American Republican Drivers: A New York City Yellow Taxi Driver's Analysis through an Overview of American Political Socioeconomic Practices

By Francois Jean-Paul

This book is about the plight of Black Americans and other minorities living in the United States and suffering from injustices as a result of the government's failure in justice provision to them due to a mistaken or willful allowance of a third branch of the American government without an election.

Then whether they were to try their own businesses or become well-educated to serve on any layer of the American government, the last words always belong to someone of the opposite race. And the law had made it so through Plessey claiming equal opportunity to the Black race where later in their interactions on the job, both races would show separate social behaviors deriving from two different educations, Plessey of which, the poorly financed Black schools had herein clearly shown through the holding positions of those minorities. Evidently, looking at the judiciary, most of the judges are whites and thus have no intention of favoring those minorities in any way because the surviving prevalence of their position does not depend on those minorities' ballots.

Then through the decision of the lower courts, those minorities, although already facing impoverishment due to the established slavery (which has plagued them for so long), are either constantly imprisoned or have to make some sort of payment to those white leaders' administrations, whether on a local, state, or federal level. Obviously, such actions have decimated every possibility for the descendants of those minorities to properly excel while facing the children of the opposite race. Indeed, the hiring of Black Judge Thurgood Marshall, for example, might be an exception; their separate education from that of the Whites, such as Plessey, had set it would not normally allow those minorities to such position and that the full segregation of the United States Supreme Court until Thurgood Marshall had evidenced it. Then those Blacks used to have a slave master on the plantation fields behind them with a cowhide, so they would not leave. In New York, for example, the city had set such victimization of minorities through the action of preventing them from leaving their poorly financed school system to go to a better one as they had applied Plessey through some school districting rule system. Obviously, those leaders, mostly Whites of European descendants, might have acted this way up to now so they could continue to reign over their former slaves. Then through the application of such behavior that they would have always all claimed was the work of the city council, even with a few members of the minority community in that council, those leaders will force minorities to continue poking at them with the epithet of neo-slave drivers of the American republic, for none had done something to end that culture. Then they faced "Occupy Wall Street" that failed. They will continue to witness more protests around the courthouses as in Oregon. Then more of George Floyd's "I Can't Breathe" right across those mayors' offices such as in the city wall park of New York when equalizer corona had temporarily stopped those leader's exploitation and abuse of those drivers on the street of Manhattan, the daily drivers' farming fields till the reshaping of the courts for the establishment of laws favoring them.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Page Publishing, Inc.
• Release date: Feb 17, 2022
• ISBN: 9781662417849

Book preview

cover.jpg

American Republican Drivers

A New York City Yellow Taxi Driver's Analysis through an Overview of American Political Socioeconomic Practices

Francois Jean-Paul

Copyright © 2022 Francois Jean-Paul

All rights reserved

First Edition

PAGE PUBLISHING

Conneaut Lake, PA

First originally published by Page Publishing 2022

ISBN 978-1-6624-1783-2 (pbk)

ISBN 978-1-6624-4774-7 (hc)

ISBN 978-1-6624-1784-9 (digital)

Printed in the United States of America

Table of Contents

Speeding Hybrid

Mr. Morris Markin and the Checker Taxi Company

The power of Tammany Hall and Mayor Fiorello Enrico Laguardia

Governor Eliot Spitzer and Maurice Greenberg, John C. Whitehead, Roger J. Stone

The Communist Plot Against the United States

The Political Negligence of the Democratic Party

The power of the National Rifle Association (NRA)

Oppositions within the Party: The Second Victory of Mr. Barack Obama

Chapter 1

Speeding Hybrid

After twelve years of primary education through high school, four years of college, three years of law school, and many years of legal practices before a judgeship nomination, city justices should not accept orders from others to the end of feeding their families. Unfortunately, most of them still could not use their own criteria to make judicious decisions when came the time for them to do their job because of special orders from their employer, whom they had to obey blindly to protect their nomination. In addition, one could not condone the hiring system of many city agencies in New York, for example, where the majority of the people at citywide administrative services first allowed to pass those exams until the twenty-first century were whites and that most of the judges of the city courthouses were whites.

