Inbox
Apr 29, 2018
4 minutes
Great on paper
I enjoyed Matthew Richards's recent article (AP 14 April) but there was one part I thought could have been amplified with some further clarification; I know you were confined to the space in the article and the screengrabs were as small as you could get away with. The second paragraph on page 36 starts to highlight the potential pitfalls of colour space conversions while in your workflow. I would have liked some further explanation as to what is one of the correct ways of achieving this so that I'm not taken aback by shifts in colour, etc. at some point further down the line.
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days