Hindustan's Frailties

By Sat Sharma

Giving a bird’s eye view of the of the circumstances leading to the present scenario impacting my people and also to showcase some of the numerous burning problems we face today in Hindustan even 71 years after attaining ‘independence’ from Britain although the real freedom from mental slavery is yet to be attained.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Xlibris AU
• Release date: Jan 26, 2021
• ISBN: 9781664103245

Book preview

Copyright © 2021 by Sat Sharma. 714547

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or

transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,

including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage

and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the

copyright owner.

Xlibris

AU TFN: 1 800 844 927 (Toll Free inside Australia)

AU Local: 0283 108 187 ([phone] from outside Australia)

www.xlibris.com.au

ISBN: 978-1-6641-0323-8 (sc)

ISBN: 978-1-6641-0324-5 (e)

Rev. date: 01/25/2021

Books by Dr. Sat D. Sharma:

1 ] INDIA MARCHING – REFLECTIONS FROM A NATIONALISTIC PERSPECTIVE

2 ] CORRUPT INEPT RUDDERLESS POLITICIANS – IMPEDIMENTS TO INDIA’S FORWARD MARCH

3 ] HINDUSTAN’S FRAILTIES – ANALYSIS AND ALLEVIATION

4 ] INDIA’S MALADIES – THERAPY AND PROGNOSIS

5 ] CROOKED HINDUSTANI POLITICIANS – A PERPETUAL BANE AND DISGRACE

6 ] WHAT AILS INDIA? – ANTI-NATIONALS, SEDITIONISTS, SEPARATISTS, TRAITORS, More….

7 ] HINDUSTAN: PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE [VOLUME I] – AN ORDINARY HINDUSTANI SPEAKS

8 ] HINDUSTAN: PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE [VOLUME II] – AN ORDINARY HINDUSTANI SPEAKS

9 ] FRIENDS AND/OR FOES - INDIA, CHINA, AMERICA, PAKISTAN

10 ] THE TURBULENT TIMES - LIFE OF AN UNKNOWN HINDUSTANI

DISCLAIMER

This Book is based on material collected from various sources and kinds of information – conventional, modern, technological, oral history or otherwise. Oral history is known to provide insight into the history that is obscure, forgotten willfully or genuinely, suppressed or distorted by rulers purposefully. In any country there is no dearth of the patriots offering authentic peep into the past. One must try to locate them. The objective of writing this book was to give a bird’s eye view of the of the circumstances leading to the present scenario impacting my people and also to showcase some of the numerous burning problems we face today in Hindustan even 71 years after attaining ‘independence’ from Britain although the real freedom from mental slavery is yet to be attained.

Limitation of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: Whereas the author and publishers have used their best efforts in preparing the Text, they make no representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy and completeness of the contents of the Book and specifically disclaim any warranties of merchantability or fitness for any purpose.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I owe a sense of deep gratitude to numerous well-wishers and the few well-meaning friends who have been ever cajoling, challenging, coaxing and thereby amplifying a true sense of duty inside me to jot down something important or worthwhile for posterity. Nations are built over time. Like bulk of my compatriots, nationalism is my credo. To me, my country, Hindustan comes first and foremost. My only regret remains I started writing rather late in life. They say better late than never. My motivation has ever been my own biological daughter who left the motherland in her early 20s; and my named son living close by in Bombay now known as Mumbai. And through them, their spouses and their children i.e. my grandkids. I owe lot of gratitude to my friends and contemporaries for their sane advice from time to time.

Man keeps om learning till he dies. Voraciously reading contemporary books and literature has always kept me informed on the goings on all around the world. Keeping abreast by dispassionately reading in between the lines on various forms of mainstream and social media gives an insight into the happenings and affection in general. Sifting information to arrive at the truth remains a paramount necessity. MSM in India as its counterpart in America is anti-establishment. Both leave no opportunity in denigrating their Chief Executive. Making money at the cost of generally gullible public is the norm. The degrees of honesty and nationalism varies in the oldest and the largest democracies of the world. Our medias are highly corrupt and perform antinational acts in the garb of ‘freedom of speech’ aided and abetted by nonexistence of checks and balances, absence of a code of conduct and judicial inadequacies. Our courts take enormous time to decide their cases so much so that a person may die awaiting the verdict. This makes India into a bizarre ‘free for all’ Democracy where anyone can obtain verdict of choice from our courts to if he/she has the resources to influence or buy judgment of his liking.

Last and not the least, my gratitude to Xlibris division of Penguin Random House Publishers. To Edilson Marks, Supervisor Publishing Sales for inviting me to write this book for publication by his company after Xlibris published my earlier one in November 2014. The delay has been on my part. I owe my gratitude to Frank J Williams, Business Consultant. Many his colleagues interacted with me from time to time. I may be missing out on some but the ones coming to my mind in alphabetical order are Ms. Amery Laurel, Publishing Consultant, Xlibris America; Ms. Kelly Smith, Operations Supervisor; Jackie [Jaqueline] Yu & Richard Kent, Senior Book Consultants; Ms. Roni Irvin, Author Service Representative and finally the dames in constant touch – Ms. Ann Porter, Ms. Karl Rodrigo, Ms. Joy Philips, Ms. Gwen Dwayne and Ms. Stephanie Maywell. It may be unfair on my part if I don’t offer my grateful thanks to Ms. Karl Rodrigo, and earlier Ms. Joy Philips who has been prodding me time and again to complete this manuscript. There is longstanding invitation from Joy & colleague to make my visit to Cebu a memorable one when once I evinced the desire to refresh my memories of beautiful Philippines, country of innumerable islands when I visited long ago in 1990 and spent a week in Manila incidentally witnessing the Coup against the first woman President Maria Corazon Aquino!

