Essays in Anthropology: Variations on a Theme
()
About this ebook
In this intriguing and provocative collection of essays, philosopher Robert Spaemann reacts against what he calls "scientistic" anthropology and ventures to take up afresh the quaestio de homine, "the question of man." Spaemann contends that when it comes to the nagging question of what we truly are as human beings, understanding our chemical make-up or evolutionary past simply cannot give us the full picture. Instead, without doing away with the findings of modern evolutionary science, Spaemann offers successive treatments of human nature, human evolution, and human dignity, which paint a full and compelling picture of the meaning of human life. Crucial to any anthropology, he demonstrates, is our future as well as our past. And our relationship to God as well as to our next-door neighbor. All of these themes coalesce in a vital contribution to the question of what it means to be human.
Robert Spaemann
Robert Spaemann taught at the universities of Stuttgart, Heidelberg and Munich until 1992. Previous translations of his work include Basic Moral Concepts (1989), Happiness and Benevolence (1999) and Persons (2006).
Related to Essays in Anthropology
Related ebooks
Recovering Nature: Essays in Natural Philosophy, Ethics, and Metaphysics in Honor of Ralph McInerny Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas: A Sketch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Aquinas and the Infused Moral Virtues Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Knowledge and Evolution: How Theology, Philosophy, and Science Converge in the Question of Origins Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmbracing Our Finitude: Exercises in a Christian Anthropology between Dependence and Gratitude Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe End of Time: A Meditation on the Philosophy of History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Writings of Charles De Koninck: Volume 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExplorations in Theology: Spouse of the Word Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Subordinated Ethics: Natural Law and Moral Miscellany in Aquinas and Dostoyevsky Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegralism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEthics as a Work of Charity: Thomas Aquinas and Pagan Virtue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Creative Retrieval of Saint Thomas Aquinas: Essays in Thomistic Philosophy, New and Old Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Conscience: Phenomena and Theories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNaming Evil, Judging Evil Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Person and the Common Good Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Comments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ethical Demand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Journey to Point Omega: Autobiography from 1964 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExplorations in Metaphysics: Being-God-Person Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe One and the Many: A Contemporary Thomistic Metaphysics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom from Reality: The Diabolical Character of Modern Liberty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYou Have Words of Eternal Life: Scripture Meditations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5St. Thomas Aquinas Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5G.E.M. Anscombe and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBernanos: An Ecclesial Existence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5John Henry Newman and His Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrammar of Ascent Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElucidations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The World and the Person: And Other Writings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The City of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: A New Translation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5History of Western Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Metaphors We Live By Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Essays in Anthropology
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Essays in Anthropology - Robert Spaemann
DULCISSIMAE MATRIS MEMORIAE
Translators’ Introduction
Though first composed separately, the four essays translated here have already been published in German as a quartet. In 1987 they were gathered into one volume, the collection given the title of its fourth and final essay, Das Natürliche und das Vernünftige (The Natural and the Rational
). The question to ask, then, is why these self-standing essays were brought together in the first place? What have they to do with one another? What are they doing as a collection? The most obvious answer is that these essays are distinctly anthropological. What unites them is their shared concern with the question What is a Human Being?
So, four years before this volume came out, in Spaemann’s reputation-making collection of essays, Philosophische Essays (1983), there had been a number of articles on Nature.
Here, though, is an essay specifically on "Human Nature." And though the treatment of evolution here was later added to make up the expanded second edition of Philosophische Essays (1994), this quartet was its original context. Alexander Pope famously wrote that the proper study of mankind is man.
If that English poet was right, then only in this slim volume does this German philosopher really find his subject.
Another way of getting at this collection’s overall objective is to identify the challenge these four essays are seeking to address. That challenge, as Spaemann himself announces in the Preface, is scientism. Scientism is not a vague umbrella-term for the totality of scientific endeavor as practiced today; it is rather the particular ideology that drives a good deal of scientific practice. Scientism champions the objectifying method peculiar to science—dissecting organisms, gathering data, inferring causal relations between material conditions, etc.—as the method for all understanding. With this claim scientism challenges (among other things) the traditional way we understand ourselves. Take, for example, the prohibition among scientists of anthropomorphism
when studying animals—
that is, of yielding to the temptation of ascribing to other creatures human-like features such as the heart (our emotions) or the will (our agency). From a purely scientific viewpoint there is no reason why this prohibition shouldn’t be extended to the study of humankind. Thus today we find the widespread assumption, both scholarly and popular, that if we are really to understand ourselves we must pay attention not to what we think, desire, or do but rather to the blind
biological processes that underlie those thoughts, desires, and actions. We are encouraged to do away with
sentimental anthropomorphism even when studying ourselves—the human being becomes an anthropomorphism to himself!
Spaemann declares in the Preface (xxiv)—and thereby to pretend that the creature being analyzed is not also the agent interested in and undertaking that very analysis. That, then, the materialistic reduction of the human,
is the threat presented by scientism that Spaemann, in a variety of ways, tackles in these essays.
