This Week in Asia

Ukraine invasion: Singapore's condemnation aside, rest of Asean's ambivalence is 'shocking'

In Southeast Asia, where the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov once lamented economic ties ran only "skin deep", the immediate diplomatic response to Moscow's Ukraine war has been one of deep ambivalence.

Diplomatic observers say despite Russia's shallow trade and investment exposure in the region, governments are exercising caution in condemning the aggression as they mull the long-term costs of their response.

Also in focus are surging energy prices and the implications of alienating Russia - the world's second biggest exporter of crude oil.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

"In general there is a lack of urgency and strategic empathy among countries like Indonesia that the war will have ramifications for US-China competition more broadly, and regional flash points like Taiwan, more specifically," said Evan Laksmana, a senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore.

By Friday evening - more than 36 hours after the assault began - only Singapore and Indonesia had outrightly condemned the invasion as a violation of Ukrainian sovereignty, though the latter's statement did not name Russia.

The reaction from the rest of Southeast Asia was a mixed bag, with Malaysia expressing "sadness" over the assault and Communist-ruled Vietnam - Russia's closest regional partner - calling for a diplomatic resolution to the crisis before the onset of the invasion.

The Philippines and Thailand statements focused on repatriating their respective nationals.

The Philippine Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jnr on Friday tweeted that he would travel to Ukraine's border with Poland to ensure the safety of Filipinos fleeing the Eastern European country.

A spokesman for Myanmar's ruling junta, a long-time client of Russia's arms industry alongside Vietnam, said the ruling generals backed President Vladimir Putin's invasion.

The National Unity Government, which is challenging the legitimacy of junta rule, condemned Russia's actions for undermining the United Nations charter and international law.

The coup-ravaged country's ties with Moscow were in the spotlight this week, after a UN special rapporteur named the nuclear power along with China and Serbia as countries that were continuing to arm the junta despite the ongoing rights abuses.

While at present it is mainly the reactions of Asia's major powers - China, India and Japan - that are under the glare of international scrutiny, diplomatic observers said the reactions of Southeast Asia's small and medium-sized nations were worth parsing too.

Southeast Asian countries, caught in the US-China power tussle and battling Beijing over sovereignty rights in the South China Sea, have long wagged their fingers over the need for major powers to abide by international law without reservation.

Those calls rang hollow if countries did not expressly condemn Russia's current aggression, Southeast Asia security expert Zachary Abuza suggested.

"With the clear exception of Singapore, the response from Southeast Asia has been shocking," said Abuza, a professor at the National War College in the United States.

Russia's actions, Abuza said, violated the foundations of international law, peace and security - the inviolability of state sovereignty.

"Putin's 'doctrine of limited sovereignty' gives him the authority to stage a full-scale invasion against a sovereign state to install a malleable government, based on very flimsy historical claims and assertions of cultural affinity," Abuza said.

"The unwillingness of every country but Singapore among Asean [Association of Southeast Asian Nations] states so far to sanction Russia and impose costs threatens their national interests and undermines their own sovereignty," the professor said. "The timidity to defend core principles of international law and punish an aggressor state is shocking."

Ian Storey, a veteran scholar of Southeast Asian diplomacy, suggested countries probably had an eye on issues of national importance for which they needed to remain in Russia's good books.

Vietnam, for instance, faced an increasingly assertive China in the disputed South China Sea and needed to keep Russia "on side", said Storey, a senior fellow with the Iseas-Yusof Ishak think tank.

"It's not surprising, therefore, that Vietnam has not condemned the invasion but only called for a diplomatic solution to resolve the crisis," Storey said.

The researcher said it was likely that Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia - autocrat-ruled nations in mainland Southeast Asia - would veto any attempt by other members of Asean to issue a strong joint statement on the war. Prime Minister Hun Sen of Cambodia, Asean's current chair, on Thursday said the bloc needed to have a "strong voice" on the issue and that any statement would require consensus from all member states.

Storey said Hun Sen was unlikely to "criticise a fellow autocrat like Putin".

Analysts were far less scathing of Indonesia, which along with Singapore chastised the attack as unacceptable. Jakarta's considered response was underscored by its decision not to name Russia in its statement.

"The attack on Ukraine is unacceptable. Moreover, the attack puts the people's lives in grave danger and threatens regional as well as global peace and stability," the foreign ministry said.

Indonesian President Joko Widodo meanwhile put out a tweet of his own, also not referring to Russia. "Stop the war. War brings misery to mankind and puts the whole world at risk," he wrote.

In Singapore, officials were quick to highlight the invasion as a cautionary tale for the island republic, which gained independence from Malaysia in 1965 and has endured tensions with Indonesia in the past.

Ukraine has featured in Singapore government talking points about foreign policy and defence since 2014, when Putin annexed Ukraine's Crimea region.

In its statement on Thursday, the Singaporean foreign ministry said it was "gravely concerned" by Russia's actions and that it "strongly condemns any unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country under any pretext".

Also offering tough language was the defence minister Ng Eng Hen, who wrote on Facebook that it was "hard to reconcile this aggression after experiencing nearly 80 years of relative peace".

Chan Chun Sing, an army general-turned-minister seen as a possible successor to Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, said the situation in Ukraine was "a stark reminder to us that we should never ever take our sovereignty and independence for granted".

Dylan Loh, a Singapore foreign policy scholar, said the republic's vocal stance - in contrast with its neighbours - was consistent with its past diplomatic conduct as a small state.

"Small powers that are primarily reliant on diplomacy, international laws and norms rather than might for its foreign policy must speak out whenever territorial aggression happens to register how 'might' cannot make 'right'," said Loh, an assistant professor at the Nanyang Technological University.

The US magazine Foreign Policy this week reported that Washington had received support from Singapore, Japan and Taiwan to implement "restrictive export controls" on Moscow. The Singapore government has not commented on the matter.

But apart from the city state, Storey said he did not envisage other Southeast Asian countries joining the West in imposing economic sanctions on Russia. "Regional states generally eschew economic sanctions unless they are UN-mandated, and in this case that won't happen as Russia has a veto," he said.

Loh agreed, saying he believed that if countries were to back the Western sanctions, it was unlikely to "amount to much but the moral and normative signals would be clear and perhaps that is the more important point".

US President Joe Biden on Thursday said the G7 nations comprising the most developed Western economies and Japan had agreed to "move forward on devastating packages of sanctions and other economic measures to hold Russia to account".

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP).

Copyright (c) 2022. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

More from This Week in Asia

This Week in Asia4 min read
Many Japanese Aren't A Fan Of Whale Meat. So Why Expand The Hunt?
The last time Ken Kato ate whale meat was around 30 years ago - and he did not enjoy the experience. He knows it contains high concentrations of mercury and other toxic heavy metals, and that Japan's whaling industry has long been subsidised using ta
This Week in Asia4 min readInternational Relations
Ambitious India-UK Trade Deal Could Be On Hold Amid Political Uncertainty Over Sunak's Losses In Local Polls
An ambitious trade deal between India and Britain is likely to be delayed until a general election is held to form a new UK government, observers say, amid political uncertainty after British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak suffered a string of defeats in
This Week in Asia4 min readInternational Relations
South China Sea: Philippines 'May Be Forced To Sue' If Chinese Coastguard Arrests Trespassers
The Philippines could hit back at Chinese arrests in the South China Sea by referring cases to an international tribunal, according to a law expert responding to reports that China's coastguard will detain foreigners accused of maritime border violat

Related Books & Audiobooks