The Iranian Hostage Rescue Attempt: A Case Study
()
About this ebook
This paper examines the failed hostage rescue mission conducted by the U.S. in Iran during April of 1980. The following text will recreate the rescue mission in its historical context while identifying factors across the three levels of war which contributed to its outcome. The three levels of war referred to in this discussion are the tactical, operational and strategic levels.
This study concludes that (1) The fall of the Shah unearthed a gap in U.S. military influence in the Middle East which could not rapidly be overcome; (2) the hostage rescue mission, although tied directly to the strategic objective of returning the 53 American hostages, provided little influence in terms of salvaging U.S. honor and interests in the Middle East. In reality, it is probable that mission failure protracted eventual diplomatic resolution of the crisis; (3) the hostage rescue mission, a limited objective and high risk raid, should only have been executed in the event that hostages lives were directly threatened; and (4) since 1961, sixty-six separate hostage, kidnapping, or hijacking incidents have occurred involving U.S. diplomats, servicemen, and private citizens. The frequency of these actions equate to 1.6 per year over the past 41 years. This data demonstrates the relevancy of the subject and the frequency of its occurrence.
Major Peter D. Buck USMC
See Book Description
Related to The Iranian Hostage Rescue Attempt
Related ebooks
Failure Of German Logistics During The German Ardennes Offensive Of 1944 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Parallel Campaigns: The British In Mesopotamia, 1914-1920 And The United States In Iraq, 2003-2004 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTeam 19 in Vietnam: An Australian Soldier at War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAirborne Warfare Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Decisiveness Of Israeli Small-Unit Leadership On The Golan Heights In The 1973 Yom Kippur War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5MY DIARY 2006 Osama bin Laden Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommonalities In Russian Military Operations In Urban Environments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Dynamics Of Doctrine: The Changes In German Tactical Doctrine During The First World War [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings1111th Engineer Group In The Bulge: The Role Of Engineers As Infantry In Airland Battle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCode Name Melisse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStorm on the Horizon: Khafji--The Battle that Changed the Course of the Gulf War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Genocide in Iraq: The Case Against the UN Security Council and Member States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSoviet Actions In Afghanistan And Initiative At The Tactical Level: Are There Implications For The US Army? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Al-Qaeda as a Business Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance: The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954?1974 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMissions of the Delta Force Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCct-The Eye of the Storm: Volume Ii – the Gwot Years Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAustralia, Canada, and Iraq: Perspectives on an Invasion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChesty Puller and other War Heroes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInside CentCom: The Unvarnished Truth About The Wars In Afghanistan And Iraq Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Assassins : Major Mossad Assassinations: 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSEAL Team Six: Battling Terrorism Worldwide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTroubled Waters: Insecurity in the Persian Gulf Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSoviet Counterinsurgency Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/52013: Memoirs of a Writer: A Year of Travel, Interviews and Reflections on Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTransport Helicopters: The Achilles Heel Of Maneuver Warfare Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Florida Warplanes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Russian Army: Its Men, Its Leaders, Its Battles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAirfield Seizure, The Modern 'Key To The Country' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Heart of Everything That Is: The Untold Story of Red Cloud, An American Legend Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When I Come Home Again: 'A page-turning literary gem' THE TIMES, BEST BOOKS OF 2020 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Washington: The Indispensable Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Iranian Hostage Rescue Attempt
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Iranian Hostage Rescue Attempt - Major Peter D. Buck USMC
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 2000 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2014, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
THE IRANIAN HOSTAGE RESCUE MISSION: A CASE STUDY
by
Major Peter D. Buck, USMC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
ABSTRACT 5
Introduction 6
Chapter 1 — Background 8
Chapter 2 — Operation Rice Bowl 13
Chapter 3 — Operation Eagle Claw 20
Chapter 4 — DISCUSSION 30
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION 37
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 40
Bibliography 41
MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS 44
ABSTRACT
Thesis: Operation Eagle Claw was tactically feasible, operationally vacant, and strategically risky.
Discussion: This paper examines the failed hostage rescue mission conducted by the U.S. in Iran during April of 1980. The following text will recreate the rescue mission in its historical context while identifying factors across the three levels of war which contributed to its outcome. The three levels of war referred to in this discussion are the tactical, operational and strategic levels.
Conclusion: This study concludes that (1) The fall of the Shah unearthed a gap in U.S. military influence in the Middle East which could not rapidly be overcome; (2) the hostage rescue mission, although tied directly to the strategic objective of returning the 53 American hostages, provided little influence in terms of salvaging U.S. honor and interests in the Middle East. In reality, it is probable that mission failure protracted eventual diplomatic resolution of the crisis; (3) the hostage rescue mission, a limited objective and high risk raid, should only have been executed in the event that hostages lives were directly threatened; and (4) since 1961, sixty-six separate hostage, kidnapping, or hijacking incidents have occurred involving U.S. diplomats, servicemen, and private citizens. The frequency of these actions equate to 1.6 per year over the past 41 years. This data demonstrates the relevancy of the subject and the frequency of its occurrence.
The Iranian Hostage Rescue Attempt: A Case Study
Introduction
On 4 November 1979 a mob of Iranian students stormed the U.S. embassy in Tehran and seized sixty-six American diplomats and most government citizens.{1} In subsequent days, American women, black Marines, and all non-American hostages were released.{2} However, 53 Americans remained in Tehran as leverage against the United States in an effort to force the return to Iran of the exiled Shah, Mohammed Reza Pahlevi. Official Iranian demands included return of the Shah to stand trial in Iran, return of the Shah’s wealth to Iran, an official apology from the U.S., and a U.S. promise of termination of interference in internal Iranian affairs.{3} Following a stalemate in political negotiations, President Jimmy Carter authorized and launched a secret military rescue mission, dubbed Operation Eagle Claw, into Tehran, Iran in April of 1980. This mission fell apart on a desolate desert, the Dasht-e-Havir, and eight brave men perished in the flaming wreckage that resulted from the collision of two aircraft at Desert-I, a remote area being used as a helicopter refueling site.
{4} Critics in the aftermath of the event highlighted helicopter failure rates and raised questions about U.S. military capabilities and technological edge.{5} To some analysts and journalists, the episode demonstrated that the Defense Department was incapable of mounting a combined assault, especially in distant territory.
{6} Additionally, contrasts were made to successful operations conducted by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) at Entebbe and the German counter terrorism unit GSFG-9 at Mogadishu, further magnifying the failure.{7} The crisis as a whole proved to be a turning point in the 1980 presidential election.{8}
This paper will argue