Not Like a Native Speaker: On Languaging as a Postcolonial Experience
By Rey Chow
()
Read more from Rey Chow
Sentimental Fabulations, Contemporary Chinese Films: Attachment in the Age of Global Visibility Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rey Chow Reader Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Not Like a Native Speaker
Related ebooks
Blank: Essays and Interviews Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Cracks Between What We Are and What We Are Supposed to Be: Essays and Interviews Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Monstrous Politics: Geography, Rights, and the Urban Revolution in Mexico City Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow We Stay Free: Notes on a Black Uprising Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Postcolony Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Struggle for Food Sovereignty: Alternative Development and the Renewal of Peasant Societies Today Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sound of Culture: Diaspora and Black Technopoetics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPerforming Indigeneity: Spectacles of Culture and Identity in Coloniality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWoman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inscrutable Belongings: Queer Asian North American Fiction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCultural Hybridity and Fixity: Strategies of Resistance in Migration Literatures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArise Africa, Roar China: Black and Chinese Citizens of the World in the Twentieth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Age of Globalization: Anarchists and the Anticolonial Imagination Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCrossing Borders, Drawing Boundaries: The Rhetoric of Lines across America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDoreen Massey: Critical Dialogues Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Postcolonial Turn: Re-Imagining Anthropology and Africa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBounded Mobilities: Ethnographic Perspectives on Social Hierarchies and Global Inequalities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPublics and Counterpublics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Funeral Casino: Meditation, Massacre, and Exchange with the Dead in Thailand Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Haitians: A Decolonial History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFuture Texts: Subversive Performance and Feminist Bodies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlong the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Migrant Anxieties: Italian Cinema in a Transnational Frame Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpace Invaders: Radical Geographies of Protest Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhither Fanon?: Studies in the Blackness of Being Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTowards the City of Thresholds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFires of Gold: Law, Spirit, and Sacrificial Labor in Ghana Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5After the Postcolonial Caribbean: Memory, Imagination, Hope Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Contesting Race and Citizenship: Youth Politics in the Black Mediterranean Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Ethnic Studies For You
Self-Care for Black Women: 150 Ways to Radically Accept & Prioritize Your Mind, Body, & Soul Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Kind of People: Inside America's Black Upper Class Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5100 Amazing Facts About the Negro with Complete Proof Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Black Boy [Seventy-fifth Anniversary Edition] Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wretched of the Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End of White World Supremacy: Four Speeches Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cherokee Herbal: Native Plant Medicine from the Four Directions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Spook Who Sat by the Door, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conspiracy to Destroy Black Women Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Manchild in the Promised Land Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Encyclopedia of the Yoruba Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Blood of Emmett Till Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Souls of Black Folk: Original Classic Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlack Like Me: The Definitive Griffin Estate Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black Rednecks & White Liberals Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Blackout: How Black America Can Make Its Second Escape from the Democrat Plantation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Indifferent Stars Above: The Harrowing Saga of the Donner Party Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Black Elk: The Life of an American Visionary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Red Record Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rock My Soul: Black People and Self-Esteem Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Barracoon: The Story of the Last "Black Cargo" Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Not Like a Native Speaker
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Not Like a Native Speaker - Rey Chow
NOT LIKE A NATIVE SPEAKER
NOT LIKE A NATIVE SPEAKER
ON LANGUAGING AS A POSTCOLONIAL EXPERIENCE
REY CHOW
Columbia University Press
New York
Columbia University Press
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright © 2014 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Chow, Rey.
Not like a native speaker : on languaging as a postcolonial experience / Rey Chow.
pages cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-231-15144-3 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-231-15145-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-231-52271-7 (e-book)
1. Language acquisition—Social aspects. 2. Postcolonialism—Social aspects. 3. Sociolinguists—History. I. Title.
P118.C523 2014
306.44—dc23
2014003450
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at cup-ebook@columbia.edu.
Cover Design: Jordan Wannemacher
Cover Image: Courtesy of Pearl Chow
References to websites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared.
For Ani, Calvin, and Pooja
What in fact is racism? It is primarily a way of introducing a break into the domain of life that is under power’s control: the break between what must live and what must die.
—Michel Foucault, Society Must be Defended
The language apparatus is there somewhere in the brain, like a spider. It has a hold.
That might shock you, and you might ask Oh come on, really, what are you talking about, where does this language come from?
I have no idea. I’m under no obligation to know everything. And besides, you don’t know anything about it either.
