Hong Kong equity investors may as well give up and kiss the HSI goodbye
Under its new regulations, companies that teach the national school curriculum will not be able to raise capital, list on stock exchanges, accept foreign investment or pay shareholders, as they will no longer be allowed to make profits. To my mind that is not a bad thing at all. As a parent I wanted the best I could find for my children and it cost an arm and a leg, and I was well aware that unlike in my day, funds raised by the schools, even at the summer fete, were not for the benefits of the teachers, pupils or their parents.
One of the main drivers behind the policy change was to address the problem of China's lack of babies, as it specifically targets child education, not extracurricular or adult education. By taking away the excruciating cost of putting kids though the supplemental tuition needed to get into good universities, theoretically, young couples would be more likely to start families and have several kids.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
However, switching hats here from Dad to equities sniffer, the result has been an absolute disaster for Chinese stocks. And the sudden change in the perception of risk over the past week delivered the investment community a painful lesson: we are at the total mercy of government policies, and therefore equity valuations at the moment play no real part in the portfolio selection process.
Not only did the change in regulation directly impact the share prices of education companies, but the change in policy is having knock-on effects in advertising and online learning businesses as well as the employment of hundreds of thousands of workers. China also threw a punch at foreign investors by prohibiting variable interest entities (VIEs) from housing education companies. Foreign investors often operate in a legal grey area by using VIEs, residing in the Cayman Islands, to skirt rules against foreign shareholding in certain sectors. The tightening of regulations of such vehicles may not stop with education companies.
China's high-growth private education industry was a week ago worth about US$100 billion to investors holding US-listed stocks such as TAL Education, New Oriental Education and Gaotu Techedu. Big institutional investors in the United States took an immediate hit as the stock prices of these education companies nosedived, and a guesstimate of the sector's current valuation places it somewhere around US$27 billion.
The move also demonstrated just how quickly, and that without warning, Chinese regulators can control the level of foreign investment in China's listed companies, even when they are listed overseas.
And as if Chinese regulation wasn't making life difficult enough for investors in Chinese stocks - tech or otherwise - the American government has been laying a heavy hand on what US investors can and cannot invest in. If the two superpowers can align on anything right now, it seems to be to make life living hell for US-based investors.
For investors in Chinese equities, this creates a series of headaches. First and foremost: where can you put your money for some growth potential with the least regulatory risks? State-owned enterprises? Clean energy? Perhaps insurance? Or airlines, for a post-Covid bounce?
None of that looks like a sure bet on equity valuations alone, and nothing is immune to policy changes. And the problem is compounded by further sanctions on the other side of the Pacific where the White House at any time could present lists of more stocks that are off limits to US investors. Even a total ban on investment in Chinese companies and forced delisting of all Chinese companies from US exchanges no longer sounds as implausible as one might have hoped.
That puts Hong Kong investors with faith in the trusted Hang Seng Index methodology and super-smart Chinese tech utterly at the mercy of the Chinese and American governments' whims, and bang in the crossfire between the two. This could present an unacceptable risk for many, who may be tempted to throw in the towel.
Perhaps all I can do is to humbly impart the benefit of my experience and a ray of hope. Having been in the financial industry for nearly 40 years, starting as a wide-eyed yuppie and ending up an over-lunched sceptic, surviving a few almighty crashes and successive bull-markets to tell the tale, I can say that thankfully, greed has a short memory. Money will find its way back, but with October almost upon us, a month notoriously bad for equity markets, perhaps stay away for the time being.
Neil Newman is a thematic portfolio strategist focused on pan-Asian equity markets
This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP).
Copyright (c) 2021. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
