Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Excellent Research Methods
Excellent Research Methods
Excellent Research Methods
Ebook663 pages11 hours

Excellent Research Methods

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

EXCELLENT RESEARCH METHODS is the 2018 Award Winning Book in Education/Academic/Nonfiction category in the 2018 NEXT GENERATION INDIE BOOK AWARDS that is sponsored by the INDEPENDENT BOOK PUBLISHING PROFESSIONALS GROUP in the United States. The Award Medals and Certificate are attached to this email.

This book is absolutely for everyone who is truly interested in identifying and solving an important problem in human life. It has marshaled the entire step-by-step procedures for arriving at empirical solutions to any chosen problem. In virtually every research situation everywhere, for everyone in almost all spheres of human endeavor, at least some of the research methods and designs in this book will work perfectly well. There are no limits to what one can accomplish in knowledge discovery by mastering and correctly applying the research methods thoroughly articulated robustly in this book. Excellent Research Methods serves as a most satisfactory answer to the ever fresh and extremely important question on the minds of numerous persons that beyond introduction, what is research? It guides to ensure that research works are able to completely meet the noble global goal of research, which is problem resolution. Virtually, all pertinent information on research methods, in the best sense of it, is exhaustively presented in the book. Grab a copy, read it voraciously with undying passion to know, resolute determination to apply, and total commitment to execute research and be reckoned among the great individuals with enormous indelible extraordinary contributions to knowledge advancement.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJun 1, 2016
ISBN9781482824995
Excellent Research Methods
Author

Peter James Kpolovie

The author, P. J. Kpolovie, is a professor of educational measurement and evaluation in the University of Port Harcourt. He is the director of academic planning, research, and control unit of the University. He is an accomplished product of University of Port Harcourt and an expert in psychological testing, educational measurement, and evaluation. His PhD dissertation on validation and standardization of culture fair intelligence test for use in Nigeria won the best doctoral thesis award by the National Universities Commission in 2002. He also won the prestigious University of Port Harcourt College of Graduate Studies’ Silver Jubilee Award of Excellence in 2007, in addition to winning the Distinct African Gold Award (DAGA) by WDG, in collaboration with Peak Laurels Magazine, in 2015 and the Common Wealth Scholarship in 1994. From 2003 to 2006, he successfully served in the Bayelsa State Executive Council, a period that the State recorded unparalleled infrastructural development. P. J. Kpolovie has over thirty-five national and more than forty international publications in professional journals. He is a member of the board of editors or team of reviewers of a number of international journals. Some of his other publications include seven groundbreaking books: Educational Management in Developing Economies (2012) and Handbook of Research on Enhancing Teacher Education with Advanced Instructional Technologies (2015), both of which are available online; Test, Measurement and Evaluation in Education (2014); The Making of the United States of America: Lessons for Nigeria (2013); Educational Reforms without Evaluation Designs: Nigeria at Risk (2012); Statistical Techniques for Advanced Research (2011); and Advanced Research Methods (2010). His research interests include use of information and communication technology in education and in data analyses, educational evaluation, improvement of human learning, educational management, and test development, validation, and standardization. He could be reached via Kpolovie@gmail.com or +2348137158851.

Related to Excellent Research Methods

Related ebooks

Teaching Methods & Materials For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Excellent Research Methods

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Excellent Research Methods - Peter James Kpolovie

    Copyright © 2016 by Peter James KPOLOVIE.

    ISBN:  Hardcover   978-1-4828-2497-1

                Softcover     978-1-4828-2498-8

                eBook          978-1-4828-2499-5

    All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.

    Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.

    Toll Free 0800 990 914 (South Africa)

    +44 20 3014 3997 (outside South Africa)

    www.partridgepublishing.com/africa

    Dedicated to my darling wife, Mrs Duduna Peter Kpolovie, and dear son, Genius Peter Kpolovie, for their kind understanding and unquantifiable motivation during yet another ‘book year’.

    Brief Contents

    1. Introduction

    2. Experimental Research

    3. Experimental Research Designs

    4. Quasi-Experimental Research

    5. Correlational Research

    6. Evaluation Research

    7. Action Research

    8. Ex Post Facto Research

    9. Triangulation Research

    10. Single-Subject Research

    11. Historical Research

    12. Ethnographic Research

    13. Survey Research

    14. Instrumentation Research

    Contents

    1. Introduction

    Definition of Research

    Research is goal oriented, aimed at meeting man’s needs

    Research is characterised by objective and controlled observation

    Research is Statistical

    Research Is Scientific

    Problem identification and hypothesis formulation

    Experimental design

    Execution of the experiment and data collection

    Data analysis, hypothesis testing, and results presentation

    Reporting or communication of the research results

    Research is characterised with theory and verification

    Research ultimately aims at correct description, explanation, prediction, and control of future occurrences

    Description

    Explanation

    Evidence of covariation of events

    Time-order relationship

    Elimination of confounding or extraneous variables

    Prediction

    Control of future occurrences

    Research demands careful recording and accurate reporting

    Research can only be done by the self-disciplined, curious, persistent, and objectively minded

    Self-discipline

    Curiosity

    Persistence

    Objectivity

    Review Questions

    2. Experimental Research

    Key Concepts in Experimental Research

    Variable

    Independent variable

    Dependent variable

    Extraneous variable

    Techniques for Controlling Extraneous Variables

    Randomisation

    Matching

    Holding of variables constant

    Incorporation into the design

    Yoked control

    Equation of subjects

    Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)