—Jacques Lacan, My Teaching
There is no language in itself, nor are there any linguistic universals, only a throng of dialects, patois, slangs, and specialized languages. There is no ideal speaker-listener, any more than there is a homogeneous linguistic community. . . . There is no mother tongue, only a power takeover by a dominant language within a political multiplicity.
—Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus
My answer to the question Can an African ever learn English well enough to be able to use it effectively in creative writing? is certainly yes. If on the other hand you ask: Can he ever learn to use it like a native speaker? I should say, I hope not.
—Chinua Achebe, The African Writer and the English Language
CONTENTS
Note on Non-English Sources
Acknowledgments
Introduction: Skin Tones—About Language, Postcoloniality, and Racialization
1. Derrida’s Legacy of the Monolingual
2. Not Like a Native Speaker: The Postcolonial Scene of Languaging and the Proximity of the Xenophone
3. Translator, Traitor; Translator, Mourner (or, Dreaming of Intercultural Equivalence)
4. Thinking With Food, Writing Off Center: The Postcolonial Work of Leung Ping-Kwan and Ma Kwok-Ming
5. The Sounds and Scripts of a Hong Kong Childhood
Notes
Index
NOTE ON NON-ENGLISH SOURCES
Because this is an English-language publication, non-English sources are given selectively rather than comprehensively, in a combination of conventionally adopted formats as is befitting the different contexts of discussion.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This collection of essays would not have materialized without the blessing of Jennifer Crewe, the president and director of Columbia University Press, who gave it first-rate professional guidance at every stage. To her and to Columbia’s production team, I am deeply grateful for an efficient and effective process of editorial advising, copyediting, design, and marketing. (Special thanks to copy editor Annie Barva for her very fine and meticulous work.) My appreciation goes also to the several anonymous reviewers of the book proposal and completed manuscript for their very enthusiastic readings and constructive suggestions.
Many of the issues addressed in the chapters had their beginnings in seminars I have taught at various points in the past decade and a half at Cornell, Brown, Princeton, and Duke. To the participants of these seminars, I extend my warmest greetings. I must also acknowledge the colleagues who in their capacities as journal or book editors kindly invited me to contribute articles and chapters that became the first published versions of some of the discussions to follow: Ralph Cohen, Ien Ang, Jing Tsu, David Der-wei Wang, Joseph S. M. Lau, and Leo Tak-hung Chan.
To Réda Bensmaïa, I owe the pleasure, among other things, of some extremely interesting conversations on Derrida, Bourdieu, Algeria, and bilingualism. Chris Cullens, Ken Haynes, and Austin Meredith have been indispensable sources of erudition, astute thinking, humor, and emotional comfort. Paul Bowman, Jeroen de Kloet, Song Hwee Lim, Livia Monnet, Michael Silverman, James Steintrager, Antonio Viego, and Robyn Wiegman, each in his or her own way, help sustain my belief in the kind of intellectual work we do, notwithstanding the world’s opinion otherwise. Kazuko Takemura and Leung Ping-kwan, who had passed away before this book was finished, remain unforgettable exemplars of charisma and integrity. I am forever indebted to my father, Chow Chak-hung, my sisters, Pearl and Enn, and their families for the indulgence they have lavished on me over the decades and across continents.
My life in the past few years would have been much impoverished without the assistance, collaboration, and camaraderie of Ani Maitra, Calvin Ka Man Hui, and Pooja Rangan. The thought of their fierce dedication to their own research brightens even my gloomiest day. I dedicate this book to the three of them with heartfelt gratitude and love.
. . .
Earlier and shorter versions of chapter 1 and chapter 3 were published respectively in New Literary History 39.2 (Spring 2008): 217–31, and 39.3 (Summer 2008): 565–80.
Earlier versions of chapter 4 were published in Communal/Plural 7.1 (1999): 45–58, and Global Chinese Literatures: Critical Essays, ed. Jing Tsu and Der-wei Wang (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 133–55.
An earlier, shorter version of chapter 5 was published in the Journal of Modern Literature in Chinese 1.1 (July 1997): 109–27 (Lingnan University, Hong Kong).
All of these previous versions have been substantially rewritten and expanded.
