A Short Treatise on the Space-Time Continuum

By Piankh Piankh

This is a unified field theory.

If you cannot see it, it is hidden.

From you.

Who has hidden it?

In physics, no one can hide anything.

Nothing is hidden from anyone.

From the beginning, it is always there.

In everything, everywhere.

For those who have the eyes to see.

One field.

One field, that makes the world one creation.

 

This work introduces the unified field theory sought by the physics community since 1920.

A theory of everything

In plain English, no mathematics.

And no Higgs bosons.

The Unified field theory.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Piankh Piankh
• Release date: Jan 27, 2021
• ISBN: 9781637951149

Book preview

A Short Treatise on the Space-Time Continuum

By Piankh (Nov. 4, 2020)

Contents

A Short Treatise on the Space-Time Continuum

The laws of physics

Introduction to the subspace flow model.

Matter and space

Matter

Gravity

Anti-matter

Subspace and subspace field

Space

Space is curved

Movement and velocity

Motion is complex

Energy equals mass

Momentum.

Time and the speed of light

The maximum action theory

Minimum time

Time

The Star Ship Anansi

Time can stop

Famous thought experiment

Thought experiment on the Z Anansi

No inertial frames of reference

Red and blue shifts

The reality of time, not real

Time travel:

General relativity

Mechanisms of general relativity

No big bang

No dark Energy

No dark matter

More dark matter

Black holes

Electric charge

Moving charge (electromagnetism)

Origin of electric charge

Energy

Anti-energy

Force

Particle interactions and particle decay

Origin of force

Origin of the strong nuclear force

Origin of mass and gravity

Origin of the Coulomb force

Origin of the weak force

Origin of exchange forces

Origin of action at a distance

Origin of inertia

Origin of all things (Self-assembly)

Quark model

Warp one

The laws of physics

The laws of physics are like other laws; based on principles. One of the main principle states that space is homogeneous and isotropic. The first part claims space is the same everywhere. If we travel to a place in space and meet an object, that will violate the principle but, we assume the object could be removed and the remaining space would be pristine. This principle is not true and is obviously based on some naïve idea like, seeing is believing.  For example, in relativistic physics, space can be curved, and different parts of space can have different curvatures. Notwithstanding little issues like that, the principle is universally accepted. An alternative would introduce many complexities, especially for beginners. It is a good place to start. Isotropic means the same in all directions and the same considerations apply. This is classical scientific and engineering technique, simplify the problem and introduce complexities by degrees as they become necessary to deal with real world applications.

An issue that arises early in physics is that of references. Everyone uses references, all the time or they would get lost. In the fairy tale, Ansel and Gretel used a string to find their way home but a bird, covering a lot of territory each day must have a better system. Other animals and humans must use references as they move about or they would not find their destinations[1]. People use landmarks, mile markers and other indications to clue them into their relative positions. In physics the markers are more formal and called coordinates. The most common one in use employs three lines, set up to be mutually at right angles to each other. Right angles simplify all issues here. The three lines are imagined meeting at the same point, this is like the home base and is called the origin. Each line is given as set of gradations, according to the problem. These could be meters, degrees, kilograms, seconds, etc., standard units of measure. They too are references. They allow physicists and engineers to be specific and to pinpoint what they mean in their communications. The above line system of reference is called cartesian in honor of seventeenth century French thinker Rene Descartes. Many other systems are possible, the lines do not even need to be at right angles but that does make things much easier to understand.

On occasions, a problem of interest may involve more than one system of reference, also called frame of reference. If they are moving, other considerations come in, but they can be handled without much difficulty. If any part is accelerating or spinning, other effects complicate the problem. As a result, the basic laws of physics are usually defined to be true in an inertial frame of reference, which is a coordinate system at rest with respect to the observer or is in straight line motion at constant velocity. The observer is the person using the reference frame. Inertia is a character of matter that tends to resist change in its status. Moving objects do not stop of their own accord and those at rest do not start moving of their own accord. This also implies that in some respects, there is no difference between moving at a constant velocity and standing still and there is something special about acceleration. The laws of physics been the same in all inertial reference frame is a convenience. The alternative would result in chaos for us. It does not follow that there would be chaos for physics, that is, for the cosmos.

Physics, as a science pursuing understanding, does not need any explicit units of measurement like meter, volt, kilogram, degrees, Farad, Ampere, etc. In that case it would be extremely hard to be specific about anything and there would be little engineering. That was the case when there were only two branches of knowledge, theology, and natural philosophy. Theology is the study of all things relating to the Gods. When we include all the religions and versions, esoteric and exoteric, that is an extensive study, and they continue to make progress too, but they do not make any measurements. They do not have any units. Consequently, each such scientist is in a world of his own. On the other hand, natural philosophy, from the time of Newton, began to take on specific theories, formulated mathematically, into which units of measure can be inserted and checked against reality. A broad range of specific explanations grew, producing specific knowledge with practical applications and the science gradually became commonly known as physics. Yet, there are still universities offering courses under the name of natural philosophy, which of course is physics[2].

Physics is a modern version of natural philosophy with emphasis on measurement and verification. There is a great reliance on mathematics. This comes out of the need to tie things together as precisely as possible. Natural philosophy seeks understandings. These are expressed in theories and encapsulated in mathematical equations. It is not the other way around; the understanding does not come from mathematics. On occasions it does give elucidation. Mathematics is mostly pursued for its own sake, but it is nevertheless a branch of natural philosophy because that is where they get all their mathematical  antecedence. In modern times, no one claims they come from theology but that may because it is politically incorrect.  One area is known as theoretical physics and they specialize in deploying mathematics to help understanding. Others specialize in setting up experiments and are gifted in that arena.

Introduction to the subspace flow model.

The modern era in natural philosophy, now commonly known as physics, began in the 17th century famously with Newton and Leibniz trying to set up mathematical formulations for common physical activities involving motion, acceleration, force, and work. The mathematics kept the science honest and succeeding centuries added to the database of knowledge in a positive way. By the early 20th century researchers begun to realize that in the realm of the exceedingly small, reality is quantized and there is a minimum value. Below that is an endless sea of possibilities out of which has come all the manifestations to which we are accustomed. We must assume that far more is possible and research continue into the early 21st century in the effort to find out what are the rules of becoming. This is an arena of not knowing. Advanced theorist has proposed that there is a continuous field corresponding to each elementary particle, the field is three-dimensional, pervades all of space and have wave