CONTENTS

Books by Dr. Sat D. Sharma:

DISCLAIMER

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

1   THE PROLOGUE:

2   INTRODUCTION:

3   THE BASIC PREMISE:

4   FRAILTIES AFFECTING HINDUSTAN AND THEIR REMOVAL:

5   PROGNOSIS:

6   EPILOGUE:

THE PROLOGUE:

Hindustan [India] belongs to the oldest civilization of the world that has existed since many millennia BCE. India had a thriving culture and civilization when all the others lived in jungles. Merriam-Webster’s Intermediate Dictionary’s entry on page 397 states: "Once the name India was applied not only the region, we now call India, but also to an ill-defined area south and west of China. Trade with the distant East brought valuable gold, gems, spices, and silk back to Europe. However, the overland journey to eastern Asia by way of the caravan routes was long and difficult. Christopher Columbus, in the late 15th century, believed that he knew an easier way of reaching the wealth of the East. According to his calculations, the westward distance by sea was less than one-third of the eastward overland route. Columbus was able to test his theory in 1492. He was delighted to find land just about where he said it would be. He decided that he must have reached the outer islands of India, although in fact he had landed in the Bahamas. Because of his mistake, the newly discovered lands were called India or the Indies. They were still called this even after people realized that they were not the same as India or Indies of Asia. Later the islands in the New World came to be called the West Indies in order to tell them apart from the East Indies. But Indian, the incorrect name to the people living in the new ‘India’ remained."

Hinduism is the oldest religion on earth. Its members or Hindus are stretching far and wide on the globe. Even America values their importance. It was my great honor to host a celebration of Diwali, the Hindu Festival of Lights, in the Roosevelt Room @Whitehouse this afternoon. Very, very special people! [https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-diwali-ceremonial-lighting-diya/ …4:20 PM - Nov 13, 2018]. Many countries in the Far East attest to the fact that they are/were Hindus. One can find the evidence of this even today. Credit must be given to the largest Muslim country in the world for acknowledging that their ancestors were Hindus. Ramayana is played for one month once in a year in Bali; picture of Lord Ganesh appears on her currency notes; Garuda, the Vahana or the mode of transport of Lord Vishnu, is the national Airline.

Ramayana and Mahabharata are two great epics for Hindus. Lord Rama remains as the most revered earliest Hindu god. Applying the modern computer knowledge, Rama was born on 15th January in the year 5132 BCE. He was the 17th king under Suryavanshi Dynasty, founded by Rishi Kashyap – after whom Kashmir was named. Tracing down to Mahabharata: There were 51 dynasties. Ramayana was written by Sage Valmiki in Rama’s times and has been verified by Rama. There have been concerted efforts first by the British historians to purposely ignore and denigrate the greatness of our culture and ancient civilization. They were meticulous in systematically distorting/changing/meddling with our history. First effort was made by British historians: James Smith and Charles Grant when they were hired to write syllabus of History for ‘Helisbury College’. The British colonizers were cruel, irrational, illogical Looters who rarely followed the laws as practiced in their own country. There are tell-tale evidences of the White peoples’ atrocities and excesses – mostly destructive or even inhuman like systematically annihilating the natives wherever they colonized across the globe from Americas to Australia. When the Europeans called it a day and initiated the process of freeing their colonies handing them over to the sons of the soil. America started colonizing buoyed by their WWII experience!

For many millennia, we Hindustanis have been best known for our culture, civilization, wisdom, tolerance and patience in assimilating thoughts of different saints and wisemen and everyone who sought shelter in the subcontinent. Brutal invaders were tamed on this pious soil. Gurudeva Rabindranath Tagore, too, spoke of how the Scythians, Huns, Pathans and Mughals have merged into one among the multitudes on the shores of India’s oceans. Forcible mass conversions of this Hindu subcontinent into Islam or Christianity could never be accomplished despite the 800-year rule by Muslim invaders one after the other or by the 200-year occupation by Europeans. At least 100 million to maybe 200 million Hindus were massacred in Hindu genocide not reported by worthless historians who had/have sold their conscience for the sake of money and/or awards from anti-national anti-Hindu Congress party. Muslims came from the Middle-East, Turkey and Central Asia; the last to come, Mughal dynasty effectively finished on 27th September 1857 with the arrest and exile of the 84-year old last nominal king Bahadur Shah Zafar to Rangoon (now Yangon) where he breathed his last longing to be buried in Hindustan. Today, his last surviving descendants live in penury – one of them was found in the eastern state of West Bengal. Muslim kings of Delhi were known for their anti-Hindu and anti-Sikh atrocities on a grand scale. Besides religious conversions into Islam, they abducted and raped innumerable girls and young Hindu women, destroyed at least 300,00 Hindu temples; set up mosques on the site of thousands of demolished Hindu temples. Shiva temple in Kashi, Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, Krishna’s birthplace temple in Mathura and the repeatedly demolished Shiva temple at Somnath are classical examples of the tell-tale destruction. On Friday, 23rd November 2018, The Indian Express carried a story by Maulshree Seth: ‘Demolish Delhi’s Jama Masjid, hang me if idols are not found’: "BJP MP Sakshi Maharaj said he be hanged if idols are not found below the staircase of Jama Masjid. Saying that he expects the government to bring a law for the construction of Ram Temple in Ayodhya (just like Somnath Temple in 1948) before the 2019 Lok Sabha election, BJP MP Sachidanand Hari Sakshi alias Sakshi Maharaj, in a controversial statement, gave a call for the demolition of Jama Masjid in Delhi. In his address, the BJP MP from Unnao also said he be hanged if idols were not found below the staircase of Jama Masjid. He said that it was his first statement after he came to politics and he still stands by it. "Main rajniti mein jab aya to mera pehla statement tha ki Ayodhya, Mathura, Kashi ko chhodo… Delhi ki Jama Masjid todo, agar seediyon mein murtiyan na mile to mujhe fansi pe latka dena… Aaj bhi mein kayam hun." [When I came to politics, my first statement was in Mathura. To leave Ayodhya, Mathura and Kashi aside and demolish Jama Masjid in Delhi and if idols are now found below the staircase then I should be hanged. I still stand by this statement], Maharaj said. He claimed that Mughals played with the sentiments of Hindus and constructed over 3000 mosques by demolishing temples. "Mughal kaal ne Hinduon ke sanmaan Ke saath khilwaad kiya gaya, Mandir tode Gaye, Masjiden banaayi gayin, 30,000 se zyada..." (During Mughal era that was effectively not more than 150 years, they played with Hindus’ honor, demolished temples and constructed mosques, over 30,000). Stating that the BJP remains clear on the construction of Ram temple in Ayodhya, Sakshi Maharaj called on the presidents-cum-owners of Congress-I, BSP SP and TMC to clarify their stand.