Evidently, because of different lawsuits against the City of New York due to the manipulation of those exams, no one could deny that those in charge of administering the results of those exams were practical profilers of the community of minorities and an obstacle to those poor people’s financial betterment. However, when those powerful American leaders had to make decisions that would help protect their physical and financial securities, they would neither care about race or political party differences in their critical choice of leaders as long as they found the right contestant, which could not be, in most cases, an easy achievement.

Indeed, they had carried such behavior to as far as their choice of federal government leaders, and then their refusal to allow their president, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, for example, the advantage of replacing Judge Antonin Scalia by someone else seemed to have approved it. Hereby, they had chosen Mr. Barack Obama as their democrat presidential nominee instead of Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton in the 2008 presidential elections; and later in that same year’s presidential elections, chose Black American senator Obama as their president over White American senator John McCain. Then during the 2015 presidential campaign, the White American barons and cronies of the Old Guard, not to confuse with military’s third Infantry Regiment also known as the old guard, had vehemently opposed the election of Mr. Donald J. Trump. Hereby, they so behaved in fear that Mr. Trump would not continue to support the noble legacy they had acquired through decades of erroneous corporate leadership mostly in the Arabs’ oil fields, wrongful wars, and financial deceptions by taking orders from them.

Obviously, such legacy contributed to the gradual American impoverishment to the point where some people were looking for food in the garbage cans, picking up others’ cigarette butts and smoking them on the main streets of most of the American cosmopolitan metropolitan cities, a behavior to which Mr. Trump and mostly people from the American suburbs who elected him had opposed. Therefore, their opposition to Mr. Trump and his supporters had followed the same track through which they had always rigged every way they had set to hire people, either by personal orders to their subordinates, the practice of wrongful exams results, or the use of political power where they would misuse the American justice system to that same achievement. Eventually, in New York, defunct Mayor Edward I. Koch, for example, had always said that the buck stopped with the mayor’s office and thus scrutinized everything his own personal way with the intent of reviving the city’s finance.

However, by acting that way, Mayor Koch had interfered with the New York provision of public service in a way that had installed the supremacy of whites over those minorities and thus had somehow used those minorities to pave the way for those whites, and forced his courts to enforce his behavior. Therefore, later, having realized their gross abuse to minorities in the application of those city exams and their wrongful hiring practice, when the court could no longer ignore it after Mr. Koch was long gone, that court had forced the city to make a ninety-eight-million-dollar settlement in a firefighters’ exams discrimination case on March 18, 2014. However, besides the firefighters, the majority of city law enforcement personnel were manipulatively Whites who continued the evident practice of undue harassment against other groups of city workers and residents, leaving the less powerful, mostly people like the NYC taxi drivers on the most vulnerable side. Hereby, such practice of racism became endemic and inevitably systemic, those who suffered through doing the taxi driving work for some time and their supporters who also noticed it would not fail signaling out through instances of overwhelming thinking that the third branch of the American government was essentially at the core of the everlasting suffering of minorities. Indeed, city court judges would await those minorities, most specially those New York City yellow taxi drivers, to whip them with fines, big or small, as a way to perpetuate their impoverishment and make them live a quality of life less than that of a normal human being. Therefore, most New York City mayors behaved like the followers of Mr. Koch their own personal way. Then Mr. Rudolph L. Giuliani, Mr. Michael Bloomberg, and Mr. Bill de Blasio, for example, had always described such taxi business as a benefit to the city. Evidently, they all looked at increasing the number of New York Taxies in continuation of the abuse, as it was a requirement to the city’s financial goal, a goal, as Mr. Bloomberg had openly called it during his municipal administration. Thus, knowing that everyone will allow them regardless of the level of falsification in their charges against city yellow cabbies, those mayors’ city cops had pursued their ticketing quota most extensively against poor cabbies while those city judges felt exonerated for their judicial malpractice and abuse as they noticeably trashed the American legal system beyond repair.

