The Federalist Papers
4/5
()
About this ebook
Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton (1755-1804) was an American statesman, legal scholar, military leader, lawyer, and economist. After serving as a senior aide to General George Washington during the American Revolutionary War, Hamilton practiced law and founded the Bank of New York. As the need to replace the confederal government became apparent, Hamilton advocated for a Constitutional Convention to be held in Philadelphia. Following the convention, Hamilton wrote 51 of the 85 Federalist Papers, essays and articles intended to promote the ratification of the new Constitution. He then served as head of the Treasury Department under President Washington, later campaigning for Thomas Jefferson’s presidential nomination. In 1804, following a dispute, Hamilton was killed in a duel by politician and lawyer Aaron Burr.
Read more from Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton: Adultery and Apology: Observations on Certain Documents in the History of the United States for the Year 1796 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers and the Constitution of the United States: The Principles of the American Government Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers: The Ideas that Forged the American Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe U.S. Constitution: Anti-Federalist Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReynolds Pamphlet Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Selected Writings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Federalist Papers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers (with Introductions by Edward Gaylord Bourne and Goldwin Smith) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReport on Manufactures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist (Barnes & Noble Classics Series) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Understanding Policy Change: How to Apply Political Economy Concepts in Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHamilton's Economic Policies: Works & Speeches of the Founder of American Financial System Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Works of Alexander Hamilton: Volume 5 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Works of Alexander Hamilton: Volume 8 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Complete Works: The Federalist Papers, The Continentalist, A Full Vindication, Private Correspondence & Biography Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Federalist Papers
Titles in the series (100)
The Lost Princess: A Double Tale Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Adventures in Oz Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdventures in Oz Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStories of Great Americans For Little Americans Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lost Princess of Oz Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLife is a Dream Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStories of the Pilgrims Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A World is Born Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bobbsey Twins at Cedar Camp Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdventures in Oz Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLittle Women Letters from the House of Alcott Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Scarecrow of Oz Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stories of the Color Line Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMary Barton Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Little Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tales of Soldiers and Civilians Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Essential Gilbert K. Chesterton Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHappiness and Marriage Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThree Men in a Boat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Little Wizard Stories of Oz Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5School of Obedience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Happy Prince and Other Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bobbsey Twins at Home Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Theory of the Leisure Class Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdventures in Oz Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Stars, My Brothers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOne of Ours Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Norse Discovery of America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPericles, Prince of Tyre Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Spiritual Canticle of the Soul and the Bridegroom Christ Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
The Liberty Amendments Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Federalist Papers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Democracy in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Democracy In America: Complete Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The United States Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommon Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anti-Federalist Papers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Social Contract Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Conscience of a Conservative Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rights Of Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The US Constitution with the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confede Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reflections on the Revolution in France Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Spirit of the Laws Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constitution of the United States of America: 1787 (Annotated) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of 'Academic Freedom' Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America: Volume I Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Original Argument: The Federalists' Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5United States Bill of Rights Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Lot Like Me: A Father and Son's Journey to Reconciliation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution: Fiftieth Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Red, White, and Black: Rescuing American History from Revisionists and Race Hustlers Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Papers and Writings of Abraham Lincoln Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The January 6th Report Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Humanity Archive: Recovering the Soul of Black History from a Whitewashed American Myth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Prince Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Federalist Papers
653 ratings23 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Essential reading.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I have a large collection of historical books that are considered either 'classics' or are just informational texts to inform us more of history (or to provide context, etc. etc). This is just one of those! Plus it's Alexander Hamilton and he doesn't really need a review.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This is a great addition to any library, and a must read/own for anyone who calls themselves an American historian/buff.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shameful that I hadn't marked this as read yet. Attached are some thoughts copied from my notes, some of which are not entirely relevant, but still.
Post-Revolution, the colonies experimented with Articles of Confederation. Flawed, replaced by modern Constitution.
History of Republics as derived from ancient Greece, then Rome -> England. Rome became Tyranny, although Republic was lauded as mixed government between Aristocracy, Monarchy, and Democracy. Same with England after the Glorious Revolution.
US was not only republic - Venice as a mercantile aristocratic Republic. Dutch as ad hoc mercantile republic w/ Stadholder. Switzerland as federal canton system. US as special because it was a mixed government, but w/o monarchy, was large, expanding and heterogeneous. All others were small and isolated, as Montesquieu had stated would be necessary for a republic's survival. US definitely became a republic, although not quite a total democracy in modern sense, as women did not become franchised until 1900s, POCs in 1960s. Capitalist social strata - nation ruled by lawyers.
Hamilton, Madison and Jay use some of the former as historical examples. Federal union as preventing interstate anarchy, as these states and colonies would have dubious chances of surviving on their won. Done so through mutual restraint, separation of powers, executive command of military, first seen through Strategos of ancient Athens. No state had hegemony over others, even the bigger ones such as New York or Virginia, hence federal union of states made more appealing.
