Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

Judge Threatens to Remove Trump From Courtroom for Not Being Quiet

Judge Threatens to Remove Trump From Courtroom for Not Being Quiet

FromJustice Matters with Glenn Kirschner


Judge Threatens to Remove Trump From Courtroom for Not Being Quiet

FromJustice Matters with Glenn Kirschner

ratings:
Length:
11 minutes
Released:
Jan 19, 2024
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

Donald Trump has repeatedly disrupted the court proceedings in his second trial for defaming E. Jean Carroll. Judge Kaplan warned Trump to stop making noise and talking out loud during the trial and he threatened to have him removed from the courtroom. When he did, Trump responded "I would love it!" In this podcast, Glenn discusses the broad authority trial court judges have to control the proceedings in their courtroom, and what may happen next time Trump is loud-mouthed in court.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner  If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Released:
Jan 19, 2024
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Join Glenn Kirschner, NBC News/MSNBC legal analyst and former Assistant U.S. Attorney at the D.C. U.S Attorney's Office as he brings analysis and insight to legal issues of the day, drawing from his 30 years as a federal prosecutor, homicide prosecutor and Army JAG. For 30 years, Glenn argued to juries, breaking down complex legal issues in ways that were universally understandable and relatable. He brings that same approach to his analysis of today's troubled legal landscape.