Ebook556 pages7 hours
The Indicted South: Public Criticism, Southern Inferiority, and the Politics of Whiteness
Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
2.5/5
()
About this ebook
By the 1920s, the sectional reconciliation that had seemed achievable after Reconstruction was foundering, and the South was increasingly perceived and portrayed as impoverished, uneducated, and backward. In this interdisciplinary study, Angie Maxwell examines and connects three key twentieth-century moments in which the South was exposed to intense public criticism, identifying in white southerners' responses a pattern of defensiveness that shaped the region's political and cultural conservatism.
Maxwell exposes the way the perception of regional inferiority confronted all types of southerners, focusing on the 1925 Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee, and the birth of the anti-evolution movement; the publication of I'll Take My Stand and the turn to New Criticism by the Southern Agrarians; and Virginia's campaign of Massive Resistance and Interposition in response to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. Tracing the effects of media scrutiny and the ridicule that characterized national discourse in each of these cases, Maxwell reveals the reactionary responses that linked modern southern whiteness with anti-elitism, states' rights, fundamentalism, and majoritarianism.
Maxwell exposes the way the perception of regional inferiority confronted all types of southerners, focusing on the 1925 Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee, and the birth of the anti-evolution movement; the publication of I'll Take My Stand and the turn to New Criticism by the Southern Agrarians; and Virginia's campaign of Massive Resistance and Interposition in response to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. Tracing the effects of media scrutiny and the ridicule that characterized national discourse in each of these cases, Maxwell reveals the reactionary responses that linked modern southern whiteness with anti-elitism, states' rights, fundamentalism, and majoritarianism.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateApr 15, 2014
ISBN9781469611655
Author
Angie Maxwell
Angie Maxwell is Diane D. Blair Assistant Professor of Southern Studies at the University of Arkansas.
Related to The Indicted South
Related ebooks
The King's Three Faces: The Rise and Fall of Royal America, 1688-1776 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Northern Men with Southern Loyalties: The Democratic Party and the Sectional Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Irony of the Solid South: Democrats, Republicans, and Race, 1865–1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the Midst of Perpetual Fetes: The Making of American Nationalism, 1776-1820 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The State and the Stork: The Population Debate and Policy Making in US History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Busing Failed: Race, Media, and the National Resistance to School Desegregation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gettysburg 1963: Civil Rights, Cold War Politics, and Historical Memory in America's Most Famous Small Town Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Last Great Strike: Little Steel, the CIO, and the Struggle for Labor Rights in New Deal America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Three Governors Controversy: Skullduggery, Machinations, and the Decline of Georgia's Progressive Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRuin Nation: Destruction and the American Civil War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gathering to Save a Nation: Lincoln and the Union's War Governors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMonumental Harm: Reckoning with Jim Crow Era Confederate Monuments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaptain Swing Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The War on Leakers: National Security and American Democracy, from Eugene V. Debs to Edward Snowden Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Beginning: Fundamentalism, the Scopes Trial, and the Making of the Antievolution Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rum Maniacs: Alcoholic Insanity in the Early American Republic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArmy at Home: Women and the Civil War on the Northern Home Front Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tory Insurgents: The Loyalist Perception and Other Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Children's Civil War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Frank Porter Graham: Southern Liberal, Citizen of the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe War Was You and Me: Civilians in the American Civil War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Republic in the Ranks: Loyalty and Dissent in the Army of the Potomac Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blue-Collar Conservatism: Frank Rizzo's Philadelphia and Populist Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolutionary Prophecies: The Founders and America's Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsH.G. Wells: Another Kind of Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The False Cause: Fraud, Fabrication, and White Supremacy in Confederate Memory Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Second Red Scare and the Unmaking of the New Deal Left Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Social Science For You