Federal government superseding and managing states would also be most efficient at economic governance, and managing the military against outside factors - Spanish, British, etc. Powers of taxation. Fear of despotism, individualist tendencies, self-rule.
Idea of popular sovereignty, derived from people, versus Westphalian sovereignty of authority and power alone. Engaged democracy, derived from Rousseau.
Constitutional crises led to one of main factors leading to civil war - sectionalism - the rights of states to continue slavery, South feeling threatened due to sudden expansion to the west of free states. #10 as major paper against worries of 'factionalism and insurrection'. History between founding of Philadelphian system to Civil War marred by controversy and three Great Compromises over slavery. Hence one of the great flaws of the system between state and federal rule, and over the great crime of slavery. Calhoun, Disquisition, pro-slavery, nullification. Webster, majority rule. But little exposition seen of Hamilton's old position by the 1850s.
Civil War ending the constitutional crisis. Federal union finally dominant. Most productive Congress in years now that the South is gone.
And so forth. These papers are old, but far from irrelevant. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As a thorough explanation of how these three men understood the US Constitution to work, this work is indispensable. The reader also gets a good understanding of the basic principles of republican government - its ideals, its limits, its checks and balances. Some of the issues raised seem particularly timely (which just goes to show that the more things change the more they stay the same).
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5It was most enlightening to read some of the Right's favorite quotes in context.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5interesting introductory historical essay, while obviously the Federalist Papers are available on archive.orgstill worth reading (I read excerpts of the Federalist Papers first in the early 1980s, but in Italian)
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The arguments of Hamilton, Madison and Jay are just as relevant today as they were more than two hundred years ago. The authors of The Federalist Papers wanted to influence the vote in favor of ratifying the Constitution. However, the authors of the Federalist papers also had a greater plan in mind. According to Federalist 1:"It has been frequently remarked, that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend, for their political constitutions, on accident and force."They present positive arguments for the ratification of the Constitution and, as Madison says in Paper No. 37, "They solicit the attention of those only who add to a sincere zeal for the happiness of their country,". What a thought and temperament, that zeal for happiness. One thing that impressed me on reading the papers was the classical education demonstrated by the authors with their articles filled with references to Cicero, Rome and Greece. Enlightenment thinkers were also evident with Montesquieu being a notable example. Certainly this is a book worth rereading with the current importance of the constitution in our political life.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Excellent; A must read and reference for any citizen of the United States! Should be required reading in all American High Schools! If one is a citizen and participates in the voting process, they must be familiar with The Federalist Papers and the Constitution.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One of the most classic documents of American history, this work is a series of essays by the writers of the Constitution, which were written to explain the new Constitution and to agitate on behalf of ratification. The prose soars in most places, and it reminds a person of what it would have been possible for America to become if we'd treated our new constitution as a living document, but recognized the importance of the clauses that safeguard us from imperial presidents and monarchs.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Americans know how important our Founding Fathers were, but sometimes we forget how smart they were. The polemics in this book manifest authorship by towering intelligences, and provoke us to ask whether we have stayed true to their vision for this country.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5All thoughtful citizens should read this classic. Does anything need to be said about its importance? A few new impressions of mine: difficult reading due to the elevated style of the authors of that time, bordering on embarrassing for our present day situation. About 1/3 through the 85 papers, I thought I could begin to determine which "Publius" was the writer, Hamilton being more foreceful in argument and direct in course. The authors predicted some of the problems we have today and the evolution of the Constitution, especially with regard to the variety and continual change of factions (and corresponding need for the country to be flexible. Our government was similar to many others being developed at that time (including the 13 state governments), all based on the recent writings of political philosophers such as Montesque. I think the 3 authors would be most surprised today at the gargantuan size of the federal government. While they admitted of the potential growth, they also believed it would be in relation to the growth of the population. A typical sentence "Our own experience has corroborated the lessons taught by the examples of other nations; that emergencies of this sort will sometimes exist in all societies, however, inseparable from the body politic as tumors and eruption from the natural body; that the idea of governing at all times by the simple force of law (which we have been told is the only admissible principle of republican government) has no place but in the reveries of those political doctors whose sagacity disdains the admonitions of experimental instruction." In #31, Hamilton illustrates his consistency by comparing axioms of good government to the axioms of geometry, the former being that: "there cannot be an effect without a cause, that the means ought to be proportioned to the end, that every power ought to be commensurate with its object, that there ought to be no limitation of a power destined to effect a purpose which is itself incapable of limitation." In reading the Constitution itself, I note that the more recent amendments are significantly longer than the original ten and even longer than most of the original articles.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5this is the written dialogue between and among our Founding Fathers as they debated -- in public -- how the U.S. of A. would work, legally speaking. news flash -- most of the "constitutional issues" in 2006 were discussed in the late 1700s by Jefferson, Adams, et al. if you agree (or disagree) with today's pundits, read this book and be able to articulate why your opinion makes sense.