Well-known writer of Indian origin, Salman Rushdie once said, "India’s ‘selfhood is so capacious, so elastic that it manages to accommodate one billion kinds of difference... it works because the individual sees his own nature writ large among the nature of the State." This milieu of peaceful co-existence, Vasudevaih Kutumbkam, has been continuously demolished by FAKE Mahatma, the first dictator-owner of INC. In 1917, he joined hands with Ali brothers of United Provinces and his INC colleague Maulana Azad for the ‘Khilafat Movement’ to reinstitute the Caliph of Islam in Turkey. Not only that, the half-Muslim Gandhi joined hands with this Muslim Trio in a conspiracy to raise money and dispatch a group of 18,000 (foolish) Indian Muslims to Turkey to fight in support of the dethroned Caliph who suffered crushing defeat in WWI. Gandhi’s both deplorable nefarious actions were challenged, rebutted and repudiated by his co-Muslim Jinnah, the Life President of Muslim League and 20-year senior to Gandhi in INC. Ottoman Empire was broken into pieces for her dismal defeat in WWI that finished the 900-year rule by the Caliphate. Kamal at-Turk took over as President of Turkey in 1922 to usher in democracy! Half-Muslim Gandhi’s wrong, disastrous anti-Hindustan action produced no benefit to the Caliph who fled to Britain to save his life; but it did help FAKE Mahatma to establish as a pro-Muslim ‘leader’. With this, however, he started Islamization of INC That wrong process did not help the party se in the 1945-46 elections 85% Muslims voted for Jinnah’s Muslim League. That was the biggest slap on the face of Gandhi. But the obstinate anti-Hindustan ‘half-Muslim’ stubborn self-aggrandizing crook did not learn any lessons. Our history has been distorted so meticulously and painstakingly that the real freedom fighters were depicted as villains and the true villains from INC made heroes!

Gandhi and Nehru had total aversion to Bhagat Singh as well as Chandrashekhar Azad and the whole clan of young revolutionaries. The reason is simple and straight-forward: Autocrats Gandhi-Nehru wanted all the credit without doing anything for freedom struggle. They acted under the diktat ordered by their British bosses. He and his ‘adopted son’ Nehru went to the solace of a prison cell for pleasure and luxury to write books. There was a tacit understanding between Gandhi and Motilal: ‘Make non-deserving Nehru the prime minister by hook or crook once the British leave India on their sweet will’. So, Gandhi-Nehru wanted to finish direct challenge from the revolutionaries including Netaji Subhas by eliminating them from the scene with tacit full support from the Raj. On the morning of 23rd March 1931, Gandhi had a long meeting with the Viceroy Lord Irwin to ink the infamous Irwin-Gandhi Pact envisaging the release of all the political prisoners’ sans Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev. The three were lodged in Lahore Jail awaiting their execution slated at 7:30am the following day i.e. 24th March 1931. The most vicious Gandhi ‘advised’ Irwin to execute (hang them by neck till dead) in the evening. The hanging did take place 12 hours before the scheduled time fixed under the law of the land in contravention to law of the land. That could happen only because of the wicked Gandhi!

Gandhi’s refusal to do anything for Bhagat Singh et al. was recounted by Sanjeev Sanyal, Principal Economic Adviser to the government of India, in a News reported by Ritu Sharma in ‘The Indian Express’ on Thursday, the 13th February 2020 and titled ‘Gandhi didn’t take any effort to rescue Bhagat Singh and other revolutionaries’: Principal Economic Adviser’. "Delivering a lecture, ‘The Revolutionaries: A Retelling of India’s History’, at Gujarat University, Sanyal said this story was inconvenient to both the political establishment of India and the British after independence. He also stressed that this narrative (of revolutionaries) should be introduced in curriculum. "It is difficult to say whether Mahatma Gandhi would have been successful to save Bhagat Singh or any other revolutionary from the gallows because the facts do not exist... he did not make much of an effort...," the Principal Economic Adviser told an audience of students and faculty.

Elaborating on the point, he said, "He (Gandhi) was happy enough to condone violence. After all, he did recruit Indian soldiers for the British army. If he was willing to recruit Indian soldiers for the British army for World War I, why did he have an objection to Bhagat Singh doing the same? Gandhi tried to downplay the violence of Malabar Rebellion following the Khilafat movement, which in a way, is another movement that Gandhi himself led. Given that background, revolutionaries did hold against Gandhiji that he did not put in enough of efforts and tried to rescue Bhagat Singh and other revolutionaries...,". Replying to a question if revolutionaries would have got freedom, the future of political system would have been fascistic in nature, Sanyal said, "No particular reason that Indian revolutionaries would necessarily have ended up in fascism. Many of them were very well read like Rash Bihari Bose, Sri Aurobindo and so on. This is a propaganda... I think it is very unfair, in fact, deliberate subversion of this story (revolutionaries) to try and suppress this alternative history of India’s freedom. He cited the example of the Irish Republic that was a democratic republic where armed revolt led to freedom but did not become fascist in nature. So, there is not a particular reason India should have gone down that path after independence. Unfortunately, most of the senior revolutionaries were killed. Rash Bihari Bose fled India during World War I to live in Japan. He raised the INA, handed it over to Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose in Bangkok in 1942, and died in January 1945 during WWII. Sachindra Nath Sanyal also died during World War II, while Ashfaq Ullah, Bismil, Bhagat Singh, et al. were hanged by the Raj and Chandreshekhar Azad killed during encounter with UP police in Alfred Park on the information to police given by Nehru. So, Gandhi-Nehru were squarely responsible for the death of the two topmost revolutionaries: Bhagat Singh and Chandrashekhar Azad respectively. Only two senior leaders of the revolutionary movement survived till independence and both were original founders of the movement — Sri Aurobindo Ghosh and Veer Savarkar," he said.

