Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar
Ebook228 pages2 hours

Julius Caesar

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

In Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare uses the most notorious murder in classical history to tell a tragic tale of friendship, ambition and betrayal.

Part of the Macmillan Collector’s Library; a series of stunning, clothbound, pocket sized classics with gold foiled edges and ribbon markers. These beautiful books make perfect gifts or a treat for any book lover. This edition is illustrated throughout by Sir John Gilbert, and includes an introduction by Ned Halley.

As the greatest figures of the Roman Republic are swept along on the tide of a terrifying conspiracy, a touchingly human story is revealed in some of the most beautiful poetry ever written.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherPan Macmillan
Release dateAug 11, 2016
ISBN9781509831739
Author

William Shakespeare

William Shakespeare was born in April 1564 in the town of Stratford-upon-Avon, on England’s Avon River. When he was eighteen, he married Anne Hathaway. The couple had three children—an older daughter Susanna and twins, Judith and Hamnet. Hamnet, Shakespeare’s only son, died in childhood. The bulk of Shakespeare’s working life was spent in the theater world of London, where he established himself professionally by the early 1590s. He enjoyed success not only as a playwright and poet, but also as an actor and shareholder in an acting company. Although some think that sometime between 1610 and 1613 Shakespeare retired from the theater and returned home to Stratford, where he died in 1616, others believe that he may have continued to work in London until close to his death.

Read more from William Shakespeare

Related to Julius Caesar

Titles in the series (100)

View More

Related ebooks

Performing Arts For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Julius Caesar

