The Flaw in America's 'Holy Grail' Against Gerrymandering
Considering that barely one-third of Americans can name their U.S. House representative, you’d think that the size, shape, and makeup of their voting district wouldn’t matter much to them. But the issue of gerrymandering—manipulating elections by redrawing district boundaries to favor one party over another—has suddenly become a political flash point. Cases from several states are winding through the courts, and a new mathematical tool designed to detect gerrymandering has provided real hope of stamping it out forever.
There’s just one problem: This tool has serious, perhaps insurmountable flaws.
Within the past few weeks, courts in both and have declared their states’ U.S. House districts to be unconstitutional as drawn, the first time in on partisan gerrymandering for Wisconsin’s state-assembly districts, and will issue a potentially landmark ruling in the next few months.
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days