The Restoration of Man
()
About this ebook
C. S. Lewis is best known for his Narnia tales and Christian apologetics, works that have sold more than 100 million copies. But Lewis was also a trained philosopher and a professor at Cambridge and Oxford. An intellectual giant, he fiercely and extensively critiqued the fashionable dogma known as scientism—the idea that science is the only path to knowledge, and matter the fundamental reality. Michael Aeschliman's The Restoration of Man ably surveys Lewis's eloquent case against this dogma, and situates him among the many other notable thinkers who have entered the fray over this crucial issue. Aeschliman shows why Lewis's case for the human person as more than matter—as a creature with inherent rationality and worth—is a precious resource for restoring and preserving our culture's sanity, wisdom, and moral order. This newly revised and expanded edition of Aeschliman's celebrated study includes forewords by three distinguished writers—James Le Fanu, George Gilder, and Malcolm Muggeridge.
Related to The Restoration of Man
Related ebooks
Evolution and Intelligent Design in a Nutshell Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGod's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Debating Darwin's Doubt Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Redeeming Culture: American Religion in an Age of Science Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Darwin Myth: The Life and Lies Charles Darwin Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Creator Revealed: A Physicist Examines the Big Bang and the Bible Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsZombie Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Darwin on Trial Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Darwin Strikes Back: Defending the Science of Intelligent Design Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Shattering the Myths of Darwinism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRelativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What's Wrong with the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCanceled Science: What Some Atheists Don’t Want You to See Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Searchers: A Quest for Faith in the Valley of Doubt Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Is Atheism Dead? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Science After Babel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Mousetrap for Darwin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Unexpected Journal: Dystopia: Volume 2, #3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Christian Theology of Science: Reimagining a Theological Vision of Natural Knowledge Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Portals: Entering Your Neighbor's World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Everlasting Man Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Your Designed Body Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Taking Leave of Darwin: A Longtime Agnostic Discovers the Case for Design Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Darwin's House of Cards Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Design Inference Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Science & Mathematics For You
Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Book of Hacks: 264 Amazing DIY Tech Projects Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fantastic Fungi: How Mushrooms Can Heal, Shift Consciousness, and Save the Planet Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Activate Your Brain: How Understanding Your Brain Can Improve Your Work - and Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Metaphors We Live By Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Critically: Question, Analyze, Reflect, Debate. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Memory Craft: Improve Your Memory with the Most Powerful Methods in History Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Systems Thinker: Essential Thinking Skills For Solving Problems, Managing Chaos, Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies, and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Psychology of Totalitarianism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Free Will Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/52084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Trouble With Testosterone: And Other Essays On The Biology Of The Human Predi Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Stone Unturned: The True Story of the World's Premier Forensic Investigators Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hunt for the Skinwalker: Science Confronts the Unexplained at a Remote Ranch in Utah Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Outsmart Your Brain: Why Learning is Hard and How You Can Make It Easy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conscious: A Brief Guide to the Fundamental Mystery of the Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Crack In Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No-Drama Discipline: the bestselling parenting guide to nurturing your child's developing mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Born for Love: Why Empathy Is Essential--and Endangered Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Mortality: An Intimate History of the Black Death, the Most Devastating Plague of All Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Gov't Told Me: And the Better Future Coming Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Restoration of Man
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Restoration of Man - Michael D. Aeschliman
THE RESTORATION OF MAN
THE RESTORATION
OF MAN
C. S. LEWIS AND THE CONTINUING
CASE AGAINST SCIENTISM
MICHAEL D. AESCHLIMAN
SEATTLE DISCOVERY INSTITUTE PRESS 2019
Description
C. S. Lewis is best known for his Narnia tales and Christian apologetics, works that have sold more than 100 million copies. But Lewis was also a trained philosopher and a professor at Cambridge and Oxford. An intellectual giant, he fiercely and extensively critiqued the fashionable dogma known as scientism—the idea that science is the only path to knowledge, and matter the fundamental reality. Michael Aeschliman’s The Restoration of Man ably surveys Lewis’s eloquent case against this dogma, and situates him among the many other notable thinkers who have entered the fray over this crucial issue. Aeschliman shows why Lewis’s case for the human person as more than matter—as a creature with inherent rationality and worth—is a precious resource for restoring and preserving our culture’s sanity, wisdom, and moral order. This newly revised and expanded edition of Aeschliman’s celebrated study includes forewords by three distinguished writers—James Le Fanu, George Gilder, and Malcolm Muggeridge.
