Modeling of Mass Transport Processes in Biological Media
By Dan Zhao
()
About this ebook
Modeling of Mass Transport Processes in Biological Media focuses on applications of mass transfer relevant to biomedical processes and technology—fields that require quantitative mechanistic descriptions of the delivery of molecules and drugs. This book features recent advances and developments in biomedical therapies with a focus on the associated theoretical and mathematical techniques necessary to predict mass transfer in biological systems.
The book is authored by over 50 established researchers who are internationally recognized as leaders in their fields. Each chapter contains a comprehensive introductory section for those new to the field, followed by recent modeling developments motivated by empirical experimental observation. Offering a unique opportunity for the reader to access recent developments from technical, theoretical, and engineering perspectives, this book is ideal for graduate and postdoctoral researchers in academia as well as experienced researchers in biomedical industries.
- Offers updated information related to advanced techniques and fundamental knowledge, particularly advances in computer-based diagnostics and treatment and numerical simulations
- Provides a bridge between well-established theories and the latest developments in the field
- Coverage includes dialysis, inert solute transport (insulin), electrokinetic transport, cellular molecular uptake, transdermal drug delivery and respiratory therapies
Related to Modeling of Mass Transport Processes in Biological Media
Related ebooks
Modeling of Microscale Transport in Biological Processes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHeat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Biological Processes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCognitive Systems and Signal Processing in Image Processing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLife Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Decision-Making: Methodologies and Case Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCardiovascular and Respiratory Bioengineering Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHandbook of HydroInformatics: Volume II: Advanced Machine Learning Techniques Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMachine Learning, Big Data, and IoT for Medical Informatics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings3D Bioprinting and Nanotechnology in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaboratory Methods in Microfluidics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCapillary Electromigration Separation Methods Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsModelling Methodology for Physiology and Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplications of Artificial Intelligence in Process Systems Engineering Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsControl Systems Design of Bio-Robotics and Bio-Mechatronics with Advanced Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHydrogen Economy: Processes, Supply Chain, Life Cycle Analysis and Energy Transition for Sustainability Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCognitive Informatics, Computer Modelling, and Cognitive Science: Volume 1: Theory, Case Studies, and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComputational Modeling in Bioengineering and Bioinformatics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSkeletonization: Theory, Methods and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSmart Metro Station Systems: Data Science and Engineering Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHandbook of Computational Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering and Healthcare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMachine Learning and Medical Imaging Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Transport in Biological Media Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMobility Patterns, Big Data and Transport Analytics: Tools and Applications for Modeling Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Computational Techniques for Biomedical Image Analysis: Methods and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethods in Sustainability Science: Assessment, Prioritization, Improvement, Design and Optimization Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBiomedical Image Synthesis and Simulation: Methods and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTranslational Biotechnology: A Journey from Laboratory to Clinics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComputational Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis: Progress and Challenges Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMultidisciplinary Microfluidic and Nanofluidic Lab-on-a-Chip: Principles and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEdge-of-Things in Personalized Healthcare Support Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Technology & Engineering For You
The Systems Thinker: Essential Thinking Skills For Solving Problems, Managing Chaos, Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Night to Remember: The Sinking of the Titanic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Right Stuff Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 48 Laws of Power in Practice: The 3 Most Powerful Laws & The 4 Indispensable Power Principles Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Book of Hacks: 264 Amazing DIY Tech Projects Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Disappear and Live Off the Grid: A CIA Insider's Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Death in Mud Lick: A Coal Country Fight against the Drug Companies That Delivered the Opioid Epidemic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Book of Maker Skills: Tools & Techniques for Building Great Tech Projects Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/580/20 Principle: The Secret to Working Less and Making More Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Electrical Engineering 101: Everything You Should Have Learned in School...but Probably Didn't Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Fast Track to Your Technician Class Ham Radio License: For Exams July 1, 2022 - June 30, 2026 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary of Nicolas Cole's The Art and Business of Online Writing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Logic Pro X For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSelfie: How We Became So Self-Obsessed and What It's Doing to Us Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The CIA Lockpicking Manual Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Inventions: The Autobiography of Nikola Tesla Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wuhan Cover-Up: And the Terrifying Bioweapons Arms Race Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRust: The Longest War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Modeling of Mass Transport Processes in Biological Media
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Modeling of Mass Transport Processes in Biological Media - Sid M. Becker
Modeling of Mass Transport Processes in Biological Media
First Edition
Sid Becker
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Andrey V. Kuznetsov
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
Filippo de Monte
Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
Giuseppe Pontrelli
Institute of Applied Mathematics - CNR, Rome, Italy
Dan Zhao
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Table of Contents
Cover image
Title page
Copyright
Contributors
Preface
Chapter 1: Applications of porous media in biological transport modeling
Abstract
1.1: Introduction
1.2: Applications of porous media in modeling in modeling transport phenomena in arteries
1.3: Fluid–structure interaction in biomedical applications
1.4: Brain aneurysms
1.5: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
1.6: Concluding remarks
References
Chapter 2: Metabolic consumption of microorganisms
Abstract
2.1: Introduction
2.2: Model formulation and metabolic mass transfer
2.3: Analysis of the equation governing monotonic growth
2.4: Closed form analytical solution of the monotonic growth
2.5: Results and discussion
2.6: Conclusions
References
Further reading
Chapter 3: Numerical simulation of deformability cytometry: Transport of a biological cell through a microfluidic channel
Abstract
Acknowledgments
3.1: Introduction
3.2: Modeling biological cells in an RT-DC channel
3.3: Hydrodynamic stresses on the cell surface
3.4: Cell shapes and cell deformation
3.5: Extraction of the cell viscosity
3.6: Approximation error of the cell volume over the channel
3.7: Conclusions
Appendix: Derivation of the deformation measure from cell contours
References
Chapter 4: Computation of organelle age during axonal transport
Abstract
Acknowledgments
4.1: Introduction
4.2: Governing equations
4.3: Simulation of the DCV concentration in the axon
4.4: Age distribution model of DCVs and mean age of DCVs in boutons
4.5: Parameter value estimation
4.6: Numerical approach
4.7: Results
4.8: Discussion, model constraints, and future directions
References
Chapter 5: Continuum models of drug transport to multiple cell-type population
Abstract
5.1: Introduction
5.2: Formulation of the problem
5.3: Method of solution
5.4: Case study: A 3D rectangular biological tissue
5.5: Results and discussion
5.6: Conclusions
5.A: Appendix A
5.B: Appendix B
5.C: Appendix C
5.D: Appendix D
5.E: Appendix E
References
Chapter 6: Computational investigation of the role of low-density lipoprotein and oxygen transport in atherosclerotic arteries
Abstract
Acknowledgment
6.1: Introduction: Atherosclerosis and the role of mass transport
6.2: Mass transfer of low-density lipoproteins and oxygen in arteries: Theoretical background
6.3: Mass transfer of low-density lipoproteins in arteries: Computational modeling
6.4: Mass transfer of oxygen in arteries: Computational modeling
6.5: Limitations of the current models and future directions
6.6: Conclusions
References
Chapter 7: Fluid dynamics and mass transport in lower limb vessels: Effects on restenosis
Abstract
Acknowledgment
7.1: Introduction
7.2: Lower limb vessels: Anatomy, physiopathology, treatment options, and their failure
7.3: Modeling the hemodynamics of treated lower limb vessels
7.4: State-of-the-art computational mass transport models of lower limb vessels
7.5: Conclusions and future directions
References
Chapter 8: Numerical modeling in support of locoregional drug delivery during transarterial therapies for liver cancer
Abstract
8.1: Introduction
8.2: State of the art of computational techniques
