A challenge to the Louisiana abortion law that requires doctors performing abortions to have hospital admitting privileges was heard by the Supreme Court last week. Julie Fikelman, who argued on behalf of the abortion providers in June Medical Services v. Russo, and Catherine Glenn Foster, who authored an amicus brief on the opposing side of the case, joined host Jeffrey Rosen on this week’s episode. They presented the arguments on both sides of the case — diving into the facts, considering whether admitting privilege requirements are prudent and whether the “undue burden” standard established by the 2016 Supreme Court case Whole Women’s Health v Hellerstedt is workable, and explaining how they think this case might impact the lives of women.  
Questions or comments about the podcast? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.