Copyright Notice
Copyright © 2019 by Michael D. Aeschliman, All Rights Reserved. Originally published 1983, Wm. B. Eerdmans under the title The Restitution of Man: C.S. Lewis and the Case Against Scientism. Reissued with new Foreword and Afterword 1998, Wm. B. Eerdmans.
Library Cataloging Data
The Restoration of Man: C. S. Lewis and the Continuing Case Against Scientism by Michael D. Aeschliman
182 pages, 6 x 9 x 0.4 inches & 0.56 lb, 229 x 152 x 10 mm. & 0.25 kg
Paperback ISBN: 978-1-936599-68-4. Kindle ISBN: 978-1-936599-70-7.
EPUB ISBN: 978-1-936599-69-1
Library of Congress Control Number: 2019945147
SCI075000 SCIENCE/Philosophy & Social Aspects
REL106000 RELIGION/RELIGION & SCIENCE
BIO007000 BIOGRAPHY & AUTOBIOGRAPHY/Literary Figures
Publisher Information
Discovery Institute Press, 208 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98104
Internet: https://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/
Published in the United States of America on acid-free paper.
Third Edition: September 2019.
DEDICATION
In piam memoriam
Adrien René Aeschliman
1899–1981
sapiens et eloquens pietas
Praise for ...
One of the most perceptive books on C. S. Lewis.—Russell Kirk, Washington Post Book World
Aeschliman’s splendid book… worthily exhibits the valour of Lewis’s championship of true humanity and the ‘philosophia perennis’…—Expository Times (Scotland)
Aeschliman pulls together a dazzling array of scholarly ammunition in his attack against scientism… Highly recommended.—Library Journal
Almost a vade mecum of the liberal arts and will be welcomed… by any reader who values what Newman called the ‘philosophic habit’ of mind.—Anglican Theological Review
Analyses ancient and modern thought with great insight… a most valuable aid and stimulus… A much-needed and timely reminder of the vital and continuing importance of perennial values, and the need to rally to their defense.—Peter Hodgson, Head of the Nuclear Physics Theoretical Group, Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Oxford University, University Bookman
An excellent study of a major theme in the writing of C. S. Lewis.—Mark G. McKim, Reformed Review
A succinct, strong book, worthy of Lewis himself.—Russell Kirk, The Wanderer
Goes beyond mere literary criticism to argue an important point with vigor, and for that reason stands on its own as a voice in the conversation.—Epiphany
An admirable synoptic review of the key thinkers of modernity who have dealt with the meaning of scientific knowledge for understanding the nature and condition of persons.—Philip H. Phenix, Columbia University
Aeschliman’s book is the best possible guide to reading for those who feel the need to recover an integral humanism open to the idea of Divine Wisdom.—David Martin, London School of Economics, Fellow of the British Academy
CONTENTS
FOREWORD
INTRODUCTION
1. COMMON SENSE AND THE COMMON MAN
2. SCIENTISM VS. SAPIENTIA
3. SCIENTISM: THE CURRENT DEBATE
4. C. S. LEWIS AND THE TWO CULTURES
5. THE ABOLITION OF MAN
AFTERWORD
GLOSSARY OF BIOGRAPHICAL IDENTIFICATIONS
ENDNOTES
INDEX
FOREWORD
James Le Fanu, 2019
THE THREE decades following the Second World War were arguably the most productive in the long history of science. Within living memory, we have learned how the Big Bang
brought the universe into being, how the first stars were formed and how within their fiery interiors the chemical elements were created by the process of nuclear fusion—hydrogen into helium, helium into carbon, oxygen, silicon, all the way up through the periodic table. We have learned how four billion years ago a vast cloud of intergalactic gas and particles in that, by now, vast universe, coalesced to form our solar system; how our earth acquired its sustaining atmosphere and how the tectonic movement of massive plates of rock created the continents and oceans. We have identified the very first forms of life that emerged three billion years ago, delineated the internal workings of their fundamental unit, the cell, and discovered the universal code
of nucleotides strung out along the double helix by which all living things replicate their kind. And we now have compelling evidence of the details of the physical characteristics of our earliest ancestors and their transformation to modern man.
This overarching historical narrative linking our existence all the way back to the moment when energy, time, and space appeared—apparently out of nothing—ranks amongst the greatest of all intellectual achievements permitting us, if astonishingly, for the first time to hold in the mind’s eye the entire history of the universe from the moment of its inception to the present day. The triumph of science, one might suppose, is virtually complete. What during these times have we learned from the humanities—philosophy, say, theology or history—that begins to touch the profundity and originality of that intellectual achievement?
