Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

String Theory For Dummies
String Theory For Dummies
String Theory For Dummies
Ebook701 pages17 hours

String Theory For Dummies

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Unravel the secrets of the universe and untangle cutting-edge physics

Yes, you actually can understand quantum physics! String Theory For Dummies is a beginner’s guide, and we make it fun to find out about the all the recent trends and theories in physics, including the basics of string theory, with friendly explanations. Build a foundation of physics knowledge, understand the various string theories and the math behind them, and hear what the opponents to string theory have to say. It’s an exciting time to be alive in advanced physics, and this updated edition covers what’s new in the string world—the Large Hadron Collider, the Higgs Boson, gravitational waves, and lots of other big headlines. Unleash your inner armchair physicist with String Theory For Dummies.

  • Brush up on the basics of physics and the approachable math needed to understand string theory
  • Meet the scientists who discovered string theory and continue to make waves (and particles) in the physics world
  • Understand what it’s all about with real-world examples and explanations
  • Learn why string theory is called "The Theory of Everything"—and what it means for technology and the future

Aspiring scientists or life-long learners will both be able to gain valuable information from this book. This accessible intro into string theory is for the theorists inside anyone.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherWiley
Release dateJun 17, 2022
ISBN9781119888994
String Theory For Dummies

Related to String Theory For Dummies

Related ebooks

Physics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for String Theory For Dummies

Rating: 3.4090909818181814 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

11 ratings2 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    My criticism of these kind of books, from what I have read from other stuff, is that the writers tend to spout all the standard or classic theories as tablets of stone and rarely introduce new ideas (presentation-wise). Imagine you were able to generate a video clip of a science book where a whole gallery of core concepts flashed by in say 60 minutes. Are we sure we’d be able to learn something from the process? Is it likely that some of the images would leave a deep impression on you? My two cents: in fact, you are seeing it, but not understanding it. It is probably similar with these dummy series of books; you get an impression, maybe even learn something, but it is unlikely to have a significant effect on your understanding of the subject at hand. I suppose it depends on the reason one attempts the book in the first place. Snobbery? (Yes, of course I have read a String Theory book.) To enter a pub quiz? (Answer to Q69: The twin at the edge of the galaxy ages more quickly.) To search for understanding about how and why the world works as it does, and how we came to understand it? (Say what?) In this age of everything-available-at-your-fingertips, aren't we all a little guilty of wanting answers to pub quiz questions without doing the work of understanding how the answer was derived? I had a physics teacher at college who kept insisting for me to "show my working". Seeking facts without understanding limits our horizons; reduces us to consumers of other people's work; makes us lazy; leads eventually to the (sorry, folks) copy-and-paste unchecked stories about the EU, the bite-size propaganda of referendum campaigns, the swallowing hook-line-and-sinker of stories that serve as confirmation bias, the decrying of experts simply because they are experts, the loss of critical reading skills.Which is where we are today.Whether the writer is that narrow in his views could be just that is what the reader wants and have dumbed down the material so as not to lose his audience. I wish we could have some of the Horizon programs of years ago when if you weren't capable of understanding them it was tough, but everything on TV is dumbed down now. Just a couple of hours a week on one channel on stuff you really have to struggle to get your mind around is all I am asking for.I am sometimes embarrassed to hear scientists (who really should know better) claiming that they have "objective" knowledge of the universe. Luckily guys like Smolin, having pondered these matters as scientific theorists, come out the other side all philosophical and talk of the universe inventing itself. Which suddenly freaks out all us bong-smokers, even though if we'd been paying attention the Buddha, Berkeley, Hume, Kant and co have been saying this for centuries...It seems we agree on the benefits of bong smoking on metaphysics. Sometimes in my hazier moments I'm convinced we're all the godhead reflecting in infinite mirrors and if you disagree then that's fine because I'm sure I'll agree with you when I am you... or something like that.Sages peer into the riddles of matter and consciousness, hoping to explain them. So what is 'explain'? Ah, but that's the toy to be shaken away and us awake in a sudden earthquake, or eclipsed in an instant by a friendly shout, or a remembered tune wafting from a nearby cafe, re-encoding through the eardrum and intoxicating the brain, or in stumbling on a pavement crack while lost in speculation, just catching oneself before the oncoming traffic, head tumbling down from the clouds to know again how slippery the concrete becomes under driving rain. It doesn't matter how the numbers do or don't add up; it is still the biggest Game of Marbles on Earth, using the smallest marbles in the Universe! When "science" knows about the Nature of TIME then all the current theories can be put into perspective and discarded. The answer to string theorist's problems is obviously not mundane quantum computing, been there done that any day now, but extra-dimensional quantum computing to get more omph in their analysis. They should be able to dream that up even if only on a string budget. I think a basic problem with communicating science is that you can't start to get a feel for difficult subjects like math and science without spending a lot of time trying to solve the problems at the end of each textbook chapter (or ones set by your teacher). I said 'trying'; you don't need to succeed every time. Kind of, if killer experiments are top trumps. Which is where String Theory falls down big time as they cannot design testable predictions that don't require a convenient quasar or an accelerator that can work at impossible energies (to unravel one of their strings). It is not testable.Down in Biology we decline to regard non testable ideas as science. But then we tend to be experimenter heavy and theorist light. Physics' problem is too many math inclined theorists with nothing else to do. What they have done with String Theory is build castles in the air, wonderful, exotic, baroque castles but made of nothing and signifying only a massive waste of time and intellectual effort.What people forget is that mathematics is a language, a highly formal and logical one, but a language nevertheless. Languages can be used to describe fictions, self-consistent, highly compelling fictions (religions, Game of Thrones) but fictions nevertheless. Without scientific experiments to determine which stories are true vs those which are not there is no way to tell the fiction from the truth. Which is why the holometer is so heartening. It is Science.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book, in the "...for Dummies" tradition, attempts to explain string theory in a way that's simple, clear, easily accessible to someone coming into it with minimal knowledge, and constructed in such a way that readers can dip in and out, rather than necessarily reading straight through. Needless to say, this attempt is doomed to failure. Even with the 100 pages of (highly compressed) Newton-to-Hawking physics lessons that are provided as necessary background, it's still doomed to failure. Theoretical physics of this kind doesn't just involve math -- the kind of math you pretty much have to have a PhD to understand -- it's made of math. And most of it is just not going to make much sense if you try to take the math out.Still, that having been said, the book does at least provide a little taste of what string theory is, how scientists approach it, and what kind of questions it's trying to answer. It also spends a couple of chapters looking at the possible implications of fun little ideas like parallel universes and time travel. More importantly, it gets into the actual doing of science, rather than just reporting the (in this case, still pretty iffy) results of scientific explorations. There's a lot of even-handed discussion of both the strengths of string theory and the criticisms of its opponents, along with some important context about what it means for an idea to be scientific and why there's room for debate about whether string theory does or doesn't qualify. Rating: 3.5/5, with the note that it's actually kind of impressive that it succeeds that well, given the restrictions of the format.