8.3: Clinical parameters
8.4: State of the art of experimental techniques
8.5: Closing remarks
References
Chapter 9: Active gel: A continuum physics perspective
Abstract
Acknowledgments
9.1: Introduction
9.2: A short insight into active gel physics
9.3: A continuum model of active gels
9.4: Worked examples
9.5: Conclusions and future challenges
Appendix: Cylindrical coordinates
References
Chapter 10: Modeling nasal spray droplet deposition and translocation in nasal airway for olfactory delivery
Abstract
Acknowledgment
10.1: Introduction
10.2: Materials and methods
10.3: Results
10.4: Discussions and conclusion
References
Chapter 11: Drug delivery and in vivo absorption
Abstract
11.1: Drug delivery
11.2: State of the art
11.3: Oral administration
11.4: Conclusions
References
Chapter 12: Modeling the physiological phenomena and the effects of therapy on the dynamics of tumor growth
Abstract
12.1: Introduction
12.2: Formal reaction kinetics
12.3: Creating tumor model with formal reaction kinetics
12.4: Concluding remarks
References
Chapter 13: Mathematical models of water transport across ocular epithelial layers
Abstract
13.1: Introduction to fluid transport in the eye
13.2: Formulation of the problem of water and solute transport
13.3: Mechanisms involved in water transport across cell layers
13.4: Aqueous humor production at the ciliary processes
13.5: Transport across the corneal endothelium
13.6: Transport across the retinal pigment epithelium
13.7: Conclusions
References
Chapter 14: Multidimensional modeling of solid tumor proliferation following drug treatment: Toward computational prognosis as a tool to support oncology
Abstract
14.1: Introduction
14.2: The workflow of the simulation framework
14.3: Mathematical formulation
14.4: Results
14.5: Conclusions
References
Chapter 15: Modeling LDL accumulation within an arterial wall
Abstract
15.1: Introduction
15.2: Wall-free and single-layer models
15.3: Multilayer modeling
15.4: Published results of multilayer models
15.5: Conclusions and future developments
References
Chapter 16: Modeling transport of soluble proteins and metabolites in the brain
Abstract
Acknowledgments
16.1: Introduction
16.2: Blood-brain barrier
16.3: Flow through the parenchyma
16.4: Conclusions
References
Chapter 17: Hybrid-dimensional models for blood flow and mass transport: Sequential and embedded 3D-1D models
Abstract
17.1: Introduction
17.2: 3D-1D geometric sequential multiscale models
17.3: 3D-1D geometric embedded multiscale models
17.4: Conclusions
References
Chapter 18: Chemical thermodynamic principles and computational modeling of NOX2-mediated ROS production on cell membrane
Abstract
Acknowledgment
18.1: Introduction
18.2: Thermodynamic principles for biochemical systems modeling
18.3: Mathematical modeling of NOX2 enzyme function
18.4: Data analysis and estimation of unknown model parameters
18.5: Biological insights into NOX2 enzyme function
18.6: Summary and conclusion
18.7: Model limitations and future directions
References
Index
Copyright
Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier
125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, United Kingdom
525 B Street, Suite 1650, San Diego, CA 92101, United States
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN 978-0-443-15765-3
For information on all Academic Press publications visit our website at https://www.elsevier.com/books-and-journals
Publisher: Mara Conner
Acquisitions Editor: Carrie Bolger
Editorial Project Manager: Emily Thomson
Production Project Manager: Prasanna Kalyanaraman
Cover Designer: Matthew Limbert
Typeset by STRAIVE, India
Image 1Contributors
Michela Abrami Department of Engineering and Architecture, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
Sebastian Aland
HTW Dresden, Dresden
TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany
A. Andreozzi Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Said H. Audi
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States
Sid Becker Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
N. Bianco Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Tim Bomberna
IBiTech—Biommeda (Biofluid, Tissue and Solid Mechanics for Medical Applications)
Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Christina Chan Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
Claudio Chiastra
Laboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics (LaBS), Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering Giulio Natta
, Politecnico di Milano, Milan
PoliToBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Monika Colombo Laboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics (LaBS), Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering Giulio Natta
, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Anna Corti Laboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics (LaBS), Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering Giulio Natta
, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Allen W. Cowley, Jr Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
Michele Curatolo Department of Architecture, University Roma Tre, Rome, Italy
Giampaolo D’Alessandro Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
Barbara Dapas Department of Life Sciences, Trieste University (Cattinara), Trieste, Italy
Ranjan K. Dash
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University
Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
Maria Valeria De Bonis Initiatives for Bio-Materials Behavior Srls c/o University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
Filippo de Monte Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
Giuseppe De Nisco PoliToBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Charlotte Debbaut
IBiTech—Biommeda (Biofluid, Tissue and Solid Mechanics for Medical Applications)
Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Rosario di Vittorio Department of Engineering and Architecture, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
Dániel András Drexler
Physiological Controls Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center
Institute of Biomatics and Applied Artificial Intelligence, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
Mariia Dvoriashyna Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Rossella Farra Department of Medical Sciences, Trieste University (Cattinara), Trieste, Italy
Luca Formaggia Department of Mathematics, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy
Alexander J.E. Foss Department of Ophthalmology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Bingmei M. Fu Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, United States
Eamonn A. Gaffney Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Gabriele Grassi Department of Life Sciences, Trieste University (Cattinara), Trieste, Italy
Lucia Grassi Department of Engineering and Architecture, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
Mario Grassi Department of Engineering and Architecture, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
M. Iasiello Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Khalil Khanafer Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Flint, MI, United States
Levente Kovács
Physiological Controls Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center
Institute of Biomatics and Applied Artificial Intelligence, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
Andrey V. Kuznetsov Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
Ivan A. Kuznetsov
Perelman School of Medicine
Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Shay Ladd Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
Laura Lagonigro Modeling and Prototyping Laboratory, College of Engineering, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
Francesco Marra
Initiatives for Bio-Materials Behavior Srls c/o University of Basilicata, Potenza
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA, Italy
Sean McGinty Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Francesco Migliavacca Laboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics (LaBS), Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering Giulio Natta
, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Gesmi Milcovich School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
Paola Nardinocchi Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
Giuseppe Pontrelli Institute of Applied Mathematics - CNR, Rome, Italy
Felix Reichel MPL & MPZPM Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
Rodolfo Repetto Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
Jose Felix Rodriguez Matas Laboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics (LaBS), Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering Giulio Natta
, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Gianpaolo Ruocco
Initiatives for Bio-Materials Behavior Srls c/o University of Basilicata
Modeling and Prototyping Laboratory, College of Engineering, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
Shima Sadri Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
Xiuhua April Si Department of Aerospace, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering, California Baptist University, Riverside, CA, United States
Luciano Teresi Mathematics and Physics, University Roma Tre, Rome, Italy
Namrata Tomar Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
C. Tucci Department of Medicine and Health Sciences Vincenzo Tiberio
, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
Alisa S. Vadasz College of Engineering, Informatics, and Applied Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
Peter Vadasz College of Engineering, Informatics, and Applied Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
Kambiz Vafai Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, United States
Lucas Daniel Wittwer
HTW Dresden, Dresden
MPL & MPZPM Erlangen, Erlangen
TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany
Neil T. Wright Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
Jinxiang Xi Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, United States
Paolo Zunino Department of Mathematics, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy
Preface
This book presents a collection of 18 chapters, each of which considers the modeling of mass transfer involved in different biological processes. This collection brings together more than 50 internationally recognized researchers who are leading the development of transport models in their respective fields. The chapters provide detailed introductions so that the reader new to the field is not alienated by the technical diction. In fact, it is anticipated that both the advanced academic clinician and the emerging researcher will find the material presented here clear and informative.
