Is Alex Murdaugh entrusting his assets to the federal government a selfless act or another crafty move in a series of disturbing decisions?
 In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski delved into the latest move by Alex Murdaugh's legal team, which involves the attempt to hand over control of Murdaugh's assets to the federal government. The defense posits this approach as a method to bypass any extra fees that a special referee might extract, aiming to ensure victims get their full dues. However, the fact that this proposal emanates from the camp of Murdaugh, a figure riddled with controversy, naturally raises eyebrows.
 
 Psychologist John Delatorre weighed in on the matter, remarking, "I do think he cares where the money is going to, and I think he cares that it's only ever going to him." Delatorre further pointed out that Murdaugh isn’t someone to think several steps ahead but has made impromptu decisions throughout his life.
 
 A pressing concern is the inherent irony of Murdaugh's request. Given his history, can he genuinely critique the fee-taking practices of others? Delatorre opined, "I do think that this is a pot calling a kettle black." He further elaborated that, to him, Murdaugh appears more concerned about asset management than mending his tarnished reputation.
 
 Brueski, reflecting on how this move could play out in public perception, mused, "If the government gets it and then distributes it correctly right away, it actually looks pretty good for Alex." Yet, if this maneuver creates an additional hurdle for victims trying to retrieve their rightful money, the optics could be disastrously detrimental for Murdaugh.
 
 As the conversation shifted, a notable declaration from Murdaugh's attorneys surfaced. Despite the apparent financial constraints, both have confirmed they would represent Murdaugh pro bono in any potential second murder trial. Delatorre pondered the motivation behind this commitment, questioning whether these attorneys might have already financially benefited from their association with Murdaugh or whether they see the extensive media coverage as a more valuable asset than direct remuneration.
 
 However, Delatorre also highlighted a crucial aspect: "If I was Alec Murdoch, I'd be concerned because they already lost. So why am I going to get with a team that lost only just to lose again?"
 
 While the media spotlight remains fixated on Murdaugh, and as legal representatives jockey for their position in this unfolding drama, there’s a broader question at play.
 
 Is Alex Murdaugh, with all the mounting evidence and public scrutiny, an indefensible client or a high-profile challenge that could be a crown jewel for any attorney's career?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com