Screen Education

Through a Speculum Darkly THE TRAGIC ANATOMY OF DEAD RINGERS

David Cronenberg isn’t an easy director to teach at a senior secondary level. His most admired films – Shivers (1975), The Brood (1979), Videodrome (1983) and The Fly (1986), among others – also tend to be gory ones, carrying R ratings for horror violence. A rare exception is Dead Ringers (1988), a film from the middle period of his career, when he was transforming from a cult B movie director into a respected establishment figure in cinema: it’s (relatively) inoffensive, but still Cronenbergian enough to give new audiences a taste of his style.

An atmosphere of respectability strikes you immediately as you watch Dead Ringers. It is Cronenberg’s first film to have a high-society setting: the world of twin gynaecologists Elliot and Beverly Mantle. Both characters are played by Jeremy Irons, whose plummy voice and refinement stand in contrast to the middle-class airs of earlier Cronenberg protagonists. Recalling her first viewing of Dead Ringers, film critic Eileen Jones told me: ‘The film was so lavishly production-designed, I was distracted by how posh it was.’1 Such newfound poshness went hand in hand with Cronenberg’s rising fortunes as a director. His previous film, The Fly, had won an Oscar for make-up, and he was working with production budgets ten times larger than those he had enjoyed a decade before.

was respectable in another sense: for Cronenberg, it heralded a move beyond genre entertainment and into the traditionally highbrow territory of biopics and character studies. Its plot was based on the real-life story of Stewart and Cyril Marcus, identical twins who practised gynaecology at New York Hospital and were found dead together in 1975, apparently from barbiturate withdrawal, in an apartment full of faeces and garbage. (More precisely, began as an adaptation of Bari Wood and Jack Geasland’s novel , which fictionalised the Marcus brothers case. Nevertheless, the final film has so little in common with the book that can barely be called a ‘source.’)with building his reputation as an actor. Receiving an Academy Award for (Barbet Schroeder, 1990) in 1991, he thanked Cronenberg in his acceptance speech even though the latter was not involved in that film’s production.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Screen Education

Screen Education12 min read
Hidden Treasures ADOLESCENT ADVENTURES IN DORA AND THE LOST CITY OF GOLD
As kids move into their tween years, they usually leave their early-childhood loves behind. The music of The Wiggles falls away, to be replaced by K-pop, boy bands and rap music. TV programs that once fuelled their imaginations and viewing habits are
Screen Education22 min read
Andrei Tarkovsky
Andrei Tarkovsky is one of the most renowned filmmakers of all time, albeit with a daunting reputation for being a master of slow cinema and the formidably esoteric. When describing the Russian director’s films, it is almost impossible not to reach f
Screen Education10 min read
Cinema Science PLAYING WITH PHYSICS IN THE TOY STORY UNIVERSE
Released just under a quarter of a century ago, Toy Story (John Lasseter, 1995) was an experiment of sorts. This tale of what children’s toys get up to when left to their own devices was Pixar’s first foray into feature film and, most notably, was al

Related Books & Audiobooks