The authority and prestige conferred by those insights has marginalized those other ways of knowing, and inevitably the doctrine of scientism—science is the only begetter of truth
—has, in its several guises, become the common currency of The Academy and public discourse: epistemic scientism, the contention that the scientific method is the only reliable path to knowledge; ontological scientism, the supposition that whatever is not encompassed within the domain of science does not exist or has only a secondary or subsidiary reality; promissory scientism, the assertion that there is nothing in principle that science cannot explain; and redemptive scientism, the idea, as philosopher Mary Midgley expresses it, of salvation through science alone.
¹
These several variations of scientism entail, by necessity, that man is the result of a purposeless and natural process that did not have him in mind,
² our seemingly unique attributes—the powers of reason and imagination, the moral law within and the sense of self—being no more than an illusion generated by our selfish
genes and the electrochemistry of the brain to maximize our chances of survival. Modern science directly implies that the world is organized strictly in accordance with mechanistic principles,
writes philosopher William Provine. There are no purposive principles whatsoever in nature. There are no gods and no designing forces that are rationally detectable... modern science implies too there are no inherent moral or ethical laws... free will, the freedom to make uncoerced unpredictable choices among alternative possible causes of action, simply does not exist... there is no ultimate meaning for humans.
³
Modern science may imply that the world (and ourselves) are organized strictly in accordance with mechanistic principles,
but it can scarcely be said to have demonstrated this to be so. On the contrary, impressed—dazzled even—by that overarching historical narrative, it is easy to overlook that its intellectual legacy is almost precisely the reverse of that which is commonly supposed. Those major landmarks—the scientific understanding of the origins of the universe, the creation of the chemical elements, the formation of our solar system and planet and so on—cannot by definition be rediscovered, so the major challenge for science in more recent times has been to refine and elaborate on what is already known. And that has proved surprisingly tricky. For while the broad outline still holds, the practicalities of how (or why) those major events came about in the way they did has proved impervious to scientific scrutiny.
The evidence for the origin of the universe at the moment of the Big Bang 14 billion years ago (or thereabouts) and its sudden dramatic expansion seems compelling enough but only serves to emphasize the inscrutable perplexity of this most influential of scientific theories. The proposition that the universe sprang into existence a finite time ago from nothing (or, at least, from nothing physical) places a heavy (insupportable) demand on any causal explanation that must—by necessity—transcend time, space, matter, and energy.
So, the scientific community has been compelled to acknowledge that the universe must have sprung into existence ab nihilo. It has subsequently emerged that the physical laws of the universe—e.g., gravity, electromagnetism, the strong and weak nuclear forces, the speed of light—are so finely tuned that the slightest alteration in their values would have rendered impossible the subsequent emergence of life on earth. It is very difficult to convey just how precise the values of those forces had to be, but physicist John Polkinghorne estimates their fine-tuning had to be accurate to within one part in a trillion trillion (and several trillion more), a figure greater by far than all the particles in the universe.⁴
As for the origins of life itself, the progressive delineation of the internal workings of its fundamental unit, the cell, over the past fifty years has revealed it to be a world of supreme technology and bewildering complexity
in which many features of our most sophisticated machines have an analogue: memory banks for information storage and retrieval, elegant control systems regulating the assembly of parts, proofreading devices for quality control, and assembly processes utilizing the principles of modular construction.⁵ This automated factory,
several thousand million times smaller than the smallest piece of functional man-made machinery, which in its various forms has the capacity to create every living organism that ever existed—from a giant redwood to the human brain—can replicate its entire structure within a matter of hours. The likelihood that the first cell’s many components might have arisen spontaneously from some prebiotic chemical soup is analogous to supposing, as the late astronomer Fred Hoyle observed in a memorable image, a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.
⁶
The most economical interpretation of these several instances of the inscrutable perplexities revealed by refining and elaborating
on that overarching historical narrative would be that by illuminating how little science can truly explain, they have undermined (annihilated, even) the fundamental tenets of scientism. But there is more, for the findings of the two most recent and ambitious of scientific projects contradict, if inadvertently, any pretensions to an exclusively materialist account of the phenomena of life and ourselves.
