Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times
Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times
Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times
Ebook126 pages1 hour

Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

This is a report published in the New York Times in 1902. The Lodge Committee was the informal name given to an investigation by the Senate Committee on the Philippines into war crimes of the Philippine-American War. The investigation commenced on January 31, 1902, and completed its work on June 28, 1902.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherDigiCat
Release dateJun 3, 2022
ISBN8596547054405
Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times

Related to Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times

Related ebooks

Classics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times - Lodge Committee

    Lodge Committee

    Lodge Committee testimony from the New York Times

    EAN 8596547054405

    DigiCat, 2022

    Contact: DigiCat@okpublishing.info

    Table of Contents

    January 1902

    Philippine Problem before the Senate

    February 1902

    Gov. Taft Talks before Philippine Committee

    More Talk of Filipinos

    March 1902

    Gen. Hughes's Retort

    Sharp Responses Made In Philippine Inquiry

    Cruelty in Philippines

    Gen. Hughes in Tilt With Senator Patterson

    Gen. Hughes's Testimony

    Testimony of Gen. Otis

    Questions for Gen. Otis

    April 1902

    Friction in Philippines

    Gen. Macarthur's Story

    Told Of Water Cure Given To Filipinos

    Saw The Water Cure Given

    Testified on Water Cure

    Gen. Macarthur Testifies

    May 1902

    Will Not Call Maj. Gardener

    The Philippine Inquiry Senate Minority

    Full Disclosure of The Facts

    Gen. Macarthur's Testimony

    Topics of the Times

    The Philippine Inquiry

    The Water Cure Described

    Philippine Bill Discussion

    Republicans Change Tactics In Senate

    This Week In Washington

    Maj. Gardener's Charges

    Philippine Question Up In The Senate

    To Send A Committee To The Philippines

    One Water Cure Victim

    Water Cure and Wine

    Cruelty in Philippines

    The Philippine Inquiry

    Bishop on the Philippines

    Bishop Thoburn Testifies

    Denies Any Misconduct

    The Philippine Inquiry

    To Prosecute Witness O'Brien.

    The Concentration Camps

    June 1902

    Says A Village Was Burned

    Tell of Water Cure Cases

    Admiral Dewey Testifies

    Aguinaldo All For Gain

    Admiral Dewey Continues His Testimony

    Admiral Dewey on the Filipinos

    August 1902

    Perjury In Senate Hearing

    Case of Corp. O'Brien

    Corporal O'Brien Held

    January 1902

    Table of Contents

    Philippine Problem before the Senate

    Table of Contents

    Senator Hoar Talks for an Investigating Committee.

    New York Times; January 15, 1902, p. 3

    Senior Massachusetts Senator Wants to Question Gov. Taft About the Administration of the Islands.

    WASHINGTON. Jan. 14.—For the first time this session the Philippine question was touched on in the Senate. The interest taken indicates that it will occupy the attention of the upper branch of Congress for some time when the tariff bill is reported. The Philippines were the subject of an address by Mr. Hoar. (Rep.. Mass.,) who spoke on his resolution, introduced yesterday, providing for the appointment of a Senate committee to investigate the administration of those islands.

    Mr. Hoar spoke at some length regarding the unreliability of statements which have been made from time to time regarding the situation in the Philippines and the causes which led to the outbreak, lie urged that there should be a place where any Senator in his official capacity could go and ask for two witnesses to prove the correctness or incorrectness of any question upon which light is desired. Continuing. Senator Hoar said.

    I do not know of any cue able to give a statement of the truth as to the differences between Gov. Taft and Gen. Chaffee. I get some dreadful stories from brave soldiers and officers of high rang about the manner in which the war is conducted. 1 have heard of an investigation now going on in regard to one transaction which, if true, has covered with a foul blot the flag which we all love and honor. I think there should be a place where any Senator who makes such a suggestion in his official responsibility can go and say, I want two witnesses on that subject brought here, and then we shall know.'"

    He said he had boon taunted by newspapers for three or four years with a statement attributed to Gen. Lawton to the effect that if certain people at home would hold their tongues there would not be any difficulty with the islands. But what the General is understood to have said was that we should stop this accursed war: it is time for diplomacy, time for mutual understanding.