    Counterbalancing

    Complete counterbalancing

    Incomplete counterbalancing

    Intrasubject counterbalancing

    Randomised counterbalancing

    Control of experimenter effects

    Control of subject effects

    Experimental validity

    Internal validity

    External validity

    Threats to Experimental Validity

    Review Questions

    3. Experimental Research Designs

    Randomised Between-Subjects After-Only

    Experimental Research Design

    Randomised Between-Subjects Before-After

    Experimental Research Design

    Randomised Solomon Four-Group Design

    Randomised Between-Subjects Factorial Design

    Randomised Six-Group Experimental Design

    Within-Subjects After-Only Experimental Research Design

    Choice of a Most Appropriate Experimental Design

    Faulty Experimental Designs

    One-Group Posttest-Only Design

    Single Group Pretest-Posttest Design

    Static-Group Comparison Design

    Review Questions

    4. Quasi-Experimental Research

    Nonequivalent Control Groups Quasi-Experimental Design

    Simulated Before-After Quasi-Experimental Design

    Regression-Discontinuity Quasi-Experimental Design

    Counterbalanced Quasi-Experimental Design

    Cohort Quasi-Experimental Design

    Time Series Quasi-Experimental Design

    Factorial Quasi-Experimental Design

    Review Questions

    5. Correlational Research

    Concept of Correlation

    Correlational Research Designs

    Simple Correlational Design

    Simple Prediction Design

    Multiple Correlations Design

    Partial Correlational Design

    Multiple Prediction Design

    Convergent Cum Discriminant Analysis Design

    Canonical Correlational Analysis Design

    Factor Analysis Design

    Path Analysis Design

    Review Questions

    6. Evaluation Research

    Evaluation Models

    Componential Evaluation Model

    Nature of Evaluation Process

    Illustration of Componential Model

    Inputs Component

    Operations Component

    Outputs Component

    Summary of Componential Evaluation Model

    Summative Evaluation Model by Provus, Malcolm

    Programme Standard

    Summative Evaluation Model by Stake, Robert

    Decision Management Evaluation Model by Alkin, Marvin

    System Assessment

    Programme Planning

    Programme Implementation

    Programme Improvement

    Programme Certification

    CIPP Decision Management Oriented Evaluation Model by Stufflebeam, Daniel

    Types of Decisions in the CIPP Evaluation Model

    Types of Evaluation in the CIPP Model

    Context Evaluation

    Input Evaluation

    Process Evaluation

    Product Evaluation

    Evaluation Research Designs

    Policy-Oriented Evaluation Design

    Legitimatory Evaluation Design

    Utilitarian Evaluation Design

    Accreditation/Certification Evaluation Design

    Programme Theory-Based Evaluation Design

    Review Questions

    7. Action Research

    Uses of Action Research

    Differentiation of Action Research from Basic and Applied Research

    Objectives of Action Research in Education

    Categorisation of Action Research

    Technical action research

    Practical action research

    Emancipatory action research

    Rationalisation of Emancipatory Action Research

    Procedural Steps in Action Research

    Problem Identification

    Research Methodology

    Implementation or Data Collection

    Data Analyses and Presentation of Results

    Development of an Action Plan

    Review Questions

    8. Ex Post Facto Research

    Characteristics of Ex Post Facto Research

    Retrospectivity

    Lack of Control

    Complete Flexibility

    Post Hoc Ergo Propter Fallacy

    Procedural Steps in Ex Post Facto Research

    Identification of Problem

    Review of Literature

    Research Design

    Matching of Subjects

    Incorporation of the Extraneous Variable

    Use of Homogeneous Subgroups

    Testing of Rival or Inverse Hypotheses

    Data Collection

    Analyses of Data and Presentation of Results

    Merits of Ex Post Facto Research

    Limitations of Ex Post Facto Research

    Appropriate Classification of Subjects into Dichotomous Groups

    Ex Post Facto Research Designs

    Correlational Ex Post Facto Research Design

    Causal-Comparative Ex Post Facto Research Design

    Effect-to-cause causal-comparative ex post facto design

    Cause-to-effect causal-comparative ex post facto design

    Review Questions

    9. Triangulation Research

    Uses of Triangulation Research Design

    Types of Triangulation

    Time triangulation

    Space triangulation

    Analysis level triangulation

    Investigator triangulation

    Theoretical triangulation

    Methodological triangulation

    Multiple triangulation

    Example of Triangulation Research

    Review Questions

    10. Single-Subject Research