After independence, the revolutionary movement got scattered across the ideological spectrum and some of these revolutionaries joined the Congress, while some remained with Hindu Mahasabha and later the RSS, he said. They were completely dispersed through the system... So, we know the individual names of the revolutionary, real and true freedom-fighters but we never think of them as a united movement. This story was inconvenient to both the political establishment of India as well as the British... All those who wrote the story after independence essentially suppressed this narrative... my idea is to come and present this to students so that they have some sense of what this story is about. He also stressed that ‘this narrative’ should be introduced in the curriculum and books. "It is important that this narrative is re-introduced to our curriculum... The good news is that the popular culture is moving ahead so you have seen very recently the story of INA brought in its own way in Amazon prime series, Forgotten Army. You also have Netaji’s story being told. Last year, for the first time, INA soldiers were given the respect they deserved by inviting veterans for the Republic Day parade. It took 71 years after independence for this to happen... In January 2020, PM Modi announced a new museum in Kolkata called ‘Biplobi Bharat’ dedicated to Independence Struggle from the revolutionary perspective.... Calling it a very different story of how India became free, a story of resistance, persistence and ultimately of a strategy that was tried repeatedly, Sanyal said that the British finally realized that they cannot control India. This is the point when India became free...."

The Indian Express came up the next day with repetition of a story, reported by Rediff.com news on 3rd February: Hegde says Gandhi’s struggle for freedom was drama; BJP issues notice. Stoking a huge controversy, BJP MP Anant Kumar Hegde termed the freedom struggle led by Gandhi as an ‘adjustment’. Addressing a public event in Bengaluru on Saturday, the 1st February, the Lok Sabha MP from Uttara Kannada in Karnataka said, Some people keep saying we got independence because someone sat on satyagraha. The British gave independence out of sheer frustration. On reading history books, my blood boils. Such [traitor] people are termed ‘Mahatma’ in our country." The freedom movement was "one big drama. None of these ‘leaders’ were beaten up by the cops even once. The freedom movement by itself was one big drama. It was staged with the approval of the British. It was not a genuine fight but an adjustment drama." In a speech titled ‘Savarkar – today’s political relevance,’ he said, India is the only nation where sacred scriptures and weapons are looked up to in a balanced manner. Vinayak Damodar Savarkar is the person whose contribution to freedom struggle far outweighs those of Gandhi-Nehru duo and all that of INC put together. Only Netaji Subhas Chandra ‘s contribution alone was the greatest, together with that of 732, 000 young revolutionaries, military warriors, and mad lovers of Freedom who ushered in independence by forcing the British to leave India in a huff. Infamous for his thought-provoking controversial statements, the MP had once asked former Karnataka IAS officer Sasikanth Senthil to go to Pakistan calling his resignation an act of arrogance.

Gandhi nominated grossly undeserving Nehru – a fellow ‘Muslim’ – as second PM of India or 1st post-independence. Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose took over as prime minister of undivided Hindustan on 21st October 1943. Thus, Nehru is the 2nd PM wrongly recorded as first PM! There are innumerable anomalies in our history created by the most selfish Thugs: Gandhi-Nehru and their notorious dynasty. Gandhi nominated Nehru at the expense of duly democratically elected PM Sardar Patel. Surprisingly, one of the many silly and absurd reasons Gandhi gave was, ‘Jawahar speaks better English as compared to the Sardar. The AICC was opposed to Nehru’s nomination who got NO vote at all! Gandhi acted as if he were the King and Hindustan was his fiefdom. Factually speaking, Nehru was the second PM after Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose who became the First PM of undivided Hindustan on 21st October 1943 when he established the Provisional Government of Azad Hindustan in Rangoon. Thus, the FAKE Mahatma inflicted a colossal damage to his own motherland. He changed the geography of Hindustan and tried his best to change its history as well. His protégé Nehru outdid Gandhi by proving him as the WORST Prime Minister of India, a shade better than the last, dumb MAHACHAMCHA eunuch Manmohan!

With the help of his comrades – Left Liberals and Pseudo-intellectuals Nehru changed not only the history of Freedom Struggle and erased the roles of Netaji and 732,000 fanatic Freedom-Fighters who sacrificed themselves at the prime of their lives but also changed the entire medieval history ignoring our brave heroes among Punjabis, Bengalis, Rajputs, Marathas and Peshwas, kings from the northern, eastern and southern regions of the subcontinent especially the north-east king who defeated the tyrant Mughal Aurangzeb in all his invasions. On 2nd March 2020, The Indian Express reported ‘Rename Campbell Bay island as Punjabi Tapu in memory of freedom fighters: House Committee’. "The sacrifices made by Punjabis in Andaman & Nicobar Islands during the freedom struggle have not been adequately reflected. A lot needs to be done to perpetuate the memory of such freedom fighters who were imprisoned at the islands for their part in the freedom struggle. No road crossing, road or island is named after Punjabis. There are many Punjabis living on the Islands, but the local authorities do not show them the respect that they deserve. The statues of Punjabis who played important roles in freedom struggle and were kept at Cellular jail, referred to as ‘Kala Pani’, should be installed outside that prison by the state government in consultation with the administration of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Campbell Bay island be renamed as ‘Punjabi Tapu’. "There are 350 islands in Andaman & Nicobar, and they all are named after Britishers. Recently the Union government renamed four or five islands. Light and sound program should be organized at war memorials in the state to highlight the role of Punjabis in the freedom struggle. Several Sikh activists of the Ghadr Lehar, Komagata Maru, Babbar Lehar, Kuka Lehar, and president of Indian Independence League Dewan Singh were lodged at Cellular Jail."

The first post-independence Union education minister Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad – a fanatic Muslim born at Mecca – was aided and abetted by the Muslim duo of Gandhi-Nehru! The Rascal ‘Muslim’ Nehru changed the complete narrative by giving credit to the INC whose ‘leaders’ had done NOTHING at all to fight the Raj but enjoyed the fruits of freedom! Nowhere in the world cities/streets named after invaders. You cannot find a single city/street named after Hitler in Poland. These least patriotic antinational INC leaders did not bother at all with changing the names of cities after Muslim rulers. Being Muslim and in Power they found it expedient to raise a false narrative in favor of Useless INC whose important leaders including Gandhi-Nehru were stooges of the British Empire! I give some examples for the benefit of younger generations: Karnavati to Ahmedabad, Dhillika to Delhi, Agrevana to Agra, Prayag to Allahabad, and so on. On the contrary, Nehru being a Muslim, named the roads in the capital after Muslim kings. Lodhi Garden still exists in the capital. Muslim rulers destroyed hundreds of thousands of Hindu temples across the subcontinent and set up mosques with that material. There three most sinister are Babri masjid at the site of Ram mandir in Lord Rama’s birthplace Ayodhya, Gyanvyapi mosque by destroying Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi, mosque over Krishan mandir at birthplace of Lord Krishna in Mathura. Examples of destruction of Hindu temples are countless.

