The End of Camelot, Truth Revealed: JFK, the Saga Unfolded

By Kevin Sandifer

If you think you know anything about this assassination, be prepared to be blown away!  Things you have never heard of:  Two Oswalds, Botched Autopsies, and Connections from the CIA to the Mossad to the Mafia.  Kevin has done an exhaustive review of all the information available and come up with many astute observations.  

The plot of this cover up story is so interwoven, masterfully hidden, and undeniably eye opening that you will find yourself enthralled for hours with the details.  Definitely, something very worthwhile reading as your mind opens up to a huge story that eclipses all your thoughts of The End of Camelot!

• Language: English
• Publisher: Outskirts Press
• Release date: Oct 15, 2023
• ISBN: 9781977269348

Kevin Sandifer

This history buff has found his niche in life. Have you ever visited the National Archives in Washington D. C.? Long lines of tourists wait to pass by and see the Declaration of Independence. Now the fact that someone had the tedious job of gathering, cataloging, and preserving these items is obvious. What type of person would be willing to dedicate his life to the nation’s attic? It would be someone patient, meticulous, detail-conscience and absorbed by historical research. In other words, someone exactly like Kevin W. Sandifer. He’s the author of over 27 books: textbooks, workbooks, and books on history and religion. His enthusiasm began his Senior year at Northwood High School when he was given the assignment in English class to do a research paper. Kevin Sandifer has a very keen mind and is a master of detail. He spent many years studying transcripts from both the 6th Floor Museum and National Archives to produce the grand finale on the JFK Assassination. 

Book preview

The End of Camelot, Truth Revealed

JFK, the Saga Unfolded

All Rights Reserved.

Copyright © 2024 Kevin Sandifer

v3.0

The opinions expressed in this manuscript are solely the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions or thoughts of the publisher. The author has represented and warranted full ownership and/or legal right to publish all the materials in this book.

This book may not be reproduced, transmitted, or stored in whole or in part by any means, including graphic, electronic, or mechanical without the express written consent of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.

Outskirts Press, Inc.

http://www.outskirtspress.com

Library of Congress Control Number: 2023917041

Cover Photo © 2024 www.gettyimages.com. All rights reserved - used with permission.

Outskirts Press and the OP logo are trademarks belonging to Outskirts Press, Inc.

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEDICATION

In Loving memory of

My Parents,

Glenn and Beverly Sandifer

Acknowledgments

My deepest thanks to the following people who either helped with the research or general editing.

Dr. Cynthia B. Elliott, professor emeritus at Southeastern University in Hammond, Louisiana. She was there when I needed her to encourage me to complete the book.

Jack White, photo analyst

Robert Groden, photo analyst

Table of Contents

Foreword

Preface

Marxism and Communism

Psychology and Sociology

JFK FUNERAL

Introduction

The Setting

1. Oswald, Impostor or Patsy

2. Warren Commission Report Debugged

3. Witnesses: Key and Expert

4. Audiovisuals Analyzed For New Evidence

5. Medical Scenario: Parkland Hospital

6. Autopsy at Bethseda Un-Raveled

7. The Shooting Scenario Crossfire Un-Raveled with Locations of All Shooter Teams

8. Investigations by Government Agrencies

Author’s Conclusions

Appendix

Bibliography

Footnotes

6th Floor Museum Transcripts

National archives (NARA)

Foreword

Dr. Marc Spurlock

Doctor of Family Medicine, Dallas, Texas, and long-time friend

I have known Kevin Sandifer for over 55 years since we were in Junior High at Northwood Jr./Sr. High School in Shreveport, Louisiana. Kevin has a very keen mind and is a master of detail. He spent many years accumulating information and documentation in his line of work. For several years, we have talked about him writing a book about the assassination of JFK. Well, he has done it, and what story it tells!

If you think you know anything about this assassination, be prepared to be blown away! Things you have never heard of: Two Oswalds, Botched Autopsies, and Connections from the CIA to the Mossad to the Mafia. Kevin has done an exhaustive review of all the information available and come up with many astute observations.

The plot of this cover up story is so interwoven, masterfully hidden, and undeniably eye opening that you will find yourself enthralled for hours with the details. Definitely, something very worthwhile reading as your mind opens up to a huge story that eclipses all your thoughts of The End of Camelot!

