Self-Interest and Social Order in Classical Liberalism: The Essays of George H. Smith
()
About this ebook
Read more from George H. Smith
Unabridged Start Classics Freethought and Freedom: The Essays of George H. Smith Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Revolution and the Declaration of Independence: The Essays of George H. Smith Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Self-Interest and Social Order in Classical Liberalism
Related ebooks
The Tyranny of Utility: Behavioral Social Science and the Rise of Paternalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSelf-Determination without Nationalism: A Theory of Postnational Sovereignty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitics and Neo-Darwinism: and Other Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Democratic Theory of Michael Oakeshott: Discourse, Contingency, and 'The Politics of Conversation' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Poverty of Liberalism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The English Utilitarians - Volume I Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTwentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnarchism: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Retrieving Knowledge: A Socratic Response to Skepticism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond Realism and Antirealism: John Dewey and the Neopragmatists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn Stuart Mill: Proportional Representation is Personal Representation. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPopular Lectures on Logic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Misery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocial Value A Study in Economic Theory Critical and Constructive Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScientific Advice to Policy Making: International Comparison Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Last Writings of Thomas S. Kuhn: Incommensurability in Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Michael Oakeshott Selected Writings Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Each According To His Ability: Essays on Karl Marx and Classical Political Economy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom a Philosophical Point of View: Selected Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Hegemony and Social Complexity: Mechanisms of Power After Gramsci Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsToward a Liberalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreatively Undecided: Toward a History and Philosophy of Scientific Agency Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRicardo's Gauntlet: Economic Fiction and the Flawed Case for Free Trade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGodless Intellectuals?: The Intellectual Pursuit of the Sacred Reinvented Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Short History of Physics in the American Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, The Value of Science, Science and Method Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Political Ideologies For You
The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blackout: How Black America Can Make Its Second Escape from the Democrat Plantation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Quest for Cosmic Justice Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mein Kampf: English Translation of Mein Kamphf - Mein Kampt - Mein Kamphf Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The January 6th Report Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Communist Manifesto: Original Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ship of Fools: How a Selfish Ruling Class Is Bringing America to the Brink of Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Emergent Strategy: Shaping Change, Changing Worlds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5While Time Remains: A North Korean Defector's Search for Freedom in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elite Capture: How the Powerful Took Over Identity Politics (And Everything Else) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Call Them by Their True Names: American Crises (and Essays) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why We're Polarized Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Self-Interest and Social Order in Classical Liberalism
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Self-Interest and Social Order in Classical Liberalism - George H. Smith
CONTENTS
1. Political Philosophy and Justice
2. David Hume
3. David Hume on Justice
4. Thomas Hobbes
5. The Selfish System
6. Joseph Butler
7. Joseph Butler, Continued
8. Bernard Mandeville
9. Mandeville on the Benefits of Vice
10. Bernard Mandeville vs. Francis Hutcheson
Notes
1
Political Philosophy and Justice
Political philosophy is a systematic inquiry into the nature of a good society and its preconditions, implications, and corollaries. The political philosopher, in framing his conception of a good society, must engage in two kinds of investigation: normative (or prescriptive) and positive (or descriptive). The normative part of political philosophy is concerned with the nature of justice, whereas the positive part is concerned with the nature of social order. What is justice? What is social order? These fundamental questions, when considered in tandem, establish the field of inquiry for that discipline known as political philosophy. (Another descriptive feature of political philosophy is its theory of human nature, which is the ultimate foundation for everything else. I discuss this issue in later chapters.)
We sometimes think of political philosophy as essentially prescriptive while neglecting its descriptive features. This is an understandable oversight, for justice has traditionally been regarded as the core concept of this discipline. But no theory of justice can be (or ever has been) defended without a corresponding theory of social order. This latter may be tacitly assumed or implicitly contained within a theory of justice, but it is there nonetheless. A philosopher may be unaware of these descriptive elements, he may not have clearly formulated his theory of social order or worked out its implications, but he cannot avoid the fact that justice is a social concept. A theory of justice expresses an ideal relationship—that is, a relationship that ought to exist—between two or more individuals. We can act unjustly only toward others, never toward ourselves.
Thus, in formulating a theory of justice, the philosopher must consider what would probably happen if his moral ideal were accepted and acted upon in the real world. Would his ideal of justice promote cooperation or conflict, harmony or chaos, abundance or poverty, happiness or misery? No philosopher, of course, will endorse the negative side of these dichotomies. No philosopher will claim that his theory of justice, if implemented, would result in perpetual conflict, chaos, poverty, or misery. We may therefore ask the philosopher how he knows all this. On what basis does he presume that his theory of justice is at least consistent with a minimal degree of social order—that it would not, for example, plunge society into that Hobbesian nightmare, that state of perpetual war of every man against every man where life is nasty, brutish, and short
?
It is when answering such questions that the political philosopher must rely upon a theory of social order. And this is where the philosopher must venture beyond his native domain of ethics into the foreign territories of sociology, economics, social psychology, and other human sciences.
Political philosophies may be divided into two broad categories, or ideal types. The first assigns to political theory the limited task of determining those general conditions that are necessary for a good society. The second assigns to political theory the more expansive task of determining, not only those conditions that are necessary for a good society, but those that are sufficient as well.
By necessary,
I mean those conditions without which a good society cannot exist. Such conditions are essential but minimal; they establish general principles of justice and social order without prescribing in detail how these principles should be implemented in particular cases. Political philosophy, thus conceived, can lay down general rules while leaving considerable room for social and cultural variations, the specifics of which will often depend on historical circumstances that are unique to a given society.
By sufficient,
I mean those conditions that will result in the best of all possible societies. In contrast to a theory of necessary conditions, which specifies the preconditions of a good society, a theory of sufficient conditions attempts to draft a social blueprint, in effect, often in considerable detail. Or, to use more familiar terms, a theory of sufficient conditions is a theory of social planning.
A theory of necessary conditions will tend to generate a model of the open society, whereas a theory of necessary and sufficient conditions will tend to generate a model of the closed society. These conflicting models result from the inner logic of ideas. To offer a sketch of what is minimally necessary for a good society is to leave considerable room for diversity, variation, and change. But the available space for individuality will progressively decrease as additional details transform what had been a sketch into a veritable blueprint for the good society.
To enumerate the particular details—the sufficient conditions—of a good society is effectively to prohibit individuality and social change. A planned society, a society in which sufficient conditions are politically determined and coercively imposed, is closed
to the spontaneous innovations of free association. We see this in the utopian writings of Plato and his many admirers. A utopian society is a perfect society, one that has been carefully designed by a wise and beneficent lawgiver. Any deviation from perfection must necessarily be for the worse, so social change—which in this scheme is but another name for social degeneration—must be arrested at all costs. And this, in turn, requires the suppression of individuality. The individual’s pursuit of happiness—that powerful and unpredictable agent of social change—must be subordinated for the sake of a good society, as specified in the utopian blueprint of sufficient conditions.
The difference between these models of political philosophy is reflected historically in two different meanings of the word political.
The Greek polis, from which our word political
is derived, referred to many aspects of the ancient Greek city-state in addition to its government—to its religious, familial, and educational institutions, for example. Most Greek philosophers, most notably Aristotle, did not distinguish between the political and the social but used political
to denote all kinds of institutions, whether coercive or voluntary. Thus, where Aristotle said that man is naturally a political animal,
later Aristotelians would sometimes substitute social animal
or social and political animal.
The older, more expansive meaning of political,
which included every kind of institution, tended to generate a theory of sufficient conditions. Over time,