Chapter 1 presents a critical review of the porous media representations of transport phenomena in biological systems. The chapter begins with a summary of the literature covering modeling transport phenomena in arteries and continues with porous media in modeling of endovascular coiling in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Finally, the chapter presents a summary of diffusive transport models of brain tissues with a focus on the application of molecular dynamics models in the simulation of transport through biological membranes.
Chapter 2 develops a novel theory of the metabolic consumption by microorganisms that are compared both quantitatively and qualitatively to existing theoretical models and to empirical observations. The chapter provides the reader with a comprehensive historical review of the existing models of predictive population dynamics and critically reviews the current mathematical expressions of this field. Different mathematical approaches are presented that are directly linked to the underlying physical phenomena.
Chapter 3 addresses recent developments and challenges associated with deformability cytometry with special emphasis on the area of real-time deformability cytometry. Theoretical and numerical models of the physical characterization of the mechanical properties of large populations of cells are reviewed and the numerical handling of the fluid-solid interaction observed in microfluidic chip technology are described. A model is presented in this chapter that represents a significant step toward the field’s need to develop a methodology that captures the full viscoelastic characterization of biological cells in high-throughput experiments.
Chapter 4 reviews the modeling of the transport of organelles in the axon. The field’s current theoretical understanding of the prediction of the age of organelles as they are transported along the axon is reviewed. The chapter provides a computational technique to simulate the age of dense core vesicles during their transport to active terminal sites that accumulate and release neurotransmitters.
Chapter 5 presents a model drug of delivery in a tissue composed of a multiple cell type population. A review of the most common components used in the three compartment continuum models of drug delivery to single cell type populations is presented. This is followed by a review of models describing transport in domains composed of multiple cell type populations. The chapter presents an analytical solution to the problem of the conservation of drug mass in a tissue composed of three cell types.
Chapter 6 considers the computational modeling of the cardiovascular transport of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) and oxygen and their influence on atherosclerosis. The chapter presents a very comprehensive review of the theoretical and mathematical understanding of the physiology underlying transport in the vessel wall. The chapter considers existing computational models of mass transport of LDL and oxygen in different vascular segments, including coronary, carotid, femoral arteries, and aortas and special attention is given to their atherogenic role. The potential and challenges posed by the application of existing theoretical models to patient-specific fluid dynamics simulations are presented as well.
Chapter 7 reviews the modeling of transport associated with the cardiovascular system of lower limbs. The chapter presents a thorough description of the field that details the theory underlying computational studies of fluid dynamics and mass transport in lower limb vessels and focuses on the relationship between local hemodynamics and restenosis in both the surgical and endovascular treatment options for peripheral artery disease. A clear link is made between the physiology and physics of these treatments and the theoretical models used to represent them.
Chapter 8 presents a detailed review of the state of the art of in silico modeling of the mass transport phenomena related to drug delivery in the hepatic arterial tree. The important physiological considerations associated with the response of the cardiovascular system to treatments are presented. The chapter discusses the challenges and advantages offered by computational modeling for improving the efficacy of transarterial embolization therapies for unresectable liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma. An informed list of specific recommendations to better predict patient-specific injection parameters for better treatment efficacy is presented.
Chapter 9 discusses a chemomechanical model of active gels within the context of a stress-diffusion theory, augmented with a theory of remodeling. A chemomechanical model of active gels is developed by using the perspective of continuum physics; the activation of the polymer network is viewed within the context of a stress-diffusion theory that is coupled to a model of growth and remodeling. A model is developed and a thorough discussion of the theoretical foundations of the model is presented.
Chapter 10 describes the transport of drugs in the route from the nose to the brain in therapies for olfactory dysfunctions. The chapter also describes the physiology and the physics associated with olfactory drug delivery and presents a study of the feasibility of gravitationally driven droplet translocation in order to enhance the nasal spray dosages in the olfactory region. A computational nasal spray testing platform is developed that includes a nasal spray releasing model, an airflow-droplet transport model, and a Eulerian wall film formation/translocation model.
Chapter 11 presents a very comprehensive review of the general field of drug delivery and of the models of drug absorption. The models presented in the chapter are set in their historical context, and to this end, a very comprehensive description of the evolution of drug delivery and therapies is presented. The chapter explains that the challenges associated with using mathematical modeling to aid researchers in overcoming biological barriers require a vision that must extend beyond drug release kinetics to include processes related to adsorption, distribution, and elimination.
Chapter 12 addresses the mathematical modeling of tumor growth and response to chemotherapeutic therapies. The chapter considers many specific physiological characteristics of the patients that affect the efficacy of the treatment and subsequent tumor evolution. A mathematical model is developed that captures the observed fundamental physiological phenomena: the tumor proliferation and necrosis, the tumor’s response to the drug, tumor cell washout, and the pharmacokinetics of the drug. Parametric fitting from experimental observations is also discussed.
Chapter 13 examines the fluid dynamics and transport associated with physiological processes in the eye. The physics underlying fluid transport across ocular epithelial layers are discussed including osmotic and mechanical pressure differences across the layer, electroosmosis along the clefts separating adjacent cells, and local osmosis. In a detailed review of the mathematical representations of these phenomena, the chapter focuses on models of transport in the ciliary epithelium, the corneal endothelium, and the retinal pigment epithelium.
Chapter 14 provides an engineering perspective on the development of virtualized oncological prognosis, including all the fundamental steps needed to develop an oncological digital support tool. The model is applied to diffuse large B-cell (non-Hodgkin’s) lymphoma proliferation in personalized organ volumes, and its validation and output are discussed with a few clinical examples. The tool uses digital images taken of patients’ tumors to provide data of tumor geometry that can be used in a personalized model to predict the growth of the tumor that is treated and compare this to the predicted growth in the absence of treatment.
Chapter 15 considers the transport of LDLs through the arterial wall and their association with cardiovascular diseases. This chapter reviews existing mathematical models of LDL transport and categorizes these into groups: the wall-free models, the single-layer models, and the multilayer models. Emphasis is given to the mathematical descriptions of the models in the multilayer category. The applications of these models to nonsimplified geometries that are encountered in patient-specific cardiovascular physiology are presented.
Chapter 16 discusses mathematical models of the molecular transport within the brain and across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). A detailed description of the underlying physiology associated with the transport and delivery of molecules to the brain is presented. A review of the field is presented that outlines models of filtration across the BBB and cerebrospinal fluid flow through the parenchyma.
Chapter 17 concerns the coupling of models that capture cardiovascular transport phenomena occurring at the macroscale and at the microscale. The field’s approach to overcoming the challenge associated with the coupling between the three-dimensional and one-dimensional representations of transport is discussed. Sequential and embedded coupling strategies are reviewed and the mathematical expressions of the models are presented both explicitly and in detail.
