Today’s show is with James Wild.  James is a coach, an applied researcher and a performance consultant.  Currently, James leads the speed program for Harlequins rugby men’s team and is Head of Performance for England Women’s Lacrosse.  He also leads modules in skill acquisition and strength & conditioning at the University of Surrey.  James is in the final stages of completing a PhD in the biomechanics and motor control of team sport athletes during sprint acceleration and is the author of “Strength Training for Speed”.

When it comes to speed, it’s always helpful to look at things from both the perspective of the coaching eye and applied biomechanics, and then on the other end, from more raw perspectives of strength and data points.  When we look at both the qualitative and the quantitative, we can get a fuller total picture of what it takes to maximize an athlete’s speed potential in a manner that sticks over time and gets results.  James is not only great with sprinting data points, but he has also been in the trenches coaching athletes for 20 years with many high level athletes, and his combination of the data, as well as in the art of coaching offers valuable insight for any coach.

On the show today, James and I talk about his process of building an acceleration profile for athletes, rate vs. stride-length dominance, foot vs. hip dominant strategies in sprinting, resisted sprinting, minimal explosive strength standards for sprint performance, and more.

Today’s episode is brought to you by SimpliFaster and Lost Empire Herbs.  For 15% off your Lost Empire Herbs order, head to www.lostempireherbs.com/justfly





View more podcast episodes at the podcast homepage.



Timestamps and Main Points

4:38 - James’ main objective with his PhD work

6:30 - The results of James’ sprint acceleration polls on social media

9:53 - The effects of acute, verbal interventions on sprinting improvement

13:34 - How to analyze and experiment with athletes’ sprinting using continuums

17:45 - How to allow athletes to experience continuums

23:47 - Running with low knees vs. high knees & Variability in performance

27:11 - The importance of incorporating experiential nature into training

29:05 - Key markers and components of acceleration profiles & Cluster analysis

34:58 - 4 main strategies for sprinting & Exploring athletes’ reliance

39:36 - The quickest way James has facilitated change in sprint acceleration performance

44:46 - The role of technical changes vs. improving strength qualities

51:51 - 3 strength measures & Single leg jump in place test

55:56 - Analyzing hip and foot-dominance in athletes

1:00:12 - How does DRF help project horizontal force or convert force to a horizontal acceleration? & Using a sled to train



“It’s certainly not been my experience that there is this one size fits all, classical model [of sprinting] that we can shoehorn everyone into and that they will run faster as a result.”

“One of the things I do will be to longitudinally track their spatial/temporal variables and try and look at essentially what it is that they’re doing when they’re running their fastest. So, it’s this concept of finding out the athlete’s reliance.”

“If I’m working with an athlete for the first time or the first few sessions… whilst I’m collecting that data, I want them to experience what it feels like to move along that continuum of greater step length or greater step rate so that by the time I’ve finished some kind of analysis and have an understanding of where their reliance is at… they’ve got prior experience now with adjusting according to that continuum, so it just makes coaching a lot easier.”

“They’re never gonna sprint the same way twice in a game, really, so they need to be able to adapt to those novel situations… they’re never going to produce exactly the same step… there’s going to be variability in everything they do,