Eutaw Springs: The Final Battle of the American Revolution's Southern Campaign
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
The Battle of Eutaw Springs took place on September 8, 1781, and was among the last in the War of Independence. It was brutal in its combat and reprisals, with Continental and Whig militia fighting British regulars and Loyalist regiments. Although its outcome was seemingly inconclusive, the battle, fought near present-day Eutawville, South Carolina, contained all the elements that defined the war in the South. In Eutaw Springs: The Final Battle of the American Revolution’s Southern Campaign, Robert M. Dunkerly and Irene B. Boland tell the story of this lesser known and under-studied battle of the Revolutionary War’s Southern Campaign. Shrouded in myth and misconception, the battle has also been overshadowed by the surrender of Yorktown.
Eutaw Springs represented lost opportunities for both armies. The American forces were desperate for a victory in 1781, and Gen. Nathanael Greene finally had the ground of his own choosing. British forces under Col. Alexander Stewart were equally determined to keep a solid grip on the territory they still held in the South Carolina lowcountry.
In one of the bloodiest battles of the war, both armies sustained heavy casualties with each side losing nearly twenty percent of its soldiers. Neither side won the hard-fought battle, and controversies plagued both sides in the aftermath. Dunkerly and Boland analyze the engagement and its significance within the context of the war’s closing months, study the area’s geology and setting, and recount the action using primary sources, aided by recent archaeology.
“A well put together book that is easy to read, and it makes good use of graphic material. Eutaw Springs is recommended.” —The Journal of America’s Military Past
“A long-overdue study of . . . Nathanael Greene’s last main force Southern campaign engagement. Drawing from a wealth of resources including new research, archaeology and pension documents, the authors have created an easy reading account. . . . For students of the Revolutionary War, this is must reading because so much focus has been directed at Yorktown where the British abandoned an army instead of the more mobile war in the South where the war was finally won by wearing down the British.” —Lawrence Babits, George Washington Distinguished Professor of History, East Carolina University
“A very good analysis of the political, military, and physical environment, with some profiles of a number of interesting people, most notably Nathanael Greene, after Washington the most important American general of the war, though he never won a battle.” —New York Military Affairs Symposium Review
Robert M. Dunkerly
Robert M. (Bert) Dunkerly studied history at St. Vincent College in Latrobe, PA, and historic preservation at Middle Tennessee State University in Murfreesboro, TN. He led tours of the battlefield and researched its history, preservation, and its National Cemetery. Bert is the author of three other books in the Emerging Civil War Series and is active in historic preservation and research.
Read more from Robert M. Dunkerly
Embattled Capital: A Guide to Richmond During the Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnhappy Catastrophes: The American Revolution in Central New Jersey, 1776-1782 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Battle of Kings Mountain: Eyewitness Accounts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5"No One Wants to be the Last to Die": The Battles of Appomattox, April 8-9, 1865 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOld Ninety Six: A History & Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo the Bitter End: Appomattox, Bennett Place, and the Surrenders of the Confederacy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to Eutaw Springs
Related ebooks
Failure Of British Strategy During The Southern Campaign Of The American Revolutionary War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThis Destructive War: The British Campaign in the Carolinas, 1780-1782 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Piercing the Heartland: A History and Tour Guide of the Fort Donelson, Shiloh, and Perryville Campaigns Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/51781: The Decisive Year of the Revolutionary War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Battle of Camden: A Documentary History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe 10 Key Campaigns of the American Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5American Crisis: George Washington and the Dangerous Two Years After Yorktown, 1781-1783 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Road to Yorktown: Jefferson, Lafayette and the British Invasion of Virginia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSouth Carolina and the American Revolution: A Battlefield History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Guide to the Battles of the American Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Raising the White Flag: How Surrender Defined the American Civil War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The American Civil War (1): The war in the East 1861–May 1863 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Dirty, Trifling