Openly, they applied that goal through a one-sided justification of evidence even when the officer’s testimony was nor sustainable or convincing, by deciding to take a prey from drivers. In fact, some of those Caucasian American civil and criminal court judges would even ironically make believe that by not applying harsher means of punishment such as felonies, for example, other than taking those drivers’ money, they were being merciful to them. Then the way those city judges had treated those drivers seemed to indicate that New York City cabbies were uneducated single-minded individuals who deserved nothing, other than punishing treatment. Thus, in turns, experience had taught those Taxi cab drivers that those people were the most abusive to them, because they had always manifested more disrespect and less sympathy toward minority drivers than did everybody else of the city, through the restraint of those drivers’ civil rights in their Courtrooms. Evidently, in any New York City’s courtroom where a driver would represent himself at a hearing, regardless of the color of the judge or the prosecutor, as soon the driver had identified himself as a respondent taxi cab driver, they would end all sympathy to him. Eventually, in situations where the cabbie would take the stand for a testimony, which would be the only time of the hearing where any defendant would exercise his right of speech and prove his defense through several statements, the prosecution would cause some problem. Usually, every time the driver would have attempted to hit a point that could bring out the truth about his case to clear himself, the prosecuting judge would play deaf-ears and look at siding up the police through some confusing questionings. In addition, in cases where the citation would require a prosecutor, the judge would also support that prosecutor and prevent the poor cabbie from bringing out the truth-breaking point he would want to make, through threats of holding that cabbie in contempt and imposing heavier fines on him. Usually, the prosecution would behave that way through that same biased thinking that they should have not allowed uneducated people, mostly taxi drivers, to prevail in their city’s courtrooms. However, some of those city cabbies could be well educated, but the fact that some bad financial circumstances had thrown them under the control of the taxi industry, people seemed to classify them under one ethic through which no one from the court would show respect. Therefore, in connection to that judicial attitude that taxi drivers were stupid, other government officials, through that same prejudice and wrongful thinking were continuously denying cabbies the benefit of justifying opportunities by refusing to apply kindness and fairness in their treatment to that class of minorities, to the profit of their own promotion or personal financial interests. Then most of those higher government officials continued to fail in their response to complaints from those drivers that the system was not right. Those officials refused to honor constant attempts by those minority drivers to have it fixed. In addition, even in the event where someone would have to the contrary attempted to help those drivers, they would consider such behavior as abnormal and unethical as it would send a message to those judges that they should apply justifiable legal rulings in their courts, which they would usually not accept even through the Appellate Court. Therefore, under normal circumstances, when they would instead be dealing directly with a complaining cabbie, once they had identified him, they would smile for they saw someone they would have never left off the hook. Then even after some of those drivers could have sometimes disposed of the right human or financial resources to defend themselves, having evaluated that willful and premeditated malfeasance against them, most of those drivers would refuse to hire a lawyer. Indeed, they would accept to be automatic financial victims of that legal epidemic, knowing that those judges will always protect the well-established fallacy those city leaders had established through their city police who then would use them in their allegations against drivers and other city minorities, so they could retain their jobs. Meanwhile, those judges would have not only followed to retain their jobs, but some would have also enriched themselves. Unfortunately, this had further evidenced an issue where prosecutors and judges could have used accident police reports and the police wrongful issuance of traffic-controlling device municipal summonses either to get rich or to enrich their friends over the insurance companies, something that the country of the United States needed to correct. Otherwise, such behavior will continue to affect the records of drivers in a negative way whereas higher insurance premium due to accumulative points on their licenses usually caused those drivers to lose their driving privileges, sometimes to no appeal. Indeed, a New York driver had had the Travelers Insurance Company denying him a policy, not just on accidents alone, but also on different other moving violations of which the New York Court had also wrongfully found him guilty. Therefore, besides of failing to protect drivers from wrongful incrimination, government authorities would help the insurance companies slaughter those drivers by permitting those insurance companies to mix and consider both the credit rating and the driving records of drivers in the application of their policy premium charges to them. Hence, being on the streets all the time behind the wheels of a taxi and thus more prone to the ticketing quota and accidents, those drivers became victims of such policies. Thus, most of them would pay close to four thousand dollars every six months on basic liability coverage that would otherwise cost them five hundred dollars, to insure their private cars to take their families around when they were occasionally home. However, from city mayors and state governors to those court presidents and their state attorney generals, they had ironically all favored the creation of rules and initiated situations that had always led to the felonious indictment of other people who would not support their behaviors, making it impossible for anyone to win even an appeal. In addition, it resulted from the fact that some of those most powerful people usually developed long-term relationships with each other through their constant presence in each other’s daily work life, something that had also forced them to support one another instinctively. In some cases, some of them had the same ancestral roots, graduated from the same colleges or universities, lived next to one another and scratched the back of each other’s dog before they would later meet in the office. Obviously, they would be the same to occupy the best public offices within the American government, whether municipal, federal or state, since they seem to have justified the American hiring system through racial partisans and friendly commonalities.