Rating: 3.7467392187826083 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

2,300 ratings33 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This was great fun, although it was quite hard keeping all the characters straight in my mind because so many of them had unfamiliar Roman/Latin names.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Reason to read: Shakespeare Category Challenge, ROOTThis was actually enjoyable to listen to. Some great lines that are very familiar and of course the story is as well. Caesar, Anthony, Brutus, the Ides of March. One should probably read this one in March..
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is one of two of Shakespeare’s better-known plays that I somehow missed in high school and college (the other is [King Lear], which I have yet to read). Despite the title, most of the action centers around Brutus, his decision to throw in with the conspirators, Caesar’s death, and the aftermath.Perhaps the most famous lines in this play come from Mark Antony, mourning Caesar’s death and allowed by the conspirators to eulogize, as long as Antony does not blame them for the act. He does so, brilliantly getting the plebeians on his side while he talks about his friend, all the while repeating variations of “But Brutus says, he {Caesar} was ambitious; / and Brutus is an honorable man.” A couple of other phrases I was delighted to discover were “it is Greek to me” and “give up the ghost,” neither of which I realized were so old. I read it in one sitting, as is my wont, with a fair amount of help from the notes. I have the “Wordsworth Classics” edition which, instead of having notes on the opposite page or footnotes, had them in the back, so I had to keep a finger there and keep glancing back and forth. The glossary was separate and alphabetically rather than by line number, which was irritating, but despite that I mostly followed the meaning on my own from the context.I would include the play among the history plays rather than calling it an all-out tragedy. Certainly there is a lot of death, but unlike [Hamlet] where audiences have sympathy for the main character yet everybody dies, no one comes out completely sympathetic in [Julius Caeser]. The conspirators are not great people, yet Antony and the others taking over government after Caesar’s death can also be ruthless and bicker among themselves. All in all, it’s rather unsettling and as modern as any current book with unlikable characters. The introduction to my edition discusses this and also has some pointed things to say about politics that could have been written today rather than 2004: “To this day, human beings are, all too often, sacrificed pointlessly on the altar of one political ideology or another. Again and again, men of slogans and ambition seduce and delude their more decent auditors; the many are swayed by the hypocritical rhetoric of the few. Repeatedly, violence generates yet more violence.” Not much has changed since 1599 - or 44 BCE, for that matter.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I am doing some preliminary research and decided to start with Shakespeare.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    One of Shakespeare's greatest and most accessible plays. Marc Antony's speech is one of Shakespeare's best, especially as it follows what would otherwise seem a pretty good speech by Brutus. Cutthroat politics goes back a long way....
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Not Shakespeare's best, but then even his lesser works are better than 99% of the rest out there. Not my favorite, but still recommended.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    It's Shakespeare, so pretty much everyone dies.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    One begins to understand cultural references the more one reads Shakespeare, and Julius Caesar is no exception to this rule (this is perhaps especially true for Star Trek fans). The fault being not in our stars but in ourselves is a great bit of poetry that everyone should heed.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I love the Folger editions w awesome illustrations from the library. This is a larger sized paperback which is easy on the eyes. I have to say that Shakespeare is fairly neutral in presenting the main characters.Was happy to see "Let loose the dogs of war", though I previously thought that was from one of the Henry's.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A wonderful classic that truly speaks to the duality of man and his eternal search for not only power, but those that are truly pure at heart. Amazing how many quotes and sayings have come from this piece of literature.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Enh I don't know what I can tell you about this. Antony's funeral oration is fairly amusing.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    'Tis happened upon chance that mine eyes have read the tale of Julius Caesar. For sooth, a great tragedy were 't. Yet happiness was clutch't betwixt mine hands that such wordsmithings are imbued into my corpus of knowledge. Brutus was not a noble understood, know that I now. It has cometh to pass that Royal Antony's quotes sitteth in upon my vernacular at the ready. What pleasure shall I give mine eyes to scan upon next? Be it, I prayeth, one of Sir William's comedies, for these tragedic readings have ravaged vexings upon my soul. Twelfth Night? Much Ado About Nothing? Instruct me, fellow plebeians.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears. Et tu, Brute. Beware the ides of March.” I'm a little embarrassed to admit that this is all I knew of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar up to this point in my life. There's so much more to this play. Shakespeare captures the tension and drama of the last years of the Roman Republic and the role of Julius Caesar's ambition in hastening its end. The L.A. Theatre Works audio production is outstanding. The cast includes Richard Dreyfuss, Kelsey Grammar, Stacy Keach, John De Lancie, and JoBeth Williams. I will listen to this recording again. Next time I will plan to do my listening when I'm able to follow along in the printed text.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Shakespeare’s dissection of the damage that idealism can do in politics is still relevant.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Cassius is quickly able to plant the idea of overthrowing Julius Caesar in the mind of Brutus, a man who claims to love Caesar. Cassius and Brutus gather a group of the Caesar's friends, who they join together to murder the leader, then tell each other that they did the man a favor and will be remembered for their courage in removing a tyrant. But then Marcus Antony gives a clever eulogy at the funeral, which causes the public to question the motives of the assassins, the conspirators no longer trust one another and Brutus finds his position threatened.A good example of how power corrupts, as even the good guy, Antony, tries to manipulate his friends to gain more for himself.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    My favourite part of this play is the "Antony is an honest man" speech. Excellent.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    So dry. What a mistake to cram this down 15-year old throats just because it's short. How many 10th graders have been completely turned off by Shakespeare because this is over their head. I really didn't care much for this. Many of his history plays are far superior. Should've been called "The Rise and Fall of Brutus" because Caesar is such a minor character -- no development either.