An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine
()
About this ebook
Related to An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine
Related ebooks
Making Medicine Scientific: John Burdon Sanderson and the Culture of Victorian Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeath and Donation: Rethinking Brain Death as a Means for Procuring Transplantable Organs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Scientists Explain Disease Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWave Phenomena: Modern Theory and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Gold Standard: The Challenge Of Evidence-Based Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe making of British bioethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Human Body in the Age of Catastrophe: Brittleness, Integration, Science, and the Great War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of Immunology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntralipid Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom a Philosophical Point of View: Selected Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhysics and Biology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedical Humanity and Inhumanity in the German-Speaking World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnder the Medical Gaze: Facts and Fictions of Chronic Pain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPaul Ehrlich's Receptor Immunology: The Magnificent Obsession Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlacebo and Pain: From Bench to Bedside Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Humanities 101 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmong The Humans Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClassical Probability in the Enlightenment Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Seeking the Person at the Center of Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversal Health Coverage in China: A Health Economic Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvolution's Clinical Guidebook: Translating Ancient Genes into Precision Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmphioxus Immunity: Tracing the Origins of Human Immunity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nature of Scientific Evidence: Statistical, Philosophical, and Empirical Considerations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOutsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistories of Scientific Observation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Intelligent Imitator: Towards an Exemplar Theory of Behavioral Choice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImmunology in the Twentieth Century: From Basic Science to Clinical Application Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Biology For You
Lifespan: Why We Age—and Why We Don't Have To Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gut: The Inside Story of Our Body's Most Underrated Organ (Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Winner Effect: The Neuroscience of Success and Failure Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Gov't Told Me: And the Better Future Coming Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dopamine Detox: Biohacking Your Way To Better Focus, Greater Happiness, and Peak Performance Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Woman: An Intimate Geography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fantastic Fungi: How Mushrooms Can Heal, Shift Consciousness, and Save the Planet Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5"Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Grieving Brain: The Surprising Science of How We Learn from Love and Loss Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Obesity Code: the bestselling guide to unlocking the secrets of weight loss Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All That Remains: A Renowned Forensic Scientist on Death, Mortality, and Solving Crimes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Peptide Protocols: Volume One Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anatomy 101: From Muscles and Bones to Organs and Systems, Your Guide to How the Human Body Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Crack In Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Blood of Emmett Till Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Mother of God: An Extraordinary Journey into the Uncharted Tributaries of the Western Amazon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Will Make You Smarter: 150 New Scientific Concepts to Improve Your Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Suicidal: Why We Kill Ourselves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine - Claude Bernard
INTEREST
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
TO CONSERVE HEALTH AND TO CURE DISEASE: Medicine is still pursuing a scientific solution of this problem, which has confronted it from the first.⁸ The present state of medical practice suggests that a solution is still far to seek. During its advance through the centuries, however, medicine has always been driven into action and from numberless ventures in the realm of empiricism has gained useful information. Though furrowed and overturned by all manner of systems so evanescent that, one by one, they have disappeared, it has none the less carried on research, acquired ideas and piled up precious materials which in due time will find their place and meaning in scientific medicine. To-day, thanks to the great development and powerful support of the physico-chemical sciences, study of the phenomena of life, both normal and pathological, has made progress which continues with surprising rapidity.
It is therefore clear to all unprejudiced minds that medicine is turning toward its permanent scientific path. By the very nature of its evolutionary advance, it is little by little abandoning the region of systems, to assume a more and more analytic form, and thus gradually to join in the method of investigation common to the experimental sciences.
In order to embrace the medical problem as a whole, experimental medicine must include three basic parts: physiology, pathology and therapeutics. Knowledge of causes of the phenomena of life in the normal state, i.e., PHYSIOLOGY, will teach us to maintain normal conditions of life and to conserve HEALTH. Knowledge of diseases and of their determining causes, i.e., PATHOLOGY, will lead us, on the one hand, to prevent the development of morbid conditions, and, on the other, to fight their results with medical agents, i.e., to cure the diseases.
In the empirical period of medicine, which must doubtless still be greatly prolonged, physiology and therapeutics could advance separately; for as neither of them was well established, they were not called upon mutually to support each other in medical practice. But this cannot be so when medicine becomes scientific: it must then be founded on physiology. Since science can be established only by the comparative method, knowledge of pathological or abnormal conditions cannot be gained without previous knowledge of normal states, just as the therapeutic action of abnormal agents, or medicines, on the organism cannot be scientifically understood without first studying the physiological action of the normal agents which maintain the phenomena of life.
But scientific medicine, like the other sciences, can be established only by experimental means, i.e., by direct and rigorous application of reasoning to the facts furnished us by observation and experiment. Considered in itself, the experimental method is nothing but reasoning by whose help we methodically submit our ideas to experience,—the experience of facts.
Reasoning is always the same, whether in the sciences that study living beings or in those concerned with inorganic bodies. But each kind of science presents different phenomena and complexities and difficulties of investigation peculiarly its own. As we shall later see, this makes the principles of experimentation incomparably harder to apply to medicine and the phenomena of living bodies than to physics and the phenomena of inorganic bodies.