Piece of Business: Volume 1: The Revolutionary War as Waged from Canada in 1781 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Second Battle of Winchester: The Confederate Victory that Opened the Door to Gettysburg Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Road to Valley Forge: How Washington Built the Army that Won the Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fall and Recapture of Detroit in the War of 1812: In Defense of William Hull Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Battle of Monroe's Crossroads: The Civil War's Last Campaign Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Thomas Fleming's The Strategy of Victory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar of 1812 Land Battles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Walk in the Dark: Military Intelligence in the English Civil War, 1642-1646 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVictory or Death: The Battles of Trenton and Princeton, December 25, 1776—January 3, 1777 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Campbells, 1250-1513 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Robert Gaudi's The War of Jenkins' Ear Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBattle Story: Hastings 1066 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFire and Desolation: The Revolutionary War's 1778 Campaign as Waged from Quebec and Niagara Against the American Frontiers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philadelphia Campaign: Brandywine and the Fall of Philadelphia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Battle of Barrosa: Forgotten Battle of the Peninsular War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIrish Brigades Abroad: From the Wild Geese to the Napoleonic Wars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistory of Kershaw's Brigade Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Maps of Chickamauga: An Atlas of the Chickamauga Campaign, Including the Tullahoma Operations, June 22 - September 23, 1863 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
United States History For You
Killing the Guys Who Killed the Guy Who Killed Lincoln: A Nutty Story About Edwin Booth and Boston Corbett Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Master Slave Husband Wife: An Epic Journey from Slavery to Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51776 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Library Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Indifferent Stars Above: The Harrowing Saga of the Donner Party Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Charlie: Wisdom from the Remarkable American Life of a 109-Year-Old Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Slouching Towards Bethlehem: Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Kids: A National Book Award Winner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5White Too Long: The Legacy of White Supremacy in American Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln's Killer: An Edgar Award Winner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Benjamin Franklin: An American Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5South to America: A Journey Below the Mason-Dixon to Understand the Soul of a Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Waco: David Koresh, the Branch Davidians, and A Legacy of Rage Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes: Revised and Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related categories
Reviews for Eutaw Springs
3 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Eutaw Springs - Robert M. Dunkerly
EUTAW SPRINGS
EUTAW SPRINGS
THE FINAL BATTLE OF THE
American Revolution’s Southern Campaign
ROBERT M. DUNKERLY
and IRENE B. BOLAND
The University of South Carolina Press
© 2017 University of South Carolina
Published by the University of South Carolina Press
Columbia, South Carolina 29208
www.sc.edu/uscpress
26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data can be found at http://catalog.loc.gov/
ISBN 978-1-61117-758-9 (paperback)
ISBN 978-1-61117-759-6 (ebook)
Front cover illustrations: (top) Battle of Eutaw Springs, 1857, engraving by Irving Washington, and (right) Nathanael Greene Major, engraved by J. B. Longacre from a drawing by H. Bounetheau, courtesy of the New York Public Library Digital Collections; and (left) Eutaw Creek downstream from big spring, courtesy of the South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Dedicated to Al Boland, whose love of military history was the inspiration for this book
To the Memory of the Brave Americans under General Greene, in South Carolina, Who Fell in the Action of September 8, 1781
Phillip Freneau
At Eutaw Springs the valiant died,
Their limbs with dust are covered o’er.
Weep on, ye Spring, your beautiful tide;
How many heroes are no more.
If in this wreck of ruin, they
Can yet be thought to claim a tear,
Smite your gentle breast and say
The friends of freedom slumber here.
Thou, who shalt trace this bloody plain,
If goodness rules thy generous breast,
Sigh for the wasted rural reign,
Sigh for the shepherds, sunk to rest!
Stranger, their humble graves adorn,
You too may fall and ask a tear,
’Tis not the beauty of the morn
That proves the evening shall be clear.