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In the book Julius Caesar, a group of conspirators lead by a man named Brutus plot to kill Julius Caesar. After succeeding in killing him, Brutus sees Julius Caesar's ghost who promises to see him in Philippi. On a battlefield in Philippi, Brutus fights with Cassius's army. Cassius being overthrown, commits suicide. When one member of Cassius's army finds Cassius dead, he then also kills himself. Brutus is defeated and runs upon his sword. Conflict in Rome is at an end. As a twelve year old this wasn't the best book I've ever read. It was a little confusing with a lot of characters and action. I thought the book was going to be about Julius Caesar but it was more about the conspirators getting rid of him. One of the morals was don't murder anyone because you will have to live with the guilt the rest of your life. This play taught me a little about Rome and war. I really enjoy reading Shakespeare. Overall this was a good book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Good story.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is one of my favorite Shakespeare plays and one that I have read and reread over the years in addition to seeing several performances of the play. The classic story is informed by history as we know from Roman accounts about the life and death of Julius Caesar. Shakespeare adhered closely to the version of the story in Plutarch's Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. In comparing prominent figures from Greek and Roman history , Plutarch presented history as a compendium of the deeds of great men, portraying the characters with all the ambiguities and idiosyncrasies that were present in their lives. The writings of Marcu Tullius Cicero also informed Shakespeare. Cicero was a staunch republican and his dislike of Caesar preceded the conspiracy that led to his assassination, which conspiracy Cicero did not directly participate in. A final source for Shakespeare was the Roman historian Appian who chronicled the civil wars as part of his longer history of Rome. All of these sources inform the dramatic tension within this play adding a historical realism to Shakespeare's own dramatic genius. I especially like the relationship between Caesar and his wife. I also found the psychology of the characters, particularly Brutus, an important aspect of the drama. This helps make many of the characters from Brutus and Cassius to Mark Antony as memorable as the title character. It is one of the great Roman plays in Shakespeare's works, and it is both an historical and a dramatic achievement.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I read this play just after finishing Goldsworthy's excellent biography of Caesar. The play focuses much more on the conspirators, especially Brutus and Cassius, rather than the titular subject, who indeed hardly appears in person and is only about three scenes, one of them as a ghost. It is splendid stuff, largely, at least in the initial acts based on the premise that the conspirators were freeing Rome of a tyrant through their act; only, when Antony makes his famous "friends, Romans, countrymen" speech does a more nuanced view of Caesar's positives and negatives enter the scene. Not one of the meatier plays, but a good supplement to other reading about the period.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    One of the most powerful of his plays. Yes, the characters are set in black and white in true Shakespearean style and there is no room for hman error, but therein lies the beauty and power of this drama.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I hope to see this again soon. The first time I saw it as a high school play, the next time in 1997 at a Pub theater (more members of the cast than the audience) next to the railroad station in Greenwich England...with a wonderful redo as a Mafia, Chicago script.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    1599, meest klassieke tragedie, bron is Plutarchus; perfecte tekst (bijna helemaal rijm), later verketterd als schooltekstBrutus is de hoofdrolspeler, maar Caesar beheerst wel de handeling. Brutus is een idealist die ten onder gaat door een gebrek aan praktisch doorzicht; het tegendeel is Cassius, maar toch meer medevoelen met hem; Antonius is de gehaaide opportunist, demagoog. Brutus’ motieven: II,1 (p 820)Moord III,1Verheven pathetiek van Marcus Antonius na de moord, p 826, 827 (maar wel vals)Redevoeringen bij begrafenis III,2 vormen het hoogtepunt, vooral die van Antonius (p 828-29): opruiend door details over de dood van Caesar en een verwijzing naar zijn testament, tegelijk vriendelijk ten aanzien van de samenzweerders.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I read this play during my Sophomore year of high school. I loved it! "Et tu, Brute!" I thought of it again because I'm reading "A Long Way Gone", and this play is referenced frequently.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    At this point (I've not yet read King Lear or Othello), this is my favorite of Shakespeare's tragedies. Unlike the essentially silly situation of Romeo and Juliet or the artificially dragged out events of Hamlet, Brutus' struggle to reconcile patriotism and friendship, passion and honor mesmerized me right from the beginning.This is a high point in my quest to read/re-read all of Shakespeare's plays.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Forgive me that it took me eight months to finish Shakespeare's shortest play. I kept picking it up, reading the first act, and then forgetting. It's strange reading about Roman history through compound filters: dramatization, Shakespearean England, what we know of the Roman Republic, modern norms. One gets so twisted around that nary an eyebrow is raised in Act 2 when Caesar asks "What is't o'clock?" (Brutus: "Caesar, 'tis strucken eight.") Such a tangle that it might not jump immediately to mind that there were probably not a whole lot of chiming clocks in the first century BC. We've got Centurions herein acting like they're on Queen Elizabeth's court. Strange.This play is brief. Brief enough that it doesn't feel like a story so much as a string of exchanges. Brutus (who refers to himself in the third person and thus puts me in the mind of Tarzan or other deep-voiced simpleton) seems instantly swayed to subterfuge. Caesar is full of lofty exaltations but kind of amounts to nothing when you think about it. Marc Antony does show a bit of craftiness, and Cassius is devious. I do like the way Casca responds to Cassius' invitation to dinner and I hope I can use it myself sometime: "Ay, if I be alive, and your mind hold, and your dinner worth the eating."I do feel like that sometimes.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I read this due to my interest in HBO's Rome series (which has been cancelled after only 2 seasons - why TV gods, WHY???). Anyway, as an English major I read tons of Shakespeare, so it wasn't a challenging read for me and I found my mind analyzing language/passages as I would have been required to do in school. Let's just say the history plays have never been my favorites; maybe knowing the ending spoils the play?
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Great Play, could easily see this as a modern re-telling set in the Italian Mob or as hotile financial take over...I see Macbeth the same way.But betrayal is a hell of a thing.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is the best William Shakespeare that I have ever read. I haven't read much but this one was really appealing to me. Even though I knew the ending, I couldn't put the book down until the end.

