Earlier this month, the Supreme Court handed down a major voting rights decision in the Allen v. Milligan case. In a 5-4 ruling, the Court upheld Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and found that Alabama’s 2022 congressional map likely violated Section 2. This comes as a surprising victory for voting rights and the Thornburg v. Gingles (1986) test after a series of other Supreme Court cases that have narrowed the scope of the Voting Rights Act, including the Brnovich v. DNC case in 2021 and Shelby County v. Holder in 2013. The decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts and was joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh along with the liberal justices. In this episode, Jason Torchinsky of Holtzman Vogel and Rick Hasen of UCLA School of Law join host Jeffrey Rosen to break down the Allen decision; discuss why Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh voted with the liberal justices to uphold the Gingles framework; what other conservative justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wrote in dissent; and what this means for redistricting and voting rights in 2024 and beyond. 
Resources:


Allen v. Milligan (June 2023)



Jason Torchinsky, Amicus Brief on Behalf of the National Republican Redistricting Trust



Rick Hasen, “John Roberts Throws a Curveball,” NYT (June 8, 2023)



Thornburg v. Gingles (1986)



Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (1965) 



Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org. 
 
Continue today’s conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr. 
 
Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly. 
 
You can find transcripts for each episode on the podcast pages in our Media Library.