Therefore, those judges and government officials would dupe others, especially intelligent minorities and powerful Blacks, whom they could not subdue otherwise, and obstruct their social and financial advancement by taking money from their pockets. However, when came the time for them to boost their personal fame to the conquest of financial or political power, in their political supports to those same minorities, and in some cases to gain those minorities supports, they could use different mentalities. Hereby, through little generosities, and courtesy to some desperate citizens or distressful city minority members when the whole public could notice the occasion, as on the federal level the Republican Old Guards had done to elect Mr. Barack Obama even when they would not allow him perfect performance of his duties, they would behave like the best of everyone’s friends. Accordingly, for example, Mayor John V. Lindsey had done that to New York minorities after the April 4, 1968, assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King in Nashville, Tennessee, just as Mayor Abraham D. Beame had during the era of Blackout 77, to appease the city. Republican mayor Rudolph Giuliani had done it during the Abner Louima police crisis era, and so had, later, Governor Andrew Cuomo, and Mayor Bill de Blasio after opportunistic Republican mayor Michael Bloomberg, who did the same.

Evidently, Mr. Bloomberg had bluffed the people of New York by making believe during his 2001 mayoral campaign that all he ever wanted to profit from the city was a single symbolic payment of a dollar because he so loved the people of New York and thus would like to help them. Then later unsuccessfully he wanted to make city drivers pay tolls on that Queens Borough Bridge (Edward Koch Bridge). In addition, he had promoted the downfall of the yellow taxi business through Governor Andrew Cuomo in his effort of devaluating the city taxi medallion even after selling out an extra 2,000 of those medallions at the price of about a million dollar each, and allowing 18,000 green cars to pollute the area. Then to the continuation of Mayor Bloomberg’s destructive promotion of the city yellow taxi business, Mayor Bill de Blasio had later allowed the introduction of Uber with an unlimited amount of Gypsy taxies throughout the city. Moreover, prior to that, former mayor Bloomberg had helped Governor Andrew Cuomo to become the worst disruption to the city’s yellow taxi business. Indeed, he had encouraged the city council members to forward their signature to that state governor for the approval of the taxi bill of 18,000 green-colored taxies and those extra 2,000 yellow medallion permits; such historic act was the contrary of the reason Mayor LaGuardia had created the taxi business, to help cabbies get out of financial trouble.

Obviously, from 1937 when Mayor LaGuardia had first started the yellow medallion business at $10 apiece with about 16,000 permits, which he had later reduced to 11787, no New York leader had ever taken the risk of interfering so deeply with that business as Mr. Cuomo and Mr. Bloomberg. Throughout almost eighty years of existence, in prevention of city pollution and the impoverishment of city yellow medallion taxi drivers, the medallion industry had only endured the experience of less than 2,000 permits increase in its business. In fact, prior to the auction of the 2,000 yellow medallion of Governor Cuomo, the city only had 13,605 taxi medallions, an increase of just about 1,818 from the reduced starting number. However, that amount of taxi permits it took the city almost 80 years to use as an increase to the original amount, Governor Cuomo came to the office with the intent of increasing it by over 100 percent just in a day, which he did. Therefore, for him to have committed such an abuse to a business, Governor Andrew Cuomo’s deed was incredible to almost everyone and had thus put him under the scope of most influential people within the yellow medallion taxi industry of New York. Pretentiously, Mr. Cuomo had done that so he could help minorities of the outer boroughs of the city of New York. Obviously, that would really be a good thing, but only to the practical application of more local judicial malfeasance to drivers. However, those city cabbies had already noticed that those higher government authorities were condoning such behavior of the city of New York because those authorities had also looked at the taxi business as a financial nest. Therefore, they might have acted as though they were doing things to the benefit of the city cabbies, their practical financial behavior had indicated otherwise through the same disrespectful ongoing abuses to those cabbies.