    Single-Subject Research Designs

    ABA→B Single-Subject Design

    Limitations of A→B→A→B Design

    Example of investigation done with A→B→A→B design

    Multiple-Baseline Design

    Limitation of Multiple-Baseline Design

    Interaction Design

    Limitations of Interactive Design

    Alternating-Treatments Design

    Example of alternating-treatments design

    Strengths and weaknesses of alternating-treatments design

    Changing-Criterion Design

    Successful application of changing-criterion design

    Stability of baseline data

    Length of treatment phases

    Magnitude of change in the criterion

    Number of treatment phases

    Example of Changing-Criterion Design

    Data Analysis in Single-Subject Research Designs

    Visual Analysis

    Statistical Analysis

    Interrupted Time Series Statistic

    Therapeutic Criterion Study

    Review Questions

    11. Historical Research

    Historical Research as Both Science and Art

    Trends in Educational Historical Research

    Two Traditional Frameworks of Educational Historical Research

    Focus on schooling

    Intent for the common good

    Equation of growth with progress

    Focus on leadership and organisation

    Two Strands of Revisionism in Educational Historical Research

    Broadened scope of education

    Failures and inadequacies of state-schooling

    Quantitative Methods in Educational Historical Research

    Future Trend of Educational Historical Research

    What Educational Historians Must Guide Against in Their Research

    Procedure for Execution of Historical Research

    Problem Identification

    Data Collection

    Primary Sources of Historical Data

    Documents

    Relics

    Oral Statements

    Numerical Records

    Human Participants and Direct Witnesses

    Secondary sources of historical data

    Review of literature in historical research

    Evaluation of historical sources

    External Criticism

    Internal Criticism

    Data Analysis

    Writing of Research Report

    Review Questions

    12. Ethnographic Research

    Utility of Ethnographic Research

    Characteristics of Ethnographic Research

    Naturalism

    Holism

    Understanding and Interpretation

    Multiple Perspectives

    Multiple Techniques

    Culture

    Contextualisation

    Emic-Etic Perspectives

    Thick Description

    Organisational Behaviour

    Nonjudgmental Orientation

    Member Checking

    Social Role of the Investigator

    Subjectivity

    Hypotheses

    Participant Observation

    Interview

    Field Notes

    Sampling

    Validity

    Reliability

    Generalisability

    As a Case Study

    Role of Theory

    Data Analysis

    Review Questions

    13. Survey Research

    Survey Research Designs

    Cross-Sectional Survey Research Design

    Cross-sectional survey sampling

    Census sampling

    Probability sampling (Noncensus sampling)

    Simple random sampling

    Stratified random sampling

    Systematic sampling

    Multistage sampling

    Cluster sampling

    Longitudinal Survey Research Design

    Factors of Change and Stability

    Biological factor of change and stability in longitudinal survey

    Environmental factor of change and stability in longitudinal survey

    Planned intervention factor of change and stability in

    longitudinal survey

    Time factor of change and constancy in longitudinal survey

    Types of Longitudinal Survey Design

    Trend Studies Longitudinal Survey Design

    Simultaneous Cross-sectional Longitudinal Survey Design

    Time Series Longitudinal Survey Design

    Intervention Longitudinal Survey Design

    Panel Longitudinal Survey Design

    Tracer Longitudinal Survey Design

    Validity of Longitudinal Survey Design

    Purpose of Survey Research

    Data Collection In Survey Research

    Instruments for survey data collection

    Decisions about question content

    Decisions about question wording

    Decisions about forms of response to the question

    Decisions about the place of the question in the sequence

    Techniques for Data Collection in Survey Research

    Self-Administered Inquiry Techniques

    Mail dissemination and retrieval

    Drop-off distribution

    Mail-panel distribution and collection

    Maximisation of Response Rate in Self-Administered Inquiry

    Computer-Assisted Inquiry Techniques

    Fax

    E-mail

    Internet

    Personal Interview Technique for Survey Date Collection

    In-home interviews

    Executive interview

    Mall-intercept interview

    Guidelines for Successful Interview

    Use a skilled and credible interviewer

    Suitable introduction

    Creation of rapport

    Data gathering

    Recording

    Telephone-Administered Interview Technique for

    Collecting Survey Data.