Wm. Marcus Spurlock, MD

There is no one to blame. There is simply taking action!........Wm. Marcus Spurlock, MD

Preface

It was, Sunday, November 24, 1963. I was sitting in front of my b&w television set. I had just turned the set on when I saw Jack Ruby emerge from the crowd of reporters and shoot Lee Harvey Oswald. I was only 7 years of age; but I never forgot that scene on tv. It was mesmerized forever.

I don’t remember the 22nd of November, 1963 when President John F. Kennedy was shot. I was at lunch at Blanchard Elementary School when the event happened. I don’t even remember being told about the event that day.

I didn’t think much about the event. Thanksgiving was coming up and we kids were out of school. I do remember hating the funeral being televised because I couldn’t watch anything else.

Then in the fall of 1974 in my Sociology class at LSUS in Shreveport, Louisiana, my instructor was Danny Walker. I was standing in the hall after class and he came out and asked if anybody wanted to go to Dallas, Texas, to see the sites of the assassination of President John Kennedy. I knew I couldn’t go because I was working. That was the end of my recollection so I thought. You see we were in a war with North Vietnam and I had signed up for the draft. However, my thoughts were glued on the United States Airforce.

Years later after Vietnam, my mind again thought about November 24, 1963 and how we would never know the truth about the assassination of President John Kennedy. You see, I was a noted researcher/writer in northwest Louisiana. I lived in the town of Blanchard, Louisiana. I had gained fame as both a writer and historian.

I wanted the truth about what happened, Friday, November 22, 1963. I had been to Dallas twice and the first time I went I had gone with my parents. I came back in 2020 and took scenic tours associated with that fateful day. I visited the 6th Floor Museum (formerly the Texas School Book Depository, a warehouse at the corner of Elm and Houston Streets) where Lee Harvey Oswald worked. I even took a van ride and saw the Rooming House where Oswald lived; and the actual spot where Dallas Policeman J. D. Tippit was shot and killed.

It didn’t seem possible that Oswald did all of this and then died unless there was more to the story. As a researcher and historian, I knew to trust my instincts and obtain the facts. I began my own library of books on the subject of the Assassination. I studied all of the books and learned more on general books to help me understand: Physics, Geometry, Linear algebra, Chemistry, Anatomy, Police Science, Cold War, Psychology, and Naval Intelligence. I was convinced that Oswald was in Intelligence.

Gradually I began researching oral history transcripts at both the 6th Floor Museum and the National Archives. Finally it made sense. There were two Oswalds in the United States.

The main focus of this book is two Oswalds and falsified documents, physical evidence; and, oral history transcripts from both the 6th Floor Museum in Dallas Texas (TSBD) and NARA (National Archives records Administration in Maryland).

I first had to learn to decipher what was truth or real and what was lied about or not real. What people said during the investigation was most of the time what the Cover-Up people wanted them to say; or the testimony was altered.

Marxism and Communism

Is there any difference between Communism and Marxism? Well, the two ‘ Communism and Marxism ‘ are the same with not much difference between the two. Communism is really based on Marxism and the two cannot be separated. However, one can see that Marxism is the theory and Communism is the practical implementation of Marxism.

Communism is the realization of a Stateless society where all are equal. On the other hand Marxism is the framework by which such a state is developed. While Marxism is a political ideology based on Karl Marx’s ideas, communism can be called as a political system, which is based on Marxist ideology.

Marxism is a system that analysis the different aspects of a state where there exists no difference between the rich and the poor. And Communism can be termed as a political system where all become one and the same. Communism aims at establishing a class less, egalitarian and stateless society based on common ownership, which promotes equality and fairness.

Marxism is a philosophy, which bases itself on the materialist interpretation of history. It says that history was driven by the materialistic approach of the people, which means the life of a person was driven by what he needed to survive. The Marxist ideology is to prepare the society for Communism.

Marxism views that just as society transformed from feudalism to capitalism, it would transform itself to socialism and eventually to Communism. Well, the method by which the transformation takes place is what differentiates the communists from Marxists. The Communists believe that the transformation will take place through revolutionary means.

Psychology and Sociology

Criminology is the study of crime; whereas without a motive, the habitual criminal has other factors leading him/her to commit the crime. Our examination of both the human mind and how the person interacts in society will enable us to learn why a crime is committee. In JFK, it may even be abnormal psychology among the perpetrators.

Chapter 19 contains the lengthy discussion of why JFK was assassinated. First, we must understand why crimes are committed. My study of Criminology enable me to understand motives better.

