Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

How We Know Meteorology is Pretending To Understand Storms

How We Know Meteorology is Pretending To Understand Storms

FromSolving Tornadoes: Physics of Storms and Flow


How We Know Meteorology is Pretending To Understand Storms

FromSolving Tornadoes: Physics of Storms and Flow

ratings:
Length:
18 minutes
Released:
Dec 31, 2019
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

Superstition and half-baked theory dominate the atmospheric sciences. Currently meteorological theories on atmospheric flow and storms maintain three superstitious and half-baked notions: 1) Convection. This is the superstition that evaporation makes air buoyant enough to power strong updrafts in the atmosphere (included in this is the strange belief that H2O in the atmosphere becomes gaseous at temperatures/pressures that have never been detected in a laboratory); 2) Dry layer capping. This is a superstition that imagines dry layers having structural properties that explain the how/why convection does not constantly produce storms and uplift; 3) Latent heat.  This is the superstition that phase changes from a gaseous phase of H2O (which are purported to exist despite never having been detected and being inconsistent with what is indicated in the H2O phase table) to a liquid phase releases "latent heat" which itself has never been confirmed/verified. This was recorded 11/16/2019, or thereabouts.

---

This episode is sponsored by
· Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

---

Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Released:
Dec 31, 2019
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (97)

Exposing the incompetence of the current meteorological paradigm on storm theory and introducing a new, scientifically competent theory of storms and atmospheric flow.