    Advantages and Disadvantages of the Various

    Techniques for Gathering Survey Data

    Types of Error in Survey Research

    Sampling Error

    Nonsampling Error

    Respondent Error Sources

    Nonresponse error

    Response error

    Measurement and Design Error Sources

    Construct development error

    Scaling measurement error

    Survey instrument design error

    Data analysis error

    Misinterpretation error

    Administrative Error Sources

    Data processing error

    Interviewer error

    Sample design error

    Analyses of Survey Data

    Data Preparation

    Editing

    Completeness

    Accuracy

    Uniformity

    Coding

    Equating of Data

    Transformation of raw scores to standard scores

    Equipercentile scaling

    Latent trait measurement

    Analysis Proper

    Univariate analysis

    Bivariate analysis

    Multivariate analysis

    Review Questions

    14. Instrumentation Research

    Validity of Measuring Instrument

    Measurement in Instrumentation Research

    Definition of the concept

    Development of items or indicators

    Gathering of empirical information for each item

    Evaluation of the representativeness of the indicators or items

    Types of Validity

    Content validity

    Construction of test-blueprint

    Confirmation and enhancement of content validity

    Definitivity of the construct

    Homogeneity of items

    Parallel-panels judgment

    Criterion-related validity

    Qualities of a Good Criterion

    Relevance

    Reliability

    Freedom from bias and contamination

    Predictive validity

    Concurrent validity

    Decision making and criterion-related validity

    Construct validity

    Ways of establishing construct validity

    Hypothesis-testing evidence of construct validity

    Correlation evidence of construct validity

    Internal consistency evidence of construct validity

    Subtest-total correlation

    Contrast group analysis

    Item-total correlations

    Developmental changes evidence of construct validity

    Convergent cum discriminant validation

    Factor analysis

    Reliability of Measuring Instrument

    Establishment of Reliability of Test Scores

    Classical True-Score-and-Error-Score Model

    Assumptions of classical or conventional reliability theory

    Sources of unsystematic variability in a test scores

    Multifacet Analysis Model of Reliability

    Completely Crossed Multidimensional Analysis of Variance Technique

    Conventional Empirical Methods of Establishing Reliability

    Test-Retest Reliability

    Limitations of test-retest reliability

    Equivalent Forms Reliability

    Split-Half Reliability

    Internal Consistency Reliability

    Domain Sampling Model of Reliability

    Uses of Reliability of Test Scores

    Ascertaining of true variance contribution

    Determination of standard error of measurement for all the examinees

    Setting of confidence intervals for each of the examinees’ true score

    Approximation of each examinee’s true score

    Verification of the dependability of actual examinees’ scores

    Determination of the possible correlation between two tests

    that measure the same domain

    Item Analysis

    Percentages of response

    Credibility of distracter

    Item difficulty

    Discriminative index

    Item-total correlation

    Consistency of successive items collections

    Frequency distribution for total scores

    Latent Trait Theory

    Caution in the use of ICC theory in test development

    Standardisation of Test

    Procedure for administering

    Procedure for scoring or establishment of norm in norm-referenced test

    Procedure for setting criterion in criterion-referenced test

    Writing of a test manual

    Test Bias and Test Unfairness

    Intrinsic test bias

    Extrinsic test bias

    Item bias

    Review Questions

    References

    Preface

    This book is a product of my 20 years of exciting experience in the execution and teaching of research and statistics and in the supervision of research theses. Often, one sees even postgraduate students who have written simply in the third chapter of their theses that the research design to be used is survey, correlational, ex post facto, experimental, or any of the other research methods without due rationalisation. This shows absolute dissatisfactory specification of how the investigation will be carried out. The research design section of the third chapter that is supposed to adequately deal with detailed explication of the step-by-step procedures on how the investigation will be done is most often haphazardly written in two or three sentences, not even one or two pages. This is horribly awful and completely incredible. The most probable reason is that such students do not know what the research methods or designs that they claim to use truly demand of them. Consequently, they end up producing either inconclusive or very poorly executed research works that add little or nothing to knowledge of problem resolution, and instead, increase ignorance. Yes, this is expected because just as a person who does not know the road to a destination and refuses to inquire from those who know it cannot arrive there, an investigator without the requisite knowledge of the research design for a particular research topic and refuses to learn it can never conclusively execute the work.

    A critical examination of this appalling situation tends to reveal that such students only strived at having introductory knowledge of research and actually ended up with just too little of it. An urgent end must necessarily be put to this, and there is no better time for it than now. This book was written for this purpose, to ensure that research works that people do are able to meet the noble global goal of research that is problem resolution.

    Appraisal of the array of most readily available well-articulated introductory books on research further made me to reach the conclusion that much more was still left to be done. It then became a special privilege and great challenge for me to humbly produce a text on the all important subject to which most existing books have successfully introduced students. This book, Excellent Research Methods, was written to serve as a satisfactory answer to the ever-fresh and extremely important question on the minds of many students and lecturers: Beyond the introduction, what is research?

    Life poses a myriad of problems that can best be solved through research. The various research methods that carefully explain the entire process of arriving at dependable solutions to identified problems in a manner that expands the frontiers of knowledge are thoroughly presented herein to adequately meet the yearnings of students pursuing a first degree, masters, or a PhD programme as well as administrators, lecturers, and practitioners of research in education, the behavioural and other sciences. Most pertinent information on research methods in the best sense of it is comprehensively presented in this book. With a mastery of the information in this text, a student at any level of tertiary institution of learning will definitely be able to identify a researchable problem, choose the most appropriate design, excellently explain it, and meticulously follow it to most successfully accomplish his/her investigation. After exhaustive discussion of each research method in a chapter, review questions are posed for the users to determine how well they have grasped the content and whether there is need for additional careful study of some aspects of the chapter.

    I must express my profound gratitude to all the authors of books and articles that were consulted in the course of compiling this book. My sincere appreciation to all my colleagues and academic friends, especially Miss Motuboma Thomas, Prof N. P. Ololube, Dr P. U. Osadebe, and Dr E. E. Kari, for their useful suggestions and support. Thanks to my students, particularly those in masters and PhD programmes, during the years that the book was written. Finally, I am immensely grateful to my mentors, Prof A. I. Joe (Deputy Vice Chancellor Academic), Prof. N. E. S. Lale (the Vice-Chancellor), and Prof A. I. Ajienka (former Vice Chancellor) of University of Port Harcourt; Prof Steve Azaiki, and His Excellency, Chief D. S. P. Alamieyesiegha, PhD, for their wonderful inspiration. My endless appreciation goes to Partridge Publishing, a Penguin Random House Company, for publishing and making this book available worldwide to all those desirous of contributing to knowledge through research. Above all, I thank Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETEFund) for sponsoring this book.

    Please, graciously send suggestions for improving the contents of the next edition of this book to me.

    KpoloviePJ

    Peter James KPOLOVIE

    kpolovie@gmail.com

    Chapter 1

    Introduction

    Research is the scientific search for knowledge that serves as practical solution to a problem. It is the surest process by which man uncovers the ultimate truth for problem-solving. Research is the conscientious scientific quest for knowledge. Knowledge means a belief that has been empirically certified to be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth for practical application in problem resolution (Kpolovie, 2010).

    At each moment, life poses a myriad of problems as a result of man’s propensity for survival, development, and advancement. This is particularly so now that the society is constantly and radically becoming more and more complex. It has therefore become necessary for each person to study and have a mastery of scientific research process that induces a way of thinking that will enable the individual to critically evaluate the information with which he or she is confronted on a regular basis. We are living in the information age and only scientifically verified information through research that can be helpful in our journey towards attainment of glory and wealth. The complexity of modern society demands that we rely completely on scientific evidence. How such evidence is arrived at as well as the way of intelligently evaluating such evidence is taught only in a course on research, which this book exemplifies.

