Bush War: The Use of Surrogates in Southern Africa (1975-1989)
()
About this ebook
The methodology of this paper is to analyze two unique surrogate forces to determine if they significantly contributed to the accomplishment of strategic aims and operational objectives. Such an examination is relevant because current U.S. policy and strategy advocates building the capacity of foreign security forces, as well as the use of irregular surrogate forces, to achieve U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Given the political and military challenges of Iraq and Afghanistan, policymakers believe that the United States can ill afford another long-duration, resource intensive, politically charged counterinsurgency campaign. The use of surrogates offers the promise of low-visibility, economy of force operations. Nonetheless, enthusiasm for the use of surrogates must be tempered by the reality that surrogates are not a substitute for effective operational art and strategy.
Major Joseph E. Escandon U.S. Army
See Book Description
Related to Bush War
Related ebooks
Operational And Strategic Lessons Of The War In Afghanistan, 1979-1990 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRole Of Army Special Operations Forces In Nation Building Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCombining Concepts: Operational Shock In Insurgencies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5America’s Mercenaries: War By Proxy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArmy Special Forces Training For The Global War On Terror Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar Dog: Fighting Other People's Wars: The Modern Mercenary in Combat Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Mercenaries: Putting the World to Rights with Hired Guns Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Barrel of a Gun: A War Correspondent's Misspent Moments in Combat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFire Force: A Trooper's War in the Rhodesian Light Infantry Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rhodesian War: A Military History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fearful Odds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCounter Insurgency: Lessons from History Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Total Onslaught: War and Revolution in Southern Africa Since 1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBush War Rhodesia: 1966-1980 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecial Forces Berlin: Clandestine Cold War Operations of the US Army's Elite, 1956-1990 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Hot Battle of the Cold War: Decision at Cuito Cuanavale and the Battle for Angola, 1987–1988 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecret SAS Missions in Africa: C Squadron's Counter-Terrorist Operations, 1968–1980 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dirty War: Rhodesia and Chemical Biological Warfare 1975-1980 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBush Pig - District Cop: Service with the British South Africa Police in the Rhodesian Conflict 1965-79 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Handful of Hard Men: The SAS and the Battle for Rhodesia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Counter Terrorist Manual: A Practical Guide to Elite International Units Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Military History of Modern South Africa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRecce: Small Team Missions Behind Enemy Lines Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rhodesian Fire Force 1966-80 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuerrilla Warfare: Irregular Warfare in the Twentieth Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Battle on the Lomba 1987: A Crew Commander's Account Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSimon Mann: The Real Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/519 With a Bullet: A South African Paratrooper in Angola Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bush War Operator: Memoirs of the Rhodesian Light Infantry, Selous Scouts and beyond Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Battle of Cuito Cuanavale: Cold War Angolan Finale, 1987–1988 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Wars & Military For You
The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fall and Rise: The Story of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Dr. Seuss Goes to War: The World War II Editorial Cartoons of Theodor Seuss Geisel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mein Kampf: The Original, Accurate, and Complete English Translation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnacknowledged: An Expose of the World's Greatest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Israel: A Concise History of a Nation Reborn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bill O'Reilly's Legends and Lies: The Civil War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5109 East Palace: Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los Alamos Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Bush War
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Bush War - Major Joseph E. Escandon U.S. Army
Army
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION
Challenges of the Strategic Environment
The Use of Surrogates: Intellectual, Doctrinal, and Organizational Challenge
Two Cases: Southern Africa’s Bush Wars
32 BATTALION SOUTH AFRICA’S SURROGATE FORCE
Historical Background and Strategic Setting
The Beginning: Operation Savannah
Operation Askari: The Changed Operational Environment
Cuito Cuanavale and the End of the Bush War
SELOUS SCOUTS: RHODESIA’S SURROGATE FORCE
Historical Background and Strategic Setting
Pseudo Operations
External Operations
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
South Africa and 32 Battalion
Rhodesia and the Selous Scouts
Recommendations
Appendix 1: Terms and Definitions
Appendix 2: Key Acronyms
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER
Bibliography
Books
Periodicals/Journals
Research Reports/Monographs
Government Documents
Internet Sources
Other Sources
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this monograph is to examine the use of indigenous surrogates by both the Republic of South Africa and Rhodesia in Southern Africa’s Bush Wars from 1975 to 1989. The Bush Wars are of significance because the use of surrogates in each case represents policy and doctrine that is outside of the United States military’s traditional understanding and employment of surrogates.
The methodology of this paper is to analyze two unique surrogate forces to determine if they significantly contributed to the accomplishment of strategic aims and operational objectives. Such an examination is relevant because current U.S. policy and strategy advocates building the capacity of foreign security forces, as well as the use of irregular surrogate forces, to achieve U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Given the political and military challenges of Iraq and Afghanistan, policymakers believe that the United States can ill afford another long-duration, resource intensive, politically charged counterinsurgency campaign. The use of surrogates offers the promise of low-visibility, economy of force operations. Nonetheless, enthusiasm for the use of surrogates must be tempered by the reality that surrogates are not a substitute for effective operational art and strategy.