Book preview

Julius Caesar - William Shakespeare

Contents

INTRODUCTION

JULIUS CAESAR

ACT I

SCENE I

SCENE II

SCENE III

ACT II

SCENE I

SCENE II

SCENE III

SCENE IV

ACT III

SCENE I

SCENE II

SCENE III

ACT IV

SCENE I

SCENE II

SCENE III

ACT V

SCENE I

SCENE II

SCENE III

SCENE IV

SCENE V

GLOSSARY

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Introduction

Julius Caesar was murdered at a theatre in the city of Rome on the morning of 15 March in the year 44BC. He was 55, dictator of Rome, and the most powerful individual in the western world. His assassination triggered a series of civil wars that destroyed the Republic, the constitutional system of government that had displaced the Roman monarchy 450 years previously.

Under the Republic, Rome was ruled by consuls, elected for just one year at a time. To begin with they were all aristocrats, the patricians, but in later centuries faced rivalry from a new, aspiring, self-made class, the plebeians. Power became divided between these two factions, but in common they shared a deep sense of public duty. The Republic, politically and ethically stable, prospered from imperialism, occupying all of southern Europe, tracts of northern Africa and Asia and latterly parts of northern Europe, including Britain.

Caesar was a patrician from an ancient landed dynasty, the Julii. A military commander before he was 21, a famous incident showed his character. Kidnapped by pirates, he promised he would pay a ransom, and that on his release he would return and crucify all of them. They thought it was bravado, but he kept his word in every respect. Caesar rose rapidly through the political ranks as a heroic public figure and in 60BC formed the first triumvirate of Roman rulers with Pompey, a general second only to Caesar in reputation, and Crassus, the richest man in Rome. It was an unofficial, largely secret, alliance but wielded great power, rivalling even that of the Republic’s legislative body, the senate. In 59 Caesar was elected consul.

Between 58 and 50 while Caesar was on military duty, Crassus was killed in battle in Asia. Pompey began to seek his own power base in Rome. Finally, on learning that Caesar was in Cisalpine Gaul (now northern Italy) intending to march on Rome with his victorious legions, Pompey had the senate order him to quit his command and disband his armies. Caesar refused, crossed the Rubicon river into Italy (it was treason to enter the country under arms) and defeated Pompey in a civil war that ranged across Italy and elsewhere in the empire. Pompey fled to Egypt where he was murdered, and Caesar was appointed both consul and dictator. Even then, he marched to Egypt (in 47) to enforce the rule of his mistress, Cleopatra, and finally defeated the last of Pompey’s armies in Africa and Spain.

When Caesar returned to Rome in 45, the senate, further cowed by his triumphs, reappointed him consul for ten years, dictator in perpetuity, and ‘Father of the Nation’. Statues of him were placed in the temples of the city and his profile minted on to the coinage. Caesar had become a demi-god.

This is where we find him at the outset of Shakespeare’s play. Formally entitled The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, it was written probably in 1599, and based on the 1579 translation by Sir Thomas North of two biographies by Plutarch, the Greek historian and philosopher (45–120 AD), The Life of Brutus and The Life of Caesar. Known to scholarship as the encyclopaedist of antiquity, a great amount of Plutarch’s work has survived, and his accuracy as a reporter has been corroborated by the work of contemporaries such as Suetonius, author of The Lives of the Caesars.

Shakespeare’s version of this pivotal event in world history has reliable provenance. The dramatis personae are all drawn from history. The famous oddities of the play, the anachronistic references to a striking clock (a late-medieval invention) and to Elizabethan-style attire such as hats and doublets, have been attributed to the notion that the play makes veiled reference to the question of the royal succession. In 1599 Queen Elizabeth was old and ailing, and had not named an heir. There was consequently some alarm that there could be civil war after her death, as there had been after Caesar’s.

The principal purpose of Julius Caesar is more obvious. The playwright exploits the episode to deliver a powerful exposition on ambition, friendship and betrayal. Caesar was certainly the most ambitious of men. His achievements to date, and his plans for the future, including a comprehensive reform of Roman law, vast infrastructure projects and foreign adventures, were feared by the leading Romans of his day as well as admired. And Caesar’s ambitions for himself were an understandable matter for speculation. Did he desire the restoration of the Roman monarchy, with himself the first king back on the throne since Tarquin, the sixth successor to founding sovereign Romulus, who had been, at least according to legend, unseated in 509BC?