Eventually, on one hand, Mayor Bloomberg had foreseen constant equity for his financial electronic transfer company Bloomberg L.P., whereas on the other hand the governor had already foreseen a profit for his father’s medallion financing company. Then besides the secured profits from the financial transactions on the 2,000 new yellow medallion taxi permits the city would get, the New York governor knew the new owners of those green taxies would later expect to transact, and transfer their permits for greater financial profits. Hereby, Mr. Andrew Cuomo also knew that the few taxi medallion mortgaging and New York’s taxi financing companies of which his father was sitting on the board of one at the time of the passing of his taxi bill would profit from those transactions. In addition to that, the governor had hoped to consolidate reelection support from those minorities, as had always done most New York leaders in position of power, using the taxi industry in ways favorable to their personal promotion even in accidental cases through their lowering of the cabbies character as though those, too, had no dignity.

In fact, anybody driving a vehicle in Manhattan could have an accident, and those accidents did happen every day in the city without anyone overlooking them because, most of the time, those drivers were private vehicle owners whom people like the then TLC commissioner Mr. David Yassky, for example, could not drive the same way he had driven the yellow cabbies. However, when the case was involved a New York cabbie, the news would go overboard and the city would suddenly want to promote laws to imprison the involved driver, having on mind that the most vulnerable will be those poor cabbies who engaged the city driving twenty-four hours a day, while most other drivers would only be passing through. Coincidently, on December 13, 1931, a passing New York driver from Yonkers had hit a visiting foreigner that happened to be Mr. Winston Churchill before he became a well-known British politician. Eventually, that last was hit crossing Fifth Avenue near Seventy-Sixth Street on a visit to a friend and became the victim of that accident while the cabbie was still waiting for him on the other side of the avenue for the confirmation of the validity of the address before leaving. However, because the hit was not by a city cabbie, not too many people knew about that accident, but the car had hit the future prime minister of England while Mr. Winston Churchill was looking the way opposite to the oncoming traffic, as he usually would do in England according to the traffic patterns there. Immediately following his hospitalization that had lasted over a week at Lenox Hill Hospital in Manhattan, Mr. Churchill, through the conscious acknowledgment of his personal mistake, wanted to forgive that driver right away which he did by meeting with his aggressor. Then he personally exonerated that driver who hit him in that accident, so fanatics of the law would not wrong him in his daily American life. Although it took the city over thirty years to compensate the victim, Mayor John V. Lindsey had later ordered the revision of the New York City traffic.

Sometime in the mid-1960s, in prevention of similar accidents, that mayor had then ordered the restructuring of some of those city streets, assuring himself that Fifth Avenue ran on a single way, making it safer and easier for foreigners like Mr. Churchill from countries of different traffic patterns to cross from the park side. Contrarily, the behavior of those today’s New York City leaders has not only indicated that they would harshly penalize and automatically imprison Mr. Edward F. Cantasano of Yonkers New York who had hit the British politician, but that they would crucify him if he happened to be the taxi driver.

Evidently, after a 2013 Taxi accident where a Bicycle had forced a cabbie off the road and that the car had gravely stroke a European tourist, city officials all ran to the bed side of the victim and made all sorts of offer to her family, which was a good deed. However, at the same time, they tried to demonize the yellow cab driver as though someone who made a living driving a taxi every day would willfully force his vehicle to the sidewalk in an attempt to hit an innocent pedestrian.

Thereby, for a very long time, the NYCTLC commissioner’s office had already been batching out information from the New York State motor vehicle’s records of city yellow cabbies to force them out of work on the ground of the application of TLC rules. Notwithstanding some complicity from the state motor vehicle that would indicate abuse of drivers rights to privacy, that office of the NYCTLC would suspend or revoke those drivers hack licenses. However, following that bicycle accident, on September 25, 2013, Mr. David Yassky, the then New York City taxi and limousine commissioner, took advantage of that accident and ran an editorial on 1010 WINS Radio against drivers. Throughout the whole day, on that date, that radio station had run a tape through which, Mr. Yassky had attempted to get the sympathy of its city listeners through some recording promise that he was ready to continue doing something, which he claimed his city agency of the NYCTLC had temporarily stopped. Indeed, Mr. David Yassky might have been thinking that people would feel proud of him when he had told them that he would continue the batching of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicle driving information of those drivers who had also held a New York City yellow taxi hack permit.