Chapter 18 provides a comprehensive overview of the thermodynamic principles and relationships for general biochemical reactions and special oxidation-reduction (redox) reactions involving electron transfer. These principles and relationships are linked to the thermodynamically constrained mathematical models of enzymatic and redox reactions associated with reactive oxygen species production and scavenging and other biochemical processes. The chapter provides a detailed review of the mathematical and computational approaches to develop, parameterize, and validate kinetic models describing the different aspects of NOX2 enzymatic function on the cell membrane.
This book presents the physics, physiology, and mathematics involved in the modeling of transport phenomena occurring in biological media. It is anticipated that the reader will find the book very helpful in bridging the gap between transport modeling and biology.
Sid Becker, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Chapter 1: Applications of porous media in biological transport modeling
Khalil Khanafera; Kambiz Vafaib a Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Flint, MI, United States
b Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, United States
Abstract
A critical review of the applications of porous media in a biological system is conducted in this study. Transport phenomena in porous media are receiving a great deal of attention from many investigators due to their importance in many biomedical applications. Such applications include drug delivery, medical imaging, transport in biological tissues, and porous scaffold for tissue engineering. This chapter is structured in three sections: the first part summarizes pertinent studies in modeling transport phenomena in arteries. The second part focuses on the applications of porous media in modeling endovascular coiling in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. The third part summarizes the available diffusion models and effective diffusion coefficients associated with brain tissues. Finally, future studies on the applications of porous media are recommended in this review.
Keywords
Porous media; Biological systems; Critical review; Transport phenomena
1.1: Introduction
Transport phenomena in porous media have received substantial interest by many researchers in the last few decades due to their importance in various engineering and medical fields. Such applications include solar panels, thermal management of electronics, thermal insulation in buildings, oil recovery, drug delivery, tissue engineering, medical imaging, and diffusion process in brain tissues (Vafai, 2000; Vafai, 2005; Vafai and Hadim, 2000; Vafai and Sozen, 1990; Vafai et al., 2006; Vafai and Tien, 1981, 1982; Khanafer and Vafai, 2006; Hadim and Vafai, 2000). Many pertinent parameters associated with transport phenomena in porous media were analyzed by many authors in the literature. Such parameters include investigating the influence of non-Darcy, porosity variation, anisotropic, and local nonequilibrium thermal between fluid and solid phases. For example, Alazmi and Vafai (2000) conducted a comprehensive study to analyze the changes within flow and heat transfer models in porous media. The authors categorized these models using four groups, namely, constant and variable porosity, thermal dispersion, and local thermal nonequilibrium. The same authors investigated the influence of varying several parameters such as Reynolds number, Darcy number, porosity, inertia, and slip coefficients on transport phenomena in porous media through testing different models of interfacial conditions between porous and fluid layers (Alazmi and Vafai, 2001, 2002). Another important topic studied in the literature is turbulent flow in porous media. Vafai et al. (2006) conducted a study on different turbulent models for transport phenomena in porous media. This chapter aims to provide a comprehensive review of porous media interpretations of fluid flow and heat transfer in biological systems.
1.2: Applications of porous media in modeling in modeling transport phenomena in arteries
Computational modeling is considered an important tool in understanding the macromolecular transport process in arteries. Many numerical and mathematical models were developed and utilized by investigators to study the transport of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) through the arterial walls (Ai and Vafai, 2006; Yang and Vafai, 2006; Stangeby and Ethier, 2002a,b; Zunino, 2002; Prosi et al., 2005; Wada and Karino, 2000). Stangeby and Ethier (2002a) studied numerically the transport of macromolecules such as LDL across the artery wall of a stenosed artery. Coupled analysis of lumen blood flow and transmural fluid flow was attained through the solution of Brinkman’s model. Their results indicated that the concentration of LDL increased downstream of the stenosed artery. Prosi et al. (2005) introduced and discussed several models to study the transport of macromolecules in the bloodstream and the arterial walls. The authors showed that the concentration of LDL at the luminal side of a stenotic segment wall was about 10% higher than for the undisturbed segment. These models were applied by Wada and Karino (2000) and Rappitsch and Perktold (1996) for the analysis of the macromolecular transport in the arterial wall, which coupled the transport within the lumen and the wall.
The most realistic models to investigate the transport of LDL in arteries are the multilayer models, which break the arterial wall down into several layers and model the transport within the wall (Prosi et al., 2005; Huang et al., 1994; Huang and Tarbell, 1997; Tada and Tarbell, 2004; Fry, 1985, 1987; Karner et al., 2001). Yang and Vafai (2006) developed a robust four-layer model to investigate the transport of LDL in the arterial wall coupled with the transport of blood flow in the lumen as depicted in Fig. 1.1.
Fig. 1.1Fig. 1.1 Physical description of the model. Reprinted with permission from Yang, N., Vafai, K., 2006. Modeling of low density lipoprotein (LDL) transport in the artery-effects of hypertension, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 850–867, Elsevier.
The endothelium, intima, internal elastic lamina (IEL), and media were all modeled as macroscopically homogeneous porous media and the volume-averaged porous media equations were utilized to model the transport phenomena in various layers. The effect of Staverman filtration and osmotic reflection coefficients were introduced in their study to account for the selective permeability of each porous layer to certain solutes. The effects of hypertension and boundary conditions were analyzed by the authors in detail. It was found that the filtration velocity and the LDL concentration profiles in the arterial wall were substantially dependent on the various types of boundary conditions (Fig. 1.2).
Fig. 1.2Fig. 1.2 Comparison of filtration velocity profiles at the lumen endothelium interface for various boundary conditions. Reprinted with permission from Yang, N., Vafai, K., 2006. Modeling of low density lipoprotein (LDL) transport in the artery-effects of hypertension, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 850–867, Elsevier.
Ai and Vafai (2006) investigated numerically the coupled analysis of the transport of macromolecules such as LDL inside a stenosed artery. Different layers of the arterial wall were modeled as a homogeneous porous medium. The advection–diffusion equations in porous media were used to model the species field in the arterial wall layers. The physical parameters needed are computed based on the available data from in vivo and in vitro measurements. The benefit of the model used in that study was that its setup was based on in vivo/vitro measurements and the computed exact solutions of the concentration field, leading to more reliable results. The effects of hypertension and geometrical variation on the LDL accumulation within the wall were analyzed. Figs. 1.3 and 1.4 illustrated the effect of varying the transmural pressure on the filtration velocity and concentration. It can be seen from these figures that the filtration velocity and concentration increased significantly with hypertension.
Fig. 1.3Fig. 1.3 Effect of varying the transmural pressure on the filtration velocity at different interfaces. Reprinted with permission from Ai, L., Vafai, K., 2006. A coupling model for macromolecule transport in a stenosed arterial wall, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 1568–1591, Elsevier.
Fig. 1.4Fig. 1.4 Effect of varying the transmural pressure on the concentration profile at the lumen/endothelium interface. Reprinted with permission from Ai, L., Vafai, K., 2006. A coupling model for macromolecule transport in a stenosed arterial wall, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 1568–1591, Elsevier.
