88 min listen
What the Oral Argument Should Have Said - Part 2
What the Oral Argument Should Have Said - Part 2
ratings:
Length:
109 minutes
Released:
Feb 15, 2024
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
As promised, we return in very short order with the completion of our analysis and response to the oral argument in Trump v. Anderson - before the Court has ruled. Again, key clips from the argument are played and dissected. The previous Part I episode concentrated on arguments concerning self-execution of Section Three; this episode reviews many of the other issues addressed by the Court, from questions of the nature of the Presidential Election and the closely related Electoral College, to the persistent irritant of "officer" and "office" questions. As in the prior episode, Professor Amar “slows everything down” to allow you and hopefully the Court avoid sweet-sounding but flawed paths. This episode is posted 8 days early for this reason. Continuing legal education credit is available; visit podcast.njsba.com after listening.
Released:
Feb 15, 2024
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
Jefferson Ben Amar: As “The Words That Made Us” approaches its May release, we continue to explore new perspectives on the early Presidents. Akhil’s disillusionment with Jefferson is explained, and the rise of the third President’s cousin and near-usurper makes for some su... by Amarica's Constitution