Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Ebook146 pages1 hour
The implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
Delays in implementing the Court’s judgments, lack of political will in certain states parties, attempts to discredit the Court…
In ratifying the European Convention on Human Rights, the signatory states accept the Court’s jurisdiction and authority and “undertake to abide by the final judgment of the Court in any case to which they are parties” (Article 46 of the Convention).
While certain member states have made real progress in implementing the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, some others face serious structural and political problems forming real “pockets of resistance” that delay or prevent the execution of judgments. The Committee of Ministers is still supervising the execution of some 10 000 judgments, although they are not all at the same stage of implementation.
This publication highlights the difficulties in implementing certain judgments encountered in the 10 countries which have the highest number of non-implemented judgments against them (Italy, the Russian Federation, Turkey, Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, Greece, Bulgaria, the Republic of Moldova and Poland). It also analyses judgments whose execution raises complex political issues.
In ratifying the European Convention on Human Rights, the signatory states accept the Court’s jurisdiction and authority and “undertake to abide by the final judgment of the Court in any case to which they are parties” (Article 46 of the Convention).
While certain member states have made real progress in implementing the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, some others face serious structural and political problems forming real “pockets of resistance” that delay or prevent the execution of judgments. The Committee of Ministers is still supervising the execution of some 10 000 judgments, although they are not all at the same stage of implementation.
This publication highlights the difficulties in implementing certain judgments encountered in the 10 countries which have the highest number of non-implemented judgments against them (Italy, the Russian Federation, Turkey, Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, Greece, Bulgaria, the Republic of Moldova and Poland). It also analyses judgments whose execution raises complex political issues.
Unavailable
Related to The implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Related ebooks
The implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnforcement fees: clear, transparent and reasonable Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe individual application under the European Convention on Human Rights: Procedural guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStrategies of Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights: Rational Choice Within Normative Constraints Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe European Convention on Human Rights – Principles and Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact of the European Convention on Human Rights in states parties: Selected examples Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Rome to Kampala : The first 2 amendments to the Rome Statute Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJournalism at risk: Threats, challenges and perspectives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEuropean Arrest Warrant Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Noncompliance: The Politics of Law in the European Union Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPreventing torture in Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Fundamental Law of the European Union Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDelivering Citizenship: The Transatlantic Council on Migration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIPBES: An Introduction for Stakeholders: Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEuropean Union Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEU Public Contract Law: Public Procurement and Beyond Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAntitrust between EU law and national law / Antitrust fra diritto nazionale e diritto dell'Unione Europea: Xe conference Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLobbying Uncovered?: Lobbying Registration in the European Union and the United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCompendium of case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the death penalty and extrajudicial execution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAntitrust between EU Law and national law/Antitrust fra diritto nazionalee diritto dell'unione europea: XII conference/XIII convegno Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJudicial Enforcement and Implementation of European Union Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollective Complaints As a Means for Protecting Social Rights in Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe practical guide to the eu labyrinth: Understand everything about EU institutions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExpertise de justice: Quel avenir en Europe? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5European Civil Society and Human Rights Advocacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings2008 Human Rights Report: Germany Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPreliminary References to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Effective Judicial Protection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHandbook on EU secondary legislation: Navigating through delegated and implementing acts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNegotiating sovereignty and human rights: International society and the International Criminal Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom of expression and defamation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Jurisprudence For You
The Law Is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Yale Law Journal: Volume 123, Number 7 - May 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNotarial Practice & Malpractice in the Philippines: Rules, Jurisprudence, & Comments Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Natural Law Jurisprudence in U.S. Supreme Court Cases since Roe v. Wade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTough Cases: Judges Tell the Stories of Some of the Hardest Decisions They’ve Ever Made Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 2 - November 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Theory of the Trial Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Case of George Pell: reckoning with child sexual abuse by clergy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBacklash: Libel, Impeachment, and Populism in the Reign of Queen Anne Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBodies of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLegal Literacy: An Introduction to Legal Studies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFictions, Lies, and the Authority of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Causes of Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving through Deep Difference Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 2 - December 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 6 - April 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCicero's Orations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 1 - November 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Volume 81, Number 4 - Fall 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroduction to The International Court of Justice - Icj- Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReligious Liberty in Crisis: Exercising Your Faith in an Age of Uncertainty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Exploring Wild Law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInside the Robe, A Judge's Candid Tale of Criminal Justice in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Seeking Justice: The Radical Compassion of Jesus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReason in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 128, Number 2 - December 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for The implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings
0 ratings0 reviews