Yang and Vafai (2008) developed an analytical solution for the transport of LDL in the arterial wall coupled with blood flow inside the lumen. The authors utilized a robust four-layer porous model. The analytical results were found to be in excellent agreement with the numerical data for different physiological conditions (Fig. 1.5). The distribution of LDL concentration in each layer of the curved artery wall was studied analytically by Wang and Vafai (2015). The influence of curvature on the growth of atherosclerosis within the arterial wall was also analyzed in their investigation. Their results showed that the average concentration in the circumferential direction was found to decrease in the axial direction for a curved artery compared with a straight artery. The increase in concentration at the lumen/endothelium interface in the axial direction was found to have an insignificant effect on the concentration profile at the other wall interface layers.
Fig. 1.5Fig. 1.5 Comparison of the species profiles across the intima between the numerical and analytical results. Reprinted with permission from Yang, N., Vafai, K., 2008. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) transport in an artery—a simplified analytical solution, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 51, 497–505, Elsevier.
Iasiello et al. (2018) used COMSOL Multiphysics software to numerically study the boundary layer effects on the concentration of LDL in a multilayer artery model for geometries of both a straight artery and an aortic-iliac bifurcation. Their results illustrated that hypertension increased the concentration of LDL in the proximity of the wall for a straight artery. Moreover, it was found that an increase in the diameter of the lumen caused a slight increase in LDL concentration near the wall, and this was attributed to small velocity gradients near the wall. For the aorta-iliac bifurcation, the concentration boundary layer was found to grow with the Reynolds number, especially when recirculation occurred. The effects of hypo-and hyperthermia, as well as the curvature of the artery on LDL deposition in a multilayer curved artery model, were studied numerically by Iasiello et al. (2019). The heat source/sink was applied from the interior side of the lumen. The heterogeneity of various layers was considered by the authors in the multilayer model. The Darcy-Brinkman equation, the Staverman-Kedem-Katchalsky equation with a reaction term, and the energy equation were utilized by the authors to analyze the wall layers. The results presented by the authors demonstrated that the curvature of the artery had an insignificant effect on LDL deposition. Mahjoob and Vafai (2009) obtained an analytical solution for bioheat transport through tissue/organ by utilizing a local thermal nonequilibrium model in porous media (Fig. 1.6). The biological media was modeled as a blood saturated tissue represented by a porous matrix. The analytical results obtained by the authors were found to be in excellent agreement with the numerical results (Fig. 1.7).
Fig. 1.6Fig. 1.6 Schematic diagram of the tissue-vascular system. Reprinted with permission from Mahjoob, S., Vafai, K., 2009. Analytical characterization of heat transfer through biological media incorporating hyperthermia treatment, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 52, 1608–1618, Elsevier.
Fig. 1.7Fig. 1.7 Comparison of the temperature profile between exact and numerical results assuming blood-tissue local thermal equilibrium. Reprinted with permission from Mahjoob, S., Vafai, K., 2009. Analytical characterization of heat transfer through biological media incorporating hyperthermia treatment, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 52, 1608–1618, Elsevier.
Most of the studies in biomedical applications treated the arterial walls as a solid nonelastic medium, which does not represent the physiological conditions. In the cardiovascular systems, the flow of blood is under continuous interaction with arterial walls and therefore they constitute an intrinsically coupled system. The interactions between blood flow and wall deformation may alter flow patterns in pathological conditions.
1.3: Fluid–structure interaction in biomedical applications
Fluid–structure interaction (FSI) is receiving great interest in the literature due to its significant applications in different fields such as aerospace, biomedical, civil, mechanical, etc. (Alamiri and Khanafer, 2011; Khanafer et al., 2015, 2016; Khanafer, 2013, 2014). Most of the investigations in biomedical applications assumed rigid artery wall which does not mimic the physiological conditions. The interactions between blood flow and wall deformation may change flow patterns in pathological conditions. To the best knowledge of the present authors, one study was found in the literature that dealt with FSI in porous media as related to the biological application. Al-Amiri et al. (2014) analyzed numerically turbulent flow in a flexible wall artery during hyperthermia treatment. The wall of the artery was modeled as an elastic porous medium. Different heating protocols were examined in their study to illustrate its effect on the temperature variations in both the blood vessel and the tumor. The results presented in that investigation demonstrated that the flexible wall model had a significant effect on the heat flux variation along the bottom surface of the tumor tissue at different flow conditions.
1.4: Brain aneurysms
A cerebral or brain aneurysm is an abnormal bulge in the wall of an artery in the brain. The rupture of the brain aneurysm causes bleeding into the brain, which leads to a hemorrhagic stroke, brain damage, and consequently death. The endovascular coiling technique has been widely used to treat intracranial aneurysms. This technique involves blocking blood flow into the sac of the aneurysm through the deployment of tiny coils. Several experimental studies were conducted in the literature to investigate flow characteristics of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular treatment using coils or stents (Lieber et al., 2002; Szikora et al., 1994; Turjman et al., 1994). A better understanding of the blood flow and hemodynamics characteristics inside brain aneurysms is a very challenging topic in clinical research. Consequently, computational fluid dynamics is considered a crucial tool in the assessment and treatment of cerebral aneurysms using stents and coils. The accuracy of CFD models has been significantly enhanced by the introduction of patient-specific geometries and physiological boundary conditions. However, computational modeling of coil embolization in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms has received less attention in the literature due to the high irregularly shaped geometry of the coil. To overcome this problem, the embedded coil was modeled using porous media theory (Khanafer et al., 2009, 2010; Wiśniewski et al., 2021; Cha et al., 2007).
Khanafer et al. (2009) developed a numerical model using porous media theory to determine the reduction in the blood flow velocity and pressure resulting from the deployment of the endovascular coil within the brain aneurysm. Physiological waveform velocity was used as a boundary condition. The results presented by the authors illustrated that the magnitude of the velocity within the sac of the aneurysm was significantly affected by the presence of the coil. By utilizing the definition of porosity, the authors showed that a volume density of 20% was adequate to arrest blood flow in the aneurysm. Further, the authors presented a simple formula to estimate the required length of the coil for arresting the blood flow within the aneurismal sac. Wiśniewski et al. (2021) conducted a numerical study to simulate the hemodynamics within the aneurysmal sac after coiling. The dome of the aneurysm was modeled as a porous medium in which, due to its low Reynolds number, the flow was governed by Darcy’s law. The blood flow was modeled as an incompressible and non-Newtonian. Its shear-thinning was modeled using a modified power law viscosity. To assess hemodynamic variations, CFD was utilized for a case without coiling and another case for a wide range of porosities to resemble 1%–30% volume packing density (VPD) of coiling. Their results illustrated that both pressures at the aneurysm wall and residual flow within the aneurysmal sac decreased when VPD exceeded 10% (Fig. 1.8). Cha et al. (2007) proposed a new approach that allowed a better understanding of the complex interaction between the endovascular coil and the local blood flow. Semiheuristic porous media sets of equations were used in that investigation to describe the intraaneurysmal flow. The results suggested that the lower permeability of the coil mass at a given packing density resulted in a faster thrombosis formation within the aneurysmal sac.
Fig. 1.8Fig. 1.8 Velocity distributions at aneurysm neck for selected VPD cases ( Wiśniewski et al., 2021 ).
Umeda et al. (2017) conducted a numerical study to predict aneurysm recurrence after coil embolization using porous media theory. Different parameters were analyzed in their study including morphological parameters, coil packing density, and hemodynamic variables to assess their relations with aneurysm recurrence. The flow in the coiled regimes was modeled using Darcy’s law. This study illustrated that the aneurysm recurrence was prone to happen in aneurysms with a larger dome or neck size, or in a coil with a lower coil packing density. As such, the coil packing density must be > 25% by residual flow volume (RFV) values in the preoperative modeling to avoid aneurysm recurrence (Fig. 1.9).