    Virtually, all the knowledge that you have gained from the study of the various subjects or courses up till date were arrived at through research. It is clear that you have been regularly bombarded by the results of scientific research and you need experimental tools to verify the research outcomes to know the ones that are conclusive.

    Unfortunately, however, the knowledge, skills, and ability to understand and personally engage in research do not and cannot come from all the other numerous courses and books that you have taken or read. It is only the course covered adequately in this book that can equip or provide you with the requisite skills and knowledge of successfully executing research to arrive at workable solutions to any of the millions of problems that face an individual, a group of persons, or mankind.

    Concerted effort, unreserved commitment, and total dedication are required of you to study and master the process of executing research as presented in this book. A mastery of the course covered with this text is a potent solution to virtually all the problems that you will encounter. There is no course that is of great importance to your success in life as the one that is treated adequately in this text. This book provides you with the requisite information on how scientific research is conducted. It is necessary for the education of every person. No one can be said to be well educated in any field of human endeavour when he or she has not known how to successfully conduct research in the area or in any other field.

    In fact, the entire material that you are required to learn in the social, physical, and educational sciences is virtually based on knowledge acquired from research (the scientific method of gaining knowledge). You will most likely be requested to conduct a study on a very important issue in the future. Conducting of a research is a sine qua non for graduation, be it at first degree, masters, or PhD level, from every globally recognised institution of higher learning. Successful execution of research is a fundamental requirement for the award of a degree in any university. You must therefore be knowledgeable and skilful in the art of conducting research successfully. This book is therefore an invaluable asset, a master-key for problem resolution that must be acquired, meticulously studied, mastered, and correctly applied in an individual’s endeavour towards the actualisation of desired goals in life. Perhaps, a closer examination of the meaning of research will further reveal or clarify the indispensability of this book.

    Definition of Research

    Research can satisfactorily be defined as the logical, systematic, and objective collection, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and recording of accurate and controlled observations for the development of generalisations, principles, or theories that are ultimately aimed at description, explanation, prediction, and control of natural phenomena to meet specific needs of man.

    Eight indispensable characteristics of research are embedded in this definition and they are briefly explicated hereunder:

    1. Research is goal oriented, aimed at meeting man’s needs.

    2. Research is characterised by objective and controlled observation.

    3. Research is statistical.

    4. Research is scientific.

    5. Research is characterised with theory and verification.

    6. Research ultimately aims at correct description, explanation, prediction, and control of future occurrences.

    7. Research demands careful recording and accurate reporting.

    8. Research can only be done by the self-disciplined, curious, persistent, and objectively minded.

    1. Research is goal oriented, aimed at meeting man’s needs

    Research is aimed at attainment of a goal, which is often provision of solutions to unsolved problems. Unravelling the truth, adding to knowledge, and pushing back the frontiers of ignorance are the goals of research. This is why a research begins with identification of a researchable problem that is begging for a solution. It is directed towards discovery of systematic cause-and-effect relationships between variables of interest. The ever increasing industrial and technological society poses numerous problems, and man engages in more and more research works to meet his needs. Originality and creativity are needed in the formulation of novel research topics for the resolution of either old or new problems. Relevant literature is reviewed extensively to show the various works that have been done by others to solve the problem and how there is need for the new investigation, approach, strategy, effort, technique, and method to solve the problem in question or fill the existing gap. Occasionally, a previous successful study in resolution of a given problem is even replicated. This means repeating the same study exactly the way it was done but using different sample, subjects, population, settings, and period of time for the same or identical problems.

    There is absolutely no problem that appropriate solution cannot be found if only man researches enough on it. Put scientifically, there is an equal and opposite reaction for every action. Perhaps, you are more familiar with the biblical expression that whatsoever a man sows is what he definitely reaps. We live in a world that is governed by law and not chance. There is nothing without a cause. Every effect has specific cause or causes. Every problem must have a cause or causes, which when removed, the problem will be solved. Research is therefore embarked on to discover the causal relationships between variables that are associated with a particular problem. Research is man’s most rational effort at solving an identified problem in order to meet his needs or at least reduce his needs for the truth about the problem. Research is said to be successful when it meets its goal by adding to knowledge. Each successful research provides solution to a problem (which was the goal of that investigation) and serves as a breakthrough in knowledge because it creates new opportunities that expand and multiply as long as the knowledge is applied, utilised, or exploited. Knowledge is generally cumulative. Once it exists, it grows exponentially as it becomes available to more and more persons. Also, there cannot be any new knowledge in isolation; as every piece of knowledge reveals connectivity and interconnectivity with other areas of knowledge in a self-reinforcing and accelerating manner. This success propels and motivates man to identify another problem or set another goal and research on it. As long as man lives on planet Earth and even when he gets to live in other planets, research will continue to be man’s permanent engagement, in order to solve his problems and meet his needs (Kpolovie, 2010).

    Every research begins with identification of its goal, which is one of the myriad of problems facing man in a given society. This goal is then carefully structured or worded to form a researchable topic. The goal is further clarified by

    (1) operationally defining all the associated variables;

    (2) clearly stating the purpose of the study;

    (3) specifically mentioning the problem under investigation;

    (4) formulating of all possible hypotheses that serve as tentative solutions to the problem, tenability of each of which will eventually be tested;

    (5) enumerating and lucidly explaining the utility, usefulness, or significance of the inquiry to the society;

    (6) outlining the questions that will definitely be answered at the end of the investigation;

    (7) stating the design and procedure to be adopted in the course of the inquiry;

    (8) indicating the limitations and delimitations as well as the assumptions of the inquiry.