Contents
List of Illustrations
Preface
Acknowledgments
Prologue
Chapter One — Commanders and Personalities
Chapter Two — The War in the Carolinas and the March to Eutaw Springs
Chapter Three — First Encounters
Chapter Four — The Battle Develops
Chapter Five — British Resurgence
Chapter Six — Aftermath
Epilogue
Appendix One — Battlefield Archaeology, Preservation, and Tour
Appendix Two — Unit Strengths and Losses, Officer Casualties, and the Return of the Army
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Illustrations
Figures
Gen. Nathanael Greene
Southern campaign map
Relief map of South Carolina
British and Colonial troop movements
Geologic map of Eutaw Springs and vicinity
Stratigraphic column from the Pregnall No. 1 Corehole
Macrofossilferas Santee Limestone
Eutaw Springs, circa 1859
Eutaw Springs circa 1938
Large spring, summer 2005
Eutaw Creek downstream from big spring
The River Road
The sweet potato field
Historic creek photograph
John Eager Howard
Washington’s cavalry flag
Lt. Col. William Polk
Lt. Col. John B. Ashe
Maj. Reading Blount
Lt. Col. John Harris Cruger
Col. Otho Holland Williams
Lt. Col. William Washington
Lt. Col. Henry Lee
William Washington monument
Brick House ruins
Maj. John Marjoribanks’s grave
Daughters of the American Revolution monument
Pvt. Paul Stroman’s grave
Pipe banner
Maps
Battle map 1: Opening Positions
Battle map 2: The Militia Advance
Battle map 3: The State Troops Engage
Battle map 4: The Continental Troops Engage
Battle map 5: The Americans Advance
Battle map 6: American High Tide
Battle map 7: American Withdrawal
Map 8: Tour route map
Preface
Who won? On September 8, 1781, a revitalized American army under General Nathanael Greene launched a surprise attack against a makeshift British force under Colonel Alexander Stewart. After several hours of intense combat, Greene broke off the engagement and withdrew. Many controversies remain from the Revolutionary War battle at Eutaw Springs, and this section will explore each of them in greater detail. A review of the sources used will highlight the difficulties in reconstructing the actions of September 8, 1781. Ironically the most enduring point of contention is over who won the engagement.
If the battle had ended when the Maryland and Virginia Continentals made their assault, there would be no question that this was an American victory. These troops swept the field, brushing aside the exhausted English troops and scoring hundreds of prisoners. The British artillery and camp fell into their hands.
Yet here the battle stalled, as the Continentals encountered the Brick House and Maj. John Marjoribanks regrouped at the palisaded garden. Looting, exhaustion, and a breakdown in leadership on the Continentals’ part, and hard work by Col. Alexander Stewart, Maj. Henry Sheridan, Bvt. Maj. John Coffin, and Marjoribanks to rally their men, turned the tide. The British counterattacked and pushed the Americans back for good. At this point Gen. Nathanael Greene broke off the engagement, as he related in the letter to the Continental Congress he wrote three days after the battle:
Washington failing in his charge on the left, and the Legion baffled in an attempt upon the right, and finding our infantry galled by the fire of the Enemy, and our Ammunition mostly consumed, tho’ both Officers and Men continued to exhibit uncommon acts of heroism, I thought proper to retire out of the fire of the House and draw up the Troops at a little distance in the Woods, not thinking it adviseable to push our advantages farther; being persuaded the enemy could not hold the Post many Hours, and that our chance to attack them on the retreat was better than a second attempt to dislodge them, which, if we succeeded, it must be attended with considerable loss. We collected our Wounded, except such as were under the command of the fire of the House, and retired to the ground from which we marched in the morning.¹
Stewart recalled that he was too weak to pursue and that during the fighting his army was nearly routed beyond recovery. He wrote to Lord Cornwallis: I assure you the Action was bloody and obstinate, and had I not my self rallyed the left wing of the Army, carried them on and exposed myself much the consequence to my little Army I believe every one allows might have been fatal.
He lamented not having Cavalry to profite of the totall rout of their Infantry
when the Americans retreated. Lt. Hector Maclean of the Eighty-Fourth Regiment concurred that the British lacked enough cavalry.²
The Americans did net several hundred prisoners and pushed the British back, yet they did not break Stewart’s army or drive them from the field. Stewart’s troops were too weak to pursue and barely held on. A clearer example of a draw could not be had. For months afterward both armies spent their energies on recuperating from this exhausting battle.