Fig. 1.9Fig. 1.9 Preoperative simulation of a right internal carotid artery aneurysm ( Umeda et al., 2017 ).
Beppu et al. (2020) conducted a numerical study to evaluate the occlusion of placing flow-diverter (FD) with CFD using porous media theory for the decision-making in treating wide-neck aneurysms. The flow in the stent region was modeled using Darcy’s law and the pressure was locally balanced with resistance forces. The authors illustrated that the hemodynamic parameters using both control CFD and porous media CFD could predict the angiographic obstruction condition at 6 months after the FD treatment.
1.5: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Magnetic resonance imaging is considered to be an important tool in various applications such as diagnostic medicine, biomedical research, and porous material characterization (Barrie, 1995; Khaled and Vafai, 2003). Most of the studies in the literature were focused on the applications of MRI in the detection of brain strokes and brain diseases such as neurodegenerative and metabolic conditions, infections, and tumors. Further, MRI was also used for the in vivo measurement of the diffusion of water and intracellular metabolites. The diffusion of water within the brain is a vital topic because of its role in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) which illustrated superior capabilities compared with other imaging techniques in ischemic brain tissue diagnosis (Hotter et al., 2019). DW-MRI technique provides important information about the water exchange between brain tissue regions in normal and diseased states (Bose et al., 1988). The diffusion process in the brain tissue is evaluated in terms of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The water ADC represented a crucial variable in the evaluation of stroke patients (Stejskal and Tanner, 1965; Taylor and Bushell, 1985; Gelderen et al., 1994). It was reported by many studies that there was a substantial reduction in the apparent diffusion coefficient several minutes after the onset of the stroke. Therefore, a thorough understanding of all the parameters that influence the ADC of water in tissue is vital. For example, Norris et al. (1993) and Latour et al. (1991) claimed that the drop in the ADC after the onset of the stroke was due to a substantial increase in the tortuosity of the existing pathways for the fast diffusion process within the extracellular space. Other studies (Moseley et al., 1990; Mintorovitch et al., 1991; Benveniste et al., 1992) related reduction in ADC to the swelling of the cells, which caused water molecules to move from extracellular space to the intracellular space consequently slower the diffusion process and overall reduction in ADC. Helpern et al. (1992) concluded that the decrease in the permeability of the cell membrane resulted in a substantial decrease in the ADC after acute injury.
Theoretical models for the diffusion process in brain tissues were received less interest from researchers. The majority of studies in the literature were experimentally based. Khanafer and Vafai (2006) conducted a comprehensive review on the role of porous media in biomedical engineering as related to magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery. The authors summarized most of the available diffusion models and diffusion coefficients in the literature. Tables 1.1 and 1.2 summarized these models. Further, Khanafer and Vafai (2006) proposed new models based on porous media theory for the diffusion process in the brain tissue as well as the effective diffusion coefficient.
Table 1.1
Table 1.2
1.6: Concluding remarks
This chapter provides an overview of the role of porous media in applications related to transport phenomena in arteries, brain aneurysms, and magnetic resonance imaging. This review cited the pertinent studies associated with modeling the wall of the arteries as multilayered model. This model was found to determine correctly the flow velocity and mass transfer within different layers of the artery wall. This review also showed the lack of studies on the application of FSI in porous media as related to the biomedical field. Therefore, more studies should be conducted in biological systems using the combination of FSI and porous medium. The wall of the blood vessel is flexible and the rigid assumption was not correct. Thus, FSI should be employed for precise predictions of flow and hemodynamic stresses. Diffusive transport models were found to play an important role in the transport of drugs and nutrients to brain tissues. Different definitions for the effective diffusivity coefficient as well as diffusion models were summarized in this review for various conditions.
References
Ai and Vafai, 2006 Ai L., Vafai K. A coupling model for macromolecule transport in a stenosed arterial wall. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2006;49:1568–1591.
Alamiri and Khanafer, 2011 Alamiri A., Khanafer K. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of mixed convection heat transfer in a lid-driven cavity with a flexible bottom wall. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54:3826–3836.
Al-Amiri et al., 2014 Al-Amiri A., Khanafer K., Vafai K. Fluid-structure interactions in a tissue during hyperthermia. Numer. Heat Transf. J. 2014;66:1–16.
Alazmi and Vafai, 2000 Alazmi B., Vafai K. Analysis of variants within the porous media transport models. J. Heat Transf. 2000;122:303–326.
Alazmi and Vafai, 2001 Alazmi B., Vafai K. Analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer interfacial conditions between a porous medium and a fluid layer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2001;44:1735–1749.
Alazmi and Vafai, 2002 Alazmi B., Vafai K. Constant wall heat flux boundary conditions in porous media under local thermal non-equilibrium conditions. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2002;45:3071–3087.
Barrie, 1995 Barrie P.J. NMR applications to porous solids. Ann. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 1995;30:37–95.
Benveniste et al., 1992 Benveniste H., Hedlund L.W., Johnson G.A. Mechanism of detection of acute cerebral ischemia in rats by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance microscopy. Stroke. 1992;23:746–754.
Beppu et al., 2020 Beppu M., Tsuji M., Ishida F., Shirakawa M., Suzuki H., Yoshimura S. Computational fluid dynamics using a porous media setting predicts outcome after flow-diverter treatment. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020;41:2107–2113.
Blanch and Clark, 1996 Blanch H.W., Clark D.S. Biochemical Engineering. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996.
Bose et al., 1988 Bose B., Jones S.C., Lorig R., Friel H.T., Weinstein M., Little J.R. Evolving focal cerebral ischemia in cats: Spatial correlation of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, cerebral blood flow, tetrazolium staining, and histopathology. Stroke. 1988;19:28–37.
Breitenbach et al., 2000 Breitenbach A., Pistel K.F., Kissel T. Biodegradable comb polyesters. Part II. Erosion and release properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)-g-poly- (lactic-co-glycolic acid). Polymer. 2000;41:4781–4792.
Cha et al., 2007 Cha K., Balaras E., Lieber B., Sadasivan C., Wakhloo A. Modeling the interaction of coils with the local blood flow after coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007;129:873–879.
El-Kerah et al., 1993 El-Kerah A.W., Braunstein S.L., Secomb T.W. Effect of cell arrangement and interstitial volume fraction on the diffusivity on monoclonal antibodies in tissue. Biophys. J. 1993;64:1638–1646.
Fry, 1985 Fry D.L. Mathematical models of arterial transmural transport. Am. J. Phys. 1985;248:H240–H263.
Fry, 1987 Fry D.L. Mass transport, atherogenesis and risk. Arteriosclerosis. 1987;7:88–100.
Gelderen et al., 1994 Gelderen P.V., Devleeschouwer M.H., Despres D., Pekar J., Vanzijl P.C.M., Moonen C.T. Water diffusion and acute stroke. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994;31:154–163.
Hadim and Vafai, 2000 Hadim H., Vafai K. Overview of Current Computational Studies of Heat Transfer in Porous Media and their Applications-Forced Convection and Multiphase Transport, Advances in Numerical Heat Transfer. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis; 2000.291–330.