    2. Research is characterised by objective and controlled observation

    Research demands accurate, systematic, logical, reliable, valid, objective, and controlled observation. It is from such observation that the relevant data for the investigation are collected, analysed, synthesised, evaluated, and recorded. The empirical evidence of a new piece of knowledge gotten from a research is based solely on the overt and/or covert observable experience that were subjected to appropriate statistical analysis and evaluation in the course of the inquiry.

    The kind of observation that the researcher makes and that is referred to here is different from the ordinary day-to-day things or events that we perceive with our eyes and other sense organs. Just think of all the things that you have seen or beheld with your eyes within the past one week. The researcher’s observation that I am talking about is far different from all the eye or body contacts that you have made during that week. While the general and ordinary day-to-day observations that every person does are done willy-nilly, the researcher’s observations are objective, controlled, directed, accurate, systematic, focused, logical, possess the rare qualities of validity and reliability, and are recorded and subjected to statistical analysis for testing of his formulated hypotheses, answering his research questions, and meeting the purpose of his inquiry without bias. The researcher’s observations, whether direct or indirect, structured or unstructured, contrived or natural, unobtrusive or obtrusive, involved or uninvolved, are carefully designed research tools or the techniques that are systematically planned, logically recorded, and critically validated for a predetermined research purpose. This accounts for why variables under investigation in a research are usually defined operationally in concordance with the observational tools employed for data collection in the inquiry.

    While direct observation is done with the use of sense organs, particularly the eye, and excludes mechanical devices, indirect observation is executed with the use of mechanical aids like hidden video camera, motion camera, one-way glass, concealed microphones, tape recorder, and so on in a natural setting. Structured observation is applied in experimental setting by controlling each of the variables associated with a particular behaviour in order to determine the effect of that variable on the behaviour. Unstructured observation on the other hand is applied in a nonexperimental setting, a situation that the variables of interest are not held constant (not controlled directly) because the investigation is not aimed at establishing cause-and-effect relationship. Contrived observation is the type that is adopted in laboratory experimentation and seeks to describe action or behaviour that will occur under carefully arranged and strictly controlled conditions. Such behaviour is sometimes simulated due to the complexity of human beings as the subjects of inquiry. Naturalistic observation is applied in the normal and usual social settings like classroom, home, hostel, prison, social group, and so on, to reveal or identify what each of the subjects actually, really, or typically does in accordance with the variables under investigation. An observation is said to be unobtrusive when the subjects being observed do not know that they are under observation. Simply put, the observer is concealed from the subjects of the study in an unobtrusive observation. On the contrary, obtrusive observation is that in which the observer reveals himself to the subjects of the study. That is, a situation in which the sampled persons for the study are aware that their behaviour or actions are being observed and recorded for the purpose of the research in question. An involved observation is that which the observer actively participates with the subjects of the study in exhibiting the behaviour under investigation. For instance, in the study of the feeding habits of obese and nonobese students, the observer necessarily has to be a student and eat with them whenever there is food. It requires more than empathy to do this type of observation. Uninvolved observation is that which does not require the observer to participate in demonstrating or exhibiting the trait under investigation. In this case, he will only watch or observe obtrusively or unobtrusively whenever the obese and nonobese students are eating to carefully record their feeding habits.

    3. Research is Statistical

    Statistics is the third integral characteristic of research. Statistics can be defined as the science of data collection, organisation, presentation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and interpretation (drawing of valid conclusions and reasonable decisions) that adds or contributes to knowledge. Research requires gathering and analysis of either firsthand/primary data or already existing data for a new purpose. The results of data collected and analysed in a research must add something new to existing knowledge or else the work does not qualify to be described as a research. Data analysis as an integral part or characteristic of research does not attempt to persuade or prove an emotionally held idea or conviction. Rather, it eliminates personal bias as it tests the tenability of each of the hypotheses at a given statistical significance level (Kpolovie, 2011a). Conventionally, the statistical significance level or probability level is 0.05, which means that the probability of obtaining such result by chance, accident, coincidence, or mistake is 5 per cent or less in every 100 replications with other samples from the same population (Kpolovie, 2011b). In the social and natural sciences, merely reorganising or restating what is already known and has been written cannot and will never be taken as a research, no matter how valuable the write up may be. A research must collect and subject data to statistical analyses and expand the frontier of knowledge.

    It is with statistical analysis that the parameter of a population is inferred from the sample of any given research. Generalisations, principles, and theories as the goal of science and research are reached through inferences from the statistical analysis of various samples and populations. The best, most apt, or precise way of describing research data is statistical or quantitative. Even data from qualitative research can best be summarised quantitatively or statistically.

    All data collected in a research can be subjected to either parametric or nonparametric statistics, descriptive or inferential statistics. Parametric statistics is employed when data collected are at the interval and/or ratio scales of measurement, and which assumes that the variable under investigation is normally or nearly normally distributed in the population covered by the study. This type of statistics easily permits close study of only a small randomly selected sample and the accurate generalisation of characteristics of the sample to the population from which the sample was drawn. Examples of parametric statistics are Pearson’s correlation, t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and regression, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), and factor analysis. Nonparametric statistics deals with data collected at the nominal or/and ordinal scales of measurement to which arithmetic operations of addition, division, subtraction, and multiplication cannot be correctly applied. Nonparametric statistics, occasionally called distribution-free statistics, is not based on the stringent assumptions that the characteristics under inquiry are normally distributed in the population under investigation. Examples include chi-square, median test, sign test, Spearman’s rho, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon test.