These projects were predicated on two remarkable technical developments that promised to resolve the two major obstacles to a truly comprehensive account of our place in the universe: how it is that those genetic instructions strung along the double helix contribute to the multitudinous diversity of form and attributes of the living world; and how the electrical activity of the human brain translates
into our subjective experiences, memories, and sense of self. Those developments were, first, the ability to spell out the full sequence of genes, or genomes, of diverse species—worm, fly, mouse, man, and many others—and, second, the sophisticated scanning techniques that permit neuroscientists for the first time to observe the brain in action
from the inside—thinking, memorizing, and looking out on the world.
The ability to spell out the full sequence of genes should reveal, it was reasonable to assume, the distinctive genetic instructions that determine the diverse forms of the millions of species, so readily distinguishable one from the other. Biologists were thus understandably disconcerted to discover precisely the reverse to be the case. Contrary to all expectations, many DNA sequences involved in embryo development are remarkably similar across the vast spectrum of organismic complexity, from a millimeter-long worm to ourselves.⁷ There is, in short, nothing in the genomes of fly and man to explain why the fly should have six legs, a pair of wings, and a dot-sized brain and we should have two arms, two legs, and a mind capable of comprehending that overarching history of our universe.
So we have moved in the very recent past from supposing we might know the principles of genetic inheritance to recognizing we have no realistic conception of what they might be. As Philip Gell, professor of genetics at the University of Birmingham, observed, This gap in our knowledge is not merely unbridged, but in principle unbridgeable and our ignorance will remain ineluctable.
⁸
It has been a similar story for neuroscientists with their sophisticated scans observing the brain in action.
Right from the beginning, it was clear the brain must work in ways radically different from those supposed. Thus, the simplest of tasks, such as associating the noun chair
with the verb sit,
cause vast tracts of the brain to light up
—prompting a sense of bafflement at what the most mundane conversation must entail.⁹ Then the sights and sounds of every transient moment, it emerged, are fragmented into a myriad of separate components without the slightest hint of the integrating mechanism that would create the personal experience of living at the center of a coherent, unified, ever-changing world.
Reflecting on this problem, Nobel Prize-winner David Hubel of Harvard University observes, This abiding tendency for attributes such as form, color and movement to be handled by separate structures in the brain immediately raises the question how all the information is finally assembled, say, for perceiving a bouncing red ball. They obviously must be so assembled—but where and how, we have no idea.
¹⁰
Meanwhile, the great conundrum remains unresolved: how the electrical activities of the billions of neurons in the brain are related to the experiences of our everyday lives—where each fleeting moment has its own distinct, intangible feel: where the cadences of a Bach cantata are so utterly different from the taste of bourbon or the lingering memory of that first kiss. The implications are obvious enough. While it might be possible to know everything about the physical materiality of the brain down to its last atom, its product,
the five cardinal mysteries of the non-material mind, remain unaccounted for: subjective awareness, free will, how memories are stored, the higher
faculties of reason and imagination, and that unique sense of personal identity that changes and matures over time but remains resolutely the same.¹¹
The standard response to such imponderables is to acknowledge that perhaps things have turned out to be more complex than originally presumed, but to insist these are still early days
to predict what might yet emerge. Now, biologists could, if they so wish, spell out the genomes of each of the millions of species with which we share the planet, but the interesting question of what determines the unique form and attributes of such diverse creatures would remain unresolved. And so too for observing the brain in action,
where a million scans of subjects watching David Hubel’s bouncing red ball would not progress understanding any further as to how those neuronal circuits experience the ball as being round and red and bouncing.
The contrast with that supreme intellectual achievement of the post-war years is striking. At a time when cosmologists can infer what happened in the first few seconds of the birth of the universe, and geologists can measure the movements of continents to the nearest centimeter, it seems extraordinary that geneticists can’t tell us why humans are so different from flies, and neuroscientists are unable to clarify how we recall a telephone number.
This necessarily poses the question as to why these recent findings have proved so difficult to unravel. There are two reasons why this might be so. The first, obvious on reflection, is that life
is immeasurably more complex than matter: Its fundamental unit, the cell, though billions of times smaller than the smallest piece of machinery constructed by man, has nonetheless, as noted, the capacity to create every organism that has ever lived. A fly is billions upon billions upon billions of times more complex than a pebble of comparable size and possesses properties that have no parallel in the inanimate world: the capacity to transform the nutrients on which it feeds into its own tissues, and to repair and reproduce itself. So, too, the laws of biology must be incommensurately more complex than the laws of physics and chemistry. So, while it is extraordinary that