In a startling conversation on the acclaimed podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into the intriguing and tumultuous defense strategies surrounding Bryan Kohberger. Unconventional expert witnesses, questions about the FBI's involvement, and the unforgettable "crotch incident" have catapulted the case into the spotlight. The conversation, featuring insights from psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, reveals more than meets the eye.
 
 As Brueski dissected, the defense's approach seems somewhat desperate. "With so much evidence, DNA included, it just seems they're trying anything and everything they can," Brueski observed. The unexpected entry of an expert witness with an "odd demeanor" raised several eyebrows, leading many to question the credibility and authenticity of her claims. Scott echoed these sentiments, highlighting her unusual appearance and the inherent biases that might influence jurors: "Having an eccentric appearance does not bode well... there's meaning in it."
 
 Further intensifying the mystery surrounding this witness, the FBI took the unexpected step of interviewing her following rumors that she recanted parts of her testimony post-hearing. Prosecutor Bill Thompson's directive to "figure out what is happening" indicates the gravity of the situation, though the FBI's direct involvement remains puzzling to many. As Brueski relayed from a conversation with a former FBI agent, Robin Dreeke, "Why is the FBI coming in, why would it not be just like a local investigator?"
 
 Scott and Brueski speculated on potential hidden aspects of the witness's life, suggesting there might be undisclosed factors that have elevated her role in this high-profile case. Scott’s perspective as a psychotherapist brings another dimension to the debate, hinting that the witness's "eccentric appearance" and the decision to have brightly colored hair, particularly in a field demanding gravitas, might communicate deeper psychological nuances.
 
 However, aside from the expert witness's unusual presentation, questions about her experience in the field also emerged. Starting her professional journey only in 2018 and being largely self-taught, doubts arose concerning the depth of her expertise. Brueski voiced the concerns many are thinking, "How much of an expert can one truly be... especially when we're talking about putting someone away for life or death?"
 
 The trial has also been peppered with seemingly unrelated distractions, one being Anne Taylor's repeated references to Bryan Kohberger's "crotch incident" in the courtroom. Brueski and Scott mused on the potential reasons behind such a focus, especially when the primary issue should be the case itself. Brueski remarked, "If he was on trial for stealing a kitten and his fly was down, people would be focusing on that."
 
 The delay of the trial, while frustrating for many, could offer strategic benefits for the defense. With the added time, there's the potential to shift the focus away from the death penalty, a primary concern given the evidence stacked against Kohberger. As Scott pointed out, it will likely benefit the defense to have this extended preparation window.
 
 However, who is genuinely calling the shots remains an enigma. Is it Anne Taylor, the defense attorney, or the enigmatic Bryan Kohberger himself? Scott concluded, "One would think that in a case like this, the attorney would be the one really making the big decisions... but every so often you have a defendant who's just really unusual."
 
 The full depth of the Bryan Kohberger trial is yet to be unearthed, and the peculiarities surrounding it only deepen the intrigue. As Scott aptly stated, maybe one day a comprehensive account will be written, offering a window into the behind-the-scenes machinations of this riveting case.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.true