Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

A Fraternity Treasurer's Personal Statement (Ep. 306)

A Fraternity Treasurer's Personal Statement (Ep. 306)

FromThinking LSAT


A Fraternity Treasurer's Personal Statement (Ep. 306)

FromThinking LSAT

ratings:
Length:
87 minutes
Released:
Jul 12, 2021
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

Conclusions that are stated without sufficient evidence invite skepticism. To succeed on the LSAT, you need to be able to spot unwarranted conclusions and poke holes in weak arguments. On your personal statement, you’re the one making the argument. You want to demonstrate to the reader that you’re an ideal candidate for their law school. The best way to prove your case is to present indisputable evidence. State the facts, and allow the reader to draw their own conclusions about how great you are. On this week’s episode, Ben and Nathan review a fraternity treasurer’s personal statement that weighs a bit too heavily on conclusions. They offer constructive criticism that anyone writing a personal statement can learn from. The guys also break down an LSAT Conclusion question from PrepTest 73, and Nathan stumps Ben with a brainteaser. Read more on our website!
Watch Episode 306 on YouTube
Released:
Jul 12, 2021
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school! Learn more at lsatdemon.com