Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You
Unavailable
The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You
Unavailable
The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You
Ebook385 pages6 hours

The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this ebook

A Finalist for the 2019 Kirkus Prize in Nonfiction

"Nayeri combines her own experience with those of refugees she meets as an adult, telling their stories with tenderness and reverence.” —The New York Times Book Review

"Nayeri weaves her empowering personal story with those of the ‘feared swarms’ . . . Her family’s escape from Isfahan to Oklahoma, which involved waiting in Dubai and Italy, is wildly fascinating . . . Using energetic prose, Nayeri is an excellent conduit for these heart–rending stories, eschewing judgment and employing care in threading the stories in with her own . . . This is a memoir laced with stimulus and plenty of heart at a time when the latter has grown elusive.” —Star–Tribune (Minneapolis)


Aged eight, Dina Nayeri fled Iran along with her mother and brother and lived in the crumbling shell of an Italian hotel–turned–refugee camp. Eventually she was granted asylum in America. She settled in Oklahoma, then made her way to Princeton University. In this book, Nayeri weaves together her own vivid story with the stories of other refugees and asylum seekers in recent years, bringing us inside their daily lives and taking us through the different stages of their journeys, from escape to asylum to resettlement. In these pages, a couple fall in love over the phone, and women gather to prepare the noodles that remind them of home. A closeted queer man tries to make his case truthfully as he seeks asylum, and a translator attempts to help new arrivals present their stories to officials.

Nayeri confronts notions like “the swarm,” and, on the other hand, “good” immigrants. She calls attention to the harmful way in which Western governments privilege certain dangers over others. With surprising and provocative questions, The Ungrateful Refugee challenges us to rethink how we talk about the refugee crisis.

“A writer who confronts issues that are key to the refugee experience.” —Viet Thanh Nguyen, Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Sympathizer and The Refugees
LanguageEnglish
Release dateSep 3, 2019
ISBN9781948226431
Author

Dina Nayeri

Dina Nayeri was born in Iran during the revolution and arrived in America when she was ten years old. The winner of the UNESCO City of Literature Paul Engle Prize as well as a National Endowment for the Arts literature grant, she is the author of two novels. A contributor to The New York Times, The Guardian, Granta, and many other publications, she graduated from Princeton, Harvard, and the Iowa Writers' Workshop. She currently resides in London.

Related to The Ungrateful Refugee

Related ebooks

Emigration, Immigration, and Refugees For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Ungrateful Refugee