Obviously, this abuse, which good city leaders should end or at least fix, went on for too long. Unfortunately, even when those drivers had not reached the New York State motor vehicle set points for a driving suspension and that the state had still authorized and permitted them to drive a motor vehicle everywhere, including in the state of New York, the TLC had cruelly ended those drivers livelihood. Unjustly, that agency of the NYCTLC had attained that power carelessly to strip drivers of their rights to operate the vehicle of their choice, which could also be a taxi vehicle, through the manipulation of their own laws and the creation of their own points system the city council had allowed them. Hereby, a city agency could access the records of drivers from a state agency at its will without the authorization of those drivers; there could not be any clearer violation of the Constitution Privacy Act laws. Thus, yellow cabbies had always interpreted this attitude of the City of New York and the NYCTLC commissioners as the commitment of a crime against them because of the legal breaching of those drivers’ rights to privacy that had occasioned greater problems to their financial survival. In fact, Mr. David Yassky, that legal predator and predecessor of first female taxi commissioner Joshi should have understood that his convincing speech at that radio station was the suggestion of continuing abuses against those drivers through constant violations of the established American Constitution rights to privacy. However, he would nonetheless care because he sat in his highly conditioned office where he could not experience the financial and social pain a wrongful hack license suspension would cause his city yellow cab victims to suffer. Indeed, not only in New York alone had they used such legal technicalities to violate drivers’ rights and profit from such violation, but also most American states had practiced other conspiring techniques besides that game of deaf-ears and radio publications not to allow private minority citizens to prevail in the courtroom against the arguments of their county or city police. Then the horrendous prosecution of those minorities continued at its best.

Evidently, in an accident that had occurred on December 18, 2014, between a veteran New York City yellow cab driver driving his private vehicle and a young New Jersey driver with less than a year of driving experience, the New Jersey law enforcement authorities from the police to the judge had ridiculed the New York driver. Indeed, to the abuse of the New York driver’s insurance company, those authorities had formatted a civil case to the favor of their New Jersey driver who should have been in fact at fault in that accident. Eventually, the Jersey driver had hit that New York driver’s black Mercedes in the middle of an intersection. Racing his Nissan Altima at a speed well over fifty miles per hour, he was driving without lights at about 10:50 p.m. after the New York driver had just left behind a stop sign, which he had carefully observed. Hereby, the high-speed Jersey vehicle had disabled the Mercedes by causing cracks in two different parts of the chassis and in other body suspension area of the Benz that required thousands of dollars of repairs without the consideration of mechanical troubles caused to another cracked engine part. Obviously, any smart police officer at such accident scene should have first questioned the speed of the Jersey driver’s car and issued a speeding summons to that driver, regardless of the circumstance that he thought had contributed to that accident. Indeed, the police officer had enough proof of the speed with which the Jersey driver had hit the Mercedes Benz of the New York driver in that residential area of twenty-five miles an hour legal speed limit. Then even without searching for cracked parts under that Benz, that officer could have noticed a front tire of that Benz bent and tilted under the smashed fender of the driver’s side of that Mercedes-Benz; something that could have not happened at thirty miles per hour as they had used in the cover-up to betray the New York driver. However, instead of slapping that Jersey driver with a summons for such a higher speed, police officer Alex Haley had sided up with the parents of that Jersey driver to whom he might have been friend for a long time through his poor judgment that the New York driver had jumped the stop sign. Then once at the scene, for the benefit of a doubt, if Officer Haley had issued a summons even to both drivers, one to the other driver for speeding and another to the New York driver assuming that that last had jumped a traffic-controlling device, the police would do a better job. Unfortunately, Officer Haley had spent his whole time on the accident scene talking only to the male companion of the Jersey driver’s mom and who at the end had handed something to him, probably the papers for the car that the Jersey boy was driving, which the officer had vehemently and viciously denied in the court of the law. Eventually, having concluded his communication with the Jersey driver mom’s companion, without allowing the New York driver a chance to present a clear statement, and by refusing that driver’s request even to take a physical look at the fender damages of the Benz, the officer told that driver that there was no time for BS. Then he went straight into writing a summons to that New York driver, assuming his experience had thought him that for that accident to happen, the New York driver had to cross that traffic-controlling device, the stop sign, without stopping. Then through such behavior, a total lie that the officer made it look like he never neither received nor executed any order from that man that had accompanied the mother of the boy at the scene of the accident. Audaciously, Mr. Haley had argued that, by his few years of experience doing the police work, he always knew the person at fault and that in that case it was the driver on the side of that stop sign, the New York driver. Therefore, having failed to investigate that accident properly after the parents of that Jersey driver who could have recourse to him and might have asked him to meet with them quickly on the scene of that accident, Officer Haley had willfully screwed that New York driver and the law. In fact, that particular officer could not reveal to the court how he had arrived at the accident scene, the probability was that he came just on a special call to perform a mission for his friends since neither the Jersey nor that New York driver had called the police. Evidently, pages 28 and 48 of the court transcript indicated that while the secrecy of that call had forced Officer Alex Haley to uphold the same position of that Jersey driver through the false contribution of that driver’s parents who had not even been at the scene upon that accident but had only received a call from their son. Therefore, on February 4, 2015, under the calling Docket of E14-034344, the driver of that Black Benz, who also identified himself as a professional New York City yellow cab driver to the Irvington Municipal Court in Irvington, New Jersey, found himself humiliated by Judge Anthony R. Atwell. On that date, Prosecutor Cherelle Toller had changed her position on what she thought had happened in several occasions because she took a case against the New York driver without briefing the Jersey driver and his family, and the judge had realized that there was a possibility to use that New York driver as a scapegoat.