INTRODUCTION
SKIN TONES—ABOUT LANGUAGE, POSTCOLONIALITY, AND RACIALIZATION
Near the beginning of his memoir Dreams from My Father, Barack Obama recalls a childhood encounter with a close-up photograph of a black man’s hands in a magazine at the U.S. embassy in Indonesia. Noting that the hands had a strange, unnatural pallor, as if blood had been drawn from the flesh,
Obama’s narrative voice goes on:
He must be terribly sick, I thought. A radiation victim, maybe, or an albino—I had seen one of those on the street a few days before, and my mother had explained about such things. Except when I read the words that went with the picture, that wasn’t it at all. The man had received a chemical treatment, the article explained, to lighten his complexion. He had paid for it with his own money. He expressed some regret about trying to pass himself off as a white man, was sorry about how badly things had turned out. But the results were irreversible. There were thousands of people like him, black men and women back in America who’d undergone the same treatment in response to advertisements that promised happiness as a white person.¹
The adult Obama remembers the nine-year-old boy’s reactions as visceral: I felt my face and neck get hot. My stomach knotted; the type began to blur on the page. . . . I had a desperate urge to jump out of my seat . . . to demand some explanation or assurance.
His embodied reactions devolved into aphasia: "As in a dream, I had no voice for my newfound fear."² This loss of voice, as I will go on to argue, is a distinct form of what may be called, after Michel Foucault, limit experience,
in which one reaches the end of certitude and touches the edge of the abyss. Although this description is still straightforward enough, another question looms: How might aphasia (as the limit of having voice or being able to speak) be understood simultaneously in relation to racialization, the other major factor in play in this story?
RACIALIZATION AS AN ENCOUNTER WITH LANGUAGE
Let me approach this question by way of an ad hoc genealogy of theoretically celebrated scenes. To begin with, Obama’s account, succinctly conveying the trauma that gripped the young mulatto, is as striking as Frantz Fanon’s anguished remembrance in Black Skin, White Masks of being fixed by others in a way that is overdetermined from without: Dirty nigger!
Look, a Negro!
³ In both situations, the piercing sensations of shock, debasement, vulnerability, and worthlessness are part of the obligatory reflexivity thrust upon the person of color, who cannot but be startled by his own and his own kind’s objectification in a predominantly visual register. In strangers’ habitual ways of gazing at oneself (Fanon) or in a chance discovery, through a photograph, of what another black person has done to himself (Obama), race is grasped and presented predominantly as a visual drama, which highlights what it is like to be seen as black in a society that treats being black with contempt, as something dirty.
Although chapter 1 of Fanon’s Black Skin, White Masks is devoted to the Negro and language,
the crucial link between racial objectification and the work of language often still seems inadequately probed in contemporary scholarship. Fanon, for his part, refers to language in the colonial context as an imposition on the colonized to master the colonizer’s language, even while the point of this mastery is, as he points out, an exchange for another kind of value in what he calls the racial epidermal schema.
The Negro of the Antilles will be proportionately whiter—that is, he will come closer to being a real human being—in direct ratio to his mastery of the French language.
⁴ The acquisition of (the French) language, in other words, becomes the acquisition of whiteness. This other biosemiotics, in which language possession is translated into and receives its value as skin color, is something that deserves much further elaboration than has usually been given. To begin such an elaboration, we must ask a deceptively simple question: What exactly is language here?
Consider again the exclamations Dirty nigger!
and Negro!
as reported by Fanon. These utterances are made, first and foremost, to name the other. Walter Benjamin’s writings on human language make him an interesting, if somewhat surprising, interlocutor at this juncture. Like some of his predecessors in the tradition of language philosophy, Benjamin discusses language in terms of a mental interiority, an inner capacity specific to humans. Although this approach is by no means remarkable, what is provocative about Benjamin’s reflections is their ambivalence, their Janus-faced quality of partaking both of religious mysticism and of early-twentieth-century revolutionary utopianism. In the case of language, for instance, Benjamin spotlights the act of naming, which, as his texts attest, conjures a divine notion of creativity. At the same time, as is characteristic of Benjamin’s thinking, naming is also the key to an arguably secularized perspective on community formation. The hinge is mimesis: as the definitive, lynchpin event in language, naming is associated with the mimetic, with the capacity to produce similarity. The name (and, by implication, human language) is, Benjamin writes, a nonsensuous form of similarity (because words are abstract rather than concretely physical entities); naming is what establishes a magical community with things
that is immaterial and purely mental
and that is symbolized by sound.⁵ In this equation between naming and mimesis lies what may be identified as a proto-sociopolitical move. By naming things, Benjamin suggests, we are in effect mimicking them—that is, becoming like them. To name (the other), to become like (the other), to form social relations (with the other): this is how we derive knowledge of the world.