Reasoning will always be correct when applied to accurate notions and precise facts; but it can lead only to error when the notions or facts on which it rests were originally tainted with error or inaccuracy. That is why experimentation, or the art of securing rigorous and well-defined experiments, is the practical basis and, in a way, the executive branch of the experimental method as applied to medicine. If we mean to build up the biological sciences, and to study fruitfully the complex phenomena which occur in living beings, whether in the physiological or the pathological state, we must first of all lay down principles of experimentation, and then apply them to physiology, pathology and therapeutics. Experimentation is undeniably harder in medicine than in any other science; but for that very reason, it was never so necessary, and indeed so indispensable. The more complex the science, the more essential is it, in fact, to establish a good experimental standard, so as to secure comparable facts, free from sources of error. Nothing, I believe, is to-day so important to the progress of medicine.
To be worthy of the name, an experimenter must be at once theorist and practitioner. While he must completely master the art of establishing experimental facts, which are the materials of science, he must also clearly understand the scientific principles which guide his reasoning through the varied experimental study of natural phenomena. We cannot separate these two things: head and hand. An able hand, without a head to direct it, is a blind tool; the head is powerless without its executive hand.
The principles of experimental medicine will be explained in this work from the triple point of view of physiology, pathology and medicine. But before going into general considerations and special descriptions of the operative procedure proper to each of these divisions, I deem it useful to give a few explanations in this introduction in relation to the theoretic and philosophic side of the method which this book, after all, treats merely on its practical side.
The ideas which we shall here set forth are certainly by no means new; the experimental method and experimentation were long ago introduced into the physico-chemical sciences, which owe them all their brilliancy. At different periods, eminent men have treated questions of method in the sciences; and in our own day Monsieur Chevreul, in all his works, is explaining very important ideas on the philosophy of experimental science. We shall therefore make no claim to philosophy. Our single aim is, and has always been, to help make the well-known principles of the experimental method pervade medical science. That is why we shall here recapitulate these principles, specially pointing out the precautions to be taken in their application, because of the very special complexity of the phenomena of life. We shall consider these difficulties, first in the use of experimental reasoning, and then in the practice of experimentation.
PART ONE
EXPERIMENTAL REASONING
CHAPTER I
OBSERVATION AND EXPERIMENT
ONLY within very narrow boundaries can man observe the phenomena which surround him; most of them naturally escape his senses, and mere observation is not enough. To extend his knowledge, he has had to increase the power of his organs by means of special appliances; at the same time he has equipped himself with various instruments enabling him to penetrate inside of bodies, to dissociate them and to study their hidden parts. A necessary order may thus be established among the different processes of investigation or research, whether simple or complex: the first apply to those objects easiest to examine, for which our senses suffice; the second bring within our observation, by various means, objects and phenomena which would otherwise remain unknown to us forever, because in their natural state they are beyond our range. Investigation, now simple, again equipped and perfected, is therefore destined to make us discover and note the more or less hidden phenomena which surround us.
But man does not limit himself to seeing; he thinks and insists on learning the meaning of the phenomena whose existence has been revealed to him by observation. So he reasons, compares facts, puts questions to them, and by the answers which he extracts, tests one by another. This sort of control, by means of reasoning and facts, is what constitutes experiment, properly speaking; and it is the only process that we have for teaching ourselves about the nature of things outside us.
In the philosophic sense, observation shows, and experiment teaches. This first distinction will serve as our starting point in examining the different definitions of observation and experiment devised by philosophers and physicians.
I. VARIOUS DEFINITIONS OF OBSERVATION AND EXPERIMENT
Men sometimes seem to confuse experiment with observation. Bacon appears to combine them when he says: Observation and experiment for gathering material, induction and deduction for elaborating it: these are our only good intellectual tools.
Physicians and physiologists, like most men of science, distinguish observation from experiment, but do not entirely agree in defining the two terms.
Zimmermann ⁹ expresses himself as follows: An experiment differs from an observation in this, that knowledge gained through observation seems to appear of itself, while that which an experiment brings us is the fruit of an effort that we make, with the object of knowing whether something exists or does not exist.
This definition embodies a rather generally accepted opinion. According to this definition, observation would be noting objects or phenomena, as nature usually presents them, while experiment would be noting phenomena created or defined by the experimenter. We should set up a sort of contrast, in this way, between observers and experimenters: the first being passive in the appearance of phenomena; the second, on the other hand, taking a direct and active part in producing them. Cuvier expressed the same thought in saying: The observer listens to nature; the experimenter questions and forces her to unveil herself.
At first sight, and considering things in a general way, this distinction between the experimenter’s activity and the observer’s passivity seems plain and easy to establish. But as soon as we come down to experimental practice we find that, in many instances, the separation is very hard to make, and that it sometimes even involves obscurity. This comes, it seems to me, from confusing the art of investigation, which seeks and establishes facts, with the art of reasoning, which works them up logically in the search for truth. Now in investigation there may be activity, at once of the mind and of the senses, whether in making observations or in making