Numbers and Losses
Historians also still debate the numbers of prisoners each army gave up and the losses they endured. Exact troop strengths are also in doubt. The present work used the reports of the opposing commanders to produce the numbers presented. Fortunately the returns for both armies exist to aid historians. According to surviving reports, the American army’s strength was 2,080 men, and the British had 1,396. When looking at the numbers, it is important to remember that the rooting party sent out by Stewart included about three hundred men, who must be subtracted from his battle strength. While some did rejoin the army, they did not do so until after the engagement.
As far as the disagreement between American and British claims, it will probably never be possible to reconcile them. No doubt Greene, Col. Henry Lee, and others hoped to put the battle in the best light, especially given the dubious outcome and high casualties they suffered. Stewart likely felt the same way with respect to his report to his superiors.
The British lost more men to capture than at any other point in the southern campaign, save for the battle at Cowpens (where more than eight hundred were taken by Gen. Daniel Morgan’s army). The loss of so many fighting men at a time when the British were spread thin in defending South Carolina was a serious blow, to be followed the following month by Lord Cornwallis’s surrender at Yorktown.
Looting the Camp
Perhaps the most enduring issue is the looting by the Continental troops at the battle’s climax. Has it been exaggerated, or did contemporaries downplay it? Greene does not refer to it at all. Lee alludes to it, but only Col. Otho Williams’s account makes much of this aspect of the affair. Out of more than one hundred accounts by battle participants examined during research for this work, only two Americans mention the looting: Williams and Lt. Col. Samuel Hammond. No British accounts refer to the enemy’s plundering the camp, a significant point since it was their camp in question and the looting supposedly saved their army at the point of collapse.
The first generation of historians to write about Eutaw Springs, which includes William Johnson and David Schenck, placed the blame for Greene’s army’s coming up short on the looting. Lee’s son, Henry Jr., insisted in his account of the battle, The Campaign of 1781 in the Carolinas (1824), that the looting of the camp was proof of American victory following the retreat of the British and the camp’s capture. Johnson, apparently with Williams’s account as his source, wrote in his Sketches of the Life and Correspondence of Nathanael Greene (1822) that the men, thinking the victory secure, and bent on the immediate fruition of its advantages, dispersed among the tents, fated upon the liquor and refreshments they afforded, and became utterly unmanageable.
According to Otho H. Williams, the camp presented many objects to tempt a thirsty, naked and fatigued soldiery.
Lee Jr. and Johnson both assigned greater blame to the looting for the American retreat than did the participants.³
With the publication of these two antebellum works, the dominance of the looting in the battle’s story was established. Nearly every subsequent history of the battle has accepted and repeated it. The looting did occur, but only in combination with other factors did it lead to the American retreat.
Henry Lee’s Actions
Colonel Lee’s audacious cavalry charge and his whereabouts on the battlefield also raised questions, both then and now. Lee was an energetic, aggressive cavalry commander who never shrank from action. At more than two centuries’ remove and with only clouded memories and agenda-driven accounts for documentation, it is difficult to understand his actions that day. This was a not a simple back-and-forth battle: the fighting was confused in his sector, and various small units performed numerous complex maneuvers.
Henry Lee Jr. made an interesting argument in defense of his father. The battle’s actions had been misunderstood, he claimed; Colonel Lee acted appropriately. The younger Lee accused Johnson of attacking his father’s character following the colonel’s death in 1818. The elder Lee had fallen on hard times, accumulating debt, suffering from ill health, and facing political ostracism for opposing the War of 1812. Johnson’s work, Life and Correspondence of Nathanael Greene (1822), has affected every account of the battle written since its publication.
Lee Jr. wrote a scathing rebuttal to Johnson’s work, which he claimed to be sinister
and written with malice.
⁴ In a section of The Campaign of 1781 stretching over fifty pages, he argued that Greene approved of his father’s actions and that Colonel Lee’s dragoons acted appropriately during the battle. According to him, Greene’s aide Nathaniel Pendleton delivered an order for the cavalry to attack Coffin on the British left flank. Pendleton could not find Lee, who was with his legion infantry, and delivered the order to the only officer he could find, Maj. Joseph Eggleston. This troop of cavalry charged and was repulsed.