PSYCHOLOGY

Psychology is the science of behavior and mind. Psychology includes the study of conscious and unconscious phenomena, as well as feeling and thought. It is an academic discipline of immense scope. Psychologists seek an understanding of the emergent properties of brains, and all the variety of phenomena linked to those emergent properties, joining this way the broader neuro-scientific group of researchers. As a social science it aims to understand individuals and groups by establishing general principles and researching specific cases.[1][2]

In this field, a professional practitioner or researcher is called a psychologist and can be classified as a social, behavioral, or cognitive scientist. Psychologists attempt to understand the role of mental functions in individual and social behavior, while also exploring the physiological and biological processes that underlie cognitive functions and behaviors.

Psychologists explore behavior and mental processes, including perception, cognition, attention, emotion, intelligence, subjective experiences, motivation, brain functioning, and personality. This extends to interaction between people, such as interpersonal relationships, including psychological resilience, family resilience, and other areas. Psychologists of diverse orientations also consider the unconscious mind.[3] Psychologists employ empirical methods to infer causal and correlational relationships between psychosocial variables. In addition, or in opposition, to employing empirical and deductive methods, some especially clinical and counseling psychologists—at times rely upon symbolic interpretation and other inductive techniques. Psychology has been described as a hub science in that medicine tends to draw psychological research via neurology and psychiatry, whereas social sciences most commonly draws directly from sub-disciplines within psychology.[4]

While psychological knowledge is often applied to the assessment and treatment of mental health problems, it is also directed towards understanding and solving problems in several spheres of human activity. By many accounts psychology ultimately aims to benefit society.[5][6] The majority of psychologists are involved in some kind of therapeutic role, practicing in clinical, counseling, or school settings. Many do scientific research on a wide range of topics related to mental processes and behavior, and typically work in university psychology departments or teach in other academic settings (e.g., medical schools, hospitals). Some are employed in industrial and organizational settings, or in other areas[7] such as human development and aging, sports, health, and the media, as well as in forensic investigation and other aspects of law.

To investigate personality, individual differences, and social behavior, a number of theorists made learning theories both more social (interpersonal) and more cognitive. They moved far beyond the earlier conditioning and reward-and-punishment principles, focusing on how a person’s characteristics interact with situational opportunities and demands. Research demonstrated the importance of learning through observation from real and symbolic models, showing that it occurs spontaneously and cognitively without requiring any direct reinforcement. Likewise, studies of the development of self-control and the ability to delay gratification in young children showed that it is crucially important how the situation and the temptations are cognitively appraised: when the appraisal changes, so does the behavior. Thus, the focus shifted from reinforcement and stimulus control to the mental mechanisms that enable self-control.

The id, ego, and super-ego are the three distinct, interacting agents in the psychic apparatus defined in Sigmund Freud’s structural model of the psyche. The three agents are theoretical constructs that describe the activities and interactions of the mental life of a person. In the ego psychology model of the psyche, the id is the set of uncoordinated instinctual desires; the super-ego plays the critical and moralizing role; and the ego is the organized, realistic agent that mediates, between the instinctual desires of the id and the critical super-ego;[1] Freud explained that: The functional importance of the ego is manifested in the fact that, normally, control over the approaches to motility devolves upon it. Thus, in its relation to the id, [the ego] is like a man on horseback, who has to hold in check the superior strength of the horse; with this difference, that the rider tries to do so with his own strength, while the ego uses borrowed forces. The analogy may be carried a little further. Often, a rider, if he is not to be parted from his horse, is obliged to guide [the horse] where it wants to go; so, in the same way, the ego is in the habit of transforming the id’s will into action, as if it were its own.[2]

Although the structural model of the psyche refers to a mental apparatus, the id, the ego, and the super-ego are purely psychological concepts, and do not correspond to (somatic) structures of the brain, such as the kind dealt with by neuroscience. The existence of the super-ego is observable in how people can view themselves as guilty and bad, shameful and weak, and feel compelled to do certain things. In The Ego and the Id (1923), Freud presents "the general character of harshness and cruelty exhibited by the [ego] ideal — its dictatorial Thou shalt; thus, in the psychology of the ego, Freud hypothesized different levels of ego ideal or superego development with greater ideals:

. . . nor must it be forgotten that a child has a different estimate of his parents at different periods of his life. At the time at which the Oedipus complex gives place to the super-ego they are something quite magnificent; but later, they lose much of this. Identifications then come about with these later parents as well, and indeed they regularly make important contributions to the formation of character; but in that case they only affect the ego, they no longer influence the super-ego, which has been determined by the earliest parental images.

