33 min listen
Dissecting the Oral Arguments in Moore v. Harper
Dissecting the Oral Arguments in Moore v. Harper
ratings:
Length:
51 minutes
Released:
Dec 8, 2022
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in what may be the biggest case of the term: Moore v. Harper. In that case, North Carolina’s state legislature is arguing that the state Supreme Court lacks the legal authority to review the heavily gerrymandered congressional districts it has enacted, on the grounds that the Constitution's elections clause gives that authority exclusively to the state legislatures—an argument often referred to as the independent state legislature doctrine, which many fear may undermine state law election protections around the country if taken up by the Court.To discuss, Lawfare senior editor Scott R. Anderson sat down on Twitter Spaces with Professor Ned Foley of The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, and Professor Derek Muller of the University of Iowa College of Law. They discussed where the justices seem to be leaning, how they may resolve different aspects of the party's arguments, and what it all might mean for 2024.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Released:
Dec 8, 2022
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
Episode #6: Jack Goldsmith on Power and Constraint: Jack Goldsmith discusses his new book, Power and Constraint: The Accountable Presidency after 9/11. by The Lawfare Podcast