We will never know whether Caesar’s ambition extended this far, but the possibility of it is certainly what cost him his life. And he made himself more vulnerable through his mercy. Most unusually for a Roman general, Caesar had the characteristic of showing clementia – clemency – to his defeated enemies. This was as true in civil conflict as it was in wars of invasion, and it had been extended to the two principal conspirators against his life, both in fact and as portrayed in the play. Brutus had sided with Pompey in the civil war of 49, but submitted to Caesar after the defeat, and was rewarded with the governorship of Cisalpine Gaul. Cassius had been a quaestor, a treasury official, in the service of Crassus until the triumvir’s death. Like Brutus, Cassius had taken Pompey’s side in the civil war. Caesar had pardoned him and advanced his political career.

In the opening scene of the play, it is a public holiday, Lupercalia (15 February), and two tribunes (elected officials similar to police) accost a couple of workmen on their way to join the crowd welcoming Caesar’s triumphant entry into Rome. The tribunes personify the old regime, telling the men that Caesar brings with him nothing of the spoils and glory that Pompey once did:

O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,

Knew you not Pompey? Many a time and oft

Have you climb’d up to walls and battlements,

To towers and windows, yea, to chimney tops,

Your infants in your arms, and there have sat

The livelong day with patient expectation

To see great Pompey pass the streets of Rome.

Pompey, though dead four years, still embodies the resistance to the irresistible Caesar. But the opposition, as manifested in chief conspirators Cassius and Brutus in Act I Scene II, is at best equivocal. The audience might not know, though Shakespeare surely did, that these two senior politicians owed not just their elevated status but their very lives to Caesar. This does not deter Cassius from turning Brutus against their benefactor, on the unsubstantiated apprehension that Caesar wishes for a crown. Brutus is taken in. Hearing the crowd call out for Caesar, he surmises Cassius must be right about the dictator’s ambition.

Brutus

What means this shouting? I do fear the people

Choose Caesar for their king.

Cassius

Ay, do you fear it?

Then must I think you would not have it so.

Brutus

I would not, Cassius, yet I love him well.

Caesar has as much to fear from his friends as he has ever done from his enemies. And in the best traditions of classical tragedy, he ignores or misses the warnings that he should stay at home on the fateful day. He makes light of Cassius’s suspicious demeanour in the famous phrase ‘he has a lean and hungry look’ and dismisses as ‘a dreamer’ the soothsayer who warns him, to his face, to beware the ides of March. Even his wife Calpurnia’s graphically related dreams and premonitions of his murder are put aside, as is the advice of the priests, whose sacrifice augurs ill. Only briefly does Calpurnia’s plea to Caesar on her knees persuade him to consider sending the trusted soldier Mark Antony to say he is unwell, but in the final twist, conspirator Decius Brutus plays the ace card. The senate, he warns, might put its leader’s absence down to foolishness, or even fear. Decius deploys a whole battery of emotional blackmail, including flattery, mockery and protestations of his own love for the intended victim in order to seal his fate.

And know it now, the Senate have concluded

To give this day a crown to mighty Caesar.

If you shall send them word you will not come,

Their minds may change. Besides, it were a mock

Apt to be render’d, for someone to say

‘Break up the Senate till another time,

When Caesar’s wife shall meet with better dreams.’

If Caesar hide himself, shall they not whisper

‘Lo, Caesar is afraid’?

Pardon me, Caesar, for my dear dear love

To your proceeding bids me tell you this,

And reason to my love is liable.

Caesar calls for his robe. He will go. Who would do otherwise? The scene is an exceptionally tense one of dénouement towards the tragic outcome, and building too on the mighty dictator’s fatal flaw of believing in his own infallibility. He is immediately swept up in the gaggle of conspirators for the short journey to the Capitol.

In setting the crime at the Capitol, seat of the senate, Shakespeare makes a diversion from the historic event. According to Plutarch, Caesar was killed at the Theatre of Pompey, at the time the principal place of entertainment in the city, which doubled as a venue for public meetings. Given the significance of Pompey’s legacy in the events themselves, and in the play, it might seem a curious departure, but the Capitol was in fairness the most important building of any kind in Rome. Note that the Theatre of Flavius, later known as the Colosseum, Rome’s largest amphitheatre, was not built until the latter part of the following century.

Just as the tension of Caesar’s progress to the wrong decision is so skilfully wrought in Act II, so is the arrival at a fatal error of judgment made by the conspirators. It is to spare Mark Antony. Cassius wants him killed with Caesar – ‘it is not meet/Mark Antony, so well beloved of Caesar/Should outlive Caesar’ – but Brutus balks at it:

Our course will seem too bloody,

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1