Book preview

String Theory For Dummies - Andrew Zimmerman Jones

Idbook_preview_excerpt.html}ے#Gݯ$EUfbwsnlVҶ3$UT<&D&BO߰zY&3>eD~ᑙIfkMw?~fmC;nm맯?WNo.EمT~苾-M5mQq('U/ChgaS}?.*m?uK)m-Pڮ(~lB~Dzcj߇C9S(U]cC ,s[˟å6e]schU3Eۄj= V! ZyM]ˡ⮋m7]7PִmۅX S෯ÁC몚Kwϴ.8E*3/6T*}u9žűGt'͖04伊FKr<>_vGEٟf_c+9#mCo=h{mC F| R**X6hm ҋYںm|v__QhB]ھu' Ъz>qgoS'%/ WtF?grv5ؕD=UC|Wmm=-_ѻIzH)nҎ$1tȦE$[D5Ӊ~K L¤ÁVnۇ?ҽPiq$='Υu=X^n4o޴NUDG\mC mX¡!yA.HMMF['Lt5t.@[$!ȞxI7Ճv]m yAh״ 1.*&~;?O֞ws]V[n X 3Ү鵲LTz^G,ҬXE:< gi 6u*kՏ;B:cO@٧˧9NVm+,#-mj:e &랁񡓴~\>y xs{(5:%w= qp(-O~l^w?.9FAiGЎHҋdo2%>tJZU{<5% #=x'zlHbL)b#MYm֑lƮܐ|o/`ЁcYP]>ҭRwIb#wDT@KHS |&u[}Y0mdYJb !CE%ٰZ. 8#߁rrs` oi?>xeě_ vImȬbr+sU5zd T~bZ4&ެK`'-{D/‚@+2I7V;XW7ŞMAbiP:OiZSꗲ_1-H쳅:7dYW 9SD(ZV{"Ɍ&>kx NwvHVRyo\̒.X~,iyzǶfL ӊ6$$W7C$>v~5IŊ8ŒcVlaeU"DstZ+4y9ܒɑNj /W|o  ~땈15y xQ7?`Q/-k ډ$UBo?O* Dz1?S+Ȇ_+lTF#8rGȱus'g%+CD^=(=iG2**k:3hDZYLЁ%w⫶eu# D٥c9HLxԈd+5FZNlئ3Xhـ`iθaȻM+;!ċ=x'x6\BޞdcdjHM+O%N¾6LД[6m뒖47>IB$-ӷjz~d@G _v. ȏ89Nik@#t~I(d ʚ֕(\x1@xנ.-w9 aPM=)xvKPSx$LbJƾ7sڐ؃}8~ߐ9dfadˢC8㚎7Eh9m)Ā3sgw$Ӥ@PK)[1Rdbm' '3`i)R%VrhpO@vGΜ'Z!t_AXpsҖZ xMKrID p^ȑN3F~\m a9"qM" 'X2@c=#JhӎnI hN(& K od}xlmBp= /'z>7~%Sn1:+:7L%+O;PBh /8=z)f+ ={`4Es{  }V.sWC߸4 62 3ٙ =<%龁8:[1E_lUa1 i_,@1>qȞ-F6bYt~]OvdXӳD"Ui^Ӣ"#iR d>]\q9ŕTA(ʼ'7F55k >kq/_|zy*v""-,q "Sut#5"YҺ³F8Zʲ8r.П[!R #gh-OTK;DqyiP~M!G]rb#&I D/L hpPYډ'n|"r1I NFf,Sc$ǿjznWfb~uE_reS12[ *ڕǪNc#p~`2nB'm Egͽxίb9D D_)t+t&Ky'Иb!ؕа8de&3Ia(&>j ]y:pG?NPDi/Xl(3 ʾtZ-Nş3B:2~oN <p::ٙGYS!;;[#\Y6/3g vc,ͬq A%FG,QO|Ћ8*U,Eŋ?x=$덒$L`M)s+G˘/`r]'d7ajJJIdXn#Iy1_yx+s?z'߼+»QLcTO_we*Ub 8U`W\L&)ޞx2ܵ;~B[rgon9Q?