Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover this podcast and so much more

    Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

    Robotic vs Open Radical Hysterectomy: Pathology Interrogation with Javier Magrina

    Robotic vs Open Radical Hysterectomy: Pathology Interrogation with Javier Magrina

    FromIJGC Podcast

    Start listeningView podcast show

    Robotic vs Open Radical Hysterectomy: Pathology Interrogation with Javier Magrina

    FromIJGC Podcast

    ratings:
    Length:
    39 minutes
    Released:
    Nov 13, 2020
    Format:
    Podcast episode

    Description

    In this episode of the IJGC podcast, Editor-in-Chief Dr. Pedro Ramirez, is joined by Dr. Javier Magrina to discuss robotic vs open radical hysterectomy in pathology interrogation. Dr. Magrina is a Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Mayo Graduate School of Medicine, and the recipient of the Barbara Woodward Lips Professorship. He is a staff consultant at Mayo Clinic Arizona.

    Conclusions:
    . robotic radical hysterectomy results in inferior survival as compared to laparotomy.
    . robotic radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer <2 cm results in similar survival as laparotomy.
    . patients with previous conization, i.e. absence of exposed cancer cells in the cervix, have similar survival as laparotomy
    . intraperitoneal recurrences are not seen with laparotomy and appear due to the exfoliation and seeding of cervical cancer cells.
    Released:
    Nov 13, 2020
    Format:
    Podcast episode

    Titles in the series (100)

    From June 2023, all our podcasts will move to https://ijgcbmj.podbean.com. You can continue with your subscription on your favourite podcast App. The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer publishes content on novel and relevant topics in the field of gynecologic cancer. IJGC Podcast features short interview segments with leading experts discussing the latest research in their respective areas. The podcasts will serve as an interactive and education experience for all our listeners. * The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. The content of this podcast does not constitute medical advice and it is not intended to function as a substitute for a healthcare practitioner’s judgement, patient care or treatment. The views expressed by contributors are those of the speakers. BMJ does not endorse any views or recommendations discussed or expressed on this podcast. Listeners should also be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. By listening to this podcast, listeners agree not to use its content as the basis for their own medical treatment or for the medical treatment of others.