Joint Operations In The James River Basin, 1862–1865
4/5
()
About this ebook
It begins with an analysis of the Peninsula Campaign conducted by Major General George B. McClellan and Rear Admiral Louis M. Goldsborough in 1862 and concludes with the Union forces entry into Richmond in April 1865.
The Union Navy played a significant role in shaping the outcome of the battles for control of the James River Basin and the eventual capture of Richmond. The Navy’s control of the river allowed Lieutenant General Grant to maintain his main supply base well forward in the theater. This enabled Grant to rapidly maneuver and resupply his forces.
The study provides lessons on the difficulties of joint operations and the requirements to ensure success in the joint arena. Furthermore, it provides today’s United States military with a view of riverine and mine warfare operations and the implication of allowing these warfare areas to decay.
LCDR David K. Zatt
See Book Description
Related to Joint Operations In The James River Basin, 1862–1865
Related ebooks
Joint Operations In The North Carolina Sounds During The Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJoint Operations And The Vicksburg Campaign Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar on the Waters: The Union and Confederate Navies, 1861-1865 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Commanding Lincoln's Navy: Union Naval Leadership During the Civil War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Naval Support To Grant’s Campaign Of 1864-65: By Design Or By Coincidence? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Union’s Naval War In Louisiana, 1861-1863 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMahan Goes To War: Effects Of World War I On The US Navy’s Force Structure And Operational Planning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Effects Of Logistical Factors On The Union Pursuit Of The Confederate Army: During The Final Phase Of The Gettysburg Campaign Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Role Of Union Logistics In The Carolina Campaign Of 1865 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMajor General Philip H. Sheridan And The Employment Of His Division During The Battle Of Chickamauga Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMajor General Joseph J. Reynolds And His Division At Chickamauga: A Historical Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRebels on the Great Lakes: Confederate Naval Commando Operations Launched from Canada, 1863-1864 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Factors Affecting Joint Cooperation During The Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Civil War in the West: Victory and Defeat from the Appalachians to the Mississippi Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Peninsula Campaign 1862: McClellan and Lee Struggle for Richmond Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Civil War In The Western Theater 1862 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Field Guide to Antietam: Experiencing the Battlefield through Its History, Places, and People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gettysburg Campaign, June-July 1863 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperation SEALORDS: A Study In The Effectiveness Of The Allied Naval Campaign Of Interdiction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStaff Ride Guide - The Battle Of First Bull Run [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChickasaw Bayou Campaign Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMr Lincoln’s Navy [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlue & Gray Navies: The Civil War Afloat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Chancellorsville Campaign, January-May 1863 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Provide and Maintain a Navy: 1775-1945 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Military Strategy: A General Theory of Power Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Confederate Command During The Fort Henry-Fort Donelson Campaign, February 1862 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Cape Charles to Cape Fear: The North Atlantic Blockading Squadron during the Civil War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Wars & Military For You
Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mein Kampf: The Original, Accurate, and Complete English Translation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrdinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Unacknowledged: An Expose of the World's Greatest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Washington: The Indispensable Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5When I Come Home Again: 'A page-turning literary gem' THE TIMES, BEST BOOKS OF 2020 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Joint Operations In The James River Basin, 1862–1865
1 rating1 review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Solid thesis on the necessity of unified command among the branches of the military.
Book preview
Joint Operations In The James River Basin, 1862–1865 - LCDR David K. Zatt
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 1993 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2015, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
JOINT OPERATIONS IN THE JAMES RIVER BASIN, 1862-1865
by
LCDR David K. Zatt, USN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
ABSTRACT 5
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 6
CHAPTER ONE—INTRODUCTION 7
CHAPTER TWO—PENINSULA CAMPAIGN 14
CHAPTER THREE—ADMIRAL LEE AND THE GENERALS 21
CHAPTER FOUR—BUTLER’S ADVANCE MAY-JUNE 1864 27
CHAPTER FIVE—SIEGE WARFARE 41
CHAPTER SIX—TAKING OF RICHMOND 50
CHAPTER SEVEN—CONCLUSION 58
APPENDIX A—VESSELS 62
APPENDIX B—BIOGRAPHY 63
Union 63
Confederate 64
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 65
BIBLIOGRAPHY 66
Books 66
Government Documents 67
ABSTRACT
This study is an analysis of Union joint operations in the James River Basin from 1862 to 1865. Specifically the contributions made by the Union Navy during the battles of this period.
