The Enclosures in England: An Economic Reconstruction
()
About this ebook
Related to The Enclosures in England
Related ebooks
The Enclosures in England An Economic Reconstruction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Story of a Loaf of Bread Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Social and Industrial History of Scotland (Barnes & Noble Digital Library): From the Union to the Present Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Story of a Loaf of Bread Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Short History of English Agriculture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOf Cabbages and Kings: The History of Allotments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Short History of English Agriculture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManures and the principles of manuring Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPloughing Machinery on the Farm - A Collection of Articles on the Operation and Maintenance of Ploughs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistory of Farming in Ontario Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgricultural Irrigation - With Information on Water Quantities, Sewage, Reservoirs and Various Methods of Irrigation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCountry Life in the Poetry of John Clare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe English Village Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Romano-British Peasant: Towards a Study of People, Landscapes and Work during the Roman Occupation of Britain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Farm That Won't Wear Out Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Agrarian Problem in the Sixteenth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Zad and NoTAV: Territorial Struggles and the Making of a New Political Intelligence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Choose and Manage a Farm Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrade and Famine in Classical Antiquity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Secret Life of a Meadow Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArtificial Grasses - Including Information on Clovers, Rye-grass, Tares and Other Types of Artificial Grasses Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRoman Farm Management The Treatises of Cato and Varro Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgricultural Implements and Machinery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOut of the Hay and into the Hops: Hop Cultivation in Wealden Kent and Hop Marketing in Southwark, 17442000 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLandscapes, Documents and Maps: Villages in Northern England and Beyond, AD 900-1250 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of the Cotton Industry: A Story in Three Continents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreen Spring Farm Fairfax County, Virginia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlantation Slavery in Georgia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
History For You
Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Richest Man in Babylon: The most inspiring book on wealth ever written Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Whore Stories: A Revealing History of the World's Oldest Profession Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Wise as Fu*k: Simple Truths to Guide You Through the Sh*tstorms of Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Things You're Not Supposed to Know: Secrets, Conspiracies, Cover Ups, and Absurdities Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5100 Amazing Facts About the Negro with Complete Proof Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The ZERO Percent: Secrets of the United States, the Power of Trust, Nationality, Banking and ZERO TAXES! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England: A Handbook for Visitors to the Fourteenth Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anglo-Saxons: A History of the Beginnings of England: 400 – 1066 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Secret History of the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Grief Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Oregon Trail: A New American Journey Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dance of the Dissident Daughter: A Woman's Journey from Christian Tradition to the Sacred Feminine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Enclosures in England
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Enclosures in England - Harriett Bradley
Harriett Bradley
The Enclosures in England: An Economic Reconstruction
Published by Good Press, 2022
goodpress@okpublishing.info
EAN 4064066145569
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER I
The Price of Wool
CHAPTER II
The Fertility of the Common Fields
CHAPTER III
The Disintegration of the Open-fields
CHAPTER IV
Enclosure for Sheep Pasture
INDEX
Columbia University in the City of New York
The West Florida Controversy
of 1798-1813
A Study in American Diplomacy
By ISAAC JOSLIN COX
THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS
Colombia University Press Publications
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS
LEMCKE & BUECHNER, Agents
30-32 West Twenty-Seventh Street, New York City
LONGMANS, GREEN & CO.
Fourth Avenue and 30th Street, NEW YORK
LONGMANS, GREEN & CO.
Fourth Avenue and 30th Street, NEW YORK
The Academy of Political Science
in the City of New York
POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY
OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
INTRODUCTION
Table of Contents
The enclosure movement—the process by which the common-field system was broken down and replaced by a system of unrestricted private use—involved economic and social changes which make it one of the important subjects in English economic history. When it began, the arable fields of a community lay divided in a multitude of strips separated from each other only by borders of unplowed turf. Each landholder was in possession of a number of these strips, widely separated from each other, and scattered all over the open fields, so that he had a share in each of the various grades of land.[1] But his private use of the land was restricted to the period when it was being prepared for crop or was under crop. After harvest the land was grazed in common by the village flocks; and each year a half or a third of the land was not plowed at all, but lay fallow and formed part of the common pasture. Under this system there was no opportunity for individual initiative in varying the rotation of crops or the dates of plowing and seed time; the use of the land in common for a part of the time restricted its use even during the time when it was not in common. The process by which this system was replaced by modern private ownership with unrestricted individual use is called the enclosure movement, because it involved the rearrangement of holdings into separate, compact plots, divided from each other by enclosing hedges and ditches. The most notable feature of this process is the conversion of the open fields into sheep pasture. This involved the eviction of the tenants who had been engaged in cultivating these fields and the amalgamation of many holdings of arable to form a few large enclosures for sheep. The enclosure movement was not merely the displacement of one system of tillage by another system of tillage; it involved the temporary displacement of tillage itself in favor of grazing.