Before we briefly outline each essay it might be worth raising the question of classification. What sort of a thinker is Robert Spaemann? How should he be categorized? Where does he fit
? Classification in Spaemann’s case is a challenging prospect because, intellectually speaking, he is a number of things at once. He is a post-war German public intellectual who has spent most of his academic career teaching at the University of Munich, yet he is also well versed in and constantly responsive to English-speaking analytic philosophy. Secondly, he is at once a modernity-critic who thinks that the profound ecological crisis that emerged at the end of the twentieth century signals the collapse of modernity (demonstrating once and for all the dire consequence of treating nature as a sheer resource for our projects). However, at the same time there are some of modernity’s achievements that Spaemann wants to protect against its own more self-destructive tendencies (for example, the idea that, with regards to . . . rights, equal minimal conditions should apply to all
[68]). Finally, Spaemann is both a self-styled philosopher, presenting in this collection philosophical anthropology, yet he is also keen to clarify the key moments of Western philosophy’s indebtedness to irreducibly religious convictions, for example the Christian discovery
of the person. In short, his preoccupations are varied and his influences are diverse—he interestingly acknowledged, for instance, that Adorno and Horkheimer’s Dialectics of Enlightenment (1948) and C. S. Lewis’s The Abolition of Man (1943) are the two books that had the greatest impact on his development. (They were, he felt, saying very much the same thing!) And so if eclectic
can be used in a non-pejorative way, it might be the best word to describe Spaemann’s particular intellectual approach.
Now, stylistically, this eclecticism clearly has advantages and disadvantages. There are moments when Spaemann’s dance is hard to follow, the author’s mind proving so wide-ranging and fast-moving that an essay’s intellectual structure may not be immediately obvious, its paragraph detours can seem obscure, and the relevance of its introductory remarks sometimes difficult to see. That said, what we are offered in this collection is more than a series of unrelated aphorisms—Press on, dear reader! What’s more, it is this very eclecticism that enables Spaemann to draw such fascinating connections between disciplines, thinkers, and worldviews, which allows him, in Hopkins’s phrase, to find freshness deep down things.
Notable examples are the comparisons Spaemann draws between evolutionism and Buddhism at the end of the second essay, or, in the essay on Human Dignity,
between the justification of the violent termination of life and the logic underpinning artificially prolonging it.
The first essay, Human Nature,
sees Spaemann in an archeological mode tracing the history of what we might call the double vision of humanity,
the two different takes
on the question of What is a human being?,
the basic dualism in perspectives
(2) that has always characterized anthropological enquiry. From one point of view, that is, humans are creatures conditioned by nature, their behavior reducible to a series of biological and physical processes. But from another point of view humans are persons, indeterminate agents who dispose of their existence as they choose. (In Kant’s summary, if the first perspective concerns what nature makes of the human being
then the second is about what he as a free-acting being makes of himself
[13].) Now, while Spaemann insists that this double vision is a constant in human self-experience ([i]n one way or another it has always been there
), in this essay he is also keen to give names to faces,
to attribute the two different perspectives to particular philosophical and theological traditions. And what emerges from this foray into intellectual history is the fact that, when taken to their extremes (in molecular biologist Dawkins
and Jean-Paul Sartre respectively), the two perspectives become irreconcilable. When you push them to their limits the two visions of humanity present us with an insurmountable stalemate
(5).
Yet Spaemann isn’t content simply to trace how we arrived at this stalemate in modernity. He also wants to dig up the different ways that dualism was managed
before the two views were allowed to become mutually exclusive. Spaemann wants to draw our attention to historical attempts to hold in tension the two perspectives on human nature. It’s here that he brings into view the concept of human self-transcendence. The claim is that, according to the ancient and medieval ecstatic-teleological
understanding thereof, human nature (and, through that, nature as a whole) intrinsically points beyond itself. The human being is not to be understood simply as found
(i.e., in the state of deficiency in which he finds himself as a natural being
[15]). Rather, human nature is always characterized by anticipation
(20), always exceeding its material conditions. What does that look like? Well, through what I can do for myself (the use of my hands and my mind
) as well as by way of what others help me to do (through social interaction, political association, and even friendship with God) I am able to reach beyond my starting-position as a creature of the world, yet, importantly, without ever leaving that belonging
behind. The key here,
Spaemann writes, "is that nature draws out from humankind something more than nature . . . a human is not this surplus; a human being is that creature in which nature transcends itself towards that surplus" (15–16).
The story doesn’t end there, though. Towards the end of the essay—and here Spaemann clearly demonstrates the commitment to modernity-criticism we mentioned above—he reviews the latest chapter in the fate of the double vision of humanity. This, he says, is the utopian interpretation of human self-transcendence
(21). According to this, as developed by Marx and Nietzsche and then fatefully taken up by the various totalitarianisms of the twentieth century, humanity’s reaching beyond itself
comes to be understood historically. Now it is humanity en bloc that can be said to transcend itself, with one race launching off from another to become something radically novel, a society of supermen or, in the communist vision, a reconciled society.
For Spaemann, though, the problem with this particular way of trying to surmount the basic dualism in perspectives
is that transcendence no longer constitutes a possibility that faces variously situated men and women in history; now transcendence is only an option for history’s last men
for whom everyone else who ever lived was a "mere