#!O(΂b$i/j݉wx+/ӘaxĒub_y7I%K5,<йvմ!SGo E?䉲/P-=d {!o 󌣨{, _(zi[IQ`p^L9pp:OW<)@,FL 4׊ FMcXC1^$ up\m5r1sBz$2#뷃ak-iJE Jfm%\"bk 4`Pr?"[zE'"%{zFQ P Pi1ZL/LD r'k_ 9Jb jb4%aFf"~!_bǂ|Y#Rq+4A]°K( 晴aܻ,vʫJ̷z{X*@ⷨz?ScXWC@.ɞZUEdހM-dW}.O]]7ڲ~w=f5oBr얈ϲy>v*M_O-oKG#2-vMQYBi3L_NgǺmRqFɒGu~WnJ#y2veonwſx+z_Rw?}V8q1 6Sh](=(&'H_»ɳ/bẢduۭ\|v d:FFL'SjNm\/18$r>~fA$ H>0f;?6Ʃ`ZMqr}qP# =Ŋ+5R_(RR#^ g9Fp] $nS|NWKr$0Qԃg|/*!b(KI";hbD%5ȴrzV.%'Z4v4d ߂\ziw0ҠmԩºM_ɑy*8uh<=s5n];9I?ٱ% VED[=@7վfmjZW#r.+x2[tDžQ3+-?pF_'܌ױf6v5ħES2~qǬ keۏ4Tf2ߐv\KD[l9V =~Uiv { mq)Aı$VTj9{f.Y‹>UAj^f 2cŸ> i,i:yyϡrE@v ^53!*d1h~jΔGxFqe`$S8k4#V,+Φj|n%k:mVD$h֚G /Cۛok Yq5RIv]gYvy8Ղ2#Ȏ|i`AY9!;zBعtINڋO\xļ/MU˞N3O E#u52S'nms(c4", (0Yݠr53{i)FLE'-;#5Y ,RFKDu}});>)9.5]be;}Sp3^1yDi{Ty@ ɠx0}82w553x f6M3p̅1`3t%e&jeu>B6ڢJkI=\Ӱ4N |F,!ĥSc0f }cfv*:/y$v[k'eNe4ʬI*IO."r\yެUM#"͆!H@ *x;M/Ld`x/ܩ\ {Vq2pU[\U'~;D*XZ0Ubf܈4hW{wS TB/ XM::Gܷd#c4q G+`t"JH/Uzz\6[ lehSK1X)hۚ4;AO vf0՞ٛ+wNM[婏&}3,듇N@zLd,,4ü]bNu1b !לD <]8kgf1.|\`ei!繺@D&*8=6Tʓ{M4+il֞FgN5= b+\ҚwYC@ $ݮ L3ri2)}'oRb7m5xM[u)?:RwWO"P|=sAMvCQ"U>*O*QO3|iP6EXI-5GIv%Y@8IqI){}ZJcWKU-Mxg2eZr;p68kGةHHa ,'TOX>MTd:NQL =6;V# /> B~!}hPb8$zSܹ)- qnkMUޱ½mx$v82[5@ ScUWiΛVIEZp0)k>:V0}+wxa4K'O[0VUeQl֦+@ՇoZY9vsƧU-L.i"*+ݰ!}&) "(e'pxYRfKp?xvԏ1b:0WIR/,Ei@p1Ѧj&Aodzu)>li9f{ף9r:28bfBLRvLhE{ǽc2#i -ɵ'T ?%6=f=2֊\FgkNL6b GU~ NAmZ1ڱ=XKi-z 5t3|6_yg>ܘ+>ԷoIx+W.R%'O>3cIc1MzQyYXEX6=ANzms(9R*b }Fyz:dl$%_u<_15]aJMD/ӌ7h{P׎E1o\ir '_7urV a2~bv?`"4:{& |eK-<]_eUƷ(8T[a dnND`;Hެf2t֍#6s(qa0aҦXZ\0'eRt|gC QgC:sQ04锡nZW=;"ck;+1ݠ)3/^Q,O}jar ¡*kNo#13;'4՗ӹ'ΓDcɹinE[b\1_+Sm Dhql@a hT9kQ !