— New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, p. 64.

The earlier in the child’s development, the greater the estimate of parental power; thus, when the child is in rivalry with the parental imago, the child then feels the dictatorial Thou shalt, which is the manifest power that the imago represents on

four levels: (i) the auto-erotic, (ii) the narcissistic, (iii) the anal, and (iv) the phallic.[3] Those different levels of mental development, and their relations to parental images, correspond to specific id forms of aggression and affection; thus aggressive and destructive desires animate the myths in the fantasies and repressions of patients, in all cultures. In response to the unstructured ambiguity and conflicting uses of the term the unconscious mind, Freud introduced the structured model of ego psychology (id, ego, super-ego) in the essay Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920) and elaborated, refined, and made that model formal in the essay The Ego and the Id.[4]

Freud’s earlier, topographical model of the mind had divided the mind into the three elements of conscious, preconscious, and unconscious. The conscious contains events that we are aware of, preconscious is events that are in the process of becoming conscious, and unconscious include events that we are not aware of.[40] At its heart was the dialectic of unconscious traumatic memory versus consciousness...which soon became a conflict between System Ucs versus System Cs.[41] With what Freud called the disagreeable discovery that on the one hand (super-)ego and conscious and on the other hand repressed and unconscious are far from coinciding,[42] Freud took the step in the structural model to no longer use the term ‘unconscious’ in the systematic sense, and to rename the mental region that is foreign to the ego...[and] in future call it the ‘id’.[43] The partition of the psyche defined in the structural model is thus one that cuts across the topographical model’s partition of conscious vs. unconscious.

The new terminology which he introduced has a highly clarifying effect and so made further clinical advances possible.[44] Its value lies in the increased degree of precision and diversification made possible: Although the id is unconscious by definition, the ego and the super-ego are both partly conscious and partly unconscious. What is more, with this new model Freud achieved a more systematic classification of mental disorder than had been available previously:

Transference neuroses correspond to a conflict between the ego and the id; narcissistic neuroses, to a conflict between the ego and the superego; and psychoses, to one between the ego and the external world.[45]

It is important to realize however, that the three newly presented entities, the id, the ego and the superego, all had lengthy past histories (two of them under other names)[46]—the id as the systematic unconscious, the super-ego as conscience/ego ideal. Equally, Freud never abandoned the topographical division of conscious, preconscious, and unconscious, though as he noted ruefully the three qualities of consciousness and the three provinces of the mental apparatus do not fall together into three peaceful couples...we had no right to expect any such smooth arrangement.[47]

The iceberg metaphor is a commonly used visual metaphor when attempting to relate the ego, id and superego with the conscious and unconscious mind. In the iceberg metaphor the entire id and part of both the superego and the ego would be submerged in the underwater portion representing the unconscious mind. The remaining portions of the ego and superego would be displayed above water in the conscious mind area.[8]

SOCIOLOGY

Sociology is the study of society, patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and culture that surrounds everyday life.[1][2][3] It is a social science that uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis[4]:3-5 to develop a body of knowledge about social order and social change.[4]:32-40 Sociology can also be defined as the general science of society. While some sociologists conduct research that may be applied directly to social policy and welfare, others focus primarily on refining the theoretical understanding of social processes. Subject matter can range from micro-level analyses of society (i.e., of individual interaction and agency) to macro-level analyses (i.e., of systems and the social structure).[5]

Traditional focuses of sociology include social stratification, social class, social mobility, religion, secularization, law, sexuality, gender, and deviance. As all spheres of human activity are affected by the interplay between social structure and individual agency, sociology has gradually expanded its focus to other subjects and institutions, such as health and the institution of medicine; economy; military; punishment and systems of control; the Internet; education; social capital; and the role of social activity in the development of knowledge. The range of social scientific methods has also expanded, as social researchers draw upon a variety of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The linguistic and cultural turns of the mid-20th century, especially, have led to increasingly interpretative, hermeneutic, and philosophic approaches towards the analysis of society. Conversely, the turn of the 21st century has seen the rise of new analytically, mathematically, and computationally rigorous techniques, such as agent-based modelling and social network analysis.[6][7]

Social research has influence throughout various industries and sectors of life, such as among politicians, policy makers, and legislators; educators; planners; administrators; developers; business magnates and managers; social