Rating: 3.684210555263158 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

38 ratings4 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Thanks to Edelweiss for the review copy. I know it took me a while to finish it but the subject matter could be hard to read at times. I love Nayeri’s style of writing. I enjoyed learning more about this author. I learned a lot about what all refugees go through.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Interesting blend of memoir, narrative, and rhetoric, this takes a hard look at the experience of refugees and the mythology around immigration. There are a lot of tools in Nayeri's toolbox here, and she makes use of them well.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Dina was right years old when she, her brother and mother fled Iran. As a Christian convert, her mother was spreading pamphlets around the country, an act that brought death threats from the morality authorities. They became refugees.Told in alternating chapters, Dina chronicles her family's struggles as refugees, with interviews taken later at a camp in Greece. She writes honestly, and with unflinching candor. Highlighting government bureaucracies, stories refugees must tell to be granted asylum. Life in the camps where many spend years, not allowed to work, slowly stagnating while trying to keep hope alive. How it feels to know one is a burden, unwanted, expected to be eternally grateful. The lack of understanding about the refugees own loss of family, culture, country. Being seen as less than, dirty, germ ridden, all of the prejudices many have of refugees. Some stories are less grim, uplifting, hopeful, but all are worth reading, maybe providing more understanding in this time of refugees coming from so many different places. The book is read by the author and her narration, telling her own story made this more personal, memorable.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I was drawn to Dina Nayeri’s The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You primarily because it advertises itself as a book that “defies stereotypes and raises surprising questions about the immigrant experience.” I had to believe that the stereotype of the “ungrateful refugee” would be one of the ones most strongly refuted by Nayeri. The last thing I expected was to come away from the book feeling that Nayeri had shot herself in the foot by exposing her own blatant hypocrisy when it comes to international refugees and their obligations to their host countries. But sadly, that’s exactly what happened.Dina Nayeri fled Iran with her mother and her younger brother when she was just eight years old. Her father, a successful dentist, elected to remain in the country – where he remarried and began a new family. Dina’s mother, an activist convert to Christianity, was in danger of arrest and imprisonment, and her husband decided to help her and his children escape the country, in effect abandoning them to them to their fate. The author was ultimately granted asylum in the United States and educated at Princeton University, and has carved out quite a successful career for herself. Despite her success, however, Nayeri seems to resent still each of the countries she passed through as a refugee, including the one she eventually settled in. Nayeri tells the stories of other refugees like her, people more or less forced to flee their own countries because of political or religious pressure, pressure strong enough to make them fear for their lives. Surprisingly, the stories, touching as they are, add little new to the conversation regarding the obligations of the West to take in as many political refugees as possible and the obligations of the refugees themselves not to become long-term burdens on the countries taking them in. More surprising is the disdainful attitude of superiority used by Nayeri to reprimand Western governments for even requiring refugees to prove that they are political refugees and not economic refugees. Nayeri argues that the distinction should not matter – that all the “mediocre” native-workers being replaced by refugees willing to work for lower wages don’t really deserve the jobs they do so poorly anyway. These quotes from the book demonstrate why I find Nayeri’s points about stereotyping a whole people to be so hypocritical on her part:“Every day her bosses questioned her (Nayeri’s mother’s) intelligence, though they had a quarter of her education. They pretended not to understand her accent. If she took too long to articulate a thought, they stopped listening and wrote her off as stupid.” Page 187 (making the same assumptions about her mother’s “bosses” that she accuses them of making about her mother.“I began looking forward again. Oklahoma wasn’t a promised land. It was hot and mediocre and lazy. And I could never satisfy these people.” Page 192 (writing off a whole population and region as being “mediocre and lazy”)“Daniel (the author’s brother) is a good immigrant – hardworking and talented and grateful, the kind who makes America better. He thanks his new country with his every move. And yes, the United States and England and Holland and Germany would be better if all immigrant were like him. I wonder, though, how many are just keeping their mouths shut and their ideas trapped in for fear of seeming defiant to the mediocre white man scrutinizing their papers.” Page 330 (fighting racism with racism of her own)“In conversations about the refugee crisis, educated people continue to make the barbaric argument that open doors will benefit the host nation. The time for this outdated colonialist argument has run out; migrants don’t derive their value from their benefit to the Western-born, and civilized people don’t ask for résumés from the edge of the grave. Page 334 (her legitimate argument cheapened by words like “barbaric” and “civilized”)“…I imagine what they (refugees) might become if they had, say, the same opportunities as the Trump children. My mind conjures Pulitzers, heart surgeries, books of poetry and philosophy and history. There is no logical reason for a mediocre few, shielded from competition, propped up by inherited riches and passports, to feast on the world’s resources under the guise of meritocracy.” Page 161 (assuming that only one of the groups is capable of mediocrity)“Maybe I’m a hypocrite. I believe in open borders, but Europe is no paradise. The notion that the rest of the world is without beauty or joy, that everyone is clamoring to break down Europe’s doors, is nonsense. For many, the West would be unequivocally worse…” Page 341 (very true argument that calls for mutual respect, something Nayeri seem to grant to the West only very reluctantly)Bottom Line: While The Ungrateful Refugee is interesting and thought-provoking, it weakens its own argument that refugees deserve more sympathy and respect than they get by basing that argument on the assumption that the average refugee is smarter, and has more potential, than the average Westerner helping to decide whether or not the refugee will be granted asylum. The author is quick to call out the hypocrisy of the West while failing to recognize her own. This book could, and should, have made a much stronger argument in favor of refugees than it does, and that is Nayeri’s fault.