It begins with an analysis of the Peninsula Campaign conducted by Major General George B. McClellan and Rear Admiral Louis M. Goldsborough in 1862 and concludes with the Union forces entry into Richmond in April 1865.
The Union Navy played a significant role in shaping the outcome of the battles for control of the James River Basin and the eventual capture of Richmond. The Navy’s control of the river allowed Lieutenant General Grant to maintain his main supply base well forward in the theater. This enabled Grant to rapidly maneuver and resupply his forces.
The study provides lessons on the difficulties of joint operations and the requirements to ensure success in the joint arena. Furthermore, it provides today’s United States military with a view of riverine and mine warfare operations and the implication of allowing these warfare areas to decay.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure
Union Command and Control Organization
Southeastern United States
Southeastern Virginia
James River from Norfolk to City Point
James River from City Point to Fort Darling
Southeastern Virginia
James River from Norfolk to City Point
Grant’s Strategic Plan of 1864
James River from City Point to Fort Darling
Southeastern Virginia
James River from City Point to Fort Darling
James River from Norfolk to City Point
Southeastern United States
James River from City Point to Fort Darling
Southeastern Virginia
CHAPTER ONE—INTRODUCTION
This study is an analysis of the Union Navy’s participation in the battles that took place in the James River Basin from 1862 to the fall of Richmond in April 1865. This examination provides important lessons for understanding the concerns and problems which may arise in today’s joint and combined arena. Furthermore, it shows the intrinsic difficulties encountered in conducting cooperative operations without unity of command or joint doctrine. The analysis will show the inter-service requirements for conducting riverine operations. It will also illustrate the inherent difficulties associated with conducting operations in a mine environment. In order to highlight these areas and the contributions made by the Navy during this period in the James River Basin, the analysis focuses on several basic questions:
1. How involved was the Navy in the planning and execution of the battles? What was the commitment of the Navy toward the James River battles? Was this involvement substantial or superficial to the total operation?
2. How important to the outcome of the battles was the contribution of the Navy? If the Union had altered its import of the Naval portion of their order of battle, would the initiative have shifted?
3. How well did the Navy integrate into the general scheme of battle? What was the assistance that the Navy rendered in protection of the Union Army both on and off the waterways? What were the problems that each service encountered interfacing with a separate organization to achieve the common goal?
The Navy did in fact play an important role in the outcome of the American Civil War: from the blockading of ports to the battles upon the inland rivers, the Navy supported the Army’s efforts throughout the war. In a letter written 26 August 1863, to Union men from his hometown, Springfield, Illinois, President Lincoln praised the achievements of the Navy:
Nor must Uncle Sam’s web-feet be forgotten. At all the watery margins they have been present. Not only on the deep sea, the broad bay, and the rapid river, but also up the narrow, muddy bayou, and wherever the ground was a little damp, they have been and made their tracks. Thanks to all.
{1}
Unlike today’s Defense Department which controls the United States military organization, the military during the Civil War was split into two separate organizations: the Department of War, and the Department of the Navy. In the James River Basin the Civil War Naval forces fell under the command of the North Atlantic Blockading Squadron. The North Atlantic Blockading Squadron had jurisdiction over the waters bounding North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, and all associated tributaries. The James River Squadron (or James River Flotilla), established in 1862, was a subordinate command of the North Atlantic Blockading Squadron and had domain over the James River and its tributaries.
Figure 1. Union Command and Control Organization
The Department of the Potomac (or Army of the Potomac) was constituted in August 1861 and consisted of the Departments of Washington, Northeastern Virginia, and the Shenandoah. Included within its limits were the states of Delaware, Maryland, the District of Columbia, and that part of Virginia east of the Allegheny Mountains and north of the James River, except for Fort Monroe and sixty miles of the country around it which fell under the command of the Department of Virginia.{2} In April 1862 when Major General George B. McClellan commenced his Peninsula Campaign, the Departments of the Shenandoah and the Rappahannock were removed from the Department of the Potomac command. In July 1863 the Department of Virginia expanded to include portions of North Carolina, and its name changed to the Department of Virginia and North Carolina.
The Civil War era military system did not allow for simplicity of command and control by a single commander-in-chief as is common today. Sister services cooperation in the theater