In this monograph two things are undertaken: first, an analysis of the usually accepted version of the enclosure movement in the light of contemporary evidence; and, secondly, the presentation of another account of the nature and causes of the movement, consistent with itself and with the available evidence. The popular account of the enclosure movement turns upon a supposed advance in the price of wool, due to the expansion of the woollen industry in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Landlords at this period (we are told) were increasingly eager for pecuniary gain and, because of the greater profit to be made from grazing, were willing to evict the tenants on their land and convert the arable fields to sheep pasture. About the end of the sixteenth century, it is said, this first enclosure movement came to an end, for there are evidences of the reconversion of pastures formerly laid to grass. An inquiry into the evidence shows that the price of wool fell during the fifteenth century and failed to rise as rapidly as that of wheat during the sixteenth century. Moreover, the conversion of arable land to pasture did not cease when the contrary process set in, but continued throughout the seventeenth century with apparently unabated vigor. These facts make it impossible to accept the current theory of the enclosure movement. There is, on the other hand, abundant evidence that the fertility of much of the common-field land had been exhausted by centuries of cultivation. Some of it was allowed to run to waste; some was laid to grass, enclosed, and used as pasture. Productivity was gradually restored after some years of rest, and it became possible to resume cultivation. The enclosure movement is explained not by a change in the price of wool, but by the gradual loss of productivity of common-field land.
This explanation is not made here for the first time. It is advanced in Denton's England in the Fifteenth Century[2] and Gardiner, in his Student's History of England,[3] accepts it. Prothero[4] and Gonner[5] give it some place in their works. Dr. Simkhovitch, at whose suggestion this inquiry was undertaken, has for some time been of the opinion that deterioration of the soil was the fundamental cause of the displacement of arable farming by grazing.[6] This explanation, however, stands at the present time as an unverified hypothesis, which has been specifically rejected by Gibbins, in his widely used text-book,[7] and by Hasbach,[8] who objects that Denton does not prove his case. In this respect the theory is no more to be criticised than the theory which these authorities accept, for that does not rest upon proof, but upon the prestige gained through frequent repetition. But the matter need not rest here. It is unnecessary to accept any hypothetical account of events which are, after all, comparatively recent, and for which the evidence is available.
Of the various sources accessible for the study of the English enclosure movement, one type only has been extensively used by historians. The whole story of this movement as it is usually told is based upon tracts, sermons, verses, proclamations, etc. of the sixteenth century—upon the literature of protest called forth by the social distress caused by enclosure. Until very recently the similar literature of the seventeenth century has been neglected, although it destroys the basis of assumptions which are fundamental to the orthodox account of the movement. Much of significance even in the literature of the sixteenth century has been passed over—notably certain striking passages in statutes of the latter half of the century, and in books on husbandry of the first half. Details of manorial history derived from the account rolls of the manors themselves, and contemporary manorial maps and surveys, as well as the records of the actual market prices of grain and wool, have been ignored in the construction of an hypothetical account of the movement which breaks down whenever verification by contemporary evidence is attempted.
The evidence is in many respects imperfect. It would be of great value, for instance, to have access to records of grain production over an area extensive enough, and for a long enough period, to furnish reliable statistical indications of the trend of productivity. It would be helpful to have exact information about the amount of land converted from arable to pasture in each decade of the period under consideration, and to know to what extent and at what dates land was reconverted to tillage after having been laid to grass. There are no records to supply most of this information. It is possible that the materials for a statistical study of soil productivity are in existence, but up to the present time they have not been published, and it is doubtful if this deficiency will be supplied. It is even more doubtful whether more can be learned about the rate of conversion of arable land to pasture than is now known, and this is little. Professor Gay has made a careful study of the evidence on this question, and has analysed the reports of the government commissions for enforcing the husbandry statutes before 1600,[9] and Miss Leonard has made the returns of the commission of 1630 for Leicestershire available.[10] The conditions under which these commissions worked make the returns somewhat unreliable even for the years covered by their reports, and much interpolation is necessary, as there are serious gaps in the series of years for which returns are made. For dates outside of the period 1485-1630 we must rely entirely on literary references. Unsatisfactory as our statistical information is on this important question, it is far more complete than the evidence on the subject of the reconversion to tillage of arable land which had been turned into pasture.
It is to the unfortunate social consequences of enclosure that we owe the abundance of historical material on this subject. Undoubtedly much land was converted to pasture in a piece-meal fashion, as small holders saw the possibility of making the change quietly, and without disturbing the rest of the community. If enclosure had taken no other form than this, no storm of public protest would have risen, to express itself in pamphlets, sermons, statutes and government reports. Enclosure on a large scale involved dispossession of the inhabitants, and a complete break with traditional usage. For this reason the literature of the subject is abundant. When, however, the process was reversed, and the land again brought under cultivation, there was involved no interference with the rights of common holders. It was to the interest of no one to oppose this change, and no protest was made to call the attention of the historian to what was being done. References to the process are numerous enough only to prove that reconversion of land formerly laid to grass took place during the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries—to an extent of which not even an approximate estimate can be made.
Imperfect as the evidence is from some points of view, it is nevertheless complete for the purposes of this monograph. It would be impossible, with the material at hand, to reconstruct the progress of the enclosure movement, decade by