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An essential classic of American constitutional scholarship.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The great letters of Publius are an essential collection for anyone wishing to understand the Constitutional views of elite federalists in the late eighteenth century. This edition adds an enlightening and interesting introductory essay by Benjamin Wright that only adds to the value of the text.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Every American citizen should read this seminal work. We have come so far from knowing why are government was created in the way it was. A brilliant justification by brilliant men.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This subtitle to my edition is "The Famous Papers on the Principles of American Government." It's an apt description, but perhaps doesn't go far enough. Try foundational. They consist of 85 essays by Alexander Hamilton, who became our first Secretary of the Treasury, James Madison, who largely framed the United States Constitution, and John Jay, who became our first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The essays were written to urge people to ratify the constitution, and have been used every since to illuminate it by everyone from judges to--well, political science professors, and this was one of my texts in my college course introducing political science. It may be this edition regularized grammar and spelling, but one thing that hit me is how readable it all is. It was meant to explain the constitution to ordinary voters, so perhaps that shouldn't be so surprising. If I could get Americans to read one book, this would be my choice. Whether they agree with the principles of the Founders who created this country or not, at least by the end of it they'd understand what--and what they were not--about, and not just who the pundits and politicians claim for them. But if I couldn't get them to read the whole thing, I'd at least urge on them "Federalist No. 10" by James Madison. Our professor taught us that particular essay was at the heart of the philosophy of American Government and the design of the constitution:Liberty is to faction, what air is to fire, an aliment, without which it instantly expires. But it could not be a less folly to abolish liberty, which is essential to political life, because it nourish faction, than it would be to wish the annihilation of air, which is essential to animal life, because it imparts to fire its destructive agency.It is to control faction (think political parties) and the strife that tore previous democracies to pieces, without sacrificing liberty that the separation of powers and system of checks and balances was written into the constitution. As that particular essay elegantly explains. If the Constitution is our text book, the Federalist Papers is the Constitution 101 for Dummies, the owners' manual.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A MUST read for every American who wants to understand our Constitution.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One thing about this version that is superior to others is the table of contents with summaries of the contents of each Federalist article. All the other Federalist Papers compilations I've read lacked an effective table of contents which told you which article covered which subject.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Okay. Here's what it is! Step ONE: Read the book.Step TWO: Just for kicks, turn on the boob tube and watch Hannity & Colmes, or any live session of the Senate or the House. And maybe a presidential debate or two.Step THREE: Ask the Almighty: "What the hell happened to this country??????"
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This was the most difficult book I have ever read. It got to the point where I loathed the idea of having to open it back up again and continue. In terms of my enjoyment, this was a 2 star read. I rated it 3 stars because as much as I disliked the hours I spent going through it, I understand the contribution these essays made toward the ratification of the Constitution and how they shaped the ideas of government for generations. With that said, they were incredibly hard to follow and unless you were directly mired in the debate at the time, most of these essays argued in favor of the more obscure issues in the Constitution. As a teacher of early American History, I am glad to have read through all of these.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I rated it 5 not just because it is a classic, but because it really is that good-- and much less naive than some commentators make out. For example, it clearly does expect that the US will have fiercely partisan politics.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5My reactions to reading this in 1992.What can you say about a classic of political thought -- a dense work that took a long time to read? I’ll record a few surface impressions. Madison has a more reasonable tone than the sometimes sarcastic Hamilton. Though he never names names, you can see why his personal invectives led to his death in the duel with Aaron Burr. I found the methods of argument interesting. The authors, especially Hamilton, argue the initial assumptions of their opponents then go on to show how their arguments are without merit even if certain of their assumptions are accepted. Constantly, they emphasize that this is not a perfect government and that we should neither assume people are totally evil or totally trustworthy. Yet, in their proposal for a Republican government, they wisely choose to link a man’s ambition to his constituents’ welfare (and carefully arrange each type of government official to have their own power base) and have the Supreme Court and Senate reign in the wilder passions of the people. I found it revealing that they expected the legislative branch to become dominant (and it has) and seemed, to my pretty ignorant eyes, to forsee the role the Supreme Court assumed after Maybury vs Madison (Justice Marshal was tutored in political philosophy by Madison). The new republic seemed to think excise taxes, duties, and property taxes would be the main supports. Hamilton comes off as a vigorous supporter of a strong central government -- vigorous enough to motivate some fortunately not heeded arguments against the proposed Bill of Rights. Hamilton seems particulary incensed that opponents of the Constitution would claim the right to trial by jury is eliminated. A great deal of space is taken by his rebuttal. Madison’s early papers shows his historical knowledge and the inspirations for different features of the Constitution. I found the argument that command of the armed forces should be vested nationally because people wouldn’t trust it interesting. One can see the whole matter of loyalty to state throughout the work, a loyalty the authors saw as a check on national despotism.