30 min listen
How a Real Conservative Party Would Respond to this week’s jihad Ep 59
How a Real Conservative Party Would Respond to this week’s jihad Ep 59
ratings:
Length:
30 minutes
Released:
Sep 20, 2016
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
The voters are demanding that the political class protect our sovereignty and security. Yet, both parties are out to lunch. While Democrats are refusing to even acknowledge the problem of Islamic jihad, their opponents are unwilling to expose their willful blindness. All Republicans care about is jailbreak and other harmful or vacuous policy ideas. They continue to refuse to use the budget bill to defund Obama’s refugee program.
In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, Daniel explores the recent terror attacks through the prism of a real principled Republican Party. What would a party that is truly committed to our nation’s security do in response to this week’s jihad?
Daniel outlines a number of ideas that will protect our homeland, address the threat doctrine of the enemy, and respect the constitutional constraints. These are all common sense ideas that are not only good policy but reflect good politics as well. Many people think it will take a massive terror attack, God forbid, for the people to wake up and vote against the cultural Marxists and apologists for Islamism. The problem is even if such an event occurs and the majority of the country undergoes a catharsis, there is no political party that can capitalize on that sentiment.
“Republicans could win a landslide election if they made it a referendum on this issue alone!” Daniel declared on this week’s episode of the Conservative Conscience podcast. “Democrats are on the hook for this issue,” he continued. The people want security but neither party will give it to them.
So what would a sane Republican Party do? Well, here are some common sense ideas:
1) Ban the Muslim Brotherhood
2) Pause Refugee Resettlement
3) Allow states to block refugees
4) Strip jihadist fighters of citizenship
5) Exit-entry visa tracking
6) Build the fence (or wall, if that strikes your fancy)
7) National reciprocity for concealed carry
8) Force DHS to deport the million or so with outstanding deportation orders
9) Place restrictions and extra monitoring of travel to dangerous countries
Don’t Miss
15 years of willful blindness after 9/11
Stolen Sovereignty: almost 1,000 criminal aliens issued citizenship
Just 14 years ago, Democrats supported cutting off visas from dangerous countries
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, Daniel explores the recent terror attacks through the prism of a real principled Republican Party. What would a party that is truly committed to our nation’s security do in response to this week’s jihad?
Daniel outlines a number of ideas that will protect our homeland, address the threat doctrine of the enemy, and respect the constitutional constraints. These are all common sense ideas that are not only good policy but reflect good politics as well. Many people think it will take a massive terror attack, God forbid, for the people to wake up and vote against the cultural Marxists and apologists for Islamism. The problem is even if such an event occurs and the majority of the country undergoes a catharsis, there is no political party that can capitalize on that sentiment.
“Republicans could win a landslide election if they made it a referendum on this issue alone!” Daniel declared on this week’s episode of the Conservative Conscience podcast. “Democrats are on the hook for this issue,” he continued. The people want security but neither party will give it to them.
So what would a sane Republican Party do? Well, here are some common sense ideas:
1) Ban the Muslim Brotherhood
2) Pause Refugee Resettlement
3) Allow states to block refugees
4) Strip jihadist fighters of citizenship
5) Exit-entry visa tracking
6) Build the fence (or wall, if that strikes your fancy)
7) National reciprocity for concealed carry
8) Force DHS to deport the million or so with outstanding deportation orders
9) Place restrictions and extra monitoring of travel to dangerous countries
Don’t Miss
15 years of willful blindness after 9/11
Stolen Sovereignty: almost 1,000 criminal aliens issued citizenship
Just 14 years ago, Democrats supported cutting off visas from dangerous countries
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Released:
Sep 20, 2016
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
Post-Wisconsin Special : How Will the Cruz vs. Trump Race Play Out?: Who will prevail as the GOP Nominee? Well, the answer to that became a lot more complicated after the resounding win in #WIPrimary by Ted Cruz. Because of his win, and the path forward, it is looking more and more like the summer nominating convention will be open and that no candidate will get to 1,237 – the magical number to secure the nomination. While Cruz and Trump both have states they will likely win easily --- the recent surge by Cruz and the shrunken field have made for an interesting race. Daniel breaks down things state by state, and discusses how the June contest in California may be a deciding factor. Daniel and Joe also discuss the messaging behind declaring a mandate in a race like this. Each Campaign will have to make the case at an open convention (or beforehand) that their candidate should be the nominee. The offer their predictions on what those arguments should be, and explain which has the most by Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz