What Girls Say About Their Science Education Experiences: Is Anybody Really Listening?
()
About this ebook
What Girls Say About Their Science Education Experiences describes the science education experiences of 12 young ladies enrolled in advanced science courses in a Southeast Texas High School. What Girls Say... includes profiles of each girl and topical chapters dealing with generalizations about the key elements of experience that the girls illuminated. Also, a detailed review of the current literature related to girls and science is provided. The strength of the text lies in the use of the participants. words to describe their own experiences.
Unfortunately, despite over 30 years of research related to gender and science education, females still are underrepresented in some upper-level high school science courses, particular college science curricula and majors, and many scientific careers. While boys and girls enter school with equal ability, girls are marginalized in science and math to the point that they trail males in science interest and participation by graduation time. However, such differences have decreased.
While attitudes, achievement levels, and the other components of "the science education experience" have been quantitatively examined, very little qualitative analysis exists to describe the educational experience of females in American high school classrooms from the perspective of the student. A description of this phenomenon as constructed through the experiences of female students represents a worthy pursuit. This book represents an attempt to describe this phenomenon as constructed through the experiences of female students. Very simply, the purpose of this book was to describe the essential elements of the current science education experience as constructed by female physics and advanced chemistry students. The construct of science education experience for females included perceived (a) affective attitudes, (b) achievement and success, (c) ability, (d) cultural factors, (e) social-psychological factors, (f) interpersonal factors, and (g) instructional/teacher factors. All of these topics are addressed in What Girls Say About Their Science Education Experiences.
Michael Papadimitriou
Dr. Mike Papadimitriou lives in Kingwood, Texas with his wife, Donna, and their family pet, Reddog. Mike serves as the science department chair and teaches physics and advanced chemistry at Caney Creek High School in the Conroe Independent School District. In addition, he serves as an adjunct professor in the alternative certification program at Kingwood College. Mike holds doctoral and specialist degrees in curriculum and instruction with a specialization in science education. He also holds a masterÕs degree in instructional supervision and a bachelorÕs degree in psychology and biology. He is licensed by the State of Texas as a mid-management administrator, instructional supervisor and secondary composite science teacher. He is licensed by the State of Louisiana as a principal, supervisor and chemistry, biology and environmental science teacher. In addition, Mike is a member of the School Science and Mathematics Association, National Association for Research in Science Teaching, National Education Association, and the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. He serves as a journal reviewer for School Science and Mathematics. You can e-mail him at mikpap@excite.com. What Girls Say About their Science Education Experiences Review of Literature Despite over 30 years of research related to gender and science education, females still are underrepresented in some upper-level high school science courses, particular college science curricula and majors, and many scientific careers. Very simply, overall science achievement of females continues to lag the achievement of males (Adams, 1996). While boys and girls enter school with equal ability, girls are marginalized in science and math to the point that they trail males in achievement by graduation time. However, differences in achievement have decreased. Moreover, males and females now enroll equally in some high school science courses. Also, males and females are represented equally in some college science majors such as biology. Yet, some areas such as physics remain unintegrated (AAUW, 1999). In fact, throughout the span of formal education, "biology is favored by girls and physics is favored by boys, and these patterns appear to persist through college and graduate school" (Farenga & Joyce, 1999, p. 56). Although more women are enrolling in undergraduate science programs, women are still much underrepresented in graduate science programs (Erwin & Maurutto, 1998). Moreover, the farther students, especially girls, progress in high school science, the more they hate their subjects (Friedman, 1999). According to the National Science Foundation (1994), in science areas, women earn less than 30% of undergraduate degrees and less than 25% of graduate degrees. Also, women in science tend to gravitate to low paying disciplines (i.e., such as biology). Further, less than 18% of engineering degrees are awarded to women. In fact, less than 20% of doctorates in physical science and math are awarded to women (National Science Foundation, 1990). These inequities and the under-representation of women in science programs are generally attributable to three sets of factors: (a) ability and achievement gender differences, (b) psychological and societal issues, and (c) cultural and organizational factors (Erwin & Maurutto, 1998). Society, science, and science education all marginalize women and foster gender stereotypes (Verna & Campbell, 1999). In essence, through socialization young male and female students assume science to be a male domain (Farenga & Joyce, 1999). This socialization de-emphasizes the possibility of math and science careers for girls (AAUW, 1992). Thus, science tends to filter women from the ranks of working scientists. "The workforce continues to function as though scientists have no significant familial responsibilities and often excludes those who either choose to give families a priority or must do so" (Brickhouse, 2001, p. 282). Social stereotyping and social expectations become self-fulfilling prophecies through psychological manifestations. Essentially, these stereotypical expectations impact self-image and self-esteem. Negative expectations with respect to science participation belittle females and undermine self-concept (Erwin & Maurutto, 1998). In essence, as social experience shapes personality, females develop traits that hamper or conflict with science participation (Farenga & Joyce, 1999). In essence, "the problem of women in the sciences appears to still be rooted in how we socialize young females in their early education experiences" (Kennedy & Parks, 2000, p. 1). Moreover, only a limited amount of knowledge exists with respect to how women actually conceptualize science and science instruction and how women feel about science and science instruction. Cultural and structural factors also impact the participation of females in science (Erwin & Maurutto, 1998). Of course, differential treatment by teachers can serve to marginalize females (Shepardson & Pizzini, 1992). Likewise, females place great importance on peer opinion and peer interaction. As a result, peer opinion can greatly impact the attitudes toward science held by females (Simpson & Oliver, 1990). Unfortunately, this impact is generally negative since females tend to hold and develop increasingly negative attitudes toward science (Adams, 1996). An additional cultural influence lies within familial or parental influence (Keeves, 1975). This influence occurs through the communication of parental expectations (Campbell & Mandel, 1990). According to Myers and Fouts (1992), attitudes are just as important as actual achievement as desirable outcomes of educational processes. Moreover, attitudes cannot be ignored in student-related educational research (Shrigley, Koballa & Simpson, 1988). However, attitude research in science education is controversial (Haladyna & Shaughnessy, 1982; Koballa, 1988). In fact, the actual construct known as attitude is very poorly defined (Koballa, 1988). Also, while girls possess more negative attitudes toward science than boys do (Weinburgh, 1995), the understanding of impact of these attitudes on achievement remains elusive (AAUW, 1992). Attitudes, perceptions, and achievement are related in a complex manner (Eichinger, 1992). Specifically, perceptions of science are affected by a variety of personal factors (i.e., gender, ethnicity, situational factors) (Ledbetter, 1993). These personal perceptions or constructions of science, from a constructivist point of view, should be considered in relation to educational processes (Ebenezer & Zoller, 1993; Ledbetter, 1993). IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY While attitudes, achievement levels, and the other components of "the science education experience" have been quantitatively examined, very little qualitative analysis exists to describe the educational experience of females in American high school classrooms from the perspective of the student. A description of this phenomenon as constructed through the experiences of female students represents a worthy pursuit. Science education research can benefit from qualitative approaches that attempt to provide a voice for marginalized individuals and all students (Brickhouse et al., 2000). Researchers in education should consider the social and cultural structures of schools in order to facilitate understanding of how student actually perceive their experiences. Through this process, enlightenment can serve as a means to improvement, success, and understanding (Rop, 1999). According to Brickhouse et al. (2000): To understand learning in science, we need to know much more than whether students have learned the proper explanation for how plants make their food or why t
Related to What Girls Say About Their Science Education Experiences
Related ebooks
The Maternal Factor: Two Paths to Morality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Truth About Girls and Boys: Challenging Toxic Stereotypes About Our Children Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStill Failing at Fairness: How Gender Bias Cheats Girls and Boys in School and What We Can Do About It Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5It's a Girl Thing: Understanding the Neuroscience Behind Educating and Raising Girls Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaking Failure Pay: For-Profit Tutoring, High-Stakes Testing, and Public Schools Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLearning in Depth: A Simple Innovation That Can Transform Schooling Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Theories of Childhood, Second Edition: An Introduction to Dewey, Montessori, Erikson, Piaget & Vygotsky Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Nature of College Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFamily Trouble: Middle-Class Parents, Children's Problems, and the Disruption of Everyday Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClimate Anxiety and the Kid Question: Deciding Whether to Have Children in an Uncertain Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChildren's Moral Lives: An Ethnographic and Psychological Approach Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender, Updated Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Guyland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Evolution: What Every Teenager Should Know Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHigher Education and Working-Class Academics: Precarity and Diversity in Academia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDistinguishing Disability: Parents, Privilege, and Special Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpark a Revolution in Early Education: Speaking Up for Ourselves and the Children Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTouchy Subject: The History and Philosophy of Sex Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPSST! Wanna Know a Secret?: Getting Smarter, Making More Money Things They Forgot To Teach You in School Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGetting to the HEARTS of Teaching Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChanging the Course of AIDS: Peer Education in South Africa and Its Lessons for the Global Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClassrooms and Corridors: The Crisis of Authority in Desegregated Secondary Schools Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Place for Truth: Leading Thinkers Explore Life's Hardest Questions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Science Communication Online: Engaging Experts and Publics on the Internet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRescuing Our Underachieving Sons: Raising the Aspirations of Underachieving Boys Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy for Kids: 40 Fun Questions That Help You Wonder about Everything! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHe Looks Like Me: An evidence based guide for teachers mentoring African American Boys Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPink and Blue: Telling the Boys from the Girls in America Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Swimming Against the Tide: African American Girls and Science Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLimitless Mind: Learn, Lead, and Live Without Barriers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
LSAT For Dummies (with Free Online Practice Tests) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Like a Lawyer--and Why: A Common-Sense Guide to Everyday Dilemmas Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Better Grammar in 30 Minutes a Day Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: How to Read a Book a Day - Simple Tricks to Explode Your Reading Speed and Comprehension Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Success Principles(TM) - 10th Anniversary Edition: How to Get from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Teenagers: The Secret to Loving Teens Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Take Smart Notes. One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How To Do Motivational Interviewing: A guidebook for beginners Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Science of Making Friends: Helping Socially Challenged Teens and Young Adults Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everything You Need to Know About Personal Finance in 1000 Words Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From 150 to 179 on the LSAT Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How You Learn Is How You Live: Using Nine Ways of Learning to Transform Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Chicago Guide to Grammar, Usage, and Punctuation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for What Girls Say About Their Science Education Experiences
0 ratings0 reviews