STAT

Opinion: Peer review could have helped short-circuit the Theranos fake news scandal

Thanks to Theranos, startups might now face a greater burden of proof to demonstrate their technology is effective.
Source: Kristoffer Tripplaar/AP

Theranos had a product almost everyone could get behind: a revolutionary blood test that would allow individuals to quickly and easily access information about their health. Startups like Theranos rely on cutting-edge innovation, then leverage that innovation to attract investors. Now the company’s downfall is a signal to innovators, the public, and the media that we need more transparency and credibility built on peer-reviewed publications.

Holmes, who was accused of falsely claiming that Theranos had developed a portable analyzer that could perform virtually any medical test using with the Security and Exchange Commission for a penalty of $500,000, among other things.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About Biocon Eyeing Weight Loss Drugs, Sanofi Layoffs, And More
Biocon is pivoting to weight loss drugs as patents for the blockbuster medicines start to expire, unleashing a coming wave of generics.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About Lilly’s Zepbound For Sleep Apnea, The FDA Budget, And More
Eli Lilly reported positive results for Zepbound in obstructive sleep apnea, giving the medication a new edge in the highly competitive obesity market.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About An OptumRx Contract, 340B Dispute Resolution, And More
Cardinal Health announced its pharmaceutical distribution contracts with UnitedHealth's OptumRx unit will not be renewed after they expire in June.

Related Books & Audiobooks