In fact, Gandhi and Nehru were both paid British Agents and stooges who spied all their lives on the activities of the Greatest Leader that Hindustan has ever seen who single-handedly shook the foundations of the firmly established British Empire.

India’s independence acted as a trigger for disintegration of British colonialism. Within the next two decades practically all British colonies declared independence from Britain! Least patriotic Muslim Nehru’s anti-national acts and blunders are painstakingly set out in a book, ‘97 Blunders of Nehru’. A study of this book is an eye-opener for any patriotic Hindustani. Nehru matched his mentor and benefactor in inflicting colossal damage to Hindu culture as well as both the geography and history of Hindustan. Muslim duo of ‘unwanted Bapu’ and ‘adopted son’ disliked Hindus of the subcontinent to the core and their scriptures. They banned the teaching of Hindu religion and Bhagwadgita, the most important book. Partition of the Subcontinent, a joint project of the ‘Muslim’ duo, led to migration of at least 100 million Hindus and Muslims across the new arbitrary artificial border, mass-scale killings, abduction/rape of at least 75,000 Hindu and Sikh girls and young women. Thus, it becomes abundantly clear that the three musketeers of INC namely Jinnah, Gandhi and Nehru in order of seniority were responsible for the greatest holocaust of all times in the world!

For the sake of readers, few of his earliest BLUNDERS have also been discussed in, ‘Jawaharlal Nehru: The Worst Prime Minister Ever’, published by The Indian Interest [@indianinterest] on 20th March 2017. A brief overview of the immense irretrievable harm Nehru did to India’s image, prestige and national interests following Gandhi’s unpatriotic pushing undeserving Nehru. Unfortunately for India, the most selfish self-centered Nehru (exactly like Gandhi) had unnecessarily long tenure. The megalomaniac wanted to die in office, and he did. Nehru’s BLUNDERS had far-reaching sinister consequences highly detrimental to his country:

1]. The immature and incompetent Nehru ‘gifted’ 40% of the princely state of Kashmir to Pakistan in 1948 and most foolishly took the matter of Pak invasion of Kashmir and India to the UNSC. Kashmir, like the 562 princely states, had already ceded to India on 27th October 1947).

2] Subsequently, he ‘gifted’ 38,000 sq. km of Aksai Chin part of Kashmir province to China. Did the womanizer (like Gandhi) playboy Nehru consider Kashmir as his father’s property? Then, anti-Hindustan Nehru was stupid enough to bark on the floor of Parliament, Not a single blade of grass grows in Aksai Chin. So, it is of no use to us.

3] Nehru had agreed to allow princely State of Hyderabad to accede to Pakistan and become South Pakistan. To appease the Muslims, Gandhi-Nehru created East and West Pakistan! Patel, as also the Minister for States ordered Operation Polo on 12th September 1948 without informing Nehru and brought the Muslim Nizam of Hyderabad to his knees. Nizam was preparing to flee to Pakistan, was arrested at the airport but Patel treated him fairly. He made Nizam to sign the ‘Instrument of Accession’ into India. That is why Patel is known as the creator of the Unity of the country. Accordingly, PM Modi very aptly laid the foundation stone in 2013 and then inaugurated the ‘Statue of Unity, of the 2nd greatest Hindustani leader after Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, on the famed Narmada in Gujarat. That happened on the great Patel’s birthday on 31st October 2018! Incidentally, this statue is the highest in the world, more than twice the height of Statue of Liberty on Ellis island in America, erected, shipped and gifted by France!

4] No patriotic Hindustani can ever forget the folly of Nehru in hurling indignity upon the country as a result of 1962 Chinese invasion of NEFA (now Arunachal Pradesh) – worst debacle that was the handiwork of Communists Nehru as PM and his Communist pal Krishna Menon as Defense Minister. Later, this vacuum led to the formation of ULFA, BODO and other insurgent movements in the North-East. They don’t want to stay with India, as the country did not help them when their people were mowed down by the PLA in 1962. The insurgency continues till date though on a low scale after over half a century of Sino-India one-sided war. My peers and seniors can never forget Nehru’s slogan of 1950 used by him very often throughout the 1950s: ‘Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai’ (Indians and Chinese are brothers).

5] Sultan of Oman Said bin-Taimur offered Gwadar port to India in 1958 for only $1 million. Anti-national Nehru declined the good offer against in India’s interests Pakistan subsequently bought Gwadar. Today, it is a major strategically located port. China is investing billions of dollars in constructing the China-Pakistan Corridor for its own benefit since it will drastically cut down the distance, time and money in transporting crude supplies from the Middle East.

6] In 1948, he ‘rented’ Coco island to Burma which stopped paying the ‘rent’ after 1949. Much later Burma gifted the island to China which has military presence there and is breathing into our neck. China uses the Coco island to spy over India.

7] Both the US and the USSR again offered a permanent seat in UNSC during 1955. The anti-national Nehru insisted that priority be given to China. Nehru left no stone unturned to get a Permanent Seat in UNSC to China at the EXPENSE of India. One cannot expect China to reciprocate since national interests are foremost to Chins much unlike the infamous Gandhi-Nehru-Gandhi dynasty! This way, Nehru gave China the power to perpetually harm India on any issue as and when it wanted to do so. This process of antagonizing India’s interests at the hands of China continues to date. Nehru-admirer and one of important Chamchas of Sania Antonia Maino, Shashi Throor admitted in 2004 that Nehru declined ‘US offer of a Permanent seat of UNSC around 1953; and suggested that it be given to China’. On 18th March 2017, replying to @indianinterest, Dr Rita Sehgal said, "India needs to correct the (colossal) damage done by Nehru’s dynasty. PM Modi is a ray of hope provided ALL TRUE Indians join hands."

