38 min listen
#172 Biologically Similar but Competitively Not So? Economic Considerations of IP Litigation Settlements Involving Biosimilars
#172 Biologically Similar but Competitively Not So? Economic Considerations of IP Litigation Settlements Involving Biosimilars
ratings:
Length:
37 minutes
Released:
Jun 13, 2022
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
Under the U.S. Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis (2013), antitrust analysis of “reverse settlements” of IP litigations between makers of branded small molecule drugs and generics requires an analysis under the rule of reason. Are there distinct challenges presented by settlements between branded biologics and biosimilars? Sean Sheridan and Archan Ruparel, principals at Charles River Associates, speak with Anora Wang and Christina Ma on the complexities of negotiating patent settlements involving biosimilars. Listen to this episode to learn about pharmaceutical entry, price erosion, and more. With special guests: Sean Sheridan, Principal, Charles River Associates and Archan Ruparel, Principal, Charles River Associates Related Link: Sean Sheridan and Archan Ruparel, FDA Biosimilar Approval Foreshadows IP Litigation Issues (September 15, 2021) Hosted by: Anora Wang, Arnold & Porter and Christina Ma, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Released:
Jun 13, 2022
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
#34 What Changes Across the Northern Border? Five Key Differences Between US and Canadian Antitrust Law: Huy Do, Partner, Fasken by Our Curious Amalgam