If Benjamin’s theological and romantic ruminations are transposed onto a sociopolitical frame, what the name signifies is none other than a contact zone. The name is the place where symbolic correspondence, meeting, symmetry, reciprocation, and integration can, ideally speaking, be established with the world. This potential of a continuum—indeed, a match—between humans and the mute world of things makes naming an incomparably powerful, performative gesture: by naming something, we confer upon it an identity it does not otherwise have—an identity by which what is named becomes animated as our relation, our equal, our community; an identity by which what is named can touch (and affect) us as much as we can touch (and affect) it.
Precisely because of such potential for commonality and sameness, however, the name is eminently dangerous. The precarious flipside to correspondence and integration between namer and named becomes insuppressible when the gesture of naming is applied not simply to a mute world of things, as Benjamin has described it, but rather to other human beings—that is to say, when the name as such is no longer simply a designation but must also be received as a form of address, a call.⁶ This is how the name enters Fanon’s account.
The instant the black man is visually objectified is the same instant he feels being hailed into existence, as it were, through the names dirty nigger
and negro.
First published in French in 1952, Fanon’s account poignantly foreshadows the interpellation of the subject as Louis Althusser argues in his oft-quoted critique of ideology and ideology state apparatuses (first published in French in 1970). Notably, for purposes of analytic clarity, Althusser breaks down the process of interpellation into a sequence of two moments, embodied by two different personae walking along the street. First is the policeman (or some other stranger) issuing an anonymous call, the call that does not yet bear a specific name—Hey, you there!
Then there is an acquiescent turning around, what Althusser describes as the 180-degree physical conversion, by the hailed person in response to that call. This turning around, a kind of feedback that is tantamount to a Yes, that’s me,
completes the loop initiated by the anonymous hailing and constitutes the subject. For Althusser, it is in this second moment, when the individual reciprocates, believing/suspecting/knowing that it is for him, i.e., recognizing that ‘it really is he’ who is meant by the hailing,
that ideology successfully completes its task of recruiting the subject.⁷
Since Althusser’s analysis became well known, it has typically provoked debates around the consistency and volition of this subjective or subjectivizing moment of turning around. Does the subject always (have to) answer the anonymous call? How do we know? Can he not ignore it or resist it? And so forth.⁸ In a similar vein, were we to transpose Althusser’s terms onto Fanon’s scene of the encounter with the namer of the black man, it would seem logical, at first, to raise questions about subjective consistency and volition as a way to counter the names/calls dirty nigger
and negro.
Couldn’t the black man refuse to answer and thus refuse the mode of address that is imposed on him? Wouldn’t it solve the entire problem if the black man simply does not recognize that he is being hailed and does not substantiate the anonymous call with himself or his own name? To be sure, Fanon himself has written in somber defiance: "with all my strength I refuse to accept that amputation."⁹ At the same time, when taken as a whole, Fanon’s work points in a quite different direction, one suggesting rather that refusal or nonrecognition is not such a simple matter—that nonparticipation in the transindividual situation of racialization (or racializing interpellation) is in fact out of the question.
What is Fanon really describing, then, when he reports the incident of the humiliating objectification and address? It is the experience of a shock, registered both in embodied form (through his own blackness) and beyond corporeality, at what may be called an ineluctability or coerciveness of identification based on none other than the performative mimeticism that is the name.¹⁰ In the magical guise of touching and corresponding with the other, as Benjamin suggests, naming establishes the community
(or, in the language of today’s social media, connectivity
) in which the named object is given a life other than muteness. Yet precisely because such community relations replace (substitute, take over—indeed, usurp) muteness, the black person has nowhere to hide once the name is pronounced. With the unleashing of the name comes the obligatory realization that something substantive has taken place, that he has been addressed and called into existence in that flash of a moment dubbed with the devastating soundbites.¹¹ This phenomenon of a compulsory self
-recognition operates at a level that goes considerably beyond the logical questions about subjective consistency and volition because the knowledge and authority it bears come from another scene, because the injunction of racialization has already been issued long before this particular encounter, before this particular black person enters the picture in an individuated fashion. What Fanon is describing, therefore, is not simply an instance of what we nowadays call hate speech, but also an ontological subtraction and contradiction: the laying-out of a trajectory of self-recognition from which the possibility of self-regard (or self-respect) has, nonetheless, been removed in advance. For the black person, this chance of self-recognition is held out in the precise form of his reduction or thing-ification: he can be/become (himself) by being/becoming less, by being/becoming diminished. A self-recognition for which he has to take off (minus) whatever self-esteem