    Descriptive statistics, as the name implies, is used for simply describing the characteristics of a sample or a group of subjects in terms of the variable under investigation. Descriptive statistics does not in itself allow or permit correct generalisation beyond the group or individuals that was observed on a specific behaviour, trait, variable, or construct. Examples are measures of central tendency like mean, mode, median, and measures of variability like range, variance, and standard deviation. Inferential statistics, also known as inductive statistics, is used primarily for appropriately drawing conclusions about the characteristics of a given population from the sample that was randomly taken from the population. It is with the use of inferential statistics that in research, only a true representative sample of a population is meticulously studied and the findings thereof are accurately generalised to cover the entire population; as it is almost impossible (cost and timewise) to observe the whole population. Causal relationships, prediction, and control of natural phenomenon through research are made possible with inferential statistics. Testing of null hypothesis for its tenability or determination of statistical significance in a research can only be done with inferential statistics.

    4. Research Is Scientific

    Research in the natural and social sciences is scientific as it adopts the careful and controlled scientific method of inquiry or approach to knowledge discovery. The scientific method of acquiring knowledge has five logical steps as follows:

    Step 1: Problem identification and hypothesis formulation

    This is the beginning stage at which one out of the myriad of problems facing mankind or society is chosen and clearly stated or formulated in researchable form. A well-formulated problem should possess these characteristics:

    i. It must appreciably advance knowledge in the chosen field when solved.

    ii. It must be of genuine interest to the investigator.

    iii. A problem that the investigator has no personal, social, cultural, or religious biases on.

    iv. A problem that the scientist or researcher has the necessary skills, abilities, and information (background knowledge) to investigate.

    v. It must be sufficiently delimited to permit exhaustive and significant treatment by the scientist.

    vi. The person carrying out the inquiry should be able to gather or obtain adequate data on the problem.

    vii. A problem that the scientist can devote enough time, money, and effort to completely deal with.

    viii. It has to be one that the researcher has access to all the necessary tools, equipment, materials, subjects, and laboratories or right social setting to conduct the inquiry.

    ix. A problem that when studied can lead to the development of other related investigations.

    x. A problem which when conclusively studied will not produce doubtful results because the instruments used for data collection are of satisfactory validity and reliability.

    xi. It should clearly indicate the breadth of applicability of the findings with regards to population, areas, and years of coverage.

    xii. It must meet the scope, topical requirements, and significance or value of the institution or journal to which the findings will be submitted.

    xiii. It must clearly specify the dependent and independent variables under investigation.

    xiv. A problem that is capable of producing findings that will be of great practical value and utility to society, scientists, educators, other professionals and the general public.

    xv. It must be that which various testable null hypotheses can be formulated on (Kpolovie, 2011a).

    xvi. It should not merely duplicate the work that has been adequately done by others and will not add something new to the already existing knowledge.

    xvii. It has to be such that the investigator can gather enough current literature on.

    Step 2: Experimental design

    The experimental design stage is that in which the entire procedure for successfully carrying out the inquiry in order to arrive at new knowledge is meticulously and logically planned. It is a very crucial and central phase that maps out in unmistakable terms everything that will be done to ensure that all hypotheses formulated in the first step are objectively tested to answer the research questions posed and achieve the purpose of the study. The various approaches, strategies, and methods to be adopted for proffering unquestionable solutions to the identified problem are planned here. A comprehensive action plan on how to execute the investigation covers the following areas:

    i. Based on the nature of the problem, historical, descriptive, developmental, causal-comparative, action, quasi-experimental, triangulation, or true experimental design is adopted.

    ii. Stating of the population that the study covers and differentiating the population from other groups that are not covered by the inquiry.

    iii. Specification of the sample size, and the methods of randomly selecting the sample such that it becomes an adequate true representation of the population.

    iv. Construction of the instruments for data collection.

    v. Ensuring through empirical evidence that the instruments have high validity and reliability by test-running them with another similar sample and validating them.

    vi. Stating of the underlining assumptions that govern interpretation of results.

    vii. Specification of data collection procedures.

    viii. Outlining and rationalisation of the statistical tools for analyses of data.

    ix. Randomised placement of subjects into the various groups in the study to maximise both internal and external validity of the research design.

    x. Clarification of how both the dependent and independent variables will be controlled effectively to avoid the influence of extraneous variables on the results of the investigation.

    xi. Running of a pilot study to reassure the efficacy and appropriateness of the design to be adopted in the main study.

    xii. Stating of the degree of freedom or level of significance at which the tenability of each of the formulated hypotheses will be tested.

    xiii. Indication of how results will be evaluated, conclusions drawn, discussed, and reported.

    xiv. Simplification of the plan in a way that it can be easily replicated by other interested researchers or scientists.

    Step 3: Execution of the experiment and data collection

    This stage marks the actual conduct of the experiment as planned in the second step. The entire plan of the inquiry is painstakingly implemented by doing all the fieldwork like interacting with the subjects, administering all the instruments, and performing all the observations in the most controlled form and collecting every relevant data and responses made by the subjects. These are the data and responses that depict the subjects with regard to the dependent and independent variables of the investigation. At this stage, variables are manipulated systematically and in controlled form in order to determine whether the experiment will produce unquestionable and conclusive evidence for the expected results. The objective, systematic, logical, reliable, valid, and controlled observation as an integral characteristic of research is practically demonstrated in the execution step in scientific knowledge acquisition as the entire subjects, experiment, method, scientist, or researcher as well as his assistants and the research tools, laboratory, and so on are carefully, actively, and maximally put into use for the generation of data.