PREFACE
The Bush
is to Southern Africa what the Outback
is to Australia. It is not only a physical setting, but also has a human dimension. Simply put, the bush is no-man’s land, geographic space that is dominated by untamed wilderness. Unsuited to human civilization, the bush is the domain of the animal world, a place where only bushmen,
both aboriginals and adventurers, dare to tread. The bush is where the brutal wars of Southern Africa, the bush wars,
were fought between 1966 and 1989. These wars encompassed the full spectrum of conflict from counterinsurgency to conventional, and involved a wide array of unique units and tactics. The bush wars are significant because they provide valuable lessons for contemporary and future American conflicts. The most important lessons relate to South Africa’s and Rhodesia’s use of indigenous surrogate forces¹ to overcome the challenges posed by war in the bush. Given the political and military challenges of Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. policymakers believe that the United States can ill afford another long-duration, resource intensive, politically charged counterinsurgency campaign. The use of surrogates offers the promise of low-visibility, economy of force operations.² Nonetheless, enthusiasm for the use of surrogates must be tempered by the reality that surrogates are not a substitute for effective operational art and strategy.
INTRODUCTION
As we look to the future, national security experts are virtually unanimous in predicting that the next several decades will be ones of Persistent Conflict—protracted confrontation among state, non-state and individual actors that are increasingly willing to use violence to achieve political and ideological ends.. .. In the years ahead, we face two major challenges to ensuring our continued success in this era of persistent conflict-restoring balance to a force feeling the cumulative effects of seven years of war and setting conditions for the future to fulfill our strategic role as an integral element of Landpower.
³ — General George W. Casey Jr., Army Chief of Staff
Challenges of the Strategic Environment
General Casey’s statement illuminates two vital shifts in U.S. strategic thinking. The first is that the conclusion of American military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan will not be followed by a strategic pause. Persistent conflict entails living in a world where Islamic extremism, genocide in Africa, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and global lawlessness will threaten peace and prosperity for the foreseeable future. This means that the U.S. military must be capable of sustaining operations of undetermined duration, especially in counterinsurgency environments. Casey’s second salient point is that seven years of war have significantly reduced the Army’s overall readiness and ability to meet other contingencies, implying that economy of force solutions will be required. Amplifying this assessment is British General Rupert Smith’s discussion of the utility of military force. Smith believes that industrial age warfare is dead as the result of a paradigm shift towards war among populations.
Traditionally, the U.S. public and policymakers have tended to focus on the moral and legal aspects of war instead of the actual utility of force.⁴ In other words, the use of force, as exemplified by the U.S. military in Iraq during the initial stages of the insurgency, has vast limitations in wars among populations.⁵ In discussing war among the people, Smith identifies several major trends, one of which resonates with General Casey’s outlook—Our conflicts tend to be timeless, since we are seeking a condition, which then must be maintained until an agreement on a definitive outcome, which may take years or decades.
⁶ Another trend stipulates that we must fight so as not to lose the force.
⁷ In other words, the U.S. cannot continue to become mired in conflicts that exhaust its military forces.
New methods must be found to meet the challenges posed by multiple adversaries. In his examination of hybrid warfare, Frank Hoffman provides insights to the methods of America’s current and future adversaries.
Hybrid threats incorporate a full range of different modes of warfare including conventional capabilities, irregular tactics and formations, terrorist acts including indiscriminate violence and coercion, and criminal disorder. Hybrid wars can be conducted by both states and a variety of non-state actors.. .. Future challenges will present a more complex array of alternative structures and strategies, as seen in the summer of 2006 in the battle between Israel and Hezbollah.
⁸
The result is that America’s adversaries will continue to adapt, so as to attack U.S. vulnerabilities and wear down the nation’s will over the long-term.
Hybrid wars will require unique solutions, such as those employed during the opening phases of Operation Enduring Freedom. Toppling the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan transcended conventional thinking.⁹ One example often cited is the use of American Special Forces teams to advise the indigenous irregular forces of the Northern Alliance, and more importantly supply them with U.S. air support.¹⁰ The actions in 2001 in Afghanistan reinforced the principles of adaptability, economy of force, and the value of working with and through indigenous forces to achieve common goals.
¹¹
Nonetheless, this approach was not without problems. For instance, the use of indigenous Afghans at Tora Bora, as surrogates,¹² or substitutes, for American conventional forces, directly contributed to the failure to capture or kill Usama bin Laden.¹³ In this particular case, the use of surrogate forces did not support U.S. operational or strategic objectives, unlike when the U.S. used the Northern Alliance to remove the Taliban from power. At Tora Bora, the interests of the surrogates were in recovering territory, not capturing bin Laden.¹⁴
In recent years, U.S. policymakers have begun to critically examine the strategic and operational environment and develop new approaches. The U.S. National Security Strategy, as well as numerous supporting strategic documents, to include the National Defense Strategy (NDS), National Military Strategy, and the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), prescribes