulars about the programme. So, to address this, I have taken one of the ChassisSim templates and radically increased the downforce so I can give you some actual numbers and a quantitive case study. Along the way, I’m pleased to say a lot was learned, in particular the limits of what you can actually do, and what you should be thinking about.

This is what we’ll be discussing in depth in this article.

First things first. While my initial comments on porpoising still stand, one thing I was remiss in not mentioning was what you can do about porpoising is highly dependent on the relationship between the platform and.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Racecar Engineering

Racecar Engineering7 min read
Spreading Disease
One of the great paradoxes of motor racing is for something that professes to be a technical sport, it has the most Jekyll and Hyde relationship with technology of any area of engineering I have encountered. A few classic examples are Balance of Perf
Racecar Engineering4 min read
To Be Or Not To Be?
The recommendation by the FIA to drop hybrids from the World Rally Championship in the middle of a rule cycle is a strange one but, at the same time, long term one that can be understood. On the face of it, the teams have been busy managing the techn
Racecar Engineering6 min read
Law Of Averages
The ongoing saga of Balance of Performance (BoP) took some dramatic steps in the early part of 2024. The FIA and ACO presented their new method of balancing the Hypercars to the media at the opening round of the FIA World Endurance Championship in Qa

Related