8] In 1959, the great Homi Bhabha, the legendary atomic scientist and the first Director of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre told Nehru, We are 18 months away from making atomic bomb. We must go ahead and make it. Imagine if that happened India would have been only the 5th country after USSR, USA, UK and France; and thus, become a member of the ‘Big Five’. "I’ll fly doves for peace rather than strengthen my country.’ Such was the skewed thinking of immature Nehru!!

9] Much earlier in 1948, when the first British C-in-C of Indian armed forces Field Marshal Sir Claude Auchinleck came to PM Nehru with a plan to modernize Indian army, Nehru threw the file at the General saying, We need the police and NOT the army. Easily, one can imagine how disastrous the anti-Hindustan Gandhi decision was to nominate another co-Muslim as the second PM at the cost of Hindu Patel, the first PM of the divided Hindustan that the latter named India!

10] Soon after Partition, the Hindu country of Nepal wanted to join the just liberated India. Nehru did not agree. Its PM Maitrika Prasad Koirala conveyed the same to Muslim Nehru who steadfastly refused and lost the opportunity for accession of this Himalayan kingdom with India. 11] Likewise, Balochis tan wanted to join the Indian Union. In 1946. Kalat (Baluchistan) king Ahmed Baloch expressed his desire to merge his country with India as a part of an earlier agreement between the two countries. That was during the days of British Raj. Nehru did not agree. The result: In April 1948, Pakistan forcibly occupied the huge landmass accounting for 46% of the area of present Pakistan. Or, in other words, today it is as big as the combined area of Pak’s other three states namely Punjab, Sindh and NWFP.

12] Nehru presented the most beautiful scenic Kabo valley in Manipur (area 11,000+ sq. km} to Burma. Did Nehru consider India as his property and the Indians as his slaves, like the ousted colonial masters Britain whose agent Nehru was?

13] Nehru gifted the group of strategic beautiful Coco islands located in northeastern Bay of Bengal to Burma 414 Km from Rangoon. Coco islands consist of 5 islands: 4 on Great Coco Reef and solitary on Little Coco Reef.

This obnoxious paradoxical job of giving importance to Muslims without doing any good for this community was close to their hearts. Willfully the downplaying of Hindus carried forward with élan in India by his ‘descendants’ in the Gandhi -Nehru-Gandhi dynasty was expected out of the Muslim dynasty in the INC and its later avatar masquerading as Hindus. Although Muslim, they were all cremated according to Vedic rites wasting tons of precious Sandalwood. Congress(I) leaders who ruled the country for almost six decades. However, the party retained its pro-Muslim and anti-Hindu stance without materially helping the former community. This created a wedge between the two major communities in the country. They accomplished the ignominious change in the geography and history of the subcontinent by creating a daughter country Pakistan losing one-third area of the original subcontinent. and with the help of their paid slave anti-national historians belonging to the Left Liberal category but having questionable integrity who have inborn hatred towards Hinduism. Even the FAKE Pandit, the first post-independence PM of Partitioned India acted as a Muslim. Was he a Muslim and Fake Brahmin? There are many anti-Hindu acts of his and his mentor or ’adopted father’ – a FAKE Mahatma promising a strong anti-Hindu bias or even hatred. Creation of two Pakistan: one on each side of the country for Muslims is most significant of their classical nefarious anti-Hindu anti-India act essentially unpardonable. Insertion of Articles 370 in 1949 and 35A in 1954 both via unconstitutional Presidential order without ever seeking parliament’s approval are a few of his most harrowing anti-national acts and BLUNDERING repeatedly one after another Nehru was obsessed with and known for.

The famous French author and journalist Francois Gautier who chose to marry an Indian lady and adopted this country as his home lists INC #2 and Nehru #3 culprits in his book titled, ‘World’s 50 anti-Hindus’. Incidentally, his infamous descendants namely: daughter Indira aka Maimuna Begum; her son Rajiv (Khan); daughter-in-law Sania Antonia Maino with children, Raul Vinci & Bianca – all find place in Gautier’s book. Even Gandhi’s name is there too! Obviously, Thomas Babington Macaulay tops the list. British introduced Macauley system of education in English by abolishing our many millennia old Gurukul System of Vedic education in Sanskrit. That was the only way they could wean their slave subjects from their roots! Another grossly abusive anti-Hindu act of Nehru was ban on the teaching of Bhagwadgita in even Hindu schools whereas Bible and Quran could be openly and freely taught in their schools. The list of Nehru’s and his party’s/Congress(I) successors’ anti-Hindu acts is quite full. The latest anti-Hindu act was nominating accidental, dummy, unelected/unelectable Manmohan as PM resulting in an unceremonious and unnecessary ten-year rule thrust upon the country by Sania Maino. It was through an Affidavit filed to the Supreme Court in 2007, Manmohan government denied the Existence of Lord Rama and Ram Setu – the land bridge between India and Srilanka. Thanks to NASA for providing scientific evidence for it. NASA attested to the existence of a continuous land bridge, now submerged in Straits waters of the Indian Ocean. Thus, NASA hit a hard slap on the face of Congress(I) and its Sonia-Bhakt (Mindless Worshippers). These are just a few notorious misdeeds due to purposeful distorted, skewed/bizarre thinking of the party Bhakts [slaves] unable to fathom or question dynasticism! Since 1917 when Gandhi supported Khilafat Movement rejected by even a Muslim Jinnah-a man of a much bigger stature than Gandhi, INC party has been a privately-owned proprietary Company/Organization of Gandhi-Nehru-(Fake) Gandhi dynasty whose ‘leaders’ earned fame/notoriety, ill-gotten unaccounted wealth by always fooling the gullible, highly ignorant and unconcerned Indian masses.