All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Quick, & Magnetic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Come As You Are: Revised and Updated: The Surprising New Science That Will Transform Your Sex Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Like Switch: An Ex-FBI Agent's Guide to Influencing, Attracting, and Winning People Over Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Mercy: a story of justice and redemption Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Men Explain Things to Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dreamland: The True Tale of America's Opiate Epidemic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5South to America: A Journey Below the Mason-Dixon to Understand the Soul of a Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Close Encounters with Addiction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sun Does Shine: How I Found Life and Freedom on Death Row (Oprah's Book Club Selection) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Secret Garden: Women's Sexual Fantasies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Questions for Couples: 469 Thought-Provoking Conversation Starters for Connecting, Building Trust, and Rekindling Intimacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Indicted South
Rating: 2.6999999800000003 out of 5 stars
2.5/5
5 ratings2 reviews
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5History of the reaction-formations induced in white Southerners as a result of criticisms of the South (or really of its whites). Maxwell argues that “southern white identity has allied itself with the unifying sense of inferiority,” leading to positions that go beyond explicit racial and gender commitments to rigidity on religion (conservative Christianity/creationism), education, science, and government’s role. Intriguingly links the New Criticism to other reaction-formations (the Scopes monkey trial and its aftermath including hardening of fundamentalism, as well as Massive Resistance after Brown), deeming New Criticism fundamentalist in its insistence on the primacy of the text over the text’s history and context and in its elevation of the feelings of critics over other forms of knowledge.The book seemed to attribute responsibility to the South’s critics for making the things they criticized worse, which I don't think is either fair or a pointer to useful alternatives. E.g., “Public criticism of southern racial practices had sparked the fire [of Massive Resistance to desegregation].” Or maybe it was … being ordered to stop segregating? Like, I’ll accept that scorn doesn’t work on many racists, but I do note that the least contemptuous person in public life, MLK Jr., was assassinated for asking for justice without H.L. Mencken’s vitriol. Maxwell identifies him as one of the critics who spurred backlash by pointing out that the civil rights movement was in favor of justice, thus (shockingly/insultingly) implying that its opponents were against justice, which of course they in fact were. Also, Maxwell notes the existence of Southern white self-criticism, but doesn’t blame them for sparking backlash or investigate what gave those whites more self-doubt/moral clarity. She spends no time on unpacking the “no true Scotsman” denunciations of white Southerners who supported at least some reforms. As she notes, Roy Carter Jr. found that, though segregationists constantly denounced the biased media as never presenting the “Southern” [white] perspective, in 12 Southern papers, 27% of the coverage was of pro-integration stories, 12% was “progradualism,” 30% prosegregation, and 31% neutral. The “[p]erception [of lack of media support] mattered,” she says, despite the reality. But Maxwell doesn’t address the fundamental issue surfaced by this mismatch: to this group of whites, any criticism was too much criticism.Her project is very much to understand people who wrote things in 1928 like “There were people in New England who wanted to destroy democracy and civil liberties in America by freeing the slaves. They were not very intelligent people; so they didn’t know precisely what they wanted to destroy. … These privy-to-God people were sending little pamphlets down South telling the Negroes, whom they had never seen, that they were abused.” I would like to spend just enough time learning about them to know how best to fight them politically and rhetorically, and yeah, contempt probably won’t convince them (though it seems to be working fine for Trumpists’ attitudes towards us). But the fact that segregationists have lifeworlds too does not to me provide a justification for blaming their radicalization on people who disparaged the South (truthfully) as having more lynchings than universities, even if those condemnations were often issued by whites with racism problems of their own (looking at you, Mencken). And I wonder why it’s important to understand these guys without contrasting them to the people engaged in the violence that they only tacitly approved—formally disavowing violence but blaming Emmett Till’s murder on civil rights activists. Without comparison to their more integrationist or more violent white counterparts, Maxwell gives us no understanding of what the alternatives were for these semi-polite racists.Maybe the most sympathetic reading is that she’s showing how backlash worked in practice: Hardened views meant a consolidation of antigovernment, fundamentalist, antieducation, antiscience, antiprogress views in a white Southern identity that admitted no nuance in things like constitutional interpretation. Despite being released before this round of white moral panic, the book definitely makes clear that the current hysteria over “critical race theory” is the same renamed racial anxiety that has stalked the US—including the white Michiganders who now embrace the Confederate traitor flag their forbears died to fight—for a long time, both as an undercurrent in the Scopes trial/bans on teaching evolution and in Civil War apologism taught in schools. And the historical links with the New Criticism reinforce my conviction that anti-“CRT” legislation embraces the idea of the objective correlative—that simply teaching particular things will create shame and guilt in white students—in excitingly racist ways. (One of the Virginia segregationists she writes about said that the worst thing about the fight over desegregation was how it generated guilt in whites. Also, today’s right-wingers are furious over any attempt to show that racism was integral to American history, whereas yesterday’s were furious that liberals portrayed racists as un-American in their racism and that liberals also portrayed Brown as the realization of the authentic American ideal, so there’s that bit of irony as well.)
