When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition
By Austin Sarat
4/5
()
About this ebook
Is capital punishment just? Does it deter people from murder? What is the risk that we will execute innocent people? These are the usual questions at the heart of the increasingly heated debate about capital punishment in America. In this bold and impassioned book, Austin Sarat seeks to change the terms of that debate. Capital punishment must be stopped, Sarat argues, because it undermines our democratic society.
Sarat unflinchingly exposes us to the realities of state killing. He examines its foundations in ideas about revenge and retribution. He takes us inside the courtroom of a capital trial, interviews jurors and lawyers who make decisions about life and death, and assesses the arguments swirling around Timothy McVeigh and his trial for the bombing in Oklahoma City. Aided by a series of unsettling color photographs, he traces Americans' evolving quest for new methods of execution, and explores the place of capital punishment in popular culture by examining such films as Dead Man Walking, The Last Dance, and The Green Mile.
Sarat argues that state executions, once used by monarchs as symbolic displays of power, gained acceptance among Americans as a sign of the people's sovereignty. Yet today when the state kills, it does so in a bureaucratic procedure hidden from view and for which no one in particular takes responsibility. He uncovers the forces that sustain America's killing culture, including overheated political rhetoric, racial prejudice, and the desire for a world without moral ambiguity. Capital punishment, Sarat shows, ultimately leaves Americans more divided, hostile, indifferent to life's complexities, and much further from solving the nation's ills. In short, it leaves us with an impoverished democracy.
The book's powerful and sobering conclusions point to a new abolitionist politics, in which capital punishment should be banned not only on ethical grounds but also for what it does to Americans and what we cherish.
Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. His primary research interest is the use of the death penalty and he believes that the death penalty, due to the extreme nature of its punishment, provides a unique opportunity to examine American values and beliefs and how they are manifested in the American legal system. Having received the Ronald Pipkin Service Award, he also has received the Lasting Contribution Award, awarded by the American Political Science Association’s Section on Law and Courts.
Read more from Austin Sarat
Gruesome Spectacles: Botched Executions and America's Death Penalty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mercy on Trial: What It Means to Stop an Execution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to When the State Kills
Related ebooks
Understanding State Constitutions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMisdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOld Sparky: The Electric Chair and the History of the Death Penalty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWith Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Measure of Madness: Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5American Injustice: One Lawyer's Fight to Protect the Rule of Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5VOICES: War Crimes USA Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuilty People Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Power and Principle: The Politics of International Criminal Courts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unequal under Law: Race in the War on Drugs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMiscarriages of Justice: Actual Innocence, Forensic Evidence, and the Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSystemic Corruption: Constitutional Ideas for an Anti-Oligarchic Republic Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Meaning of Life: The Case for Abolishing Life Sentences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Star-Spangled Deception: The True History of the U.S. Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInventing the Criminal: A History of German Criminology, 1880-1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrdinary Injustice: How America Holds Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One Nation Undecided: Clear Thinking about Five Hard Issues That Divide Us Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlind Injustice: A Former Prosecutor Exposes the Psychology and Politics of Wrongful Convictions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Smoke but No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Accidental History of the U.S. Immigration Courts: War, Fear, and the Roots of Dysfunction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgainst Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Price of Justice: The Myths of Lawyer Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Jurisprudence For You
Notarial Practice & Malpractice in the Philippines: Rules, Jurisprudence, & Comments Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bodies of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Natural Law Jurisprudence in U.S. Supreme Court Cases since Roe v. Wade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 2 - December 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 4 - February 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Case of George Pell: reckoning with child sexual abuse by clergy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConfident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving through Deep Difference Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Courts and Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 1 - January 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 123, Number 7 - May 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArgument and Program for Certainty in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLegal Literacy: An Introduction to Legal Studies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 2 - February 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Volume 79, Number 2 - Spring 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Law Is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 5 - March 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 2 - December 2013 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5A Theory of the Trial Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInside the Robe, A Judge's Candid Tale of Criminal Justice in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Philosophy of Law Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 81, Number 3 - Summer 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPsychiatric Emergencies and the Law: The Impact of the Mental Health Act (1959) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTough Cases: Judges Tell the Stories of Some of the Hardest Decisions They’ve Ever Made Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeeking Justice: The Radical Compassion of Jesus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 1 - November 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReason in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExploring Wild Law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related categories
Reviews for When the State Kills
2 ratings0 reviews