The Supreme Court has taken up three cases that arise out of litigants seeking accountability for the violent events of January 6th. This month, the Court will hear arguments on former president Trump's presidential immunity claim and take a look at whether the law used to prosecute many January 6th participants was validly applied in one such prosecution. Lindsay Langholz speaks with Donald Sherman of CREW about what the Court's decision in Trump v. Anderson, the ballot disqualification case, means for this ongoing pursuit of accountability. Join the Progressive Legal Movement Today: ACSLaw.orgToday's Host: Lindsay Langholz, ACS Sr Director of Policy and ProgramGuest: Donald Sherman, Executive Vice President and Chief Counsel, CREWLink: American Historians' Brief Link: Childrens' Rights Legal Scholars and Advocates Brief Link: Colorado lawsuit enforcing Donald Trump's unconstitutional disqualification, CREWVisit the Podcast Website: Broken Law PodcastEmail the Show: Podcast@ACSLaw.orgFollow ACS on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube-----------------Broken Law: About the law, who it serves, and who it doesn’t.----------------- Production House: Flint Stone Media Copyright of American Constitution Society 2024.