Experts Are for Facts, Amateurs Are for Analysis
During testimony before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt described a new proposed rule that would require the agency to publish the data behind all studies used to guide clean-air and clean-water regulations.
“It seems to me it’s common sense that as we do rule making at the agency, we base it upon a record, scientific conclusions, that we should be able to see the data and methodology that actually caused those conclusions,” Pruitt said. “We’re agnostic about who adopts the study.”
As , the rule threatens to upend the environmental rule-making process. A cynical (and perhaps accurate) reading would be that Pruitt is seeking to sandbag
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days