Eventually, to the prosecutor’s suggestion that the Jersey party wanted to bring a lawsuit, the judge responded, Well! If I ‘am being told’ I am getting counsel, do you know if they will collaborate? You know! The judge had said that through the display of a finger-swiping gesture to Prosecutor Toller that would indicate a financial plot. Notwithstanding the behavior of Judge Anthony R. Atwell, another implication was that two blocks away from the court, that Judge had owned a private law practice office in that same Irvington Township he presided his judgeship and that he had allowed the transcripts. However, the transcript provider had to protect such statement from Honorable Atwell as they all worked with each other and that the transcript would always be supportive of that Judge for that judge’s court to continue using that tape-reporting firm. The transcript reporter to whom the court had forced the New York driver to pay $5.29 per half page that the reporting firm had counted as a whole page had misinterpreted most of that cabbie’s defense.

Evidently, through a written assuming note on the top of the second page of that transcript to the favor of that Irvington Municipal Court judge, they had stated that the defendant had a heavy accent that made it difficult to understand him, which was true. However, the reporter also protected their failure of accuracy in what Judge Atwell had stated in paragraph 4 of page 6 and in the second part of sentence 6 of page 7 that ended on the first part of line 7 of that same page. Obviously, such two parts of Judge Atwell statement had fallen under a statement of Prosecutor Toller as that reporter had put it under one of the prosecutor’s statements. Perhaps the prosecutor could have also made that same statement, but if she did, the reporter should have not shown it in only one spot. Hereby, in their effort to clear the judge of his bad ethical behavior through his personal statement, the Reporter had said on the top of the second page that the participants frequently talked over each other. Indeed, they had eliminated any questionable doubt of qualification for that bad translating service and raised the possibility for even them not to properly being able to hear fully and properly the judge’s statement because of the speakers’ voices overlapping. Since all American judges were apparently to be better-educated people with clear American English accent, the reporter should have thus discerned the Judge’s voice but failed to report incriminating judicial statements by Mr. Atwell of that particular Irvington court, because of professional protectionism. Through such behavior, one could see the vicious and strategic legal arrangement between judges, prosecutors, and even court tape reporters to uphold each other’s position.