Another aspect of destruction of our ancient culture is systematic clandestine theft and export of Indian idols from temples and historical sites by anti-nationals obviously with the connivance of unworthy politicians at the helm of affairs going on for a long time ever since the times of Congress PM Indira or maybe earlier. On 20th September 2018, Rediff.com News carried a news item, ‘The woman who nailed the idol thief’. "The startling story of how a bitter ex-girlfriend helped capture artefacts raider Subhash Kapoor. The arrest of idol thief Subhash Chandra Kapoor, then 62, on October 30, 2011, at Frankfurt international airport, after Interpol issued a red corner alert, revealed something shocking to the world. It showed how a ring of fancily-turned out, high-flying antique dealers, like Kapoor, were stealing so many of India’s historical treasures to send to art markets and museums in the West, while the guardians of these relics, be they temple caretakers or government officials, either turned a blind eye or secretly facilitated this illegal trade. The smooth, urbane Kapoor, India born but an American citizen, ran Art of the Past, a posh, spendy gallery at 1242 Madison Avenue in Manhattan, and belonged to a family of Indian art dealers. He was brought back to Chennai on July 14, 2012 to Puzhal Central Jail. Some years later he was transferred to the Trichy Central Prison in Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, as his trial proceeds. He faces trial eventually in the US too. Kapoor was not the biggest antiquity thief. But his arrest was timely. It brought global awareness. Kapoor has till date been found allegedly responsible for the theft of 2,622 artefacts worth $107.6 million (cINR66.71 billion), according to The New York Times. A combination of factors led to Kapoor’s lucky arrest. Very few know that it was a bitter ex-girlfriend named Grace Paramaspry Punusamy who helped set the ball rolling.

When the Brooklyn Museum in 2009 purchased a Chola-era Shiva and announced its arrival on its Web site, Punusamy, who knew way too much about Kapoor’s pieces, writing under the handle Grace Paramaspry, started posting messages there, wondering about the piece’s provenance (place of origin): Punusamy: ‘Does this Siva has (sic) any history of passing through Mr. Subhash Kapoor in New York, any part of the provenance history from UK?’ Brooklyn Museum curator Joan Cummins, not providing details of the Shiva’s provenance, sidestepped the question with this lame answer: ‘We know the Shiva’s history since the late 1960s, and at that time it was not in the UK, nor did it come through Subhash Kapoor’. Punusamy’s post caught the eye of an ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officer named Brenton Easter and his team and they began their own course of action in building a case against Kapoor and his operation. She began to aid the Indian authorities too in their efforts to track down Kapoor, apparently even providing photographs and information on his movements, so he could be nabbed at Fougade Frankfurt-am-Main in 2012.

S Vijay Kumar’s book The Idol Thief, profiles Grace Punusamy and explains her connection with Subhash Kapoor and how she helped bring about his arrest. Singapore-based Kumar, who calls himself VJ and works in shipping, several years ago turned blogging into a special and very useful art, when he started keeping track, online, of idol thefts and the illicit artefacts trade. From his office/home desk chair, thousands of miles away, after diligently, laboriously scanning the Internet and newspaper reports, VJ would regularly post exhaustive details of the Indian artefacts and murtis that had been burgled and then catalogue when they reappeared in museums and auctions in other parts of the world. His efforts drew attention and eventually both American and Indian authorities reached out to VJ for his assistance in building a case against Kapoor.

An exclusive excerpt from The Idol Thief: The True Story Of The Looting Of India’s Temples: A rather rundown shopping mall by Singapore’s high standards, the Tanglin Shopping Centre on Tanglin Road, just off the high-end Orchard Road, holds within it a sprinkling of ‘art galleries’ selling a myriad art pieces, from modern Buddha faces in eclectic colors to Khmer funeral reliquary. They hardly seem to have any visitors except for the occasional ‘foreign’ tourist looking for a cheap memento. But art galleries the world over are similar -- they display a fraction of their actual stock, leaving the ‘better’ ones safe in their go downs for private viewings of their elite clients. One such gallery at the Tanglin Shopping Mall was Jazmin Asian Arts, run by Grace Paramaspry Punusamy who’d grown up in the island city-State, was the daughter of a Tamil father and a Chinese mother. She sold Kapoor’s artefacts on consignment basis, and they began dating soon after they met in 1997. Kapoor had married Neeru in 1976 in India, shortly before the family emigrated to America. The couple had a daughter, Mamata Kapoor, but they had divorced in 1986 and had been living separately since then. Very scant details are available about the Grace-Subhash relationship, but they seem to have been quite a pair, embarking on many ‘business development’ trips into South-East Asia and creating a network of dealers and suppliers. In fact, Kapoor was so comfortable with Grace that he started using her as a cover for provenance paperwork which enabled him to create fake ownership records and helped to sell to prestigious museums -- paperwork signed by Grace for his artefacts. But some time in 2008, after nearly a decade together, Kapoor ended their relationship. During this time Kapoor had started a relationship with another woman, Selina Mohamed, in America, but it is not known if this was the reason for the split. What we do know is that Selina was also involved in Subhash’s work. However, the parting was not peaceful, to say the least. They went to court in 2010 in Singapore to settle their business dealings. Kapoor won the case, displaying his shrewd business acumen and his relationship with dealers.

This is what The Straits Times had to say in March 2010: A Singaporean art dealer, who was in a relationship with an American art dealer, kept antiques worth hundreds of thousands of dollars after their affair soured two years ago. To get these back, Subhash Kapoor, 61, took her to the High Court and succeeded. Delivering his verdict on Thursday, Judicial Commissioner Steven Chong said he agreed with Paramaspry Punusamy’s lawyer that the case should have never come to court as it really was about a break-up between two lovers. The judge also noted that while both parties were unable to produce much in documentation to prove ownership of the 19 contested antiques, Kapoor, 61, had called on three art traders from Bangkok to testify that they have sold some of the pieces to him. Paramaspry, 54, did not produce any witnesses during the three-day hearing heard last month. Ms. Punusamy, the proprietor of Jazmin Asian Arts at Tanglin Shopping Centre, was also ordered to pay costs for the proceedings. It is interesting to note a key finding by the judge that ‘both parties were unable to produce much in documentation to prove ownership of the 19 contested antiques’. Though this was not front-page news in conservative Singapore, the Asian Civilizations Museum, which had done business with Subhash Kapoor’s Art of the Past, would have surely followed this case keenly. Grace took the verdict badly. She had lost her case, money, artefacts and had also been publicly shamed. She was itching for retribution, hence her indiscreet and innuendo-laden comments on the Brooklyn Museum’s Web site that had caught the attention of Indy (Easter) and his team. Grace would in due course reach out to Indian law enforcement agencies to nail Subhash Kapoor and extract her sweet revenge.

