HOW TO PREVENT A BREAKDOWN
The decision that Narendra Modi took on March 24, 2020—to impose a total lockdown in the country—will go down as among the most important prime ministerial acts since Independence. Never before in human history have a billion-plus people been forced to confine themselves to their homes. Not even in China, where the novel coronavirus—which causes the disease called COVID-19—made its first appearance, did the leadership resort to such a drastic countrywide shutdown.
In the four wars that India fought since Independence, barring night-time blackouts, people moved around freely, as did goods and services. The wheels of industry never stopped. During the Emergency of 1975-1977, fundamental rights were severely curtailed as was public assembly, but transport and all other activity continued—perhaps even more efficiently, out of fear. Modi and his team, therefore, had no past experience of their own to fall back on or, for that matter, of other countries handling the pandemic to guide their actions after the country went into lockdown.
Officials in the know reveal that they even had to scramble to find out a law they could use to pass a decision, short of declaring a nationwide Emergency. Apart from the stigma attached to that event and the legality of imposing such an order, the assessment was that using the provision might disempower the states at a time when their full cooperation was needed to win the battle against the virus. They then studied the Epidemic Diseases Act that was first promulgated in 1897 to tackle the bubonic plague in Mumbai. That legislation, however, largely vested
