Editorial: Some court decisions deserve to be overruled. Roe vs. Wade isn't one of them
The Supreme Court's decision this week to overrule one of its prior decisions is attracting attention not because of its unexciting holding - that a state can't be sued in the courts of another state - but because of a forceful and timely dissent from the court's four Democratic appointees.
Writing for himself and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, Justice Stephen G. Breyer said that needlessly overturning previous decisions threatens the stability of the