Evidently, they had promoted the creation of that civil litigation lawsuit as formatted by page 6, paragraphs 2 and 3; page 7, paragraphs 1 and 2; pages 12 and 13; the last paragraph of page 14; and paragraph 2 of page 16. Indeed, the transcript translator had therefore protected Mr. Atwell from the vicious statement he made in response to the prosecutor’s suggestion by acting as if many stating expressions were unclear. Eventually, Mr. Anthony R. Atwell was an arrogant Black Judge who would threaten to have the police arrest anyone who tried to talk in his Courtroom so there would be no voice overlapping. Obviously, by not rewriting and reporting those statements as they were, those reporters lived with some felonious attitude that the court that had hired them had clearly encouraged.

Hereby, immediately after the suggestion of that female prosecutor, Judge Atwell started to make inquiries as to whether the attorneys from that suit would collaborate with them; and Mr. Anthony R. Atwell had asked that without any fear or elaboration whatsoever. Automatically, to that New York driver, that Judge was someone who willfully participated in the formation of usual lawsuits through upholding a wrongful position against others and, in that case, against that New York cabbie. Hereby, suppressing the proper defense of that New York Taxi driver, with the probability that they knew such case could go to his Attorney-friends, if not his private law firm, who would later get a third of all the proceedings, Mr. Atwell and Prosecutor Toller had rigged the law and screwed that driver. Wherefore, the insult had manifested, and the Irvington Municipal Court Video for that date would reveal it, when that Judge had pointed his ass toward the face of the New York driver as though he was adjusting his clothes. Then rapidly speaking, Mr. Atwell had told that New York driver that he did not believe anything he said and that he had long made up his mind that that driver was guilty. Therefore, the behavior of Mr. Atwell in his Judgment to that driver and the behavior of Mr. Yassky in response to that accident involving a bicycle cab and a tourist seemed to relate to prompt decisions newly elected New York mayor Bill de Blasio had made to start a traffic zero tolerance project right from the start of his mayoral term: humiliating and punishing the driver.

Eventually, throughout his many years as a poor New York City public advocate, it was surprising that Mayor Bill de Blasio had never been aware of how repressive those people at the NYCTLC, more respectively under Commissioner Yassky already were against the city taxi cab driver they were supposed to serve. Hereby, quickly under the advice of that commissioner, the mayor had acted out by signing the approval of seventeen new rules of which some had enabled more power to that city agency of the NYCTLC. Moreover, after they had signed on the mayor’s Machiavellian New Vision Zero Rules, the city council seemed to be very satisfied in their effort of cracking down mostly on yellow taxi cab drivers. Eventually, with Mrs. Melissa King Veverito in charge as its speaker, that New York City Council had immediately passed another taxi bill, allowing Gypsy car service Uber to compete against the city’s yellow taxi business just in compliance to some promising threat former mayor Michael Bloomberg had made to Taxi Icon Manager Gene Friedman.

Eventually, in a loudly open conversation between those two, while watching a game at Madison Square Garden, Mr. Bloomberg had told Mr. Friedman that the day following his mayoral term he was going to concentrate on the destruction of the Icon’s taxi business. Therefore, with all the money Mr. Bloomberg had acquired throughout his mayoral career and with all the people he had rallied behind him through friendly commonalities, it was not difficult for him to plot the financial destruction of Mr. Gene Friedman and have him put to jail for many days. Through the support of Mr. Bloomberg’s promise, even the Press had demonized Mr. Freidman while the American Court had antagonized him, until his death on October 24, 2021. However, it was through that Taxi Icon that the rest of the New York City Yellow Taxi industry had been represented most of the time, in prevention of excessive government fraud and abuse, which Mayor Bloomberg had supported. Therefore, the former mayor succeeded in his threat against Mr. Friedman by getting the new Mayor and the governor on the same side pushing Uber’s boat out of the river into the city streets of New York with all its pollution.

Obviously, Mayor Bill de Blasio was already aware of the new increase in the city traffic pollution through the recent change in the taxi business that Governor Cuomo had just made in favor of those green cabs, and another 2000 yellow taxi medallions. However, somewhat promoted by former mayor Bloomberg, that corrupt decision Mrs. Melissa King Veverito had forced upon that poor city council through which Mayor Bill de Blasio had accepted the introduction of Uber became a traffic disaster. Evidently, every other Gypsy cab service base had