/7$p0Q,X />i*NVq=e76]0حAcUKFTRjI\cJTGrWF`fҸ'\^6.aWK}t^vPV'4|e..Ix?֋t4x❆Wn!^PTIkivU-⠷yCK%XuÈ|3A1L' ~Ck!;bkpbz+G_-/Y2N6>#?I|7aЖKv7i gW,b(Z#6ANhg܈*q=EY`+ݐrWFSag+s)Ȗ?[tp.w1aq?IӮɇ4Qf9{,tHT#шw:_k"/ܫv-SM<@%*cpy$go1,ZVEB%MsPz2`=q_9 gaO'W[ulu[ѐ8IzH9)$-+곃1)鈷6:*9O>}Y:wܶ#f1KsMع=Y?MB^9vRyic+.xT?Z?ur9m`s2_ 2aUtWY)X:ؓSF"wqɕ.44"-8H [%.r==sA&[+ނP|%A .r&^8YyqI;Œ>D`Y sNf * +oݖdWܱ}tڽ*%wӄZH!%_;!vۇ yTFƼVzwڑ~0UyjUQ%GFlM눗nטȋt@~nkxC=VrprZpa|cw=9EW!I>?k]cy{emFc\LH |pHx+MOv+Gx·ʧm>`]^*x1G(y-{Ic2aT(I._lxte0Mُ 5)Y"Ƴ-Z8'0\ӌ_,CʣevRq{h{tFY'7KzA\* ˑ5Fu +^cxaU—R-|@P딭*Vh0} چ5wlJr8vRee"Atn]FpeSVS2v?Ndd b/oى>NCJK*DYroF7_6>EALڇ݊ln8gjVG&>NG=&EMv RUȣ-V.=ehcX,H{5}M֣󡙩㶉$=l%J< Τ\댣&S@ 9a+ !JyO-|,#WqȵL?_B>"4&ax/8 H Рc/9:XB^ PCڟU|W^Ż]AR!D|Q* = r%HaT8L\I6Y[η!jrţ<,-g 2ǚDqo#(aⒺu=q:b`N1-UWJ 0fš7FO  m5PU bq).g0[O噴* pOjEbHOn̊SC6؃ ҮC#owx^S1kADmE|gjlx")tu]J W ߾ࢫhRIhA=CasaΣctR'MxpTϦE%|PO_Gpv\ ]ܤRa3eD8@+)m5J֪=`鐫\xB@ajd$M{d:V%|)ӹ /%)Mq`X%/oR A(zd]0 PӾOQos1wVOb;px7ZTiҼެA,׸m ܊e&s2J԰R|:+g/p0]#dgiBAfl@ZR%8NHT7mHb.|O{ڶNfǮSQ 7$&iO}In88,3miZf3uʪ& k eMf';^#8lt{9ކ:u#lvL6CTk:> H*1ʰMnj =7eJ,\OrTfY%u_-ue7'8?Mu<;`{hxkTU.z'2.VBINSA)+e) g\1AK~cn]/| )/ڑN CT8d1'{IUIpfyؤfIcD,lpN$]Z*X</?4G\1GcP3a2䳎8n::SohIs0Q;'Vk:.e ^v?.vHY,$Ǒ!i'cO#_dy8'Ik#RHoU\@'*2S^N /w+cx!6/uC7ylkt᳈Mt]f w|% WgEd2frv6Z#L$סGxL9I x&v]J^\ND(f={1 vhەg7t9>zNϡS@鮄bj.N-鯯oⶏ _YIZBFQ( y'pi(n_LAZ"|8K9kevmil]qm"[b­@Z=xT PoJ w0gNalo*D+##Ӥx0ǭK8,q-!ܖۺd*ܙ_Hi\5+|Ǯd_ dY*[K6'(ټ&)
Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1