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/55771. The Indicted South Public Criticism, Southern Inferiority, and the Politics of Whiteness, by Angie Maxwell (read 21 Dec 2021) This is a 2014 book linking the Scopes trial of 1925, the 1930 book by 12 Southern writers on Agrarianism, and the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision. Each is discussed at length and the author strives to show they exhibit Southern cultural traits listed in the book's subtitle. Much of the discussion is a mite heavy-going and did not arouse much interest in me. I presume many Southerners would disagree with the author, though much of what she says I tend to accept. And I have a less bleak take on what she sees, since one cannot help but see much improvement from the days of Massive Resistance which flared up after the Brown decision
1 person found this helpful
Book preview
The Indicted South - Angie Maxwell
*e book_preview_excerpt.html ێG%+>TIJR4H&)1%ކIOp%! U0pmP5}0O?їfn4Ō7˾}?>'o>)^}Y:|囧o/_¯o?|z?WOv/veWxm諸oTe]oֳQ
j8]/Y[ 7m=6ŷmoMŷg~*N]?|u,v_)*c/ծuqujy]x;ujU?aۻ//7o//.^,ݿ|7?.O
sxuۧ/^M]l:?0߿7W|S8_c∰}gg/>z.7Mj8xvî(x݅>;n|_]\we9uxQ6CWqS'rQc('B
쁪/m{]CL8v8~/zQ6b=v岪}EWB2Tjo<[ YU5}^-L&حB;02K,cS%*VWÇ]/ǃ(nU}P5^ۨ=7
u
lUXhUV:vĴ,Xu˪7k
b8.\/u;lÉW_W]?B3L:[jop[.zR@z?*O^6z\e9ۮ<~mDI5}W_|=xO|^N,W.IFyHiRl+9ap<|Q݀ *mq9mj
PƚYCzϊOM B9~}?jWqgٌApVԫ8:D h
߱h@GQb&\k"g/>d>hGO?yǟ"kj݄#ܮF}W]IjC\z *)?-:_]7m[XF)o/_}ڽF^ymy7ճ'Q\]z-`Qk]u]fooy0X6HkoMX C^SvO.(?\HPcR_W+x[^SP&8_0>xA2_ͺ䆊꾆_CruJuUo1|!.|XMq~Lq[QS-m~ b0K瀓>@wM!
~!lPJqx_/(/:8|t&t`P4)ˋ'\C/ `591H^IHj C
ԦC
//8־+iVQ`s_`W#t~Kd\GIAھg"O__>OLf%D Q_tASQ _ZSC=) ]RWNA_|ջO|b&^r He5)(`aP`~1mYkukHЕUB*<Hʾ7eE)hx1fW{0a;?| v{mAЬ{Mj(^k̂
R2؎E҆?j7cI\
Y~npn%k$6]uKt_-q" -k]\HsK`Nߎ_ >Ǟԏ0PjkTwx܇|hOB}Lhpu;zIySt[z$*7%4;ݛT>
3N{I&O`qIMoZ [)ex2 _[ 8vmyQV=f
Qbo
mo+ij_b˱qXY5v~Y~*/0r]eP{v߂JHzxp \ ȡ?@Ƹ-Lb\
,˵.HuzsX=!j-ݵuЀ=?0} g_*a'p(־ %rSc5b
N,=p֎mZ8 (`
0P ɒ^'7Ţ6v Z YK("3^"iuw$`K]ipeWi?,_`YaoBO<d'mCYRз
y$8@,qG/[˄VgR1E.,g |=K 0UM=˦/i $DIX1P=N$hLwzwM0i/<짙o`W72O»v(/9qDW 5vǾ}V<=+^a/Zp/z~!pzne5m{KmIoޅ$TA̕M|~z7i>]bRI*=2˪?WH,NW~3U
>1y4|$s)UD%L2snL_RM0+9Q_HxPu+_ PN?X~WI\(a4'qֺ