In the meantime Lee arrived and ascertained that the time was at hand to charge the British. Upon organizing the assault, however, he discovered Eggleston’s troops were not ready, having already assaulted and failed. The younger Lee argued that Johnson faulted Lee for not being in place at the time the order arrived from Greene. As Lee Jr. pointed out in The Campaign of 1781, though, the commanding general who had placed Colonel Lee in charge of his legion infantry never indicated any disappointment in his officer’s conduct during the battle. Pendleton did not make enough of an effort to find Lee, in Henry Lee Jr.’s assessment.
Furthermore the younger Lee blamed Johnson for creating the myth that the looting of the British camp was the reason for the American withdrawal. He asserted that the little incident
Greene referred to as preventing him from gaining complete victory was not the pillaging of the camp but the confusion among the cavalry at the battle’s climax.⁵ Indeed the possession and pillage of the enemy’s camp is the best proof, generally, of their defeat; nor has its plunder, after a hard fought action, been deemed either disgraceful or disastrous.
⁶ Lee felt that Greene’s reference to an incident
was not the looting of the camp but Pendleton’s mistake in not finding Colonel Lee to direct him to organize an effective cavalry charge.
This point is important, for while Johnson’s early history has colored all subsequent interpretations of the battle, Lee’s argument is worth considering. Looting no doubt did occur, and it caused confusion in the Maryland ranks. Yet this alone was not the cause of the Americans’ failure to break through at the house, and it seems apparent that Greene did not think so, either. The looting, along with other factors such as exhaustion, heat, a strong British position, and a counterattack led by Sheridan, Marjoribanks, and Stewart, saved the day for the English. It seems, as per Henry Lee Jr., that this combination of factors is what Greene was referring to when he mentioned the incident in his letters.⁷
Otho Williams also blamed the English defensive position at the house for the Americans’ failure to win the battle. He wrote that the Enemy were defeated and obliged to retire to their camp which had the advantage of a large Brick House in which many of them found refuge from our fire and annoyed us from the windows which circumstances alone saved them from a total Rout, and in all probability, the whole of them from being made Prisoners.
⁸
Samuel Hammond insisted in his postwar writings that he and Lee had an arrangement that if the opportunity presented itself and Hammond charged, Lee would support him. He writes that this was the sole cause of preserving the British army from total defeat.… if the troops which had already surrendered, and been taken off and passed in the rear of the Virginia Brigade, and those troops supported by the Cavalry of the Legion … the brick house also would have been passed in our rear with out loss and our force would have fallen heavily upon the rear and the left flank of the enemy.
⁹
As with many other battles, the postwar controversies create their own layers of history that later readers must sift through to understand the original events.
The Battlefield Is Underwater
An important misconception that we hope to address in this work concerns the battlefield itself. Ever since the flooding of the Santee River in 1940, most writers have assumed that the waters of Lake Marion covered the battlefield. Our research, and recent work by others, show that this is not so.
Comparing a preflood topographical map with a modern map reveals that the county boundary between Orangeburg and Clarendon did not change with the flooding. The two maps together reveal that the lake waters filled the streambed of Eutaw Creek but did not overflow onto the higher ground above, where the battle took place. The fringe along the creek and the springs themselves were inundated. Most of the battlefield—95 percent—remains on dry ground. While the waters of Lake Marion did not destroy the battle site, however, development has. The majority of the battlefield is covered by a modern neighborhood largely built in the 1960s. Recent archaeology, aided by information from relic hunters, has located the Brick House foundations and identified the location of battle actions from artifacts.
Sources
With a little digging, we discovered more information on the battle than we initially expected. A great deal was written in the early nineteenth century. This secondary scholarship formed the basis for how most historians understood the battle, even up to the Bicentennial years and the 1980s and 1990s. We decided to bypass these works temporarily and begin with the primary sources. After developing an account of the actions based on the accounts of