We turn again to an extract from the confession of Subhash Kapoor to piece together the story in his own words: ‘My wife and I divorced in the year 1986-1987 in America and my wife is living separately now. My daughter Mamata is presently 32 years old and she is living with her husband in New York... I could remember that the Chandrasekar bronze idol received from Sanjivi Ashokan was sold to (an) antique collector and now I believe it is in Brooklyn Museum...’ ‘I created false provenance documents for all these stolen idols received from Sanjivi Ashokan with the help of my long-time girlfriend Selena Mohammed, my employee Aaron Friedman and Jennifer Moore...’ His confession also stated that he had been in a relationship with Selena for ten years and that ‘she has the access for my office and residence’." [Excerpted from ‘The Idol Thief: The True Story of The Looting of India’s Temples by S Vijay Kumar, with the kind permission of the publishers, Juggernaut. S Vijay Kumar]

Double whammy for some Hindustanis is they can’t find fault with PM Modi but still oppose him. CA Vinod Arya tried to explain this in his blog: ‘GOD SAVE OUR INDIA’. Hindustanis could tolerate 800 years of Muslim rule, 200 years of British Raj, 50 years of family rule (Congress party has been tolerating Gandhi-Nehru-Gandhi dynasty for 101 years), 10 years of Italian lady rule via proxy puppet dumb MAHACHAMCHA Manmohan but NOT 6 years of NDA rule! "Everyone agrees that Modi is NOT corrupt. If he fails to in his fight against corruption and black money, no PM of India will have the courage to take these issues again on his agenda for next 100 years. And corrupt politicians, bureaucrats, police, criminals, and businessmen will keep looting the masses as their birthright. So, it is the duty of every respectable citizen to stand in support of PM Modi and thwart the evil design of the corrupt people to incite violence and create anarchy. If we fail to discharge our duty today, our children and coming generations will NEVER forgive us, will hold us squarely responsible for NOT providing then a CLEAN Hindustan.

I am not in politics and as of now no plans to enter this dirty profession. But there will be dumb readers who consider this post politically motivated. My apologies to those duffers in advance. I was wondering why there are some people against the Honorable PM Narendra D Modi. I noted that this started after Demonetization. Keeping that in mind, I was wondering which people would be affected by Demonetization. I was shocked to discover that here are people who will feel the impact more than anyone:

1 ] Educational Institutions. They used to get huge capitation fees in cash most of which was unaccounted.

2 ] Terror Organizations. Their funding is under heavy stress now.

3 ] Fake Currency Dealers. Those are in trouble because of Digital Economy.

4 ] Real Estate Mafia. We all know that a big chunk of payment used to be made in cash. Now the buggers find it difficult to account for unaccounted cash.

5 ] Hawala Dealers. With almost all deals with accounted money, they won’t mind killing Modi.

6 ] Fake Trusts and Charities. These have been used for money laundering. Now, with ban on large donations by cash, they are unable to fulfill their agenda.

7 ] Politicians. Less said, better it is. Just look at NIL SCAM during his regime. This means that majority of politicians including some from BJP also are unhappy with Modi. They expected Him to be a Maun Baba [Dumb guy] like his predecessor who would close his eyes to their corruption.

8 ] Rich Agricultural landowners. With subsidy directly going into their bank accounts, they are getting exposed.

9 ] Film Industry. It is well known that this industry used lots of black money except for a miniscule of genuine filmmakers.

10 ] Betting in Sports, etc. We know gambling is banned except lotteries. Still there is a turnover of $150 billion. Hence bookies are affected. Please note that these industries employ some of the brilliant most minds in the country. They will leave no stone unturned that Modi does not get second term. Now, it is for us the responsible citizens to decide whether we want to support the before-mentioned categories of Crooks or, to support ourselves and other honest compatriots!"

A comparison on the efforts to curb corruption in a bigger country may be interesting. On 29th January 2019, Yahoo News cited The Independent, ‘It’s no wonder China’s Xi Jinping is winding down anti-corruption efforts – they’ve barely made a dent’. "Politics is not just about dealing with facts. It’s about the stories that get told to place those facts in context. Successful politicians subsequently don’t just rely on the real world talking for itself – they tell stories about it. They develop narratives that help them convince the watching world. Nowhere is this truer than in attempts to tackle corruption. Understandings of what corruption is, what causes it and indeed what can and should be done about it are (at times hotly) contested. There is no simple toolkit that those who are serious about combatting graft can call upon. In that context, storytelling becomes even more important – it helps you explain what you’re doing, why you’re doing it and why others should support you in that endeavor.

When Xi Jinping became general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012 he quickly started developing anti-corruption narratives. He wanted to tackle corruption for, so he proclaimed, the gravest of reasons. At the opening of the first party congress where he was in the hotseat in November 2012, he noted solemnly that if left unchecked corruption could kill the party and ruin the country. The tone in his speeches and statements is nonetheless gradually beginning to change. In a statement published in mid-December 2018, for example, Xi Jinpeng declared his campaign a crushing success. Indeed, it is sounding ever more like he wants to begin winding down an anti-corruption drive that has seen well over 100,000 people – including some very high-profile party members – end up behind bars. Whether Xi’s anti-corruption campaign has succeeded is debatable. Today, Transparency International, one of the world’s leading anti-corruption NGOs, published its annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). If one were to take that as a guide, then it looks as if it’s been more a damp squib than a cause for national celebration. Back in 2012 China scored 39 out of 100 (the nearer to 100, the lower the perceived levels of corruption). By 2017 the country’s score had improved, but only by two points (to 41). In the intervening period the scores varied between 36-40. The newest data has China coming in at 39 again; precisely where it was when Xi took over.

The data that Transparency International produces is not without its critics. These are, after all, perceptions of corruption and what we perceive to be true often turns out not to be. Boiling down a country’s score to one simple number is also regarded by some as a case of reductionism on steroids. That China still has deep-rooted corruption challenges is nonetheless not contested. So, why is Xi thinking about winding down his anti-corruption drive? Given that genuinely radical reform is off the table – questions about the fundamental