Hong Kong's Foreign Correspondents' Club cancels annual Human Rights Press Awards, citing legal concerns
Hong Kong's Foreign Correspondents' Club (FCC) has suspended its annual Human Rights Press Awards, citing legal concerns.
In a statement sent to members on Monday, club president Keith Richburg said the FCC board had reached the "tough decision" to cancel the accolades pending further review after a "lengthy discussion" on Saturday.
"Over the last two years, journalists in Hong Kong have been operating under new 'red lines' on what is and is not permissible, but there remain significant areas of uncertainty and we do not wish unintentionally to violate the law," Richburg said. "This is the context in which we decided to suspend the awards ... We explored a variety of other options, but could not find a feasible way forward."
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
The club was initially expected to announce the winners of the awards on World Press Freedom Day next Tuesday.
Richburg said the decision did not reflect the FCC board's view of the content of any of the entries or the work of the independent judges.
"The FCC intends to continue promoting press freedom in Hong Kong, while recognising that recent developments might also require changes to our approach," he said.
At least three members of FCC's press freedom committee announced their resignations on social media, expressing anger and disagreement with Richburg's decision.
This year's awards would have been the club's 26th edition.
In November last year, Beijing accused the club of abandoning its professional ethics and "sowing discord" over the state of press freedom in the city.
The condemnation from the local office of China's foreign ministry was triggered by an FCC survey of 99 journalists in which 83 said the working environment for the media had "changed for the worse" since Beijing imposed the national security law in June 2020.
"We urge the FCC to stop sowing discord and refrain from interfering with the law-based governance of [the Hong Kong administration] and [the city's] rule of law in the name of press freedom," the office of the foreign ministry's commissioner said in a strongly worded statement at the time.
"The FCC has walked away from its professional ethics. Its misleading report, based on just a few responses, is neither representative nor credible. Its smearing of Hong Kong's press freedom and playing-up of the chilling effect are interference in Hong Kong affairs."
Chief executive candidate John Lee Ka-chiu said on Sunday that there was no need to "defend" press freedom as it was protected by the Basic Law, the city's mini-constitution.
"Freedom of the press always exists in Hong Kong. I think there's no need to use the word 'defend' because it exists and we attach great importance to press freedom. But press freedom needs to fulfil the requirements of the law," Lee said when asked by a reporter whether he would protect the principle.
The Consumer Council in November last year suspended the staging of its annual journalism awards pending a full review, citing the need to keep up with the changing media landscape.
The official website of the Human Rights Press Awards states that it recognises top rights-related reporting from around Asia, with the goal of increasing respect for people's basic rights and focusing attention on threats to those freedoms.
The entry period for this year's awards ran from January 1 to February 1. Categories included breaking news, feature, multimedia, video and photography.
This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP).
Copyright (c) 2022. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