Helpern et al., 1992 Helpern J.A., Ordidge R.J., Knight R.A. The effect of cell membrane water permeability on the apparent diffusion coefficient of water. In: Proceedings of SMRM, 11th Annual Meeting, SMRM, Berlin; 1992:1201.
Horn, 1979 Horn A.S. Characteristics of dopamine uptake. In: Horn A.S., et al., eds. The Neurobiology of Dopamine. London: Academic; 1979:217–235.
Hotter et al., 2019 Hotter B., Galinovic I., Kunze C., Brunecker P., Jungehulsing G., Villringer A., Endres M., Villringer K., Fiebach J. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging Identifies ischemic lesions in a majority of transient ischemic attack patients. Ann. Neurol. 2019;86:452–457.
Huang and Tarbell, 1997 Huang Z.J., Tarbell J.M. Numerical simulation of mass transfer in porous media of blood vessel walls. Am. J. Phys. 1997;273:H464–H477.
Huang et al., 1994 Huang Y., Rumschitzki D., Chien S., Weinbaum S. A fiber matrix model for the growth of macromolecular leakage spots in the arterial intima. J. Biomech. Eng. 1994;116:430–445.
Iasiello et al., 2018 Iasiello M., Vafai K., Andreozzi A., Bianco N. Boundary layer considerations in a multi-layer model for LDL accumulation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 2018;21:803–811.
Iasiello et al., 2019 Iasiello M., Vafai K., Andreozzi A., Bianco N. Hypo-and hyperthermia effects on LDL deposition in a curved artery. Comput. Therm. Sci. 2019;11:95–103.
James and Matthew, 1997 James M.A., Matthew S.S. Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997;28:5–24.
Karner et al., 2001 Karner G., Perktold K., Zehentner H.P. Computational modeling of macromolecule transport in the arterial wall. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 2001;4:491–504.
Khaled and Vafai, 2003 Khaled A.-R.A., Vafai K. The role of porous media in modeling flow and heat transfer in biological tissues. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2003;46:4989–5003.
Khanafer, 2013 Khanafer K. Fluid–structure interaction analysis of non-Darcian effects on natural convection in a porous enclosure. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2013;58:382–394.
Khanafer, 2014 Khanafer K. Comparison of flow and heat transfer characteristics in a lid-driven cavity between flexible and modified geometry of a heated bottom wall. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014;78:1032–1041.
Khanafer and Vafai, 2006 Khanafer K., Vafai K. The role of porous media in biomedical engineering as related to magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery. Heat Mass Transf. 2006;42:939–953.
Khanafer et al., 2009 Khanafer K., Berguer R., Schlicht M., Bull J.L. Numerical modeling of coil compaction in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms using porous media theory. J. Porous Media. 2009;12:887–897.
Khanafer et al., 2010 Khanafer K.M., Berguer R., Vafai K. Using Porous Media Theory to Determine the Coil Volume Needed to Arrest Flow in Brain Aneurysms, Porous Media: Applications in Biological Systems and Biotechnology. Taylor & Francis; 250. 2010;Vol. 237.
Khanafer et al., 2015 Khanafer K., Schlicht M.S., Vafai K., Prabhakar S.A.N.D., Gaith M. Validation of a computational model versus a bench top model of an aortic dissection model. J. Biomed. Eng. Inform. 2015;2:82–90.
Khanafer et al., 2016 Khanafer K., Vafai, Gaith M. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of flow and heat transfer characteristics around a flexible microcantilever in a fluidic cell. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2016;75:315–322.
Latour et al., 1991 Latour L.L., Svoboda K., Mitra P., Sotak C.H. Time dependent diffusion of water in a biological model system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991;91:1229–1233.
Lehner, 1979 Lehner F.K. On the validity of Fick’s law for transient diffusion through a porous medium. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1979;34:821–825.
Lieber et al., 2002 Lieber R.B., Livescu V., Hopkins L.N., Wakhiloo A.K. Particle image velocimetry assessment of stent design influence on intra-aneurysmal flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2002;30:768–777.
Limbach and Wei, 1990 Limbach K.W., Wei J. Restricted diffusion through granular materials. AICHE J. 1990;36(242–248):44.
Lubarsky et al., 1995 Lubarsky D.A., Smith L.R., Sladen R.N., Mault J.R., Reed R.L. Defining the relationship of oxygen delivery and consumption-use of biological system models. J. Surg. Res. 1995;58:508–803.
Mahjoob and Vafai, 2009 Mahjoob S., Vafai K. Analytical characterization of heat transfer through biological media incorporating hyperthermia treatment. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:1608–1618.
Mintorovitch et al., 1991 Mintorovitch J., Moseley M.E., Chileuitt L., Shimizu H., Cohen Y., Weinstein P.R. Comparison of diffusion and T2- weighted MRI for the early detection of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats. Magn. Reson. Med. 1991;18:39–50.
Moseley et al., 1990 Moseley M.E., Cohen Y., Mintorovitch J., Chileuitt L., Shimizu H., Kucharczyk J., Wendland M.F., Weinstein P.R. Early detection of cerebral ischemia in cats: Comparison of diffusion and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Med. 1990;16:330–346.
Nicholson, 2001 Nicholson C. Diffusion and related transport mechanisms in brain tissue. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2001;64:815–884.
Nicholson and Phillips, 1981 Nicholson C., Phillips J.M. Ion diffusion modified by tortuosity and volume fraction in the extracellular microenvironment of rat cerebellum. J. Physiol. 1981;321:225–257.
Norris et al., 1993 Norris D.G., Niendor T., Leibfritz D. A theory of diffusion contrast in healthy and infracted tissue. In: Proceedings of SMRM, 12th Annual Meeting, SMRM, New York; 1993.
Peppas, 1985 Peppas N.A. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Acta Helv. 1985;60:110–111.
Prosi et al., 2005 Prosi M., Zunino P., Perktold K., Quarteroni A. Mathematical and numerical models for transfer of low-density lipoproteins through the arterial walls: A new methodology for the model set up with applications to the study of disturbed luminal flow. J. Biomech. 2005;38:903–917.
Rappitsch and Perktold, 1996 Rappitsch G., Perktold K. Pulsatile albumin transport in large arteries: A numerical simulation study. J. Biomech. Eng. 1996;118:511–519.
Stangeby and Ethier, 2002a Stangeby D.K., Ethier C.R. Computational analysis of coupled blood-wall arterial LDL transport. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002a;124:1–8.
Stangeby and Ethier, 2002b Stangeby D.K., Ethier C.R. Coupled computational analysis of arterial LDL transport—Effects of hypertension. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 2002b;5:233–241.
Stejskal and Tanner, 1965 Stejskal E.O., Tanner J.E. Use of spin-echo pulsed magnetic field gradient to study anisotropic restricted diffusion and flow. J. Chem. Phys. 1965;43:3579–3603.
Szikora et al., 1994 Szikora I., Guterman L.R., Wells K.M., et al. Combined use of stents and coils to treat experimental wide-necked carotid aneurysms: Preliminary results. AJNR. 1994;15:1091–1102.
Tada and Tarbell, 2004 Tada S., Tarbell J.M. Internal elastic lamina affects the distribution of macromolecules in the arterial wall: A computational study. Am. J. Phys. 2004;287:H905–H913.