    Step 4: Data analysis, hypothesis testing, and results presentation

    Data collected by the scientist or researcher are meaningless except when they are appropriately organised, analysed, and interpreted in accordance with each of the hypotheses stated ab initio for the study. This deals with statistical analyses of the data for testing, rejecting, or accepting the tenability of each of the null hypotheses, and clearly presenting and interpreting the findings (results) in line with the hypotheses as well as the research questions and reviewed literature. The data analysis for each hypothesis is conventionally summarised in tabular form for easy perusal, simplicity, and understanding without committing the error of oversimplification. The table is then explained in unambiguous terms to clearly show whether the given null hypothesis is accepted or rejected at the chosen level of significance. Next, each result is discussed lucidly in line with all previous related works that have been reviewed by the investigator to anchor the new finding in its rightful place. The discussion shows the connection of the present finding with already existing knowledge and moves toward formulation of generalisations, principles, or theories for the control of future occurrence. In this way, the implications and contributions of the new finding to the existing body of knowledge is explicitly made.

    Step 5: Reporting or communication of the research results

    Results of a scientific inquiry must be properly documented and carefully reported in professional journals and periodicals in a systematic form. This is the only way that the new knowledge discovered by a researcher becomes known to the public who utilise it for resolution of the problem solved in the study whenever such occurs in day-to-day existence of the society. The report must be skilfully written to clearly show why and particularly how the research was conducted and what findings were arrived at. In addition to dissemination of knowledge gained in a research, proper reporting and communication of research findings allows for replication of the study in similar situations with other populations.

    A well-written research report does not exclude any of the following (Blaxter, Hughes, and Tight, 2009; Rugg and Petre, 2009; Murray, 2009; Jackson, 2006; and Nworgu, 2006):

    i. Title: This is the topic of investigation.

    ii. Abstract: This briefly, but very richly, summarises the entire study in just about 150 words.

    iii. Introduction: The introduction adequately states the problem and purpose or objectives of the study in very clear terms. It also covers the research questions and hypotheses postulated for the inquiry. A summary of related literature reviewed in the work is also covered in the introduction.

    iv. Methodology and execution of the study: While methodology covers the well-planned approach adopted for the work such as population, sample, instrumentation, research design, assumptions, and methods of data analyses, execution treats how the methodology was actually, carefully, and systematically conducted or implemented in the course of the experiment or observation for data collection.

    v. Data analysis and results presentation: This contains tabular synopsis of data analysed for testing tenability of each of the hypotheses and answering the research questions in unmistakable terms.

    vi. Conclusion: The conclusion discusses each of the results presented in line with reviewed literature. It very clearly outlines and vividly explains the implications and practical utility or contributions of the findings in problem resolution.

    vii. References: This is where works sited in the study are appropriately referenced.

    5. Research is characterised with theory and verification

    The development or testing of a theory, generalisation, or principle characterises research. A theory is a general explanation for certain phenomena as it establishes causal relationship between variables that are associated with the phenomena. It is a logically organised set of propositions that defines events, describes their interconnectivity as explanations for their occurrence. Broadly speaking, research is aimed at generating empirical knowledge for the building of a theory, or testing of parts of a theory and sometimes for the application of a theory to resolution of practical everyday problem.

    While those who engage in fundamental or basic research are concerned with theory formulation by addressing the question of what (Kpolovie, Iderima, and Ololube, 2014), investigators who are engaged in applied research are concerned with testing of theoretical concepts in actual problem situation by addressing the questions of why and how to improve products or process for greater satisfaction of man. Every research can be categorised loosely as either fundamental/basic (theory formulation and development) or applied (theory verification in practical setting). It is on this note that every research is characterised overtly or covertly with theory.

    Other reasons for considering theory as characteristic of research are as follows (Kpolovie, 2010):

    i. Postulation and evaluation of theory are the core and absolutely essential challenge for engagement in research.

    ii. Theory is arrived at or propounded inductively through research findings.

    iii. Deductively, a theory’s acceptability depends on successful tests of related hypothesis via research.

    iv. Research works are the only reliable and most valid way of freeing a theory from contradiction.

    v. Research leads to meaningful and logical arrangement of the propositions in a theory.

    vi. Definitions, assumptions, and propositions of a theory are frequently debated scientifically (i.e., through research) for the continuity of a given profession.

    vii. A theory produces many specific hypotheses or questions that beg for research works on them.

    viii. Theory allows for the application of the principle of parsimony in which the simplest alternative explanations are proffered and scientifically tested for the how, why, and what of phenomena or events.

    ix. Theory posits intervening variables for the explanation of observed behaviour.

    x. Good theories organise empirical knowledge and guide research by providing room for rigorous testing of hypotheses.

    xi. Theory logically organises propositions for the definition and description of relationships and events for the prediction of future occurrences.

    xii. Through research, the internal consistency of a theory is tested by observing whether hypothesised outcomes are upheld and precise predictions of the theory are tenable from empirical evidence.

    6. Research ultimately aims at correct description, explanation, prediction, and control of future occurrences

    The ultimate goal of virtually all research works, is understanding of the world in which we live through detailed examination of phenomena and provision of accurate description, explanation, prediction, and control.

    i. Description

    Description refers to the procedures by which events and the relationships among events are explicitly defined and classified into categories. Description is the systematic and accurate portrayal of a phenomenon that clearly identifies the variables that exist, their association or interaction, and the degree or magnitude of their existence. The nomothetic approach and the idiographic approach are used in description of phenomena, events, or behaviour in research.

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1