    There is no one. Mr. Hoar declared, who can tell whether Gen. Lawton said that or whether he said the other, or it is a forgery.

    Gen. Otis had shocked the country by saying we should keep 40,000 troops in the Philippines for a considerable time, but instead of that number we have 70,000, and Mr. Hoar asked how long were we going to keep them there. Lt Gen. Chafee is right. he said. there is not a man in these islands who is not conspiring against the Government and eager for his liberty. Now give us a little light. Take the most zealous men in this body and give us a committee that will hear the evidence, put questions, hear both sides, and let us know what is the truth. We are engaged in the unholy office of crushing out a republic, the first great republic ever established in the Eastern Hemisphere. If we had dealt with this people as we dealt with Cuba we should have had today a civilized, happy peaceful republic sending their youths to our schools studying our laws, imitating our examples, animated by a love and affection and a gratitude such as no one people on earth ever yet felt for another.

    One of the great events of history, he said, was the civilization of Japan. Another was the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. Japan has just celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of taking her place among free nations, at which the declaration had been made that everything that Japan was she owed to the United States and yet in half a century she had encountered China as a superior and Russia as an equal.

    That came. Mr. Hoar said, from the application of a world power that he should like to have his country exercise: that came from the application to the affairs of modern life of the great doctrine of the immoral declaration.

    Mr. Lodge (Rep., Mass.,) urged that the resolution be referred to the Philippine Committee, of which he is Chairman, and said that if the Senate saw fit to charge that committee with the investigation of any question, past or present, the committee was competent to deal with it and would deal with it honestly and effectively. If however, the committee contemplated by the resolution was appointed, he said the reason for the existence of the Philippine Committee would cease.

    Mr. Hoar replied that all he wanted was that there should be somewhere a tribunal to take evidence on these questions as far as practicable.

    Was it worth while for us he continued to be considering these great questions which involve the propriety and good faith and integrity of our dealings with these unfortunate "people in the matter of their liberty when we were in the dark? He said he wanted to know something about the character of the Filipinos. He wanted Gov. Taft to come before a Senate committee, where he could be asked questions. He said he had received some terrible stories from brave soldiers and officers of high rank about the way the war in the Philippines is conducted.

    Mr. Carmack, (Dem., Tenn.,) while in entire accord with the resolution said that these matters should be handled by the Philippine Committee. The necessity for an investigation was apparent, he said because there had been a constant joint debate between the civil and military authorities in the Philippines ever since we came into possession.

    It being evident that a number of Senators were desirous of being heard on the subject, it was agreed that the resolution should be on the table for a day.

    February 1902

    Table of Contents

    Gov. Taft Talks before Philippine Committee

    Table of Contents

    Civil Rule in All Filipino and Christian Provinces. Moros Still Under Martial Law — The Hospitality of the Islanders—Dispute with Jolo Sultan.

    New York Times; February 1, 1902 p. 3

    WASHINGTON. Jan. 31.-The investigation into conditions in the Philippine archipelago was begun by the Senate Committee on the Philippines to-day. Gov. W. H. Taft was the first witness. There was a full attendance, and Senator Lodge, (Rep., Mass.,) Chairman, explained that the committee desired not only the fullest information concerning the islands, but any advice that the Governor might offer.

    Gov. Taft began by saying that he had gone to the Philippines in the Spring of 1900, and had visited almost all the provinces during the past year. He said that in all the thirty-four Filipino and Christian provinces there were forms of civil government, and that the Moros were friendly, except a few who had always been hostile to the Spaniards. Even these were now being brought over by the prospect of trade. Going back to the beginning of the commission's tour of the islands, the Governor said that it had only been undertaken after the re-election of President McKinley, when the time seemed ripe for the establishment of local government in the islands.

    Describing this tour, he said that the object was to present to the dignitaries of the various places visited an explanation of the provincial and municipal acts. We had some oratory, he said, from the rear platform of the train, but generally from the windows of the ear. At each of the seventeen capitals the delegates of the people were met, the prescribed special act was passed, and a Governor was appointed and authorized to organize municipalities. These provincial Governments consisted, besides the Governor, of a Secretary, Superintendent, Treasurer, and Fiscal or Prosecuting Attorney.

    In all cases where the selection could be

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1