Taylor and Bushell, 1985 Taylor D.G., Bushell M.C. The spatial mapping of translational diffusion by the NMR imaging technique. Phys. Med. Biol. 1985;30:345–349.
Turjman et al., 1994 Turjman F., Massoud T.F., Ji C., et al. Combined stent implantation and endosaccular coil placement for treatment of experimental wide-necked aneurysms: A feasibility study in swine. AJNR. 1994;12:1087–1090.
Umeda et al., 2017 Umeda Y., Ishida F., Tsuji M., Furukawa K., Shiba M., Yasuda R., Toma N., Sakaida H., Suzuki H. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) using porous media modeling predicts recurrence after coiling of cerebral aneurysms. PLoS One. 2017;28:doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190222.
Vafai, 2000 Vafai K. Handbook of Porous Media. 1st edn New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2000.
Vafai, 2005 Vafai K. Handbook of Porous Media. 2nd edn New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2005.
Vafai and Hadim, 2000 Vafai K., Hadim H. Overview of current computational studies of heat transfer in porous media and their applications- natural convection and mixed convection. In: Advances in Numerical Heat Transfer. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis; 2000:331–371.
Vafai and Sozen, 1990 Vafai K., Sozen M. Analysis of energy and momentum transport for fluid flow through a porous bed. J. Heat Transf. 1990;112:690–699.
Vafai and Tien, 1981 Vafai K., Tien C.L. Boundary and inertia effects on flow and heat transfer in porous media. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1981;24:195–203.
Vafai and Tien, 1982 Vafai K., Tien C.L. Boundary and inertia effects on convective mass transfer in porous media. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1982;25:1183–1190.
Vafai et al., 2006 Vafai K., Bejan A., Minkowycz W.J., Khanafer K. A critical synthesis of pertinent models for turbulent transport through porous media. In: Handbook of Numerical Heat Transfer. 2nd edn Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2006:389–416 (Chapter 12).
Wada and Karino, 2000 Wada S., Karino T. Computational study on LDL transfer from flowing blood to arterial walls. In: Yamaguchi T., ed. Clinical Application of Computational Mechanics to the Cardiovascular System. Springer; 2000:157–173.
Wang and Vafai, 2015 Wang S., Vafai K. Analysis of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) transport within a curved artery. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015;43:1571–1584.
Wiśniewski et al., 2021 Wiśniewski K., Tomasik B., Tyfa Z., Reorowicz P., Bobeff E.J., Stefańczyk L., Posmyk B.J., Jóźwik K., Jaskólski D.J. Porous media computational fluid dynamics and the role of the first coil in the embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J. Clin. Med. 2021;24:1348.
Yang and Vafai, 2006 Yang N., Vafai K. Modeling of low density lipoprotein (LDL) transport in the artery- effects of hypertension. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2006;49:850–867.
Yang and Vafai, 2008 Yang N., Vafai K. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) transport in an artery—A simplified analytical solution. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2008;51:497–505.
Zunino, 2002 Zunino P. Mathematical and Numerical Modeling of Mass Transfer in the Vascular System. Ph.D. thesis Ecole Polythe’chnique Fe’de’rale de Lausanne; 2002.
Chapter 2: Metabolic consumption of microorganisms
Peter Vadasz; Alisa S. Vadasz College of Engineering, Informatics, and Applied Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
Abstract
This review chapter presents a proposed theory that accounts for the metabolic consumption of microorganisms, which is analyzed and compared with experimental data both qualitatively and quantitatively. As distinct from other models that traditionally disregarded the growth and reproduction from the metabolic process, the proposed model links the latter directly to growth and reproduction in microorganism. The major reason for the latter is that the other models caused inconsistencies between the modeling results and experimental data. A major discrepancy was related to the experimentally observed LAG phase in the growth process. Associating the LAG phase with delay processes, as frequently proposed, has been proven incorrect and will be shown as such in this chapter. The present model shows that the origin of the LAG phase is the existence of unstable stationary states resulting from the explicit inclusion of the metabolic consumption process via a resource consumption and utilization term.
Keywords
Metabolic mass transfer; Monotonic growth; Microorganisms; LAG
2.1: Introduction
Despite the fact that 222 years have passed since the first attempt by Malthus (1798) to propose a predictive model for population dynamics, 182 years since Verhulst (1838) introduced the Logistic Growth Model (LGM), and 93 years since Pearl (1927) showed that the LGM can reproduce accurately experimental growth data in some circumstances, the problem of predictive growth in microbiology (as well as other fields such as ecology) is still not resolved. In addition, it is widely agreed (Baty and Delignette-Muller, 2004; Augustin and Carlier, 2000; Baranyi, 2002) that the LAG Phase, a typical phase in the growth of microorganisms, cannot be estimated accurately by any existing model. We counted at least 20 different models that are being used in "Predictive Microbiology" to describe population growth (14 of them being consistently used in the last few decades). Furthermore, all these models use extensive curve fitting as a really poor alternative to True Predictive Modeling. The 20 models we refer to are: Malthus (Malthus, 1798), Logistic Growth Model (Pearl, 1927; Verhulst, 1838; Baty and Delignette-Muller, 2004), Gompertz model (Gompertz, 1825), Allee model (Alee, 1931), Richards model (Richards, 1959), Baranyi and Roberts’s model (Baranyi and Roberts, 1994; Baranyi et al., 1993; Baty and Delignette-Muller, 2004), Smith model (Smith, 1963), Model with Delay (May, 1973, 1978, 1981; Hutchinson, 1948), Structured Models, age or otherwise (e.g., Hills and Wright, 1995; Baty and Delignette-Muller, 2004; among many others), Bi-Logistic model (Meyer, 1994), Generalized Logistic model (Tsoularis and Wallace, 2002), Generalized Gompertz model (Tsoularis and Wallace, 2002; Farber et al., 1996), Modified Logistic model (Messen et al., 2002), Varying Carrying Capacity Logistic model (Meyer and Ausubel, 1999), Modified Gompertz model (McClure et al., 1994; Baranyi and Roberts, 1994; Gibson et al., 1988; Zwietering et al., 1990; Baty and Delignette-Muller, 2004), Three-Phase Linear model (Buchanan et al., 1997), Monod model (Monod, 1942), Ginzburg model (Ginzburg, 1986; Akçakaya et al., 1988), von Bertalanffy model (von Bertalanffy, 1957), and Unified Generic Growth model (Turner et al., 1976). All the models listed above share at least one common attribute that a large number of these models are not really predictive. One can use some of them to fit a particular set of data, but for the next set of data one needs to fit them again. Therefore, one may raise the question: what is the use of predictive modeling
if it cannot predict? No wonder that given this gloomy state of affairs, Buchanan et al. (1997) proposed an ingeniously simple solution, a three-phase linear model. If prediction is anyway not accomplished, why use complicated models at all? This state of affairs led to a profound controversy regarding scientific approaches and the methodology used in biological sciences (see Murray, 1992; Turchin, 2001, to list only a few).
By using one of the most popular models in predictive microbiology, i.e., Baranyi and Roberts’s model, Baranyi and Roberts (1994) attempt to fit 19 data points with 12 model coefficients and obtain results which show some fit. The correct way of using a predictive model
with some appropriate curve fitting is linked to the model’s parameter estimation. However, for monotonic growth, a model that generically has three parameter values to estimate needs about 27 data